[Bug 1763147] Review Request: golang-github-creack-goselect - Select(2) implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763147 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1778549 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778549 [Bug 1778549] tinygo install fails : nothing provides clang-libs = 8.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1770566] Review Request: gron - Make JSON greppable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566 --- Comment #10 from Dusty Mabe --- The new spec seems to address any concerns I had! Neal, anything you see that needs to be changed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1780849] Review Request: pymol - PyMOL Molecular Graphics System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 Sergio Monteiro Basto changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-01-05 04:02:20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787714] Review Request: wireguard-tools - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
First pass spec review notes:
> %global debug_package %{nil}
This is not acceptable. Some quick tests indicate the reason why you're unable
to generate debuginfo is because you are not setting the build flags from the
distribution as part of the build. Please fix this.
> Epoch: 1
Drop this. There has never been a point where this has been in Fedora such that
an Epoch is needed. Moreover, RPM Fusion's version of this package is an older
version, so this will seamlessly upgrade properly.
> Requires: (kernel >= 5.6 or wireguard-dkms)
This is not allowed. You cannot describe a dependency that cannot exist in
Fedora. My suggestion here is to use "Requires: kmod(wireguard.ko)".
> Provides: wireguard-tools = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
This is pointless and redundant. Remove it.
> %setup -q -n wireguard-tools-%{version}
Use "%autosetup -p1" instead.
> LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -s" RUNSTATEDIR=/run make
I'm not sure what's going on here, but $LDFLAGS isn't defined yet, because you
don't have a "%set_build_flags" call at the beginning of the %build section.
Also, %{_rundir} is the macro for RUNSTATEDIR. And why is make at the end
instead of the beginning?
So, then, why isn't this '%make_build LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -s"
RUNSTATEDIR=%{_rundir}'?
> DESTDIR=%{buildroot} BINDIR=%{_bindir} MANDIR=%{_mandir} RUNSTATEDIR=/run \
> make install
More loopy make calls...? Why isn't this just "%make_install BINDIR=%{_bindir}
MANDIR=%{_mandir} RUNSTATEDIR=%{_rundir}"?
> %clean
> rm -rf %{buildroot}
Unneeded. RPM does this automatically. Drop it.
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
Drop this. RPM does this automatically since RPM 4.2 days.
> %attr(0755, root, root) %{_bindir}/wg
.. [snip] ...
> %attr(0644, root, root) %{_mandir}/man8/wg-quick.8*
Drop all the %attr() statements. They're superfluous because RPM is already
using those values by default.
> %{!?_licensedir:%global license %doc}
Drop this, it's not needed for anything anymore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787714] Review Request: wireguard-tools - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714 --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- > SRPM URL: > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jdoss/wireguard/fedora-31-x86_64/01137539-wireguard-tools/wireguard-tools-1.0.20200102-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm This is not the Source RPM URL. Please post a link to the source RPM. It's the package with the ".src.rpm" extension. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787714] Review Request: wireguard-tools - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785350] Review Request: rust-cargo-c - Helper program to build and install c-like libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785350 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-05 00:40:56 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- rust-cargo-c-0.5.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1783998] Review Request: php-psr-http-server-handler - Common interface for HTTP server-side request handler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783998 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-psr-http-server-handler-1.0.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1772648] Review Request: whsniff - Command line utility that interfaces TI CC2531 USB dongle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772648 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-05 00:40:32 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- whsniff-1.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1783713] Review Request: expliot - Internet of Things Security Testing and Exploitation framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783713 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-05 00:40:54 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- expliot-0.7.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1783433] Review Request: python-jupyter-kernel-singular - Jupyter kernel for Singular
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783433 Bug 1783433 depends on bug 1783432, which changed state. Bug 1783432 Summary: Review Request: python-pysingular - Python interface to Singular https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783432 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1772664] Review Request: past-time - Visualizer for the days of the year
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772664 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- past-time-0.2.0-3.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1771173] Review Request: xournalpp - Handwriting note-taking software with PDF annotation support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771173 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- xournalpp-1.0.16-7.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1783433] Review Request: python-jupyter-kernel-singular - Jupyter kernel for Singular
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783433 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-05 00:40:03 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-jupyter-kernel-singular-0.9.9-1.fc31, python-pysingular-0.9.7-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1783432] Review Request: python-pysingular - Python interface to Singular
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783432 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-05 00:40:01 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-jupyter-kernel-singular-0.9.9-1.fc31, python-pysingular-0.9.7-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787714] Review Request: wireguard-tools - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714 Jason A. Donenfeld changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ja...@zx2c4.com --- Comment #1 from Jason A. Donenfeld --- This is the .spec that we've been suggesting users install on the official instructions at www.wireguard.com/install/ for several years now. It seems to work well and now would be a good time to add it to Fedora indeed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1762789] Review Request: vim-gitgutter - Shows a git diff in the gutter and stages/undoes hunks and partial hunks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762789 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- vim-gitgutter-0-2.20191207git1c53af9.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763423] Review Request: gedit-color-schemes - Color schemes for Gedit and apps to render the syntax highlight
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763423 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- gedit-color-schemes-0-4.20191019git4f62aae.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1762768] Review Request: vim-nerdtree-git-plugin - Plugin of NERDTree showing git status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762768 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- vim-nerdtree-git-plugin-0-1.20191024gitf522a09.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1762670] Review Request: vim-pathogen - Manage your runtimepath
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762670 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- vim-pathogen-0-2.20181213gite9fb091.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1762768] Review Request: vim-nerdtree-git-plugin - Plugin of NERDTree showing git status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762768 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- vim-devicons-0.11.0-1.20191110gite3e6aa1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763128] Review Request: golang-github-google-slothfs - FUSE filesystem for light-weight, lazily-loaded, read-only Git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763128 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-google-slothfs-0-0.1.20200101git6b42407.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0295dd1bee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1778443] Review Request: php-ralouphie-getallheaders - A polyfill for getallheaders
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778443 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6-6.5.2-1.fc31, php-guzzlehttp-psr7-1.6.1-1.fc31, php-ralouphie-getallheaders-3.0.3-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5879f3cf2e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785874] Review Request: polybar - Fast and easy-to-use status bar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785874 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- polybar-3.4.2-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a0d98da21e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1767998] Review Request: mbpfan - A simple daemon to control fan speed on all MacBook/MacBook Pros
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767998 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- mbpfan-2.2.1-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8f2dde35e7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1767998] Review Request: mbpfan - A simple daemon to control fan speed on all MacBook/MacBook Pros
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767998 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- mbpfan-2.2.1-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786773] Review Request: obs-service-recompress - An OBS source service: Recompress files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786773 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- obs-build-20191205-325.1.1.fc30, obs-service-recompress-0.3.1-3.git20170704.59bf231.fc30, obs-service-tar_scm-0.10.10-2.fc30, osc-0.167.1-281.1.3.fc30, osc-source_validator-0.19-3.fc30, perl-BSSolv-0.15-2.git20191121.1955d7f.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786774] Review Request: obs-service-tar_scm - An OBS source service: checkout or update a tarball from svn/git/hg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786774 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- obs-build-20191205-325.1.1.fc30, obs-service-recompress-0.3.1-3.git20170704.59bf231.fc30, obs-service-tar_scm-0.10.10-2.fc30, osc-0.167.1-281.1.3.fc30, osc-source_validator-0.19-3.fc30, perl-BSSolv-0.15-2.git20191121.1955d7f.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748228] Review Request: ghc-xdg-userdirs - Basic implementation of XDG user directories specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748228 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-xdg-userdirs-0.1.0.2-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1784577] Review Request: chatterino2 - Chat client for twitch.tv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784577 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- chatterino2-2.1.4-7.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785373] Review Request: python-should_dsl - Should assertions in Python in as clear and readable a way as possible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785373 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-should_dsl-2.1.2-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773855] Review Request: tpm2-tss-engine - Engine for OpenSSL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773855 --- Comment #3 from Mathias Zavala --- I've made the changes to the issues pointed up in the review, please let me know if a i missed something Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mzavalavz/tpm2-tss-engine/fedora-31-x86_64/01138511-tpm2-tss-engine/tpm2-tss-engine.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mzavalavz/tpm2-tss-engine/fedora-31-x86_64/01138511-tpm2-tss-engine/tpm2-tss-engine-1.0.1-1.fc31.src.rpm KOJI BUILD: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40117272 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1778443] Review Request: php-ralouphie-getallheaders - A polyfill for getallheaders
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778443 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6-6.5.2-1.fc30, php-guzzlehttp-psr7-1.6.1-1.fc30, php-ralouphie-getallheaders-3.0.3-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-328050568b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1763128] Review Request: golang-github-google-slothfs - FUSE filesystem for light-weight, lazily-loaded, read-only Git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763128 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-google-slothfs-0-0.1.20200101git6b42407.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-623107a7c0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785874] Review Request: polybar - Fast and easy-to-use status bar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785874 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- polybar-3.4.2-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6dc1cbad74 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1764175] Review Request: elements - A C++/Python build framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764175 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- elements-5.8-5.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f1c1df23bf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1784677] Review Request: gap-pkg-fr - Computations with functionally recursive groups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784677 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-04 20:32:57 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- gap-pkg-fr-2.4.6-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786773] Review Request: obs-service-recompress - An OBS source service: Recompress files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786773 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-04 20:33:02 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- obs-build-20191205-325.1.1.fc31, obs-service-recompress-0.3.1-3.git20170704.59bf231.fc31, obs-service-tar_scm-0.10.10-2.fc31, osc-0.167.1-281.1.3.fc31, osc-source_validator-0.19-3.fc31, perl-BSSolv-0.15-2.git20191121.1955d7f.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1784577] Review Request: chatterino2 - Chat client for twitch.tv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784577 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-04 20:32:52 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- chatterino2-2.1.4-7.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786774] Review Request: obs-service-tar_scm - An OBS source service: checkout or update a tarball from svn/git/hg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786774 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-04 20:33:04 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- obs-build-20191205-325.1.1.fc31, obs-service-recompress-0.3.1-3.git20170704.59bf231.fc31, obs-service-tar_scm-0.10.10-2.fc31, osc-0.167.1-281.1.3.fc31, osc-source_validator-0.19-3.fc31, perl-BSSolv-0.15-2.git20191121.1955d7f.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785373] Review Request: python-should_dsl - Should assertions in Python in as clear and readable a way as possible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785373 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-should_dsl-2.1.2-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1756899] Review Request: upt - Universal Packaging Tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756899 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- upt-0.10.3-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1781071] Rename Review Request: xe-guest-utilities-latest - XAPI Virtual Machine Monitoring Scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781071 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- xe-guest-utilities-latest-7.17.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785373] Review Request: python-should_dsl - Should assertions in Python in as clear and readable a way as possible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785373 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-04 20:09:48 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-should_dsl-2.1.2-1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1781071] Rename Review Request: xe-guest-utilities-latest - XAPI Virtual Machine Monitoring Scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781071 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-04 20:08:12 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- xe-guest-utilities-latest-7.17.0-2.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1772664] Review Request: past-time - Visualizer for the days of the year
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772664 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-04 20:08:20 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- past-time-0.2.0-3.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1765102] Review Request: lua5.1-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua 5.1 (EPEL8)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765102 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-01-04 20:07:42 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- lua5.1-lpeg-1.0.2-1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787701] Review Request: python2-pillow - Python image processing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787701
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok ---
Created attachment 1649712
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1649712=edit
Output of fedora-review's licensecheck
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
Note: python27 is deprecated, but see https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2266
- The license of the package is probably incomplete.
There are LGPL files included.
Also other licenses present in tests, not in the resulting RPM, that's OK.
See attachment.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License",
"*No copyright* SIL Open Font License (v1.1)", "SIL Open Font License
(v1.1)", "NTP License (legal disclaimer)", "Expat License".
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 163840 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names
[Bug 1785852] Review Request: rust-rust_hawktracer_proc_macro - Helper crate for hawktracer profiling library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785852
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith ---
Package is approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "Apache License
(v2.0)". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
in /home/jsmith/Documents/Fedora/Reviews/1785852-rust-
rust_hawktracer_proc_macro/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/cargo/registry/rust_hawktracer_proc_macro-0.3.0(defaulting,
C, set, locale,, to, Failed),
/usr/share/cargo/registry/rust_hawktracer_proc_macro-0.3.0/src(defaulting,
C, set, locale,, to, Failed), /usr/share/doc/rust-
rust_hawktracer_proc_macro-devel(defaulting, C, set, locale,, to,
Failed), /usr/share/licenses/rust-rust_hawktracer_proc_macro-
devel(defaulting, C, set, locale,, to, Failed)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[!]: Fully versioned
[Bug 1787701] Review Request: python2-pillow - Python image processing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787701 --- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok --- ack. will run automated checks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787429] Review Request: mopidy - An extensible music server written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787429 --- Comment #3 from Tobias --- No worries, Raphael. Looking at the Mopidy 3.0 sources, pykka is required by the main mopidy software. I'll try to find a provenpackager to merge the PR. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787701] Review Request: python2-pillow - Python image processing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787701 --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani --- >> Drop files which used to be in subpackages > Obsolete the subpackages? This was addressed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752361 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787701] Review Request: python2-pillow - Python image processing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787701 --- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok --- > Drop files which used to be in subpackages Obsolete the subpackages? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787714] New: Review Request: wireguard-tools - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714 Bug ID: 1787714 Summary: Review Request: wireguard-tools - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j...@solidadmin.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jdoss/wireguard/fedora-31-x86_64/01137539-wireguard-tools/wireguard-tools.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jdoss/wireguard/fedora-31-x86_64/01137539-wireguard-tools/wireguard-tools-1.0.20200102-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm Description: WireGuard is a novel VPN that runs inside the Linux Kernel and uses state-of-the-art cryptography (the "Noise" protocol). It aims to be faster, simpler, leaner, and more useful than IPSec, while avoiding the massive headache. It intends to be considerably more performant than OpenVPN. WireGuard is designed as a general purpose VPN for running on embedded interfaces and super computers alike, fit for many different circumstances. It runs over UDP. This package provides the wg binary for controlling WireGuard. FAS Username: jdoss WireGuard is set to be included in Linux 5.6 and the upstream maintainer of WireGuard wants to stage this package to be included in Fedora when Linux 5.6 hits Rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787701] Review Request: python2-pillow - Python image processing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787701
--- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani ---
Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python2-pillow.spec
SRPM URL:
https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python2-pillow-6.2.1-2.fc32.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sat Jan 04 2020 Sandro Mani - 6.2.1-2
- Add full description
- %%{python2_sitearch}/* -> %%{python2_sitearch}/PIL/
- Remove files instead of using %%exclude
- Don't provide python-imaging
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787701] Review Request: python2-pillow - Python image processing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787701
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
> Provides: python-imaging = %{version}-%{release}
No more of this, python-xxx is provided by Python 3 packages.
Also, latest version of pillow in rawhide is: 6.2.1-1.fc32, this package needs
to be at least 6.2.1-2.fc32.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787701] Review Request: python2-pillow - Python image processing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787701
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok ---
> This is a minimal compatibility package for https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2266
Feel free to keep this in the description, but I'd rather include the original
one and put this at the end.
> %{python2_sitearch}/*
This is forbidden:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_files_to_include
> %exclude %{python2_sitearch}/PIL/_imagingtk*
> %exclude %{python2_sitearch}/PIL/ImageTk*
> %exclude %{python2_sitearch}/PIL/SpiderImagePlugin*
> %exclude %{python2_sitearch}/PIL/ImageQt*
Can the files be explicitly removed in %install instead? %exclude is tricky,
see for example: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/994
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785967] Review Request: python-apply-defaults - Apply values to optional params
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785967 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-01-04 12:49:14 --- Comment #4 from Mukundan Ragavan --- Built on rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1785970] Review Request: python-jsonrpcserver - Process JSON-RPC requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785970 Bug 1785970 depends on bug 1785967, which changed state. Bug 1785967 Summary: Review Request: python-apply-defaults - Apply values to optional params https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785967 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1787701] New: Review Request: python2-pillow - Python image processing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787701 Bug ID: 1787701 Summary: Review Request: python2-pillow - Python image processing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: manisan...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python2-pillow.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python2-pillow-6.2.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Python image processing library Fedora Account System Username: smani Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40097837 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1786204] Review Request: golang-github-youmark-pkcs8 - Parse and convert private keys in PKCS#8 format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786204 Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi --- Hello Robert-André, This package meets the quality control requirements for Fedora. I reviewed all items in Review Guidelines and will attach a report of fedora-review for our reference. Best Regards, Hirotaka Wakabayashi ``` Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Cannot run licensecheck: Command 'licensecheck -r /home/vagrant/FedoraReview/1786204-golang-github-youmark- pkcs8/upstream-unpacked' returned non-zero exit status 127. [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/doc/golang-github- youmark-pkcs8-devel(to, Failed, defaulting, set, locale,, C), /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com(golang-github-cactus-statsd-client- devel, golang-github-mitchellh-wordwrap-devel, golang-github-docker- credential-helpers-devel, golang-github-opentracing-contrib-grpc- devel, golang-github-jellevandenhooff-dkim-devel, golang-github- markbates-inflect-devel, golang-github-puerkitobio-purell-devel, golang-github-zmap-rc2-devel, golang-github-spacemonkeygo-spacelog- devel, golang-github-docker-cli-devel, golang-github-yudai-golcs- devel, golang-github-m3db-prometheus-client-model-devel, golang- github-paulbellamy-ratecounter-devel, golang-github-stack-devel, golang-github-opencontainers-image-spec-devel, golang-github-posener- complete-devel, golang-github-protobuf-devel, golang-github-coreos- oidc-devel, golang-github-mistifyio-zfs-devel, golang-github-eknkc- amber-devel, golang-github-shopify-logrus-bugsnag-devel, golang- github-keybase-crypto-devel, golang-github-rogpeppe-internal-devel, golang-github-mxk-flowrate-devel, golang-github-andybalholm-cascadia- devel, golang-github-armon-consul-api-devel, golang-github- marcinbor85-gohex-devel, golang-github-spf13-pflag-devel, golang- github-google-cmp-devel, golang-github-makenowjust-heredoc-devel, golang-github-fatih-color-devel, golang-github-hashicorp-raft-mdb- devel, golang-github-evanphx-json-patch-devel, golang-github- olekukonko-tablewriter-devel, golang-github-moby-buildkit-devel, golang-github-docker-libkv-devel, golang-github-goftp-server-devel, golang-github-dnsimple-devel, golang-github-julienschmidt-httprouter- devel, golang-github-nkovacs-streamquote-devel, golang-github- knieriem-markdown-devel, golang-github-puerkitobio-urlesc-devel, golang-github-rainycape-memcache-devel, golang-github-ijc-gotty-devel, golang-github-cockroachdb-cockroach-go-devel, golang-github- hajimehoshi-mp3-devel, golang-github-marten-seemann-qtls-devel, golang-github-racksec-srslog-devel, golang-github-jsimonetti- rtnetlink-devel, compat-golang-github-commonmark-linkify-devel, golang-github-kagami-avif-devel, golang-github-jackc-pgx-devel, golang-github-kdar-factorlog-devel, golang-github-gorilla- securecookie-devel, golang-github-anacrolix-dms-devel, golang-github- containerd-runc-devel, golang-github-pelletier-toml-devel, golang- github-linode-linodego-devel, golang-github-j-keck-arping-devel, golang-github-dropbox-sdk-unofficial-devel, golang-github-hashicorp- mdns-devel, golang-github-blakesmith-ar-devel, golang-github- rackspace-gophercloud-devel, golang-github-goji-httpauth-devel, golang-github-getsentry-raven-devel, golang-github-cpu-goacmedns- devel, golang-github-wellington-libsass-devel, golang-github-ghemawat- stream-devel, golang-github-performancecopilot-speed-devel, golang- github-influxdata-usage-client-devel, golang-github-jsternberg-zap- logfmt-devel, golang-github-codahale-hdrhistogram-devel, golang- github-mock-devel, golang-github-vividcortex-ewma-devel, golang- github-exponent-io-jsonpath-devel, golang-github-marusama-semaphore- devel, golang-github-kit-devel, golang-github-opencontainers-runc- devel, golang-github-biogo-store-devel, golang-github-macaron-session- devel, compat-golang-github-coreos-etcd-devel, golang-github-stretchr- testify-devel, golang-github-skynetservices-skydns-devel, golang- github-jacobsa-crypto-devel, golang-github-vbatts-tar-split-devel, Failed, golang-github-appc-spec-devel,
[Bug 1770566] Review Request: gron - Make JSON greppable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566 --- Comment #9 from Lars Kiesow --- No, they aren't. Sorry! The correct links are: Spec URL: https://data.lkiesow.io/rpm/gron/0.6.0-2/gron.spec SRPM URL: https://data.lkiesow.io/rpm/gron/0.6.0-2/gron-0.6.0-2.fc31.src.rpm Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40083094 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1704312] Review Request: intel-undervolt - Intel CPU undervolting and throttling configuration tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704312 --- Comment #3 from Artem --- Latest version with debuginfo https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/intel-undervolt/fedora-31-x86_64/01138368-intel-undervolt/intel-undervolt.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/intel-undervolt/fedora-31-x86_64/01138368-intel-undervolt/intel-undervolt-1.7-2.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
