[Bug 1829070] Review Request: multiwatch - Forks and watches multiple instances of a program in the same context
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070 Benjamin Lefoul changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@fedoraproject.org Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1814682] Review Request: rshim - rshim driver for Mellanox BlueField SoC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #54 from Honggang LI ---
I had run basic functional tests for rshim. Confirmed it works as expected and
the
output of fedora-review tool looks good for me.
Set the 'fedora-review+' flag. Michal, please add lsun into packager group.
=
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
PASS
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
PASS
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
PASS
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* GPL (v2)", "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2)".
23 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/honli/review/1814682-rshim/licensecheck.txt
PASS. It is a review tool issue, as those files have "SPDX-License-Identifier:
GPL-2.0-only" tag.
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
PASS.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/systemd,
/usr/lib/systemd/system
PASS
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
PASS
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
PASS
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
PASS
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
PASS
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
PASS. It is not a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
PASS. no devel
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
PASS
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
PASS
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
PASS
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
PASS
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
PASS
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
PASS
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
PASS
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
PASS
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
PASS. start/stop rshim service confirmed the systemd service file works.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
PASS
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
PASS
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
PASS
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
PASS
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
Note: Systemd
[Bug 1814682] Review Request: rshim - rshim driver for Mellanox BlueField SoC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682 --- Comment #53 from Honggang LI --- (In reply to lsun from comment #49) > > Why does the rshim.service use killall in the first place? There is: > > > KillMode=process > > > > Why this mode? Do you need child processes to be left running in the cgroup > > after the service is stopped? > > If yes, commenting on it in the unit file would be nice. > > It's a copy/paste error. I would like to stop all processes when service > stops. > > > > > > ExecStop=/usr/bin/killall -SIGKILL rshim > > > > Referencing processes to kill by name is not good. It would kill unrelated > > processes with the same name. > > Is none of systemd's kill modes suitable for stopping the service without > > additional help? > > And why SIGKILL? Does it not stop on SIGTERM? > > Will update in next posted version with the following: > - Remove the "Requires: psmisc" > - Remove "ExecStop". > - Use "KillMode=control-group" > - Support SIGTERM > > [Service] > Restart=always > Type=forking > ExecStart=-/usr/sbin/rshim $OPTIONS > KillMode=control-group Confirmed rshim.service start/stop works with the new systemd service file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828984] Re-Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828984 Parag Nemade changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Rename Request: |Re-Review Request: |culmus-fonts - Fonts for|culmus-fonts - Fonts for |Hebrew from Culmus project |Hebrew from Culmus project --- Comment #1 from Parag Nemade --- Actually srpm name culmus-fonts remained same but binary packages are getting renamed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822971] Review Request: notcurses - character graphics and TUI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971 --- Comment #35 from Nick Black --- I've rebuilt with a new spec file. * Verified that notcurses.py is installed 0755 (achieved via %attr directive) * Verified that /usr/share/notcurses gets cleaned up on removal (indeed, find /usr -iname \*notcurses\* is empty upon removal) * Verified that the -data package is gone, and the binaries/man pages are in -utils. The base package installs only shared libraries. * Blank line between specfile changelog entries. I think this answers everything you raised in this most recent round of review. In particular, /usr/share/notcurses is properly owned (and thus removed). As I noted above, the exit() is in the child path of a fork(), following a failed exec(). I believe this to be acceptable library behavior. Please note that all child processes are managed with Linux 5 pidfds, eliminating some typical worries there. I've uploaded the new SRPM and RPMs: https://www.dsscaw.com/repos/dnf/ [vps](0) $ sha256sum * 12a220effbbb6674880ad5da448a167905ab22611ea3569d6eaf97ed46121891 build.log 3b361c0d38f2fd17ab6b0a220d35557c1c27581e86ac216f6c6680a538ff4125 hw_info.log b6671f523a9f27223e777be3a23c8850bae755709e1ed75fa732419c2b81a35b installed_pkgs.log e73cbfefa06fb4288f7f0e160417108bce953009b11929d4a5c23696e162ba9c notcurses-1.3.3-1.fc33.src.rpm 677adf06441b7be9ef0ebe2795a3ac67332e11a360b5999f38c385e10361b351 notcurses-1.3.3-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm 58b7cfb64a1e738b966bda7d4adb6fc84cb113d81a386954e42b797e6439 notcurses-debuginfo-1.3.3-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm 579e4c10d69808455332cf7cf1422a187466ed59f73013640282781458d9137f notcurses-debugsource-1.3.3-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm 666d9ec54d33e8accea13325cd71d033e0b96a859a3e83b47e610692c1bd59d8 notcurses-devel-1.3.3-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm a51497a0596ba57a0281824266408df7cecf517cf9031b19c1262e4aaea094f4 notcurses-static-1.3.3-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm 10e57a4dcb1f88af632e7c540647c5fcf2a26a96e3bfbbbfb53048fed05a972c notcurses-utils-1.3.3-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm 9bd852283ef92bbaa3702d45dcbf7cedba2cc4e274f75dca392cf18faefee235 notcurses-utils-debuginfo-1.3.3-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm d4612c2fe0dd9ffa7decbbe763e03f1cdee30d68e5bc47af7eb7b9bd5d3cfb24 python3-notcurses-1.3.3-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm 9e855b0455e899b70df7ed59591e97d9f5c64e0d6b560c0eee2a70e72113decf python3-notcurses-debuginfo-1.3.3-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm 54949abce9bf6343969eac5a9169a79fc6dc2194441fe2ddeecbe96c4b22b22e root.log 46ff4b0254c09f75d9fa68710ff30035e559a596bf459b4c88b3a00b368a337f state.log [vps](0) $ Specfile: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dankamongmen/notcurses/master/tools/notcurses.spec PTAL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818565] Review Request: itf-poppins-fonts - A geometric sans serif Latin and Devanagari font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818565 --- Comment #1 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi --- Successful Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43889269 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1814682] Review Request: rshim - rshim driver for Mellanox BlueField SoC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682 --- Comment #52 from Honggang LI --- (In reply to Alaa Hleihel (Mellanox) from comment #51) > Hi Honggang, > You can take the setup back and continue your testing/review. I confirmed the network traffic between the aarch64 machine and SmartNIC works via ssh. The rshim user space driver works for me. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818565] Review Request: itf-poppins-fonts - A geometric sans serif Latin and Devanagari font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818565 Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||hiw...@yahoo.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|hiw...@yahoo.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827427] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-argos - Create GNOME Shell extensions in seconds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-74679c3b8a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-74679c3b8a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-74679c3b8a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827925] Review Request: rust-vmw_backdoor - Pure-Rust library for VMware host-guest protocol ("VMXh backdoor")
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827925 --- Comment #1 from Robert Fairley --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828968] Review Request: python-oca - Bindings for XMLRPC OpenNebula Cloud API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828968
--- Comment #2 from Nils Philippsen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[!]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packa
[Bug 1828968] Review Request: python-oca - Bindings for XMLRPC OpenNebula Cloud API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828968 Nils Philippsen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||nphil...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nphil...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1829070] New: Review Request: multiwatch - Forks and watches multiple instances of a program in the same context
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070 Bug ID: 1829070 Summary: Review Request: multiwatch - Forks and watches multiple instances of a program in the same context Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/multiwatch.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/multiwatch-1.0.0-2.fc30.src.rpm Description: Multiwatch forks multiple instance of one application and keeps them running. It is made to be used with spawn-fcgi, so all forks share the same fastcgi socket (no webserver restart needed if you increase/decrease the number of forks), and it is easier than to setup multiple daemontool supervised instances. Fedora Account System Username: xavierb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1773720] Review Request: golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi - HAProxy Data Plane API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720 --- Comment #16 from Brandon Perkins --- As of now, dataplaneapi is not functional as reported at: https://github.com/haproxytech/dataplaneapi/issues/85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827427] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-argos - Create GNOME Shell extensions in seconds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-74679c3b8a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-74679c3b8a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816733] Review Request: rust-libslirp - High-level bindings & helper process for libslirp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816733 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-libslirp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1814349] Rename Request: ht-caladea-fonts - Caladea, a serif font family metric-compatible with Cambria font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814349 Parag Nemade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||ht-caladea-fonts-1.001-2.gi ||t336a529.fc33 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-04-28 17:22:20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828984] New: Rename Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828984 Bug ID: 1828984 Summary: Rename Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pnem...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pnemade/fedora-review/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01353796-culmus-fonts/culmus-fonts.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pnemade/fedora-review/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01353796-culmus-fonts/culmus-fonts-0.133-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: The culmus-fonts package contains fonts for the display of Hebrew from the Culmus project. Fedora Account System Username: pnemade -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828983] New: Rename Request: khmer-os-fonts - Khmer font family set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828983 Bug ID: 1828983 Summary: Rename Request: khmer-os-fonts - Khmer font family set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pnem...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pnemade/fedora-review/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01353798-khmer-os-fonts/khmer-os-fonts.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pnemade/fedora-review/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01353798-khmer-os-fonts/khmer-os-fonts-5.0-30.fc33.src.rpm Description: The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. Fedora Account System Username: pnemade -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828968] Review Request: python-oca - Bindings for XMLRPC OpenNebula Cloud API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828968 Vipul Siddharth changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Vipul Siddharth --- patch link: https://siddharthvipul1.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-oca/oca_init_error.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828968] New: Review Request: python-oca - Bindings for XMLRPC OpenNebula Cloud API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828968 Bug ID: 1828968 Summary: Review Request: python-oca - Bindings for XMLRPC OpenNebula Cloud API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: siddharthvip...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://siddharthvipul1.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-oca/python-oca.spec SRPM URL: https://siddharthvipul1.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-oca/python-oca-4.10.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Bindings for XMLRPC OpenNebula Cloud API Fedora Account System Username: siddharthvipul1 Koji build link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43880402 License was missing from the upstream, I have created an issue suggestion adding it. Will update as soon as it's reflected on upstream -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1441843] Review Request: linchpin - Ansible based multicloud orchestrator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843 --- Comment #37 from greg.helli...@gmail.com --- Updated this to latest version, which now fully supports Python 3 and drops Python 2 support. Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43882055 SRPM: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2057/43882057/linchpin-2.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Spec file: https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/linchpin/linchpin.spec Hopefully this journey is finally underway! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 911781] Review Request: bittwist - Bit-Twist is a simple yet powerful libpcap-based Ethernet packet generator.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911781 Giuseppe Marco Randazzo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2020-04-28 15:57:07 --- Comment #13 from Giuseppe Marco Randazzo --- Dear all, thank you for your support and interest. I found a workaround package, tcpreply. With this message I would like to close this package request. Best regards, GMR -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828938] New: Review Request: rust-box_drawing - library for drawing boxes with UTF-8 characters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828938 Bug ID: 1828938 Summary: Review Request: rust-box_drawing - library for drawing boxes with UTF-8 characters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: uhh...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://filebin.ca/5Kh5QRTsh5K6/rust-box_drawing.spec SRPM URL: https://filebin.ca/5Kh4gEZHxiP4/rust-box_drawing-0.1.2-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Very simple library containing constants for UTF-8 box drawing Fedora Account System Username: appadeia -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825419] Review Request: rust-standback - New standard library, old compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825419 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827925] Review Request: rust-vmw_backdoor - Pure-Rust library for VMware host-guest protocol ("VMXh backdoor")
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827925 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816733] Review Request: rust-libslirp - High-level bindings & helper process for libslirp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816733 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|needinfo?(i.gnatenko.brain@ |fedora-review+ |gmail.com) | --- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko --- Sorry, I was quite busy lately. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826034] Review Request: cubeb - A cross platform audio library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826034 --- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cubeb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818567] Review Request: ms-studio-karmilla-fonts - A grotesque sans serif sans serif font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818567
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
Hi Hirotaka
Thank you for the kind review.
The last tagged version is 0.15, but the actual packaged state (a later commit)
is 0.16. If you open project fontlog, you will see the project version bumping
to 0.16 in 2016
> 23 May 2016 (ms-studio) Karmilla v.016
Don’t ask me why the project stopped tagging new versions after 0.15 :(.
Anyway, rolling back to 0.15 would deprive Fedora users of all the fixed done
in the project since 0.15.
There are no new upstream font builds after the packaged commit
https://github.com/ms-studio/karmilla/tree/master/dist/version%2015/fonts/ttf
!
→ Latest commit 0019472 on 11 Dec 2018 (almost 2 years after the fontlog
switched version to 0.16)
%{dist} is not used in the %changelog, as seen in the rpmlint error I made the
mistake of writing 1.0 instead of 1 for release in the changelog entry
0.16-1.0.20200329git0019472 ['0.16-1.20200329git0019472.fc33']
I will remove the needless .0, that will satisfy rpmlint
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818567] Review Request: ms-studio-karmilla-fonts - A grotesque sans serif sans serif font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818567
--- Comment #2 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
Hello Nicolas, please check the issues.
Thanks in advance,
Hirotaka Wakabayashi
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Upstream's latest version is 0.15
Please set the right version. The package version is 0.16,
which is newere than the upstream one.
- %{?dist} should never be used in the %changelog entries.
"0.16-1.0.20200329git0019472" should be "0.16-1".
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DistTag/#_using_dist
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "SIL Open Font License 1.1", "*No
copyright* Public domain". 1154 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/vagrant/FedoraReview/1818567-ms-
studio-karmilla-fonts/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Sourc
[Bug 1826034] Review Request: cubeb - A cross platform audio library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826034 --- Comment #10 from Jeremy Newton --- Ah yes thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828813] Review Request: bashtop - Resource monitor written in bash that shows usage and stats for processor, memory, disks, network and processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813 Alessio changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/bashtop/bashtop.spec SRPM URL: https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/bashtop/bashtop-0.8.15-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Resource monitor written in bash that shows usage and stats for processor, memory, disks, network and processes. Fedora Account System Username: alciregi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1828813] New: Review Request: bashtop - Resource monitor written in bash that shows usage and stats for processor, memory, disks, network and processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813 Bug ID: 1828813 Summary: Review Request: bashtop - Resource monitor written in bash that shows usage and stats for processor, memory, disks, network and processes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: alcir...@posteo.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/bashtop/bashtop.spec SRPM URL: https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/bashtop/bashtop-0.8.15-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Resource monitor written in bash that shows usage and stats for processor, memory, disks, network and processes. Fedora Account System Username: alciregi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1814349] Rename Request: ht-caladea-fonts - Caladea, a serif font family metric-compatible with Cambria font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814349 --- Comment #13 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ht-caladea-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1465889] Tracking: Deepin Desktop related package review tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@scrye.com, ||ppi...@redhat.com Component|Package Review |distribution --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- This is an invalid Package Review request. Trackers for adding packages belong to the Distribution component. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827427] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-argos - Create GNOME Shell extensions in seconds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427 --- Comment #9 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-argos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649713] Review Request: glusterfs-selinux - Gluster file-system specific selinux policy module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649713 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|mchan...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1664926] Review Request: python-lesspass - LessPass CLI open source password manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664926 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 911781] Review Request: bittwist - Bit-Twist is a simple yet powerful libpcap-based Ethernet packet generator.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911781 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 974714] Review Request: thermal_daemon - A close loop thermal monitoring and control daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974714 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|dw...@infradead.org |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1481597] Review request: python-karborclient
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481597 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|hgue...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377762] Review Request: opendht - A lightweight C++11 Distributed Hash Table implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377762 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1441843] Review Request: linchpin - Ansible based multicloud orchestrator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1302989] Review Request: linux-eoip - Linux support for Mikrotik EoIP protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302989 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|puiterw...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1364631] Review Request: nodejs-glob-stream - A wrapper around node-glob to make it streamy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364631 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-review- | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1000799] Review Request: ulatencyd - Daemon to minimize latency on a Linux system using cgroups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000799 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1662344] Review Request: python-s3transfer - Amazon S3 Transfer Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662344 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||python-s3transfer-0.1.13-5. ||fc30 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-04-28 11:22:03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1433784] Review Request: nodejs-nodemon - Simple monitor script for use during development of a node.js app
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433784 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1662309] Review Request: python-ifaddr - Python library that allows you to find all the IP addresses of the computer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662309 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||python-ifaddr-0.1.6-1.fc30 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-04-28 11:16:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1615641] Review Request: compliance-masonry - Security Documentation Builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1615641 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1195255] Review Request: compat-tolua++ - lua-5.1 compatible version of tolua++ (C++ Lua integration)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195255 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||compat-tolua++-1.0.93-2.fc2 ||2 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-04-28 11:11:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1613574] Review Request: DCD - The D Completion Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613574 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1558683] Review Request: python-ucsmsdk - Python SDK for Cisco UCSM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558683 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1567819] Review Request: golang-github-pilebones-go-udev - Simple udev implementation in Golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567819 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1814349] Rename Request: ht-caladea-fonts - Caladea, a serif font family metric-compatible with Cambria font family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814349 Parag Nemade changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Rename Request: |Rename Request: |google-caladea-fonts - |ht-caladea-fonts - Caladea, |Caladea, a serif font |a serif font family |family metric-compatible|metric-compatible with |with Cambria font family|Cambria font family --- Comment #12 from Parag Nemade --- I am sorry for not changing this review request bug summary. I am going to retire google-caladea-fonts now and will request again new ht-caladea-fonts package request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1775443] Review Request: wlr-randr - An xrandr clone for wlroots compositors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443 --- Comment #16 from Morian Sonnet --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/momosomium/wlr-randr/fedora-31-x86_64/01353359-wlr-randr/wlr-randr.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/momosomium/wlr-randr/fedora-31-x86_64/01353359-wlr-randr/wlr-randr-0-4.20200408git5ff601a.fc31.src.rpm * Removed unnecessary BuildRequires Thanks for the hint Aleksei. It seems like that BR remained from the original .spec file I used as base. Further, after reading [1] again, I also removed the BR wayland-devel. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/PkgConfigBuildRequires/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
