[Bug 1845667] Review Request: qxmledit - Powerful XML editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845667 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a250d662e6 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-a250d662e6 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a250d662e6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853858] Review Request: badwolf - Web Browser which aims at security and privacy over usability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853858 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-cfe42d56c1 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-cfe42d56c1 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cfe42d56c1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1845297] Review Request: jgmenu - A simple X11 menu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845297 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-368d4a4b1a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-368d4a4b1a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-368d4a4b1a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843751] Review Request: cvise - Super-parallel Python port of the C-Reduce
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843751 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-bdcb8a4b8b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-bdcb8a4b8b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bdcb8a4b8b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844794] Review Request: openelp - Open Source EchoLink Proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844794 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-12aeb91375 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843268] Review Request: librem - Library for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843268 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5d39e9f054 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840797] Review Request: shhgit - GitHub secrets search tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840797 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b7ccd84eef has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1852631] Review Request: python-flask-compress - Compress responses in your Flask app with gzip or brotli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852631 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a03fe1bc4a has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1837019] Review Request: theme-switcher - Switch dark/light GTK theme automatically during day/night
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837019 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6cb66aac02 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843264] Review Request: libre - Library for real-time communications and SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843264 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e629bf7724 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835023] Review Request: openbgpd - OpenBGPD Routing Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835023 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-59ec839f59 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843516] Review Request: php-composer-semver3 - Semver library version 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843516 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-81d0b25664 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844336] Review Request: php-phpunit-php-timer5 - PHP Utility class for timing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844336 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-089b0521ac has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1852631] Review Request: python-flask-compress - Compress responses in your Flask app with gzip or brotli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852631 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-08 01:04:46 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e82bf47c8a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843516] Review Request: php-composer-semver3 - Semver library version 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843516 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-08 01:04:18 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-9b1cadc765 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835023] Review Request: openbgpd - OpenBGPD Routing Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835023 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-08 01:04:37 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-fc096ea7d3 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1848794] Review Request: lgogdownloader - GOG.com download client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848794 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-08 01:04:42 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f882350f38 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844794] Review Request: openelp - Open Source EchoLink Proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844794 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-08 01:04:21 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-788631a28f has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840797] Review Request: shhgit - GitHub secrets search tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840797 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-08 01:04:11 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-bac58edcdf has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844336] Review Request: php-phpunit-php-timer5 - PHP Utility class for timing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844336 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-07-08 01:04:06 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c6b5a6072b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1852339] Review Request: barrier - Use a single keyboard and mouse to control multiple computers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852339 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-dfc7491169 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-dfc7491169 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1852339] Review Request: barrier - Use a single keyboard and mouse to control multiple computers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852339 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e331a4af86 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e331a4af86 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1762755] Review Request: vim-trailing-whitespace - Highlights trailing whitespace in red and provides :FixWhitespace to fix it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762755 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-32d80a2c2b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816295] Review Request: python-mysqlclient - MySQL/mariaDB database connector for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816295 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6984cdde39 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 --- Comment #39 from yon...@cisco.com --- the above https://id.fedoraproject.org/openidc/Authorization?scope=openid+https%3A%2F%2Fid.fedoraproject.org%2Fscope%2Fgroups+https%3A%2F%2Fmbs.fedoraproject.org%2Foidc%2Fsubmit-build+https%3A%2F%2Fsrc.fedoraproject.org%2Fpush_type=code_id=fedpkg_uri=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A12345%2F_mode=query became the below URL in my web browser: http://localhost:12345/?code=5e030de8-3f8b-410f-b352-e01dedfee77d_sJl-CR0TTHg2xjfArxX_rYuJMN0KAeYi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 yon...@cisco.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(yon...@cisco.com) | --- Comment #38 from yon...@cisco.com --- hi Robert-Andre, Thanks for the suggestions! After re-running kinit, I successfully uploaded the tarball. [rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 openosc]$ kinit yon...@fedoraproject.org Password for yon...@fedoraproject.org: [rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 openosc]$ [rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 openosc]$ fedpkg import ~/yonhan/fedora-review-dir/openosc-1.0.2-1.fc33.src.rpm Uploading: /home/rtd/fedora-scm/openosc/openosc-1.0.2.tar.gz 100.0% diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 000..5bcb111 --- /dev/null +++ b/sources @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +SHA512 (openosc-1.0.2.tar.gz) = 56b3d2a6f7f4b01937717c80a07b0bdcc874c8093c9ce69b5420846cbc18cb7d57cad42864e8e4526a9b7b48680fafc4873c44579987888abbaa2d774b668e5f New content staged and new sources uploaded. Commit if happy or revert with: 'git reset --hard HEAD' (warning: it reverts also eventual user changes). [rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 openosc]$ git commit -sm "Initial import (#1812961)" [master b0424bd] Initial import (#1812961) 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .gitignore create mode 100644 openosc.spec create mode 100644 sources [rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 openosc]$ [rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 openosc]$ fedpkg push Please visit https://id.fedoraproject.org/openidc/Authorization?scope=openid+https%3A%2F%2Fid.fedoraproject.org%2Fscope%2Fgroups+https%3A%2F%2Fmbs.fedoraproject.org%2Foidc%2Fsubmit-build+https%3A%2F%2Fsrc.fedoraproject.org%2Fpush_type=code_id=fedpkg_uri=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A12345%2F_mode=query to grant authorization but I could not connect the above https://id.fedoraproject.org/openidc/Authorization? link. I always run into the below error when connecting with a web-browser. Unable to connect Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at localhost:12345. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853888] Review Request: libLTK - Ladspa v3 ToolKit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853888
--- Comment #5 from Lewis ---
Hi Robert-André Mauchin, really glad to see you there!
"- Feel free to converse in French if needed." ok,
everything I'm not sure to say the right way will be written in french.
> - Source must point to the upstream archive URL
>
> Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
The line you paste there, what do you really expect? (same url as in "URL:"?)
> - https://codecolla.com:10734/ doesn't resolve for me. Where to get the
> source code *officially*?
Vraiement officiellement? c'est hébergé sur une raspberry pi chez moi et
accessible en git uniquement pour le moment :
git clone git://codecolla.com/libltk
Je compte à termes y mettre un serveur http pour suivre l'évolution des
projets, deployer, tester, démontrer, etc...
En attendant je pourrais fournir
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lewisanesa/CodeColla/ comme URL non?
> - Please remove the gz extension for man page in %files and use a glob *
> instead, as compression may change in the future.
J'enlève .gz dans les fichiers, les commandes gzip, mais ne dois-je pas les
remplacer par d'autres commandes?
Sinon, comment rpm build sait où trouver les man pages dans mes sources?
> - Why do you repeat: mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man3 several times? It
> only needs to be created once. Try simplify the copy code too
Le spec file est auto généré avec un script, il me faut encore travailler
dessus. Vous le trouverez à la racine du projet git au nom de make.sh .
> - includes go to the devel package
> - The unversioned library goes to devel subpackage too
> - %build %set_build_flags %make_build
> NAME=%{name} VERSION=%{version}
Done.
> - install -m 755 -D bin/lib%{name}.so
> %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.%{version}
> This is not sufficient to set a SONAME, it's just create a link. Setting a
> soname is mandatory in Fedora, generally ask upstream to do it, or if they
> refuse, add it to your Fedora package.
Le upstream ne risque pas de refuser, puisque c'est moi. Je suis seul et unique
a ravailler sur ce projet et je veux coller aux specs de fedora.
Je vais faire ça : gcc -shared -fPIC -Wl,-soname,libfoo.so.1 -o
libfoo.so.1.0.0 foo.c
Mais mettre des virgules dans une commande de compilation me semble étrange.
For non french speaking people, I'll recap changes made to fit fedora
requirements, may this help someone one day...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853858] Review Request: badwolf - Web Browser which aims at security and privacy over usability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853858 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-cfe42d56c1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cfe42d56c1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1837107] Review Request: 7kaa - Seven Kingdoms: Ancient Adversaries (claiming ownership of package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #19 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Sponsored! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853858] Review Request: badwolf - Web Browser which aims at security and privacy over usability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853858 --- Comment #4 from Lyes Saadi --- Thank you for the quick review :D! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853858] Review Request: badwolf - Web Browser which aims at security and privacy over usability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853858 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- > Sorry for the mistakes, I should've self-reviewed the package before > submitting it. No worry, we're all here to learn from them. >I used it in the new version of the spec! What do you think? >Both seem to work fine, and I don't really have any preference for one or >another. Works as well! I tried to mimic how the find-lang script is supposed to work, but that's good as well. Package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(yon...@cisco.com) --- Comment #37 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Should I continue to proceed with: git commit -sm "Initial import (#1812961)" fedpkg push No do not continue if the archive is not uploaded to dist-git. > Could not execute import_srpm: Request is unauthorized. Have you identified with kinit first? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Install_the_developer_client_tools and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos i.e. before being allowed to upload something you need to identify yourself to Koji with Kerberos: env KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stdout kinit yon...@fedoraproject.org Then type your FAS username password. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812961] Review Request: openosc - Open Object Size Checking Library to detect buffer overflows with built-in metrics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #36 from yon...@cisco.com ---
hi All,
I run into below error when cloning my openosc repo:
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 fedora-scm]$ fedpkg -v clone openosc
Cloning ssh://yon...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc
Running: git clone ssh://yon...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc --origin
origin
Cloning into 'openosc'...
ssh: connect to host pkgs.fedoraproject.org port 22: Connection timed out
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 11, in
load_entry_point('fedpkg==1.37', 'console_scripts', 'fedpkg')()
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/fedpkg/__main__.py", line 86, in main
sys.exit(client.args.command())
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/cli.py", line 1931, in clone
depth=self.args.depth)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/__init__.py", line 1543, in
clone
self._run_command(cmd, cwd=path)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/__init__.py", line 1228, in
_run_command
raise rpkgError('Failed to execute command.')
pyrpkg.errors.rpkgError: Failed to execute command.
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 fedora-scm]$
But I can clone it anonymously. Then I saw "Could not execute import_srpm:
Request is unauthorized." error when doing "fedpkg import" command.
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 fedora-scm]$ fedpkg -v clone -a openosc
Cloning https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc.git
Running: git clone https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc.git --origin
origin
Cloning into 'openosc'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 3, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (3/3), done.
remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done.
Git-excludes patterns were added into
/home/rtd/fedora-scm/openosc/.git/info/exclude
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 fedora-scm]$ cd openosc/
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 openosc]$ fedpkg import
~/yonhan/fedora-review-dir/openosc-1.0.2-1.fc33.src.rpm
Could not execute import_srpm: Request is unauthorized.
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 openosc]$ ls -al
total 492
drwxrwxr-x. 3 rtd rtd 4096 Jul 7 14:45 .
drwxrwxr-x. 3 rtd rtd 4096 Jul 7 14:44 ..
drwxrwxr-x. 8 rtd rtd 4096 Jul 7 14:45 .git
-rw-rw-r--. 1 rtd rtd 0 Jul 7 14:45 .gitignore
-rw-rw-r--. 1 rtd rtd 482329 Jul 7 14:45 openosc-1.0.2.tar.gz
-rw-rw-r--. 1 rtd rtd 1793 Jul 7 14:45 openosc.spec
-rw-rw-r--. 1 rtd rtd 30 Jul 7 14:44 README.md
-rw-rw-r--. 1 rtd rtd 0 Jul 7 14:45 sources
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 openosc]$
Should I continue to proceed with:
git commit -sm "Initial import (#1812961)"
fedpkg push
Let me know how to proceed.
Thanks,
Yongkui
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853888] Review Request: libLTK - Ladspa v3 ToolKit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853888
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Source must point to the upstream archive URL
Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- https://codecolla.com:10734/ doesn't resolve for me. Where to get the source
code *officially*?
- Do not gzip the man pages yourself, it is handled by RPM
- Please remove the gz extension for man page in %files and use a glob *
instead, as compression may change in the future.
%{_mandir}/man3/LTK.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKAdd.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKArray.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKBacktrace.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKCtd.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKCtl.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKExec.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKHash.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKLog.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKNum.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKRand.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKRun.3.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/LTKTrg.3.gz
→
%{_mandir}/man3/LTK*.3.*
- includes go to the devel package:
%files devel
%{_includedir}/%{name}.%{version}
%{_includedir}/%{name}
- The unversioned library goes to devel subpackage too:
%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so
- Why do you repeat: mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man3 several times? It
only needs to be created once. Try simplify the copy code too
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man3
cp -a man/LTK*.3 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man3/
- This is not good:
%build
make NAME=%{name} VERSION=%{version}
You need to make sure that Fedora build flags are respected while compiling:
We have %set_build_flags to define them but you also need to make sure that the
Makefile will respect these flags (CFLAGS, LDFLAGS). I checked the Makefile it
seems good so you just need to do:
%build
%set_build_flags
%make_build NAME=%{name} VERSION=%{version}
If possible use: %make_build to do // compilation:
%make_build NAME=%{name} VERSION=%{version}
- install -m 755 -D bin/lib%{name}.so
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.%{version}
This is not sufficient to set a SONAME, it's just create a link. Setting a
soname is mandatory in Fedora, generally ask upstream to do it, or if they
refuse, add it to your Fedora package. Should be something like:
gcc -shared -fPIC -Wl,-soname,libfoo.so.1 -o libfoo.so.1.0.0 foo.c
when building your package. Patch the Makefile to add your SONAME if upstream
is not responsive.
- Use install -p to keep timestamps.
- Feel free to link to COPR build for your SPEC and SRPM (just don't delete
them)
- Feel free to converse in French if needed.
- Separate your changelog entries with a newline
- Add version-release number to your changelog entries
- Main package should be named libLTK. The same name to be used for the SPEC
filename, the bug report name and the Name: of the SPEC.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853858] Review Request: badwolf - Web Browser which aims at security and privacy over usability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853858
--- Comment #2 from Lyes Saadi ---
Hello :D!
Sorry for the mistakes, I should've self-reviewed the package before submitting
it.
Spec URL: https://lyessaadi.fedorapeople.org/badwolf/badwolf.spec
SRPM URL:
https://lyessaadi.fedorapeople.org/badwolf/badwolf-1.0.0-2.fc32.src.rpm
Copr Build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lyessaadi/badwolf/build/1527169/
Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46760118
> - There are some shenanigans with lang directories not being owned but I
> don't know what's the problem with the script. I've tried this:
>
> %find_lang Badwolf
> echo "%%dir %%{_datadir}/%%{name}/locale" >> Badwolf.lang
> for l in locale/*;
> do
> echo "%%dir %%{_datadir}/%%{name}/$l"
> echo "%%dir %%{_datadir}/%%{name}/$l/LC_MESSAGES"
> done >> Badwolf.lang
I really liked your approach for solving this!
After trying some more things, I found that this apparently also worked:
> %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/locale
> %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/locale/*
> %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES
I used it in the new version of the spec! What do you think?
Both seem to work fine, and I don't really have any preference for one or
another.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854281] Review Request: dlib - A modern C++ toolkit containing machine learning algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854281
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- In order to avoid unintentional soname bump, we discourage globbing the
major soname version, instead be more specific:
%{_libdir}/libdlib.so.19*
- Some MIT thing is shipped too, add it to the corresponding license field:
Expat License
-
dlib-19.20/docs/python/_static/jquery.js
dlib-19.20/docs/python/_static/underscore.js
- Use %global instead of %define:
[!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
Note: %define requiring justification: %define py_setup_args --no
USE_SSE4_INSTRUCTIONS
- Remove Sphinx build leftovers:
dlib-doc.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/doc/dlib-doc/docs/python/.buildinfo
- The documentation subpackage should be noarch
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Boost Software License
1.0", "Boost Software License 1.0", "*No copyright* Public domain",
"Public domain", "NTP License", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License", "zlib/libpng license", "Expat License", "*No copyright*
Creative Commons CC0 Universal 1.0 Public Domain Dedication". 3726
files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/dlib/review-dlib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0
[Bug 1693013] Review Request: perl-Test-RunValgrind - Tests that an external program is valgrind-clean
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693013 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||jples...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||perl-Test-RunValgrind-0.2.0 ||-1.fc31 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 18:02:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1658634] Review Request: perl-Games-Solitaire-Verify - Perl 5/CPAN distribution to verify solutions of Solitaire card games
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658634 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||jples...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||perl-Games-Solitaire-Verify ||-0.1900-1.fc30 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 18:01:09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843751] Review Request: cvise - Super-parallel Python port of the C-Reduce
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843751 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-bdcb8a4b8b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bdcb8a4b8b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1632545] Review Request: perl-WWW-xkcd - Synchronous and asynchronous interfaces to xkcd comics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632545 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||jples...@redhat.com Fixed In Version||perl-WWW-xkcd-0.009-1.fc30 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 17:58:02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853674] Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Util - Some utility routines related to module loading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853674 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Load-Util-0.003 ||-1.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 17:37:07 --- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854357] Review Request: golie - A client/server implementation of ROLIE protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854357 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1852631] Review Request: python-flask-compress - Compress responses in your Flask app with gzip or brotli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852631 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a03fe1bc4a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a03fe1bc4a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1852631] Review Request: python-flask-compress - Compress responses in your Flask app with gzip or brotli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852631 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e82bf47c8a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e82bf47c8a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853650] Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNamesLite-WWW - WWW color names and equivalent RGB values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853650 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Graphics-ColorNamesLit ||e-WWW-1.14.000-1.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 17:26:25 --- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854351] Review Request: golang-github-gocomply-scap - A GO module of the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) Specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854351 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853669] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Pattern-Perl - Regexp patterns related to Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853669 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Regexp-Pattern-Perl-0. ||002-1.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 17:14:17 --- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853674] Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Util - Some utility routines related to module loading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853674 Bug 1853674 depends on bug 1853669, which changed state. Bug 1853669 Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Pattern-Perl - Regexp patterns related to Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853669 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854468] Review Request: rust-libcryptsetup-rs - high level Rust bindings for libcryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854468 John Baublitz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 17:10:47 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853644] Review Request: perl-ColorThemeBase-Static - Base class for color theme modules with static list of items
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853644 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-ColorThemeBase-Static- ||0.008-1.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 17:05:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854390] Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading HRTFs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854390
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- %exclude is for assigning files within different subpackage, it's not for
removing files from build (Panu's wisdom 42)
Instead rm the file in %install.
- Not needed anymore but for EPEL7: %ldconfig_scriptlets
Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issues before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License", "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License",
"*No copyright* Expat License", "zlib/libpng license". 135 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/libmysofa/review-libmysofa/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[Bug 1845667] Review Request: qxmledit - Powerful XML editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845667 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a250d662e6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a250d662e6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1845297] Review Request: jgmenu - A simple X11 menu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845297 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-368d4a4b1a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-368d4a4b1a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853634] Review Request: perl-Color-ANSI-Util - Routines for dealing with ANSI colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853634 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Color-ANSI-Util-0.164- ||1.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 16:55:17 --- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854268] Review Request: opencsd - ARM coresight debug and trace decoder library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854268 Paul Whalen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pwha...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pwha...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Paul Whalen --- I'll do the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854392] Review Request: gstreamer1-doc - GStreamer 1.0 documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854392
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Don't mix tabs and spaces (tab line 10)
- add a full stop for the description
- %dir %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/GStreamer-%{majorminor}/ is not needed, it is
redundant with %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/GStreamer-%{majorminor}/
- It includes libraries under MIT
Expat License
-
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/devhelp/books/GStreamer/assets/css/bootstrap-toc.min.css
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/devhelp/books/GStreamer/assets/css/custom_bootstrap.css
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/devhelp/books/GStreamer/assets/js/bootstrap-toc.min.js
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/devhelp/books/GStreamer/assets/js/bootstrap.js
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/devhelp/books/GStreamer/assets/js/jquery.js
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/devhelp/books/GStreamer/assets/js/jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/devhelp/books/GStreamer/assets/js/scrollspy.js
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/html/assets/css/bootstrap-toc.min.css
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/html/assets/css/custom_bootstrap.css
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/html/assets/js/bootstrap-toc.min.js
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/html/assets/js/bootstrap.js
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/html/assets/js/jquery.js
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/html/assets/js/jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
gstreamer-docs-1.17.2/html/assets/js/scrollspy.js
Add the license to the License field and explain the breakdown
- Shouldn't that whole package be noarch?
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GPL (v3)", "Expat
License", "GNU Lesser General Public License (v2.1 or later)", "*No
copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License". 163176 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/gstreamer1-doc/review-
gstreamer1-doc/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must
[Bug 1854268] Review Request: opencsd - ARM coresight debug and trace decoder library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854268 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson --- I've sponsored Jeremy, I work with him regularly on things in Fedora. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853087] Review Request: rust-libcryptsetup-rs-sys - low level Rust bindings for libcryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853087 John Baublitz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 14:30:58 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853634] Review Request: perl-Color-ANSI-Util - Routines for dealing with ANSI colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853634 Bug 1853634 depends on bug 1853629, which changed state. Bug 1853629 Summary: Review Request: perl-Color-RGB-Util - Utilities related to RGB colors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853629 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853629] Review Request: perl-Color-RGB-Util - Utilities related to RGB colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853629 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Color-RGB-Util-0.601-1 ||.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 15:10:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853644] Review Request: perl-ColorThemeBase-Static - Base class for color theme modules with static list of items
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853644 Bug 1853644 depends on bug 1853629, which changed state. Bug 1853629 Summary: Review Request: perl-Color-RGB-Util - Utilities related to RGB colors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853629 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854468] Review Request: rust-libcryptsetup-rs - high level Rust bindings for libcryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854468 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-libcryptsetup-rs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854468] Review Request: rust-libcryptsetup-rs - high level Rust bindings for libcryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854468 --- Comment #2 from John Baublitz --- Ok the changes have been applied, thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854468] Review Request: rust-libcryptsetup-rs - high level Rust bindings for libcryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854468
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- You must install the license file with %license in files devel and should
install the %doc as well:
%files devel
%license LICENSE
%doc README.md
%{cargo_registry}/%{crate}-%{version_no_tilde}/
- Latest version packaged
- Builds in mock
- No rpmlint errors
- Conforms to Packaging Guidelines
Package approved. Please fix the installation of the license before import.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830767] Re-Review Request: retext - Simple editor for Markdown and reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830767 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin --- No it's good Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853669] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Pattern-Perl - Regexp patterns related to Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853669 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Regexp-Pattern-Perl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854468] New: Review Request: rust-libcryptsetup-rs - high level Rust bindings for libcryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854468 Bug ID: 1854468 Summary: Review Request: rust-libcryptsetup-rs - high level Rust bindings for libcryptsetup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jbaubl...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jbaublitz/rust-libcryptsetup-rs/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01523563-rust-libcryptsetup-rs/rust-libcryptsetup-rs.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jbaublitz/rust-libcryptsetup-rs/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01523563-rust-libcryptsetup-rs/rust-libcryptsetup-rs-0.4.2-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: High level Rust bindings for libcryptsetup Fedora Account System Username: jbaublitz Here is the successful koji build for this crate: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46748407 This is the higher level version of rust-libcryptsetup-rs-sys which I just got into rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853650] Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNamesLite-WWW - WWW color names and equivalent RGB values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853650 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Graphics-ColorNamesLite-WWW -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843751] Review Request: cvise - Super-parallel Python port of the C-Reduce
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843751 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cvise -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1845297] Review Request: jgmenu - A simple X11 menu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845297 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jgmenu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1845667] Review Request: qxmledit - Powerful XML editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845667 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qxmledit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1852631] Review Request: python-flask-compress - Compress responses in your Flask app with gzip or brotli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852631 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-compress -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830767] Re-Review Request: retext - Simple editor for Markdown and reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830767
--- Comment #5 from José Matos ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4)
> - Why are you using:
>
> %{__python3} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot}
>
>
> instead of %py3_install?
Honestly? :-)
Because this is a re-review and I have reused the original spec file.
I will change it, do you want me to submit a new version just with this change?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853674] Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Util - Some utility routines related to module loading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853674 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Load-Util -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853644] Review Request: perl-ColorThemeBase-Static - Base class for color theme modules with static list of items
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853644 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ColorThemeBase-Static -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853634] Review Request: perl-Color-ANSI-Util - Routines for dealing with ANSI colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853634 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Color-ANSI-Util -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853629] Review Request: perl-Color-RGB-Util - Utilities related to RGB colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853629 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Color-RGB-Util -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1843751] Review Request: cvise - Super-parallel Python port of the C-Reduce
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843751
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #5)
> - Remove the Rpath:
>
> cvise.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> /usr/libexec/cvise/clang_delta ['/usr/lib64']
>
> Maybe try -DCMAKE_SKIP_BUILD_RPATH=TRUE first or nuke it with chrpath. See
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_removing_rpath
-DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=TRUE helped:
$ readelf -Wd clang_delta
# no RPATH
> - %{_libexecdir}/cvise/clex is listed twice
Fixed.
> Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issues before import.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1845297] Review Request: jgmenu - A simple X11 menu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845297
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License",
"GPL (v2)", "GNU General Public License", "Expat License", "GNU Lesser
General Public License (v3 or later)", "GNU Lesser General Public
License (v2 or later)", "NTP License (legal disclaimer)", "GPL (v2 or
later)", "GNU General Public License (v2)". 363 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/jgmenu/review-jgmenu/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/libexec/jgmenu
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager
[Bug 1854392] New: Review Request: gstreamer1-doc - GStreamer 1.0 documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854392 Bug ID: 1854392 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer1-doc - GStreamer 1.0 documentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: wtaym...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://people.freedesktop.org/~wtay/SPECS/gstreamer1-doc.spec SRPM URL: https://people.freedesktop.org/~wtay/SRPMS/gstreamer1-doc-1.17.2-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: GStreamer 1.0 plugin documentation and manuals Fedora Account System Username: wtaymans The GStreamer project recommends shipping their prebuild documentation instead of building our own per module documentation blob. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853120] Review request: zlib-ng - a zlib implementation with optimizations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853120 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Consider using to the new cmake macros, %cmake_build and %cmake_install instead of %make_build and %make_install This change is currently applied to F33: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854390] New: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading HRTFs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854390 Bug ID: 1854390 Summary: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading HRTFs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kwiz...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libmysofa.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libmysofa-1.1-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: C functions for reading HRTFs Fedora Account System Username: kwizart koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46743724 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1830767] Re-Review Request: retext - Simple editor for Markdown and reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830767
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Why are you using:
%{__python3} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot}
instead of %py3_install?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1845667] Review Request: qxmledit - Powerful XML editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845667 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1852631] Review Request: python-flask-compress - Compress responses in your Flask app with gzip or brotli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852631 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Sponsored. I sent you a mail with instructions on what to do next. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853217] Review Request: ServiceReport - a tool to validate and repair system configuration for specific purposes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853217 --- Comment #8 from Sourabh Jain --- Hello Robert-André, Thanks for your support. > I tried to mail you but the mail got rejected: Apologies for the inconvenience, I am facing some issue with my email. Thanks, Sourabh Jain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853217] Review Request: ServiceReport - a tool to validate and repair system configuration for specific purposes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853217 Vasant Hegde changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hegdevas...@in.ibm.com --- Comment #7 from Vasant Hegde --- repo creation request : https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26877 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26878 Note that I will maintain this package until Sourabh gets sponsor. -Vasant -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1845667] Review Request: qxmledit - Powerful XML editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845667
--- Comment #4 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> - gzip install_scripts/environment/man/%{name}.1
>
> Do not gzip the manpage yourself, it is handled by RPM
>
> - Do not use .gz extension for man page as the compression may change in
> the future, use a glob instead:
>
> %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.*
Fixed.
> - libraries should be installed with 0755. It is needed for them to be
> stripped and detected as a Provides.
>
> %attr(0644,-,-) %{_libdir}/libQXmlEdit{Sessions,Widget}.so.*
Fixed.
> - This was not fixed as intended:
>
> > - In order to avoid unintentional soname bump, we recommend not globbing
> > the major soname version, instead be more specific:
> >
> The major soname version is 0, so unglob that part:
>
> %{_libdir}/libQXmlEdit*.so.0*
Fixed.
SPEC: https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qxmledit/qxmledit.spec
(old SPEC:
https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qxmledit/qxmledit-0.9.15.2.spec)
SRPM:
https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qxmledit/qxmledit-0.9.15-3.fc32.src.rpm
Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46737986
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854357] New: Review Request: golie - A client/server implementation of ROLIE protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854357 Bug ID: 1854357 Summary: Review Request: golie - A client/server implementation of ROLIE protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sluka...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/golie/golie.spec SRPM URL: https://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/golie/golie-0-0.1.20200702git9dd93d8.fc31.src.rpm Description: A client/server implementation of ROLIE written in GO Fedora Account System Username: isimluk Depends on: bug 1854351 Successful build in copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/isimluk/gocomply/build/1516551/ Copy of Upstream tarball: https://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/golie/golie-9dd93d88181d5c73097761848231426343a01667.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854351] Review Request: golang-github-gocomply-scap - A GO module of the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) Specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854351 Šimon Lukašík changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1853474 --- Comment #1 from Šimon Lukašík --- *** Bug 1853449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853474 [Bug 1853474] golie: A client/server implementation of ROLIE written in GO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854351] New: Review Request: golang-github-gocomply-scap - A GO module of the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) Specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854351 Bug ID: 1854351 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-gocomply-scap - A GO module of the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) Specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sluka...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/gocomply/scap/golang-github-gocomply-scap.spec SRPM URL: https://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/gocomply/scap/golang-github-gocomply-scap-0-0.1.20200702git27dcc4e.fc31.src.rpm Description: A GO module of the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) Specification. Fedora Account System Username: isimluk Successful build in copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/isimluk/gocomply/build/1516520/ Copy of Upstream tarball: https://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/gocomply/scap/scap-27dcc4e20641d934c885afd57b1ccd0e20e0cb5c.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1845297] Review Request: jgmenu - A simple X11 menu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845297
--- Comment #4 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> - Not needed anymore:
> %post
> %postun
Fixed.
> - Source0:
> https://github.com/johanmalm/%{name}/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz#/%{name}-
> %{version}.tar.gz
> →
> Source0:
> https://github.com/johanmalm/%{name}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.
> tar.gz
Fixed.
> - Don't use the .gz extension for man pages but a glob * as compression may
> change in the future
Fixed.
SPEC: https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jgmenu/jgmenu.spec
(old SPEC: https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jgmenu/jgmenu-4.2.1-2.spec)
SRPM: https://tieugene.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jgmenu/jgmenu-4.2.1-3.fc32.src.rpm
Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46736299
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853622] Review Request: perl-Test-RandomResult - Test that results of a running code look random
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853622 --- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853674] Review Request: perl-Module-Load-Util - Some utility routines related to module loading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853674 --- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26876 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853669] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Pattern-Perl - Regexp patterns related to Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853669 --- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26875 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853650] Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNamesLite-WWW - WWW color names and equivalent RGB values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853650 --- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26874 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853644] Review Request: perl-ColorThemeBase-Static - Base class for color theme modules with static list of items
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853644 --- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova --- You are right, I'll remove perl(Exporter) https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26873 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853634] Review Request: perl-Color-ANSI-Util - Routines for dealing with ANSI colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853634 --- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26872 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853622] Review Request: perl-Test-RandomResult - Test that results of a running code look random
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853622 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-RandomResult-0.00 ||1-1.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-07 07:01:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853629] Review Request: perl-Color-RGB-Util - Utilities related to RGB colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853629 Bug 1853629 depends on bug 1853622, which changed state. Bug 1853622 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-RandomResult - Test that results of a running code look random https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853622 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
