[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 Taniyakhan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||taniyakhan7...@gmail.com --- Comment #142 from Taniyakhan --- Gurgaon Call Girls will give you an erotic service which you have never experienced before. You will get amazing services with well educated and highly experienced Call Girls in Gurgaon working with this agency. https://www.dlfgurgaoncallgirls.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416455] Review Request: python-easywatch - super simple directory monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416455 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added CC|m...@fabian-affolter.ch | Flags|needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol | |ter.ch) | --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Athos Ribeiro from comment #3) > Hi Fabio, still interested on this one? Hmm, I'm not the reporter. Looks like that this review is not going on (-> You can't ask Fabio Alessandro Locati because that account is disabled.). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810048] Review Request: netbeans-l10n - Internationalization support for NetBeans IDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810048 Priya Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added CC||priyabeti2...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Priya Sharma --- Best High Profile Call Girls In Gurgaon Stress, anxiety, and work load are the bye products of financial and professional woes. When you are in stress, Gurgaon Call Girls service can work like your stress buster. As a result, there has been a significant increase in the number of spas and salons in Gurgaon with hot and sexy Call Girls, and they also provide Call Girls service in Gurgaon. https://muskangirlsdwarka.in/ https://muskangirlsdwarka.in/high-profile-call-girls-gurgaon/ https://rishikeshgirls.in/ https://rishikeshgirls.in/call-girls-in-dehradun/ https://rishikeshgirls.in/call-girls-in-gurgaon/ https://rishikeshgirls.in/call-girls-in-haridwar/ https://www.singledate.in/ https://is.gd/luQu50 https://is.gd/1vqYl7 https://is.gd/0pv0Y0 https://is.gd/D72b9B https://is.gd/n5pwiX https://is.gd/xJtpML https://is.gd/tV2P4P https://rb.gy/nutcqy https://rb.gy/ykgxut https://rb.gy/nzcoxq https://rb.gy/x3veue https://rb.gy/jqydsg https://rb.gy/mlt8yi https://rb.gy/x3cf4d http://t.ly/qQqn http://t.ly/ZF1K http://t.ly/gceP http://t.ly/MAa2 http://t.ly/o9Mo http://t.ly/YXJh http://t.ly/AvyV https://bit.ly/2YXiBCo https://bit.ly/327Mthp http://bit.ly/2Qei8qZ https://bit.ly/38LhwAX https://bit.ly/3030CtE https://bit.ly/3egniM3 http://bit.ly/35axdOU -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #141 from Priya Sharma --- https://muskangirlsdwarka.in/ Best High Profile Call Girls In Gurgaon Stress, anxiety, and work load are the bye products of financial and professional woes. When you are in stress, Gurgaon Call Girls service can work like your stress buster. As a result, there has been a significant increase in the number of spas and salons in Gurgaon with hot and sexy Call Girls, and they also provide Call Girls service in Gurgaon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854202] Review Request: golang-github-instrumenta-kubeval - Validate your Kubernetes configuration files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854202
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Package APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com(golang-github-dnsimple-devel, golang-
github-nrdcg-namesilo-devel, golang-github-jackpal-gateway-devel,
golang-github-kagami-avif-devel, golang-github-sap-hdb-devel, golang-
[...]
golang-github-reiver-oi-devel, golang-github-marten-seemann-
chacha20-devel, golang-github-fortytw2-leaktest-devel, golang-github-
chzyer-test-devel, golang-github-okzk-sdnotify-devel)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 14 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
Note: Could not download Source0:
https://github.com/instrumenta/kubeval/archive/0.15.0/kubeval-0.15.0.tar.gz
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/SourceURL/
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[Bug 1856163] Review Request: python-vcversioner - Use version control tags to discover version numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856163
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter ---
- Please modify the description. Perhaps something like this:
One can write a setup.py with no version information specified. vcversioner
will find a recent, properly-formatted VCS tag and extract a version from it.
It's much more convenient to be able to use your version control system's
tagging mechanism to derive a version number than to have to duplicate that
information all over the place.
- License file is missing. Consider to switch to the upstream tarball which
contains the license file.
- There are also tests available (test_vcversioner.py).
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "ISC License". 6 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1856163-python-
vcversioner/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on
[Bug 1265759] Review Request: mingw-drmingw - Just-in-Time (JIT) debugger for MinGW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265759 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-drmingw -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 851819] Review Request: mingw-sparsehash - MinGW Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851819 --- Comment #16 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-sparsehash -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856163] New: Review Request: python-vcversioner - Use version control tags to discover version numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856163 Bug ID: 1856163 Summary: Review Request: python-vcversioner - Use version control tags to discover version numbers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-vcversioner.spec SRPM URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-vcversioner-2.16.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Use version control tags to discover version numbers Fedora Account System Username: itamarjp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849384] Review Request: swappy - Wayland native snapshot editing tool, inspired by Snappy on macOS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849384 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8a4d68c884 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-8a4d68c884` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8a4d68c884 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844803] Review Request: scanless - An online port scan scraper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844803 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8e3b867045 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840314] Review Request: ldeep - LDAP enumeration utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840314 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-95a2e09ca0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840298] Review Request: ldapdomaindump - Active Directory information dumper via LDAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840298 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-99b35bb08b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856139] New: Review Request: python-flask-pymongo - PyMongo support for Flask applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856139 Bug ID: 1856139 Summary: Review Request: python-flask-pymongo - PyMongo support for Flask applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flask-pymongo.spec SRPM URL: https://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flask-pymongo-2.3.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: PyMongo support for Flask applications Fedora Account System Username: itamarjp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1795079] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-stm - Software Transactional Memory in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795079 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ddc261863e has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849291] Review Request: golang-github-btcsuite-btcutil-base58 - API for encoding and decoding to and from the modified base58 encoding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849291 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-560bdc0420 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853035] Review Request: golang-github-snowflakedb-gosnowflake - Go Snowflake Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853035 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-62d291b12c has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853047] Review Request: golang-github-jedib0t-pretty - Pretty print Tables and more in golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853047 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-823bc937ec has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802362] Review Request: golang-github-viant-assertly - Arbitraty datastructure validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802362 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a216f58794 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853049] Review Request: golang-uber-config - Configuration for Go applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853049 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5215d24ab3 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853048] Review Request: golang-github-xwb1989-sqlparser - SQL Parser implemented in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853048 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e3e6a78782 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1836559] Review Request: python-promise - Promises/A+ implementation for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836559 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5074720caf has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851634] Review Request: python-niapy - Micro framework for building nature-inspired algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851634 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5f74771618 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844308] Review Request: python-uvicorn - The lightning-fast ASGI server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844308 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto --- I think you can continue this review now -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844308] Review Request: python-uvicorn - The lightning-fast ASGI server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844308 Bug 1844308 depends on bug 1668058, which changed state. Bug 1668058 Summary: python-uvloop-0.14.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668058 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1844308] Review Request: python-uvicorn - The lightning-fast ASGI server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844308 Bug 1844308 depends on bug 1798863, which changed state. Bug 1798863 Summary: python-httptools-0.1.1 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798863 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855986] Review Request: python-wavio - Read and write WAV files as numpy arrays
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855986 --- Comment #2 from Artur Iwicki --- Most of the python modules I've packaged so far weren't purelib. I got confused and forgot that sitearch and sitelib are two different things. Fixed. spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/python-wavio-0.0.4-2/python-wavio.spec srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/python-wavio-0.0.4-2/python-wavio-0.0.4-2.fc32.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47080415 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 533763] Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Spec filename and bug report should match the SPEC name:
Name: tex-cjwltx
Choose either tex-cjwltx or tex-cjw. Make all the same name: the SPEC filename,
and this bug title as it will determine the repo name too.
- Can safely remove this now:
%{!?_texmf: %global _texmf %(eval "echo `kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN'`")}
Package is approved but you need to choose the name you are going to use
*before* requesting the repo.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
Note: tex-cjw.spec should be tex-cjwltx.spec
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_spec_file_naming
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[-]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages
[Bug 533763] Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763 --- Comment #13 from W. Michael Petullo --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/tex-cjw.spec SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/tex-cjwltx-20090907-4.fc32.src.rpm - Use global, not define - Use predefined macros - Run the TeX Live macros -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851405] Review Request: libbee2 - cryptographic library which implements cryptographic algorithm and protocols standardized in Belarus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851405 --- Comment #21 from Кощеев --- Thank you and Björn 'besser82' Esser, you have helped me a lot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1855984] Review Request: python-simpleaudio - Simple, asynchronous, cross-platform audio playback module for Python3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855984
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 24 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/python-simpleaudio/review-python-
simpleaudio/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named
[Bug 1855986] Review Request: python-wavio - Read and write WAV files as numpy arrays
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855986
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- What does that do? Why do you need to install it in %{python3_sitearch}
innstead of %{python3_sitelib}?
--install-purelib %{python3_sitearch}/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||zebo...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-12 18:57:33 --- Comment #20 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Olivier Samyn from comment #19) > I initially proposed in 2011 to revive and maintain the deprecated abcMIDI > package; see BZ715127. > That bug report was closed in favour if this one, and it seems the original > reporter lost interest in becoming a maintainer. > > Since 2011, I started maintaining a copr version of that package which in > time seemed more easy than become an official package maintainer, > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/oleastre/abcMIDI/ > > Now if someone would like to guide me how to get sponsorship, and how to > become and official package maintainer, I would be happy to get this back in > Fedora. > > I already read : > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group > > But those process seems to be quite long and I'm afraid to have to spend > 2h-3h/day reading emails from 4 different mailing lists and review an > undefined number of packages before I can get this simple one back in Fedora. > > So, help needed. Package was revived recently https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/abcMIDI If you want to contribute, see if that maintainer is interested in collborating and sponsoring you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1245852] Review Request: mingw-lua51 - MinGW Windows Library providing Lua 5.1 programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245852
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Still want a review?
- Group: not used in Fedora.
- Not needed anymore
%{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc}
- Please document the patches: add a comment for each patch explaining why
they are needed
- [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment.
See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools
AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found
--
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL found in: lua-5.1.5/configure.ac:10
Patch this with LT_INIT
Package is approved, please fix the aforementioned issues before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 125 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/mingw-lua51/review-mingw-
lua51/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
mingw32-lua51 , mingw32-lua51-static , mingw64-lua51 ,
mingw64-lua51-static
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does
[Bug 1851405] Review Request: libbee2 - cryptographic library which implements cryptographic algorithm and protocols standardized in Belarus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851405 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Robert-André Mauchin --- The package is approved. You still need to find a sponsor: see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851405] Review Request: libbee2 - cryptographic library which implements cryptographic algorithm and protocols standardized in Belarus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851405 Кощеев changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: bee2 - |Review Request: libbee2 - |cryptographic library which |cryptographic library which |implements cryptographic|implements cryptographic |algorithm and protocols |algorithm and protocols |standardized in Belarus |standardized in Belarus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1851405] Review Request: bee2 - cryptographic library which implements cryptographic algorithm and protocols standardized in Belarus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851405 --- Comment #19 from Кощеев --- Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kashcheyeu/bee2/srpm-builds/01550991/libbee2.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kashcheyeu/bee2/srpm-builds/01550991/libbee2-2.0.5-9.20200706git7afea8b.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1652944] Review Request: simbody - Multi-body dynamics and physics library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652944 Till Hofmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(thofmann@fedorapr | |oject.org) | Last Closed||2020-07-12 17:23:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1652944] Review Request: simbody - Multi-body dynamics and physics library
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Till Hofmann has canceled Package Review 's request for Till Hofmann 's needinfo: Bug 1652944: Review Request: simbody - Multi-body dynamics and physics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652944 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 533763] Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763
--- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Spec filename and bug report should match the SPEC name:
Name: tex-cjwltx
- Use global not define
- %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(eval "echo `kpsewhich -expand-var
'$TEXMFMAIN'`")}
Use the predefined macros:
%_texmf_main = /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist
%global texpkgcjwltx
%global texpkgdir %{_texmf_main}/tex/latex/%{texpkg}
%global texpkgdoc %{_texmf_main}/doc/latex/%{texpkg}
- Run the Texlive macros:
%post
%texlive_post
%postun
%texlive_postun
%posttrans
%texlive_posttrans
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1850262] Review Request: kissat - Keep It Simple SAT solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850262 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James --- Upstream has fixed both the 32-bit and big endian issues, so I'm building from a git snapshot now. I've also changed the release number to reflect that fact. Macros are in place to help manage the library soname. New URLs: Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/kissat/kissat.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/kissat/kissat-0-0.1.20200704gitbaef460.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 533763] Review Request: tex-cjw - LaTeX class for writing resumes and cover letters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533763 --- Comment #11 from W. Michael Petullo --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/tex-cjw.spec SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/tex-cjwltx-20090907-3.fc32.src.rpm - Remove use of defattr - Remove rm -rf of buildroot - Remove use of Group - Update Source0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1245852] Review Request: mingw-lua51 - MinGW Windows Library providing Lua 5.1 programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245852 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l | |inuxnetz.de)| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1245852] Review Request: mingw-lua51 - MinGW Windows Library providing Lua 5.1 programming language
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Robert Scheck has canceled Package Review 's request for Robert Scheck 's needinfo: Bug 1245852: Review Request: mingw-lua51 - MinGW Windows Library providing Lua 5.1 programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245852 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 890772] Review Request: tvlsim - Travel Market Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890772 --- Comment #12 from Denis Arnaud --- Yes, I'm still very much interested in that review to be completed (normally, it should now have become a no-brainer, as the latest iteration cleared the concerns; see #10). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 890772] Review Request: tvlsim - Travel Market Simulator
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Denis Arnaud has canceled Package Review 's request for Felix Kaechele 's needinfo: Bug 890772: Review Request: tvlsim - Travel Market Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890772 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 890772] Review Request: tvlsim - Travel Market Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890772 Denis Arnaud changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(fe...@kaechele.ca | |) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1389404] Review Request: python-flask-pymongo - PyMongo support for Flask applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389404 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(david.hannequin@g | |mail.com) | Last Closed||2020-07-12 11:59:43 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1833854] Review Request: input-wacom - Linux kernel driver for Wacom devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833854 --- Comment #3 from ar...@unizar.es --- It is working now. (In reply to artal from comment #2) > Apparently there is a delay in updating these drivers. A Wacom One tablet > works in Fedora only as graphic tablet, the screen is recognized but it does > not work. It works in Ubuntu 20.04 and it also works in Fedora 32 after > following the instructions in > https://github.com/linuxwacom/input-wacom/wiki/Installing-input-wacom-from- > source -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416455] Review Request: python-easywatch - super simple directory monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416455 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Flags||needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol ||ter.ch) --- Comment #3 from Athos Ribeiro --- Hi Fabio, still interested on this one? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1389404] Review Request: python-flask-pymongo - PyMongo support for Flask applications
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Athos Ribeiro has canceled Package Review 's request for Athos Ribeiro 's needinfo: Bug 1389404: Review Request: python-flask-pymongo - PyMongo support for Flask applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389404 --- Comment #8 from Athos Ribeiro --- Hi David, Are you still interested in proceeding with this one? ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1389404] Review Request: python-flask-pymongo - PyMongo support for Flask applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389404 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(athoscribeiro@gma |needinfo?(david.hannequin@g |il.com) |mail.com) --- Comment #8 from Athos Ribeiro --- Hi David, Are you still interested in proceeding with this one? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1332267] Review Request: golang-github-heketi-tests - Test utility functions for golang
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Athos Ribeiro has canceled Package Review 's request for Athos Ribeiro 's needinfo: Bug 1332267: Review Request: golang-github-heketi-tests - Test utility functions for golang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332267 --- Comment #5 from Athos Ribeiro --- Resetting due to submitter being unresponsive. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1332267] Review Request: golang-github-heketi-tests - Test utility functions for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332267 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|athoscribe...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | |needinfo?(athoscribeiro@gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #5 from Athos Ribeiro --- Resetting due to submitter being unresponsive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1463492] Review Request: koko - container connector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463492 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(athoscribeiro@gma |needinfo?(s1061...@gmail.co |il.com) |m) --- Comment #28 from Athos Ribeiro --- Hi, What is the state on this one? It has been a while. Are you still interested in packaging koko? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1463492] Review Request: koko - container connector
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Athos Ribeiro has canceled Package Review 's request for Athos Ribeiro 's needinfo: Bug 1463492: Review Request: koko - container connector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463492 --- Comment #28 from Athos Ribeiro --- Hi, What is the state on this one? It has been a while. Are you still interested in packaging koko? ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376659] Review Request: golang-github-franela-goreq - Minimal and simple request library for Go language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376659 Bug 1376659 depends on bug 1376660, which changed state. Bug 1376660 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-franela-goblin - Minimal and Beautiful Go testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376660 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376660] Review Request: golang-github-franela-goblin - Minimal and Beautiful Go testing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376660 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review- |needinfo?(athoscribeiro@gma | |il.com) | Last Closed||2020-07-12 08:00:03 --- Comment #3 from Athos Ribeiro --- This is already packaged. I could not find the review request BZ though. See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-franela-goblin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1376660] Review Request: golang-github-franela-goblin - Minimal and Beautiful Go testing framework
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Athos Ribeiro has canceled Package Review 's request for Athos Ribeiro 's needinfo: Bug 1376660: Review Request: golang-github-franela-goblin - Minimal and Beautiful Go testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376660 --- Comment #3 from Athos Ribeiro --- This is already packaged. I could not find the review request BZ though. See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-franela-goblin ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1297011] Review Request: rubygem-mimemagic - Fast mime detection by extension or content
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Athos Ribeiro has canceled Package Review 's request for Athos Ribeiro 's needinfo: Bug 1297011: Review Request: rubygem-mimemagic - Fast mime detection by extension or content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297011 --- Comment #3 from Athos Ribeiro --- This has been packaged in Fedora a while ago. See BZ#1574973 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1574973 *** ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1574973] Review Request: rubygem-mimemagic - Fast mime detection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574973 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1206855 CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com --- Comment #6 from Athos Ribeiro --- *** Bug 1297011 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206855 [Bug 1206855] rubygem-hipchat-1.6.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297011] Review Request: rubygem-mimemagic - Fast mime detection by extension or content
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297011 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review- |needinfo?(athoscribeiro@gma | |il.com) | Last Closed||2020-07-12 07:55:28 --- Comment #3 from Athos Ribeiro --- This has been packaged in Fedora a while ago. See BZ#1574973 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1574973 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1442576] Review Request: golang-github-restic-chunker - Implementation of Content Defined Chunking
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Athos Ribeiro has canceled Package Review 's request for Athos Ribeiro 's needinfo: Bug 1442576: Review Request: golang-github-restic-chunker - Implementation of Content Defined Chunking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442576 --- Comment #5 from Athos Ribeiro --- The submitter did not respond to the first review in 2017. This has already been packaged in Fedora and I will close this of a dup of bz#1592482 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1592482 *** ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442576] Review Request: golang-github-restic-chunker - Implementation of Content Defined Chunking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442576 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review- |needinfo?(athoscribeiro@gma | |il.com) | Last Closed||2020-07-12 07:52:09 --- Comment #5 from Athos Ribeiro --- The submitter did not respond to the first review in 2017. This has already been packaged in Fedora and I will close this of a dup of bz#1592482 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1592482 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1592482] Review Request: golang-github-restic-chunker - Implementation of Content Defined Chunking (CDC) in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592482 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) CC||p...@phib.io --- Comment #6 from Athos Ribeiro --- *** Bug 1442576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
