[Bug 1772770] Review Request: beanstalk-client - C/C++ client for the beanstalkd work queue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772770 Dan Callaghan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Flags|needinfo?(d...@djc.id.au)| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849401] Review Request: growlight - Block device and filesystem manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849401 Nick Black changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849255] Review Request: ghc-network-bsd - Network.BSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849255 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849255] Review Request: ghc-network-bsd - Network.BSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849255 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen --- Thank you for the review https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26042 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818892] Review Request: webanalyze - Tool to uncovers technologies used on websites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818892 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c90d0afedd has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-c90d0afedd \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c90d0afedd See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1846175] Review Request: trojan - an unidentifiable proxy software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d0339317fe has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-d0339317fe \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d0339317fe See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830539] Review Request: mdns-scan - Scan for mDNS/DNS-SD services published on the local network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830539 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f553e1b011 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818870] Review Request: hulk - DoS tool using unique and obfuscated traffic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818870 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-4ac3985328 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-4ac3985328 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4ac3985328 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816295] Review Request: python-mysqlclient - MySQL/mariaDB database connector for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816295 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-077ea0d190 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-077ea0d190 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-077ea0d190 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821808] Review Request: golang-github-badgerodon-peg - Parsing Expression Grammer Parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821808 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-860aefee64 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-860aefee64 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-860aefee64 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812435] Review Request: python-beautifultable - Print ASCII tables for terminals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812435 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c459a8024e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1838686] Review Request: PDAL - Point Data Abstraction Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686 --- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ed997a6971 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843426] Review Request: perl-Test2 - Framework for writing test tools that all work together
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843426 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-23 01:40:41 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1e6db211d2 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830539] Review Request: mdns-scan - Scan for mDNS/DNS-SD services published on the local network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830539 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-50e29b55d1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1762755] Review Request: vim-trailing-whitespace - Highlights trailing whitespace in red and provides :FixWhitespace to fix it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762755 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-32d80a2c2b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-32d80a2c2b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839978] Review Request: php-doctrine-sql-formatter - SQL highlighting library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839978 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-23 01:20:32 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5221816b3d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833479] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-custom-printf - Printf-style format-strings for user-defined string conversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833479 Bug 1833479 depends on bug 1833477, which changed state. Bug 1833477 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv - Generate S-expression conversion functions from type definitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833477 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839887] Review Request: python-cle - A Python interface for analyzing binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839887 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-945346ba94 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830306] Review Request: python-git-revise - Efficiently update, split, and rearrange git commits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830306 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-23 01:20:28 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d1530ee346 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816295] Review Request: python-mysqlclient - MySQL/mariaDB database connector for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816295 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6984cdde39 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6984cdde39 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833477] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv - Generate S-expression conversion functions from type definitions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833477 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-06-23 01:20:02 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a55671118d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839242] Review Request: python-ouimeaux - Open source control for Belkin WeMo devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-32c26ec183 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-32c26ec183` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-32c26ec183 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1846175] Review Request: trojan - an unidentifiable proxy software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846175 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f2a359582a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-f2a359582a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f2a359582a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822132] Review Request: golang-github-andreasbriese-bbloom - Fast bit set Bloom filter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822132 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-71189d6772 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-71189d6772 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-71189d6772 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820855] Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-requestlog - Simple request logging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820855 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6928d510cf has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-6928d510cf \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6928d510cf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821808] Review Request: golang-github-badgerodon-peg - Parsing Expression Grammer Parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821808 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a55182de97 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-a55182de97 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a55182de97 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818870] Review Request: hulk - DoS tool using unique and obfuscated traffic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818870 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ba8a0e08cf has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-ba8a0e08cf \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ba8a0e08cf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818892] Review Request: webanalyze - Tool to uncovers technologies used on websites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818892 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7edd3974b0 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-7edd3974b0 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7edd3974b0 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816295] Review Request: python-mysqlclient - MySQL/mariaDB database connector for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f8ae67d409 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-f8ae67d409 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f8ae67d409 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835452] Review Request: mlxbf-bootctl - Bootloader control for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835452 --- Comment #12 from Honggang LI --- (In reply to Spencer Lingard from comment #10) > Ok, done. I see the message > > "annobin: mlxbf-bootctl.c: ICE: Should be 64-bit target" > > when I build with these flags. Is this expected? That's OK. I did not see such message when I built it with mock fedora-rawhide configuration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835452] Review Request: mlxbf-bootctl - Bootloader control for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835452
--- Comment #11 from Honggang LI ---
1 Package Review
2 ==
3
4 Legend:
5 [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
6 [ ] = Manual review needed
7
8
9
10 = MUST items =
11
12 C/C++:
13 [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
PASS
14 [ ]: Package contains no static executables.
PASS
15 [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
16 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
17 [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
18 [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
19
20 Generic:
21 [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
meets
22 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of
Packaging
23 Guidelines.
PASS
24 [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
25 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
26 found: "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "Unknown or
generated",
27 "GNU General Public License, Version 2". 11 files have unknown
28 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/test/1835452-mlxbf-
29 bootctl/licensecheck.txt
PASS
30 [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is
installed.
PASS
31 [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
PASS
32 [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
PASS
33 [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
PASS
34 [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
PASS
35 [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
PASS
36 [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
PASS
37 [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
PASS
38 [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
39 names).
PASS
40 [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
PASS
41 [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
PASS
42 [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
PASS
43 [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes
and
44 Provides are present.
PASS
45 [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
PASS
46 [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
PASS
47 [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
PASS
48 [ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
PASS
49 [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
PASS. It is aarch64 specific package.
50 [ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be
size
51 (~1MB) or number of files.
52 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
PASS
53 [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
PASS
54 [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least
55 one supported primary architecture.
56 [x]: Package installs properly.
57 [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
58 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
59 [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
60 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of
the
61 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
62 [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
63 [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
64 [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
65 [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
66 [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at
the
67 beginning of %install.
68 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
69 [x]: Dist tag is present.
70 [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
71 [x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
72 [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
73 [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=...
doesn't
74 work.
75 [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
76 [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
77 [x]: Package is not relocatable.
78 [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
79 provided in the spec URL.
80 [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
81 %{name}.spec.
82 [x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
83 [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
84
85 = SHOULD items =
86
87 Generic:
88 [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate
89 file
[Bug 1839889] Review Request: python-angr - A multi-architecture binary analysis toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839889 --- Comment #5 from W. Michael Petullo --- Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/python-angr.spec SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/python-angr-8.20.6.8-2.fc32.src.rpm Description: angr is a platform-agnostic binary analysis framework with the ability to perform dynamic symbolic execution and various static analyses on binaries. Fedora Account System Username: mikep - Add some BuildRequires This should fix the build problems. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835452] Review Request: mlxbf-bootctl - Bootloader control for Mellanox BlueField
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835452 --- Comment #10 from Spencer Lingard --- New version. Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/slingard/mlxbf-bootctl/fedora-rawhide-aarch64/01496412-mlxbf-bootctl/mlxbf-bootctl.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/slingard/mlxbf-bootctl/fedora-rawhide-aarch64/01496412-mlxbf-bootctl/mlxbf-bootctl-1.1-6.fc33.src.rpm Scratch Koji URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46001191 (In reply to Honggang LI from comment #8) > (In reply to Spencer Lingard from comment #6) > > Spec URL: > > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/slingard/mlxbf-bootctl/ > > fedora-rawhide-aarch64/01476093-mlxbf-bootctl/mlxbf-bootctl.spec > > 27 %build > 28 %make_build > > Need to setup the CFLAGS. Please insert %set_build_flags between line 27 and > 28. see > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/master/f/ > buildflags.md > Ok, done. I see the message "annobin: mlxbf-bootctl.c: ICE: Should be 64-bit target" when I build with these flags. Is this expected? The binaries appear to run fine. (In reply to Alaa Hleihel (Mellanox) from comment #9) > I ran some tests, it seems OK: > > > [root@dhcp19-243-132 ~]# rpm -qf `which mlxbf-bootctl` > mlxbf-bootctl-1.1-5.el8.aarch64 > [root@dhcp19-243-132 ~]# > [root@dhcp19-243-132 ~]# mlxbf-bootctl --help > syntax: mlxbf-bootctl [--help|-h] [--swap|-s] [--device|-d MMCFILE] > [--output|-o OUTPUT] [--read|-r INPUT] > [--bootstream|-b BFBFILE] [--overwrite-current] > [--watchdog-swap interval | --nowatchdog-swap] > > > [root@dhcp19-243-132 ~]# modprobe -rv mlxbf_bootctl > rmmod mlxbf_bootctl > [root@dhcp19-243-132 ~]# mlxbf-bootctl > primary: /dev/mmcblk0boot0 > backup: /dev/mmcblk0boot1 > boot-bus-width: x8 > reset to x1 after reboot: FALSE > post_reset_wdog: No such file or directory > [root@dhcp19-243-132 ~]# echo $? > 1 > [root@dhcp19-243-132 ~]# modprobe -v mlxbf_bootctl > insmod > /lib/modules/4.18.0-215.el8.aarch64/kernel/drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf- > bootctl.ko.xz > [root@dhcp19-243-132 ~]# mlxbf-bootctl > primary: /dev/mmcblk0boot0 > backup: /dev/mmcblk0boot1 > boot-bus-width: x8 > reset to x1 after reboot: FALSE > watchdog-swap: disabled > lifecycle state: GA Non-Secured > secure boot key free slots: 4 > [root@dhcp19-243-132 ~]# echo $? > 0 > [root@dhcp19-243-132 ~]# For completeness I added a message that warns if you don't have the mlxbf_bootctl driver loaded, rather than printing "No such file or directory". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826308] Review Request: golang-github-songgao-water - TUN/TAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826308 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-songgao-water -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826318] Review Request: meshbird - Distributed private networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826318 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/meshbird -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1824269] Review Request: python-korean-lunar-calendar - Convert Korean lunar-calendar to Gregorian calendar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824269 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-korean-lunar-calendar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849182] Review Request: golang-gitlab-esr-fqme - Mines configuration files to discover full name and email address
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849182 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-gitlab-esr-fqme -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849180] Review Request: golang-github-termie-shutil - Golang port of python's shutil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849180 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-termie-shutil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823376] Review Request: golang-github-gin-contrib-static - Static middleware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823376 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-gin-contrib-static -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1823365] Review Request: golang-github-ns3777k-shodan - Shodan API client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823365 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-ns3777k-shodan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821305] Review Request: zgrab2 - Application Layer Scanner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821305 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/zgrab2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #24 from yon...@cisco.com --- HI Artur, Thanks for the info. I will wait for the notification from pagure. Thanks! Yongkui -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826313] Review Request: golang-github-alexflint-scalar - Parsing library for string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826313 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-alexflint-scalar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849183] Review Request: golang-gitlab-ianbruene-kommandant - Command line meta-interpreter for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849183 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-gitlab-ianbruene-kommandant -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1826315] Review Request: golang-github-alexflint-arg - Struct-based argument parsing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826315 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-alexflint-arg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1772770] Review Request: beanstalk-client - C/C++ client for the beanstalkd work queue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772770 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/beanstalk-client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1827399] Review Request: sqm-scripts - Traffic shaper scripts of the CeroWrt project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827399 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sqm-scripts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822952] Review Request: golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus - Lightweight eventbus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822952 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-asaskevich-eventbus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #23 from Artur Iwicki --- Repositories on src.fedoraproject.org are created manually by members of the Release Enginnering team in response to opened tickets. Your pagure.io/releng ticket is still open. You'll need to wait a bit for someone to pick it up and process it. You'll receive a notification from pagure when that happens. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #22 from yon...@cisco.com --- I also tried to clone it anonymously, failed with the below error message: fedpkg -v clone -a openosc Cloning https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc.git Running: git clone https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc.git --origin origin Cloning into 'openosc'... fatal: repository 'https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc.git/' not found Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 renara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||renara...@gmail.com --- Comment #129 from renara...@gmail.com --- NetBeans IDE is an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for Java/JavaFX, C/C++, Ruby, PHP, etc. The NetBeans IDE is oriented on a wide audience of developers from beginners up to experts. A developer can find a useful set of the development tools that are embedded in the IDE or can be integrated with. The NetBeans IDE is the modular system and it can be configured according to user needs.https://escortse.com/ http://jaipurescorts.club/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/ http://www.geocities.ws/vip-jaipur-escorts-service/ http://www.geocities.ws/renaravv/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/udaipur-escorts-agency-vip-call-girls-in-udaipur-7665166866/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/jodhpur-escort-service-call-girls-in-jodhpur-7665166866/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/pushkar-escorts-agency-7665166866-call-girls-in-pushkar/ Netbeans package was re-enabled. I think that will be nice to close this bug and asking for co-maintaining Netbeans at PkgDB. You have to unbundle Netbeans-platform, cause it is already a separate package. Maybe ask the maintainers of Netbeans-platform to update the package. By the way, what is the difference between thos both packages Netbeans-platform and NetBeans-platform8 in SCM? Netbeans-platform8 seems to be orphaned for a long time, see http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/netbeans-platform8.git/commit/?id=3fc6fe194b12f61cf5abbb8d884dfb4101e4dcff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #21 from yon...@cisco.com --- hi Robert-Andre, I have successfully done the below: vim ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf fedpkg request-repo openosc 1812961 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26022 Then I run into the below error: fedpkg -v --user yonhan clone openosc Cloning ssh://yon...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc Running: git clone ssh://yon...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc --origin origin Cloning into 'openosc'... ssh: connect to host pkgs.fedoraproject.org port 22: Connection timed out fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command. This seems caused by firewall? or I need to wait for some time and retry? I can do "git clone" with https URL, but perhaps cannot with ssh URL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849182] Review Request: golang-gitlab-esr-fqme - Mines configuration files to discover full name and email address
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849182 --- Comment #2 from Denis Fateyev --- Thanks a lot for your reviewing efforts! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #20 from yon...@cisco.com --- hi Robert-Andre, Thank you very much for the approval! I think the next step for me is to follow the below wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process I will use the fedpkg tool to request a git repository for it. Thanks! Yongkui -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830267] Review Request: python-nanoid - Unique string ID generator for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830267
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Meanwhile d/l the license file as a separate source.
Package approved otherwise.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 10 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-
nanoid/review-python-nanoid/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if
[Bug 1849722] New: Review Request: python-graphene - GraphQL Framework for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849722 Bug ID: 1849722 Summary: Review Request: python-graphene - GraphQL Framework for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jp...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-graphene/python-graphene.spec SRPM URL: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-graphene/python-graphene-3.0b2-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Graphene is a Python library for building GraphQL schemas/types fast and easily. Fedora Account System Username: jpena Koji scratch build is available at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45992169 . Unit tests had to be disabled because some test requirements are not packaged in Fedora yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830273] Review Request: golang-github-matoous-nanoid - Go implementation of ai's nanoid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830273 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Bump to 1.4.1 - License ok - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849706] Review Request: python-bluepyopt - The Blue Brain Python Optimisation Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR), ||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sanjay.an...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags|needinfo?(nobody@fedoraproj |fedora-review? |ect.org)| |needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks for this, Anil. I'll look at it in the next few days. Have you created a Fedora Account System (FAS) account yet? It's what gives you access to the necessary infrastructure. You can get one here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ Please use the same e-mail address as you are using here on Bugzilla, since that's how Bugzilla syncs with the rest of the infrastructure set up. Cheers, Ankur Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803223] Review Request: golang-github-google-starlark - Starlark is a dialect of Python intended for use as a configuration language.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803223 --- Comment #14 from Alejandro Sáez Morollón --- Spec URL: https://people.redhat.com/asaezmor/shared/golang-starlark SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/asaezmor/shared/golang-starlark/golang-starlark-0-0.1.20200622git32f3451.fc32.src.rpm Description: Starlark is a dialect of Python intended for use as a configuration language. Fedora Account System Username: alexsaezm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1803223] Review Request: golang-github-google-starlark - Starlark is a dialect of Python intended for use as a configuration language.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803223
--- Comment #13 from Alejandro Sáez Morollón ---
Thanks for the comments. I updated the name and the license.
I'm still not 100% convinced about the name. I think I prefer the starlark one
but the upstream project is starlark-go, the command is starlark, and I know
that there are more implementations out there in other languages so not sure
which name is the best here.
I would love to hear your suggestions. Or about other packages in the same
situation.
Regarding the license, I wrote ASL 2.0 instead of Apache License 2.0 after
looking at this page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses.
(In reply to Jakub Čajka from comment #12)
> Generally looks good to me. I see two issues. First the name of the
> package/spec. I think it can be even just starlark, but golang-starlak(or
> the full "import" path) will work too. Please adjust the name of the package
> in the review request title and change the name of the spec to the name that
> you will choose.
> Second is that there are two files of testdata under the apache 2.0 license.
> Could you please adjust the license tag and add license breakdown in to the
> comment above it?
> Otherwise look good to me. Thank you for packaging :).
> Fedora review output follows.
>
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> [ ] = Manual review needed
>
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
> %{name}.spec.
> Note: golang-github-google-starlark.spec should be golang-starlark.spec
> See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
> guidelines/#_spec_file_naming
> - contains testdata under apache2.0 license not listed under the license tag
> * starlark/testdata/paths.star
> * syntax/testdata/scan.star
>
> = MUST items =
>
> Generic:
> [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
> other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
> Guidelines.
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
> [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
> [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
> [x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
> [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
> [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
> [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
> [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
> [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
> names).
> [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
> [x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
> [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
> [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
> Provides are present.
> [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
> [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
> [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
> [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
> [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
> [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
> (~1MB) or number of files.
> Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
> [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
> [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
> one supported primary architecture.
> [x]: Package installs properly.
> [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
> Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
> [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
> license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
> license(s) for the package is included in %license.
> [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
> [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
> [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
> beginning of %install.
> [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
> [x]: Dist tag is present.
> [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
> [x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
> [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
> [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
> work.
> [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
> [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
> [x]: Package is not relocatable.
> [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
> provided in the spec URL.
> [x]: File names are valid
[Bug 1849709] New: Review Request: rust-shared_library - Easily bind to and load shared libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849709 Bug ID: 1849709 Summary: Review Request: rust-shared_library - Easily bind to and load shared libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: stef...@figura.im QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.sr.ht/~returntrip/rust-shared_library/blob/master/rust-shared_library.spec SRPM URL: https://git.sr.ht/~returntrip/rust-shared_library/blob/master/rust-shared_library-0.1.9-1.fc33.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45991237 Description: Easily bind to and load shared libraries. Fedora Account System Username: returntrip -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1727505] Review Request: python-bluepyopt - Bluebrain Python Optimisation Library (bluepyopt)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727505 --- Comment #19 from Anil Tuncel --- I did it here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849706] Review Request: python-bluepyopt - The Blue Brain Python Optimisation Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706 Anil Tuncel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nob...@fedoraproject.org, ||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(nobody@fedoraproj ||ect.org) ||needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai ||l.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849706] New: Review Request: python-bluepyopt - The Blue Brain Python Optimisation Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706 Bug ID: 1849706 Summary: Review Request: python-bluepyopt - The Blue Brain Python Optimisation Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tuncel.ma...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anilbey/bluepyopt-rpm/master/python-bluepyopt.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/anilbey/bluepyopt-rpm/blob/master/python-bluepyopt-1.9.48-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: The Blue Brain Python Optimisation Library (BluePyOpt) is an extensible framework for data-driven model parameter optimisation that wraps and standardises several existing open-source tools. It simplifies the task of creating and sharing these optimisations, and the associated techniques and knowledge. This is achieved by abstracting the optimisation and evaluation tasks into various reusable and flexible discrete elements according to established best-practices. Further, BluePyOpt provides methods for setting up both small- and large-scale optimisations on a variety of platforms, ranging from laptops to Linux clusters and cloud-based compute infrastructures. Fedora Account System Username: Anil Tuncel (tuncel.ma...@gmail.com) Reviewer: Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849568] Review Request: sourcetrail - a free and open-source interactive source explorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849568 Tom Stellard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tstel...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Tom Stellard --- Since this project uses CMake, you should try to align the spec file with this proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds . I don't know if all the new macros exist, but you could at least adopt the convention of not cd'ing into the build directory. And also use _vpath_builddir macro for the build directory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1316526] Review Request: jo - Command-line to create JSON objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316526 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Daein Park from comment #9) > Hi Fabian, sorry for late response too. > > Would you review updated spec and srpm of this package ? > > Update to v1.2 of jo : > - SPEC URL: > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bysnupy/toolbox/master/jo/jo.spec > - SRPM URL: > https://github.com/bysnupy/toolbox/raw/master/jo/jo-1.2-1.fc30.src.rpm > > Thanks a lot, > Daein If you're still interested, open your own bug and mark this one as duplicate. You can tag me and I'll review it. The bug reporter should be the same as the one who requests the repo later, otherwise it is refused. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1829523] Review Request: python-pysam - reading, manipulating and writing genomic data sets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829523
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Use
Source0:%{pypi_source}
- Bump to 0.16.0.1
- Install the license file:
%files -n python3-%{pypi_name}
%doc README.rst
%license COPYING
- Find a way to disable Rpath:
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libcalignedsegment.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libcalignmentfile.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libcbcf.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libcbcftools.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libcbgzf.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libcfaidx.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libchtslib.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libcsamfile.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libcsamtools.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libctabix.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libctabixproxies.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libcutils.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
python3-pysam.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/pysam/libcvcf.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
['$ORIGIN']
- Make the doc subpackage noarch
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[!]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Note: See rpmlint output
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or
"Revised" License", "Public domain", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified"
License". 80 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-pysam/review-python-
pysam/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]:
[Bug 1839242] Review Request: python-ouimeaux - Open source control for Belkin WeMo devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-32c26ec183 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-32c26ec183 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1829334] Review Request: 3mux - Terminal multiplexer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829334 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Please bump to 1.0.1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1829337] Review Request: golang-github-burntsushi-xdg - Reader for the XDG Base Directory specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829337 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License is not Public Domain but: License:WTFPL - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. Please fix the License before import. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1839242] Review Request: python-ouimeaux - Open source control for Belkin WeMo devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-54d98b5b1f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-54d98b5b1f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849678] New: Review Request: rust-servo-fontconfig - Rust bindings for fontconfig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849678 Bug ID: 1849678 Summary: Review Request: rust-servo-fontconfig - Rust bindings for fontconfig Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: stef...@figura.im QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.sr.ht/~returntrip/rust-servo-fontconfig/blob/master/rust-servo-fontconfig.spec SRPM URL: https://git.sr.ht/~returntrip/rust-servo-fontconfig/blob/master/rust-servo-fontconfig-0.5.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Rust bindings for fontconfig. Fedora Account System Username: returntrip -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849676] New: Review Request: rust-freetype-rs - Rust bindings for FreeType library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849676 Bug ID: 1849676 Summary: Review Request: rust-freetype-rs - Rust bindings for FreeType library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: stef...@figura.im QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.sr.ht/~returntrip/rust-freetype-rs/blob/master/rust-freetype-rs.spec SRPM URL: https://git.sr.ht/~returntrip/rust-freetype-rs/blob/master/rust-freetype-rs-0.26.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Rust bindings for FreeType library. Fedora Account System Username: returntrip -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1838027] Review Request: zuul - Trunk Gating System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838027 Bug 1838027 depends on bug 1742034, which changed state. Bug 1742034 Summary: python-virtualenv-20.0.23 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742034 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849255] Review Request: ghc-network-bsd - Network.BSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849255 Tristan Cacqueray changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849568] Review Request: sourcetrail - a free and open-source interactive source explorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849568 --- Comment #2 from Konrad Kleine --- As mentioned on IRC, when installing this on Fedora 32 I get this error: $ dnf install https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/sourcetrail-2020.1.117-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 0:11:59 ago on Mon 22 Jun 2020 10:37:00 AM CEST. sourcetrail-2020.1.117-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm 2.0 MB/s | 3.3 MB 00:01 Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides libboost_filesystem.so.1.73.0()(64bit) needed by sourcetrail-2020.1.117-1.fc33.x86_64 - nothing provides libboost_program_options.so.1.73.0()(64bit) needed by sourcetrail-2020.1.117-1.fc33.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1708175] Review Request: python-prawcore - Low-level communication layer for PRAW 4+ library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708175 Bug 1708175 depends on bug 1708161, which changed state. Bug 1708161 Summary: Review Request: python-testfixtures - A collection of helpers and mock objects for unit tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708161 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1708161] Review Request: python-testfixtures - A collection of helpers and mock objects for unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708161 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-06-22 10:05:24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820915] Review Request: bettercap - Tool for 802.11, BLE/Ethernet reconnaissance and MITM attacks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820915 Bug 1820915 depends on bug 1820805, which changed state. Bug 1820805 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-bettercap-gatt - Go package for building Bluetooth Low Energy peripherals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820805 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820805] Review Request: golang-github-bettercap-gatt - Go package for building Bluetooth Low Energy peripherals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820805 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-06-22 10:05:43 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822160] Review Request: golang-github-dghubble-sessions - Sessions with a secure cookie Store implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822160 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1848758] Review Request: libsoundio - C library for cross-platform real-time audio input and output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848758 --- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík --- And it seems utilities in bin should be independent from library itself, according to Packaging Guidelines [1]. Are those tools required by the library? Are they useful standalone? 1. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_libraries_and_applications -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1848758] Review Request: libsoundio - C library for cross-platform real-time audio input and output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848758 Petr Menšík changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pemen...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Petr Menšík --- I think doc subpackage should be architecture independent. Is there reason, why it is platform specific? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849568] Review Request: sourcetrail - a free and open-source interactive source explorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849568 --- Comment #1 from serge_sans_paille --- This is my first time packaging a graphical application, Can't say If I missed something on the xdg-desktop aspects... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849568] New: Review Request: sourcetrail - a free and open-source interactive source explorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849568 Bug ID: 1849568 Summary: Review Request: sourcetrail - a free and open-source interactive source explorer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sguel...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/sourcetrail.spec SRPM URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/sourcetrail-2020.1.117-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Sourcetrail is a free and open-source cross-platform source explorer that helps you get productive on unfamiliar source code. Fedora Account System Username: sergesanspaille -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1837019] Review Request: theme-switcher - Switch dark/light GTK theme automatically during day/night
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837019 --- Comment #10 from Artem --- Added systemd user unit preset for < F32 https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/theme-switcher/fedora-31-x86_64/01495845-theme-switcher/theme-switcher.spec https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/theme-switcher/fedora-31-x86_64/01495845-theme-switcher/theme-switcher-2.0.4-4.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825587] Review Request: python-aiosmb - Asynchronous SMB protocol implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825587 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > Also this one: > > DEBUG util.py:621: Error: > DEBUG util.py:621: Problem: conflicting requests > DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides python3.9dist(prompt-toolkit) < 3 > needed by python3-aiosmb-0.2.10-1.fc33.noarch Have to check that one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1825587] Review Request: python-aiosmb - Asynchronous SMB protocol implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825587 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1) > - Bump to 0.2.20 Updated > - Missing dep on latest version: > > DEBUG util.py:621: Problem: conflicting requests > DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides python3.9dist(asysocks) >= 0.0.4 > needed by python3-aiosmb-0.2.20-1.fc33.noarch Should be there: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1525930 %changelog * Mon Jun 22 2020 Fabian Affolter - 0.2.20-1 - Update to latest upstream release 0.2.20 Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-aiosmb.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-aiosmb-0.2.20-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #127 from rena ravv --- https://escortse.com/ https://escortse.com/about/ https://escortse.com/gallery/ https://escortse.com/contact/ https://escortse.com/escort-service-in-sindhi-camp-jaipur/ https://escortse.com/escorts-in-banipark-jaipur/ https://escortse.com/escorts-in-durgapura-jaipur/ https://escortse.com/escorts-in-mansarovar-jaipur/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/contact/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/gallery/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/about/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/vidhyadhar-nagar-escorts-jaipur-call-girls-7665166866/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/malviya-nagar-escorts-jaipur-call-girls-7665166866/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/raja-park-escorts-jaipur-7665166866-call-girls-raja-park/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/bais-godam-escorts-jaipur-7665166866-call-girls-bais-godam/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/gopalpura-escorts-jaipur-7665166866-call-girls-gopalpura/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/sanganer-escorts-jaipur-7665166866-call-girls-sanganer/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/call-girls-in-c-scheme-jaipur-7665166866-c-scheme-escorts/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/vaishali-nagar-escorts-7665166866-call-girls-vaishali-nagar/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/bhankrota-escorts-jaipur-7665166866-call-girls-bhankrota/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/kukas-escorts-jaipur-7665166866-model-call-girls-in-kukas/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/escort-service-in-sindhi-camp-jaipur/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/escorts-in-banipark-jaipur/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/escorts-in-durgapura-jaipur/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/escorts-in-mansarovar-jaipur/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/udaipur-escorts-agency-vip-call-girls-in-udaipur-7665166866/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/jodhpur-escort-service-call-girls-in-jodhpur-7665166866/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/pushkar-escorts-agency-7665166866-call-girls-in-pushkar/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #128 from rena ravv --- http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/ghat-darwaza-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/kukas-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/nirman-nagar-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/gangori-bazar-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/barkat-nagar-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/bais-godam-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/sindhi-camp-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/bhankrota-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/new-colony-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/jawahar-nagar-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/vidhyadhar-nagar-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/sitapura-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/pratap-nagar-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/sodala-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/rambagh-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/mi-road-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/ambabari-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/gopalpura-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/chandpole-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/lal-kothi-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/raja-park-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/sanganer-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/civil-lines-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/jagatpura-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/bani-park-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/durgapura-escorts-7665166866-call-girls-in-durgapura/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/vaishali-nagar-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/mansarovar-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/malviya-nagar-escorts-and-call-girls/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/punjabi-escorts-in-jaipur/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/night-club-jaipur-escorts/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/housewife-escorts-in-jaipur/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/jaipur-escorts-for-party-fun/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/high-profile-girls-in-pink-city/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/girlfriend-experience-with-jaipur-escorts/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/foreigner-escorts-jaipur-contact/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/pink-city-escorts-gallery/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/hot-escorts-jaipur-about/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/hot-tv-actress-escorts-in-jaipur/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/jaipur-russian-escorts/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/jaipur-college-girls-escorts/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/jaipur-vip-models-escorts/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/jaipur-airhostess-escorts/ http://jaipurescorts.club/index.php/jaipur-escorts-service-location/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 rena ravv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jprhostin...@gmail.com --- Comment #126 from rena ravv --- Jaipur Escorts service | 7665166866 | VIP Call Girls in Jaipur | Jaipur escorts service | 7665166866 | Call Girls in Jaipur | Jaipur escorts service | 7665166866 | Model Call Girls in Jaipur | Jaipur escorts service | 7665166866 | High Profile Call Girls in Jaipur | Jaipur escorts service | 7665166866 | College Call Girls in Jaipur | https://escortse.com/ http://jaipurescorts.club/ http://vipmodel-escorts.com/ http://www.geocities.ws/vip-jaipur-escorts-service/ http://www.geocities.ws/renaravv/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849255] Review Request: ghc-network-bsd - Network.BSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849255 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #3) > > Latest version is 2.8.1.0 > > That's correct, but I don't think it in current Rawhide: since it needs > network-3 Ugh, that was meant to read: I don't think 2.8.1.0 can build in current lts-14 rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849255] Review Request: ghc-network-bsd - Network.BSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849255 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen --- (In reply to Tristan Cacqueray from comment #2) > LGTM, thanks. A couple of comments: > > Latest version is 2.8.1.0 That's correct, but I don't think it in current Rawhide: since it needs network-3 but it can be updated after to the latest version. > No doc or test, I guess there is not much we can do when they don't exist in > upstream project. Right there is only the doc subpackage, and no testsuite in this case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1813181] Review Request: python-jaraco-text - Module for text manipulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813181 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-jaraco-text-3.2.0-1. ||fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-06-22 06:31:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1813182] Review Request: python-jaraco-collections - Collection objects similar to those in stdlib by jaraco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813182 Bug 1813182 depends on bug 1813181, which changed state. Bug 1813181 Summary: Review Request: python-jaraco-text - Module for text manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813181 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1813182] Review Request: python-jaraco-collections - Collection objects similar to those in stdlib by jaraco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813182 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-jaraco-collections-3 ||.0.0-2.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-06-22 06:25:05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849513] Review Request: rust-block-cipher - Traits for description of block ciphers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849513 --- Comment #2 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-block-cipher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
