[Bug 1764799] Review Request: triehash - Generator for order-preserving minimal perfect hash functions in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764799 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko --- Please use -p for install. Otherwise looks good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369232] Review Request: jackson-datatypes-collections - Jackson datatypes: collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369232 Bug 1369232 depends on bug 1369227, which changed state. Bug 1369227 Summary: Review Request: pcollections - A Persistent Java Collections Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369227 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENT_DATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369227] Review Request: pcollections - A Persistent Java Collections Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369227 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flags|fedora-review? | Last Closed||2019-10-24 05:09:01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1185275] Review Request: rome-utils - Utility classes for ROME projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185275 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1193730] Review Request: apache-jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web and Linked Data applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764924] Review Request: libdasm - Simple x86 disassembly library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764924 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||package-review@lists.fedora ||project.org Component|libdasm |Package Review Blocks||1634370 Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |nob...@fedoraproject.org |.org| Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634370 [Bug 1634370] libemu: Remove (sub)packages from Fedora 31+: python2-libemu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763931] Review Request: apt - Debian's commandline package manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931 --- Comment #14 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #13) > I think you misunderstood me , this is for review, is not a final version. I > already changed sources.list, I can do sub-packaging and doc packages. I > honestly don't want ship any non-released version is not my goal in "deb > tools project". You have to look how are the evolution of the other packages > , for example dpkg (which I owned) is not updated , I need updated it > urgently, is version 1.18.25, is not 1.19.7 but epel 7 haven't minimums > required for version 1.19.x Is there anything other than GnuTLS that isn't satisfied in EPEL7? > I just try to help , you may do whatever you like , I already have a > apt-1.8.4 working which is useful for my work, no worries. > APT 1.9.4 shipped with Ubuntu 19.10, so I consider that sufficiently stable. Also, as a matter of course, I think it makes sense to follow the latest released versions of software as our policy dictates, provided they can be built and installed in Fedora. This also makes it so that we can handle supporting building packages that necessitate transitions from Debian, for example when Debian and Ubuntu switched from gzip to xz in mid 2018. They're debating a similar change again, this time to zstd. And build-side changes such as updates to debhelper and the set of dh_* scripts are relevant for building packages complying with the latest standards of the Debian Policy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-8fd0f6e877 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8fd0f6e877 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-130487262e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-130487262e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764799] Review Request: triehash - Generator for order-preserving minimal perfect hash functions in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764799 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1764813 (apt,apt-dpkg) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813 [Bug 1764813] Review Request: apt - Command-line package manager for Debian packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764813] Review Request: apt - Command-line package manager for Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1764799 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764799 [Bug 1764799] Review Request: triehash - Generator for order-preserving minimal perfect hash functions in C -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764813] Review Request: apt - Command-line package manager for Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||apt, apt-dpkg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764813] Review Request: apt - Command-line package manager for Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- *** Bug 1678632 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1678632] Review Request: apt - Main commandline package manager for Debian and its derivatives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678632 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Alias|apt-dpkg| Last Closed||2019-10-23 19:28:02 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Replaced by bug 1764813. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1764813 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764813] New: Review Request: apt - Command-line package manager for Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813 Bug ID: 1764813 Summary: Review Request: apt - Command-line package manager for Debian packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ngomp...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/apt.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/apt-1.9.4-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: This package provides commandline tools for searching and managing as well as querying information about packages as a low-level access to all features of the libapt-pkg library. These include: * apt-get for retrieval of packages and information about them from authenticated sources and for installation, upgrade and removal of packages together with their dependencies * apt-cache for querying available information about installed as well as installable packages * apt-cdrom to use removable media as a source for packages * apt-config as an interface to the configuration settings * apt-key as an interface to manage authentication keys Fedora Account System Username: ngompa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kitty -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763597] Review Request: python-graph-tool - Efficient network analysis tool written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597 --- Comment #7 from Ben Cotton --- I took down my home server trying to run the build (turns out I could have used your original spec by passing the f31 mock config to fedora-review. Alas!). But I have the results of your most recent Koji build. I need to review it before I post it because there are a lot of messages and I suspect some of them are false. I'll try to do that tonight or tomorrow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763931] Review Request: apt - Debian's commandline package manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931 --- Comment #13 from Sergio Monteiro Basto --- I think you misunderstood me , this is for review, is not a final version. I already changed sources.list, I can do sub-packaging and doc packages. I honestly don't want ship any non-released version is not my goal in "deb tools project". You have to look how are the evolution of the other packages , for example dpkg (which I owned) is not updated , I need updated it urgently, is version 1.18.25, is not 1.19.7 but epel 7 haven't minimums required for version 1.19.x I just try to help , you may do whatever you like , I already have a apt-1.8.4 working which is useful for my work, no worries. Best regards, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- LGTM now. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #13 from Artem --- https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty-0.14.6-10.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764799] New: Review Request: triehash - Generator for order-preserving minimal perfect hash functions in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764799 Bug ID: 1764799 Summary: Review Request: triehash - Generator for order-preserving minimal perfect hash functions in C Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ngomp...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/triehash.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/triehash-0.3-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: TrieHash generates perfect hash functions as C code which then gets compiled into optimal machine code as part of the usual program compilation. TrieHash works by translating a list of strings to a trie, and then converting the trie to a set of recursive switch statements; first switching by length, and then switching by bytes. TrieHash has various optimizations such as processing multiple bytes at once (on GNU C), and shortcuts for reducing the complexity of case-insensitive matching (ASCII only). Generated code performs substantially faster than gperf, but is larger. TrieHash was written for use in APT. Fedora Account System Username: ngompa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #12 from Artem --- https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty-0.14.6-9.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763931] Review Request: apt - Debian's commandline package manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931 --- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #11) > Spec URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/apt-debian/apt.spec > SRPM URL: > https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/apt-debian/apt-1.8.4-1.fc30.src.rpm > > Update to 1.8.4 with some syncing from > https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:Pharaoh_Atem:APT/apt-dpkg/ > apt-dpkg.spec?expand=1 , hopefully package aren't much different, please > note I don't want test latest version of debian tools , usually we use > version of Debian stable . > Sorry, there is no way this is acceptable, as this configures apt as a package manager with default ubuntu sources and removes the necessary libification package splitting. It violates our packaging policies and enables potentially system-damaging behavior. Honestly, I don't particularly want to ship intentionally old versions of APT, because it makes it difficult for me to work with upstream if things need to be done there. If you want to ship old versions of Debian tools in Fedora that you maintain, that's your business, but note that makes it harder for people packaging for Debian officially from Fedora to work, since they'll be missing the versions of tools needed to develop packaging against the latest version of the Debian Policy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #11 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- 1. Please add %set_build_flags before build. 2. New rpmlint errors must be fixed: kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/ask/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/choose/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/clipboard/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/diff/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/hints/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/icat/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/key_demo/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/panel/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/resize_window/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/show_error/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/ssh/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/tui/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/unicode_input/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/conf/__init__.py kitty.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/fonts/__init__.py -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271
--- Comment #10 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
Note: Sources not installed
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?)
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
[Bug 1764753] Review Request: rust-assert-json-diff - Easily compare two JSON values and get great output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764753 --- Comment #1 from Robert Fairley --- Created attachment 1628566 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1628566=edit Metadata fix for assert-json-diff Changes requirement on `version-sync` to `0.8` (currently in Fedora) from `0.5`. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #9 from Artem --- https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty-0.14.6-8.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764753] New: Review Request: rust-assert-json-diff - Easily compare two JSON values and get great output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764753 Bug ID: 1764753 Summary: Review Request: rust-assert-json-diff - Easily compare two JSON values and get great output Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rfair...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://rfairley.fedorapeople.org/package-review/rust-assert-json-diff/rust-assert-json-diff.spec SRPM URL: https://rfairley.fedorapeople.org/package-review/rust-assert-json-diff/rust-assert-json-diff-1.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Easily compare two JSON values and get great output. Fedora Account System Username: rfairley The upstream notes an MIT license in the README.md [1], and the crate on crates.io has an MIT license. However, there is no LICENSE file currently in the upstream repository. A PR to add this is open: [2] Needed to update `rust-mockito` from `0.17.1` to at least `0.20.0`, needed by `rust-zincati-0.0.6` [3] Koji build: [4] [1] https://github.com/davidpdrsn/assert-json-diff/blob/master/README.md [2] https://github.com/davidpdrsn/assert-json-diff/pull/5 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759996#c3 [4] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38505942 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763931] Review Request: apt - Debian's commandline package manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931 --- Comment #11 from Sergio Monteiro Basto --- Spec URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/apt-debian/apt.spec SRPM URL: https://sergiomb.fedorapeople.org/apt-debian/apt-1.8.4-1.fc30.src.rpm Update to 1.8.4 with some syncing from https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:Pharaoh_Atem:APT/apt-dpkg/apt-dpkg.spec?expand=1 , hopefully package aren't much different, please note I don't want test latest version of debian tools , usually we use version of Debian stable . User Ctria [1] reported (2 years ago) I've actually used this pbuilder suite to build Debian *deb from a Centos VPS. My goal is have way to build , convert , download etc deb packages and apt is useful to list and download packages from debian repos . Best regards, [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ctria/pbuilder/monitor/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #8 from Artem --- https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty-0.14.6-7.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #7 from Artem --- Quick dirty fix. Need to review it again. :D Will do now... https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty-0.14.6-6.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1744388] Review Request: golang-gocloud - Library and tools for open cloud development in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744388 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-gocloud-0.17.0-2.fc31~bootstrap has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1ec37cb2b0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1762230] Review Request: golang-github-nicksnyder-i18n-2 - Translate your Go program into multiple languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762230 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-nicksnyder-i18n-1.10.1-1.fc31, golang-github-nicksnyder-i18n-2-2.0.2-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-53ee26ab76 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1761451] Review-Request: kata-runtime - Kata runtime to run containers in virtual machines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761451 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- kata-runtime-1.8.2-4.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2d11c3738d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1761576] Review Request: zmat - A portable and easy-to-use data compression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761576 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- zmat-0.9.2-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6658c6a026 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764715] New: Review Request: python-django-health-check - Checks for various conditions and provides reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764715 Bug ID: 1764715 Summary: Review Request: python-django-health-check - Checks for various conditions and provides reports Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: d...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dmsimard/python-django-health-check-distgit/master/python-django-health-check.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/dmsimard/python-django-health-check-distgit/raw/master/python-django-health-check-3.11.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: A Django application that provides health check capabilities. Many of these checks involve connecting to back-end services and ensuring basic operations are successful. Fedora Account System Username: dmsimard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1333529] Review Request: opa-fm - OPA Fabric Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333529 Scott Breyer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(scott.j.breyer@in | |tel.com)| --- Comment #31 from Scott Breyer --- It seems that the information has been provided by the previous comment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #6 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- 1. This errors need to be fixed: kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/__main__.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/ask/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/choose/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/clipboard/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/diff/collect.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/diff/config.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/diff/config_data.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/diff/highlight.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/diff/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/diff/patch.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/diff/render.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/diff/search.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/hints/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/icat/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/key_demo/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/panel/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/resize_window/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/runner.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/show_error/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/ssh/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/tui/handler.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/tui/images.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/tui/line_edit.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/tui/loop.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/tui/operations.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kittens/unicode_input/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/borders.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/boss.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/child.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/cli.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/client.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/cmds.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/complete.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/conf/definition.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/conf/utils.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/config.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/config_data.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/constants.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/fonts/box_drawing.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/fonts/core_text.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/fonts/fontconfig.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/fonts/list.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/fonts/render.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/key_encoding.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/key_names.py /usr/bin/env python kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/key_names.py 644 /usr/bin/env python kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/keys.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/layout.py 644 /usr/bin/python3 kitty.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/main.py 644 /usr/bin/python3
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #5 from Artem --- Created attachment 1628465 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1628465=edit Licensecheck from fedora-review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vit...@easycoding.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- I will review this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #3 from Artem --- https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty-0.14.6-5.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764597] New: Review Request: python-flask-restplus - Framework for fast, easy and documented API development with Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764597 Bug ID: 1764597 Summary: Review Request: python-flask-restplus - Framework for fast, easy and documented API development with Flask Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jpope...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/python-flask-restplus.spec SRPM URL: https://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/python-flask-restplus-0.13.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Flask-RESTPlus is an extension for Flask that adds support for quickly building REST APIs. It encourages best practices with minimal setup. If you are familiar with Flask, Flask-RESTPlus should be easy to pick up. It provides a coherent collection of decorators and tools to describe your API and expose its documentation properly using Swagger. Fedora Account System Username: jpopelka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763433] Review Request: rust-chunked_transfer - Encoder and decoder for HTTP chunked transfer coding (RFC 7230 § 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763433
--- Comment #4 from J. Scheurich ---
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such
a list, create one.
- Add your own remarks to the template checks.
- Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not
listed by fedora-review.
- Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this
case you could also file a bug against fedora-review
- Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines
in what you paste.
- Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint
ones are mandatory, though)
- Remove this text
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No
copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "Apache License (v2.0)". 5 files
have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/mufti/review-rust-chunked_transfer/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
Note: Test run failed
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[!]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
chunked_transfer-devel , rust-chunked_transfer+default-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources
[Bug 1764271] Review Request: kitty - Cross-platform, fast, feature full, GPU based terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764271 --- Comment #2 from Artem --- https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/kitty-0.14.6-4.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763433] Review Request: rust-chunked_transfer - Encoder and decoder for HTTP chunked transfer coding (RFC 7230 § 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763433 J. Scheurich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||muft...@web.de --- Comment #3 from J. Scheurich --- $ rpmbuild -ba rust-chunked_transfer.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xkcR3c + umask 022 + cd /home/mufti/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd /home/mufti/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf chunked_transfer-1.0.0 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/mufti/rpmbuild/SOURCES/chunked_transfer-1.0.0.crate + /usr/bin/tar -xof - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd chunked_transfer-1.0.0 + /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + set -eu + /usr/bin/mkdir -p .cargo + cat + /usr/bin/rm -f Cargo.lock + %generate_buildrequires /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xkcR3c: line 71: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xkcR3c (%prep) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xkcR3c (%prep) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763045] Review Request: did - What did you do last week, month, year?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763045 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok --- Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763045] Review Request: did - What did you do last week, month, year?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763045 --- Comment #11 from Petr Šplíchal --- Ah, I see. Should now be fixed: https://github.com/psss/did/commit/88cf84a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1744388] Review Request: golang-gocloud - Library and tools for open cloud development in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744388 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-1ec37cb2b0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1ec37cb2b0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Bug 505154 depends on bug 1134835, which changed state. Bug 1134835 Summary: Review Request: kissplice - Detection of various kinds of polymorphism in RNA-seq data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1134835] Review Request: kissplice - Detection of various kinds of polymorphism in RNA-seq data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835 David Parsons changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2019-10-23 07:20:27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1134835] Review Request: kissplice - Detection of various kinds of polymorphism in RNA-seq data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835 David Parsons changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(david.parsons@inr | |ia.fr) | --- Comment #22 from David Parsons --- Dear Orion, Following your question, I've asked upstream what they thought. Since I've had no answer and it's been 6 months+, I suppose we can consider they are not interested. Thank you for your consideration, David -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
