[Bug 1880953] Review Request: python-nocaselist - A case-insensitive list for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880953 Andreas Maier changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pywbem/nocaselist/andy/fedora-packaging/packaging/fedora/python-nocaselist.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pywbem/nocaselist/andy/fedora-packaging/packaging/fedora/python-nocaselist-1.0.2-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: A case-insensitive list for Python Fedora Account System Username: andymaier This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. I am also the upstream maintainer of the Python package at https://github.com/pywbem/nocaselist. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881285] New: Review Request: python-nocasedict - A case-insensitive ordered dictionary for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881285 Bug ID: 1881285 Summary: Review Request: python-nocasedict - A case-insensitive ordered dictionary for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: andreas.r.ma...@gmx.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pywbem/nocasedict/andy/fedora-packaging/packaging/fedora/python-nocasedict.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/pywbem/nocasedict/blob/andy/fedora-packaging/packaging/fedora/python-nocasedict-1.0.0-1.fc34.src.rpm?raw=true Description: A case-insensitive ordered dictionary for Python Fedora Account System Username: andymaier This is my first package (along with python-nocaselist) and I am seeking a sponsor. I am also the upstream maintainer of the Python package at https://github.com/pywbem/nocasedict. This package is a dependency of the latest version of the existing 'pywbem' package on Fedora, but it is generally useable and useful. Latest RPM builds: Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51995594 COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andymaier/python-nocasedict/build/1680593/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880765] Review Request: python-flask-healthz - Module to easily add health endpoints to a Flask application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880765 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7f2b0adcb7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7f2b0adcb7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880765] Review Request: python-flask-healthz - Module to easily add health endpoints to a Flask application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880765 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7f2b0adcb7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7f2b0adcb7 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8f259c1a02 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8f259c1a02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881231] Review Request: rust-buf-min - Minimal buffer traits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881231 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881231] Review Request: rust-buf-min - Minimal buffer traits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881231 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1844054 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844054 [Bug 1844054] rust-v_escape-0.12.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881231] New: Review Request: rust-buf-min - Minimal buffer traits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881231 Bug ID: 1881231 Summary: Review Request: rust-buf-min - Minimal buffer traits Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-buf-min.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-buf-min-0.1.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Minimal buffer traits Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51982272 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880695] Review Request: python-readlike - Readline-like line editing module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880695 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-66ea85f510 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-66ea85f510 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1877893] Review Request: dbus-parsec - DBus PARSEC interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877893 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-91532104d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-91532104d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880694] Review Request: python-reparser - Simple regex-based lexer/parser for inline markup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880694 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-4066dd25b8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4066dd25b8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636 --- Comment #19 from Jie Kang --- I updated jmc and jmc-core license and added a comment. I've made sure owasp-java-encoder spec has a correct changelog entry. I also did a test build of jmc on top of jakarta-mail [1] here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jkang/blob/builds/ [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880735 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636 Jie Kang changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/jmc/raw/ursine/f/jmc.spec SRPM URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/jmc/raw/ursine/f/jmc-7.1.1-6.fc34.src.rpm Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/jmc-core/raw/ursine/f/jmc-core.spec SRPM URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/jmc-core/raw/ursine/f/jmc-core-7.1.1-5.fc34.src.rpm Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/directory-maven-plugin/raw/ursine/f/directory-maven-plugin.spec SRPM URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/directory-maven-plugin/raw/ursine/f/directory-maven-plugin-0.3.1-2.fc34.src.rpm Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/owasp-java-encoder/raw/ursine/f/owasp-java-encoder.spec SRPM URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/owasp-java-encoder/raw/ursine/f/owasp-java-encoder-1.2.2-4.fc34.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jkang This is to unretire the master branch for these previously module-only packages for https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2406 jmc jmc-core directory-maven-plugin owasp-java-encoder Goal is to deliver jmc via ursine packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636 --- Comment #18 from Miro Hrončok --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #17) > owasp-java-encoder is APPROVED But please fix the changelog entry: > Rpmlint > --- > Checking: owasp-java-encoder-1.2.2-4.fc34.noarch.rpm > owasp-java-encoder-javadoc-1.2.2-4.fc34.noarch.rpm > owasp-java-encoder-1.2.2-4.fc34.src.rpm > owasp-java-encoder.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.2.-4 > ['1.2.2-4.fc34', '1.2.2-4'] > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > > Rpmlint (installed packages) > > owasp-java-encoder.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.2.-4 > ['1.2.2-4.fc34', '1.2.2-4'] > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636
--- Comment #17 from Miro Hrončok ---
owasp-java-encoder is APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License". 15 files have unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[?]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
Checking:
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636 --- Comment #16 from Miro Hrončok --- (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #14) > (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #13) > > I wonder where is "UPL or BSD-3" coming from, should it be "UPL and BSD" > > instead? > > The README.md for jmc sources has: "The Mission Control source code is made > available under the Universal Permissive License (UPL), Version 1.0 or a > BSD-style license, alternatively. The full open source license text is > available at license/LICENSE.txt in the JMC project." > > And generally I was following dual licence scenario in: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/ > LicensingGuidelines#Dual_Licensing_Scenarios In that case I strongly suggest to explain the situation in a comment. Also, the license identifier is BSD, not BSD-3. BTW That link is outdated, please use https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_dual_licensing_scenarios -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636
--- Comment #15 from Miro Hrončok ---
directory-maven-plugin is APPROVED:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Apache License 2.0". 2 files have
unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: directory-maven-plugin-0.3.1-2.fc34.noarch.rpm
directory-maven-plugin-javadoc-0.3.1-2.fc34.noarch.rpm
[Bug 1881183] Review Request: freeorion - Turn-based space empire and galactic conquest (4X) computer game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881183 josef radinger changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from josef radinger --- diff from last version to actual version: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/temp/freeorion.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881183] New: Review Request: freeorion - Turn-based space empire and galactic conquest (4X) computer game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881183 Bug ID: 1881183 Summary: Review Request: freeorion - Turn-based space empire and galactic conquest (4X) computer game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: che...@nosuchhost.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/temp/freeorion.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/32/SRPMS/freeorion-0.4.10-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: freeorion got retired due to using python2 only. This changed with 0.4.10, therefore we want to revive freeorion. Fedora Account System Username: cheese -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881169] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881169 --- Comment #3 from Alex Macdonald --- Created attachment 1715573 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715573=edit rpmlint - rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881169] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881169 --- Comment #2 from Alex Macdonald --- Created attachment 1715572 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715572=edit rpmlint - srpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881169] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881169 --- Comment #1 from Alex Macdonald --- Created attachment 1715571 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715571=edit rpmlint - spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881169] New: Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881169 Bug ID: 1881169 Summary: Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: almac...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/almac/rpms/lz4-java/blob/master/f/lz4-java.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/almac/lz4-java/fedora-33-x86_64/01680271-lz4-java/lz4-java-1.7.1-5.fc33.src.rpm Description: This is my first package. I am seeking a sponsor. This package is currently orphaned and unmaintained. LZ4 compression for Java, based on Yann Collet's work. This library provides access to two compression methods that both generate a valid LZ4 stream: * fast scan (LZ4): ° low memory footprint (~ 16 KB), ° very fast (fast scan with skipping heuristics in case the input looks incompressible), ° reasonable compression ratio (depending on the redundancy of the input). * high compression (LZ4 HC): ° medium memory footprint (~ 256 KB), ° rather slow (~ 10 times slower than LZ4), ° good compression ratio (depending on the size and the redundancy of the input). The streams produced by those 2 compression algorithms use the same compression format, are very fast to decompress and can be decompressed by the same decompressor instance. Fedora Account System Username: almac Successful Copr Build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/almac/lz4-java/build/1680271/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881168] Review Request: cpptasks - Compile tasks for Apache Ant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881168 --- Comment #2 from Alex Macdonald --- Created attachment 1715569 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715569=edit rpmlint - srpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881168] Review Request: cpptasks - Compile tasks for Apache Ant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881168 --- Comment #3 from Alex Macdonald --- Created attachment 1715570 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715570=edit rpmlint - rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881168] Review Request: cpptasks - Compile tasks for Apache Ant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881168 --- Comment #1 from Alex Macdonald --- Created attachment 1715568 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715568=edit rpmlint - spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881168] New: Review Request: cpptasks - Compile tasks for Apache Ant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881168 Bug ID: 1881168 Summary: Review Request: cpptasks - Compile tasks for Apache Ant Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: almac...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/almac/rpms/cpptasks/blob/master/f/cpptasks.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/almac/lz4-java/fedora-33-x86_64/01680266-cpptasks/cpptasks-1.0b5-26.fc33.src.rpm Description: This is my first package. I am seeking a sponsor. This package is currently orphaned and unmaintained. This ant task can compile various source languages and produce executables, shared libraries (aka DLL's) and static libraries. Compiler adaptors are currently available for several C/C++ compilers, FORTRAN, MIDL and Windows Resource files. Fedora Account System Username: almac Successful Copr Build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/almac/lz4-java/build/1680266/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881167] Review Request: mvel - MVFLEX Expression Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881167 --- Comment #3 from Alex Macdonald --- Created attachment 1715567 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715567=edit rpmlint - rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881167] Review Request: mvel - MVFLEX Expression Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881167 --- Comment #1 from Alex Macdonald --- Created attachment 1715565 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715565=edit rpmlint - spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881167] Review Request: mvel - MVFLEX Expression Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881167 --- Comment #2 from Alex Macdonald --- Created attachment 1715566 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715566=edit rpmlint - srpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1881167] New: Review Request: mvel - MVFLEX Expression Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881167 Bug ID: 1881167 Summary: Review Request: mvel - MVFLEX Expression Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: almac...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/almac/rpms/mvel/blob/master/f/mvel.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/almac/lz4-java/fedora-33-x86_64/01680269-mvel/mvel-2.3.2-3.fc33.src.rpm Description: This is my first package. I am seeking a sponsor. This package is currently orphaned and unmaintained. MVEL is a powerful expression language for Java-based applications. It provides a plethora of features and is suited for everything from the smallest property binding and extraction, to full blown scripts. Fedora Account System Username: almac Successful Copr Build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/almac/lz4-java/build/1680269/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636 --- Comment #14 from Jie Kang --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #13) > I wonder where is "UPL or BSD-3" coming from, should it be "UPL and BSD" > instead? The README.md for jmc sources has: "The Mission Control source code is made available under the Universal Permissive License (UPL), Version 1.0 or a BSD-style license, alternatively. The full open source license text is available at license/LICENSE.txt in the JMC project." And generally I was following dual licence scenario in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Dual_Licensing_Scenarios -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636 --- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok --- I wonder where is "UPL or BSD-3" coming from, should it be "UPL and BSD" instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636 Jie Kang changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/jmc/raw/ursine/f/jmc.spec SRPM URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/jmc/raw/ursine/f/jmc-7.1.1-6.fc34.src.rpm Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/jmc-core/raw/ursine/f/jmc-core.spec SRPM URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/jmc-core/raw/ursine/f/jmc-core-7.1.1-4.fc34.src.rpm Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/directory-maven-plugin/raw/ursine/f/directory-maven-plugin.spec SRPM URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/directory-maven-plugin/raw/ursine/f/directory-maven-plugin-0.3.1-1.fc34.src.rpm Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/owasp-java-encoder/raw/ursine/f/owasp-java-encoder.spec SRPM URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jkang/rpms/owasp-java-encoder/raw/ursine/f/owasp-java-encoder-1.2.2-3.fc34.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jkang This is to unretire the master branch for these previously module-only packages for https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2406 jmc jmc-core directory-maven-plugin owasp-java-encoder Goal is to deliver jmc via ursine packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636 --- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok --- (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #11) > (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #8) > > - There is no %check section. > > For these projects what would you expect in the %check section? I believe > the unit tests are run during %build and they generally don't provide tests > that act on the result. I don't expect anything in particular, I'd just thought to point that out, since I'm used to packages with %checks (with either unit tests or a smoke test) and packages SHOULD have %check sections. If unit tests run during %build, disregard that comment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880695] Review Request: python-readlike - Readline-like line editing module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880695 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-readlike -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880694] Review Request: python-reparser - Simple regex-based lexer/parser for inline markup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880694 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-reparser -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880663] Review Request: python-pyduofern - Library for controlling Rademacher DuoFern actors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880663 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyduofern -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880636] Review Request: jmc module rpms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636 --- Comment #11 from Jie Kang --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #8) > - There is no %check section. For these projects what would you expect in the %check section? I believe the unit tests are run during %build and they generally don't provide tests that act on the result. I'll have updated spec and srpms shortly that address the rest, minus javamail. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880694] Review Request: python-reparser - Simple regex-based lexer/parser for inline markup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880694 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880663] Review Request: python-pyduofern - Library for controlling Rademacher DuoFern actors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880663
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for your feedback.
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1)
> > Name: python-%{pypi_name}
> > Version:0.34.0
>
> Version 0.34.1 was recently released:
> https://github.com/gluap/pyduofern/releases/tag/v0.34.1
>
> Tested in COPR:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andymenderunix/python-iot/build/
> 1678740/
Upstream fixed some things and change the release process to make the life of
packagers easier.
> > License:GPLv2+
>
> A very minor thing, but I think the license is just "GPLv2" according to
> upstream: https://github.com/gluap/pyduofern/blob/master/license.txt
The file header says:
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1840632] Review Request: python-pymc3 - Exploratory analysis of Bayesian models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632 --- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pymc3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880765] Review Request: python-flask-healthz - Module to easily add health endpoints to a Flask application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880765 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-healthz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1796401] Review Request: python-requre - REQuest REcording your python code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796401 Jan Ščotka changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jsco...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #11 from Jan Ščotka --- Hi, I'll do it as soon as possible, to finish this BZ. Thanks for reminder Honza -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks very much. SCM requested now :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1879291] Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and applications in the browser from Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Charalampos Stratakis --- Great, everything looks good :) Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 Jessica Brite changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jessicabr...@elesb.net --- Comment #157 from Jessica Brite --- How about changing the contents of the directory is it gonna help? I am new to it so please do leet me know if I am wrong. http://herambachandracollege.ac.in/blog/hotmail-login/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 yogaessence changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yogaessencerishikesh09@gmai ||l.com --- Comment #192 from yogaessence --- today i am trying to update to 8.0.3 without netbeans-flatform. i get an error msg : Here is Error Msg : https://yogaessencerishikesh.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880953] Review Request: python-nocaselist - A case-insensitive list for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880953 Andreas Maier changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pywbem/nocaselist/andy/fedora-packaging/packaging/fedora/python-nocaselist.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pywbem/nocaselist/andy/fedora-packaging/packaging/fedora/python-nocaselist-1.0.2-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: A case-insensitive list for Python Fedora Account System Username: andymaier This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880953] Review Request: python-nocaselist - A case-insensitive list for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880953 Andreas Maier changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pywbem/nocaselist/andy/fedora-packaging/packaging/fedora/python-nocaselist.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pywbem/nocaselist/andy/fedora-packaging/packaging/fedora/python-nocaselist-1.0.2-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: A case-insensitive list for Python Fedora Account System Username: andymaier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880953] New: Review Request: python-nocaselist - A case-insensitive list for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880953 Bug ID: 1880953 Summary: Review Request: python-nocaselist - A case-insensitive list for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: andreas.r.ma...@gmx.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pywbem/nocaselist/andy/fedora-packaging/packaging/fedora/python-nocaselist.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pywbem/nocaselist/andy/fedora-packaging/packaging/fedora/python-nocaselist-1.0.2-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: A case-insensitive list for Python Fedora Account System Username: andymaier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #191 from shruti989 --- Also great site here with all of the Valuable information which you have. Keep up the good work you are doing here. https://css-tricks.com/forums/users/shrutigoyalesservice/ https://impression3d.laposte.fr/fr/utilisateurs/shrutigoyalesservice https://www.producthunt.com/@shruti_goyal https://speakerdeck.com/shruti989 http://www.webestools.com/profile-259964.html https://www.intensedebate.com/people/shruti9891 http://www.folkd.com/user/shruti989 https://payhip.com/shruti989 https://works.bepress.com/shruti-goyal/ https://www.steinberg.net/forums/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile=265593 https://www.question2answer.org/qa/user/shruti989 http://forum.yealink.com/forum/member.php?action=profile=127042 https://fontlibrary.org/en/member/shruti989/ https://ello.co/shruti989 https://network.changemakers.com/profiles/100795592367758602649 https://worldcosplay.net/member/914173 https://www.bakespace.com/members/profile/shruti989/891771/ http://knsz.prz.edu.pl/forum/member.php?action=profile=566258 https://www.youmagine.com/shruti-goyal/designs https://subrion.org/members/info/shruti989.html https://poptype.co/shruti-goyal/ludhiana-call-girls-agency-shruti https://myapple.pl/users/343200-shruti-goyal http://czechtribe.com/profile/shruti989 https://community.onsen.io/user/shruti989 https://www.woddal.com/shruti989 http://www.rohitab.com/discuss/user/107020-shruti989/ https://torgi.gov.ru/forum/user/profile/1162483.page http://cpsustentaveis.planejamento.gov.br/forum/profile/89395/shruti989 https://anchor.fm/shruti-goyal31 https://soundcloud.com/shruti-goyal-469023223 https://www.reverbnation.com/artist/shrutigoyal?kick=282259 https://www.flickr.com/people/190085965@N02/ https://www.wattpad.com/user/shruti9891 https://weheartit.com/shrutigoyalesservice https://www.crokes.com/shruti989/profile/ https://ficwad.com/a/shruti989 https://www.deviantart.com/shruti989/about#about https://oneway.com/shruti989# https://www.zoimas.com/profile/shruti989/about https://nap-sack.com/shruti989 https://switter.at/@shruti989 http://www.soleermetico.com/social/user/shruti989 https://bresdel.com/shruti989 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 shruti989 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shrutigoyalesservice@gmail. ||com --- Comment #190 from shruti989 --- Happy to come this website https://www.shrutigoyal.co.in -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1880721] Review Request: hydroxide - A third-party, open-source ProtonMail bridge
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880721 proletarius...@protonmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
