[Bug 1909468] Review Request: vdr-extrecmenung - VDR plugin for extended recording menu NG

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909468

MartinKG  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from MartinKG  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "Unknown or
 generated". 70 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/martin/rpmbuild/SPECS/vdr-
 extrecmenung/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[-]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
 See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
 guidelines/SourceURL/
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
 Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Sources are 

[Bug 1884608] Review Request: dosbox-staging - DOS/x86 emulator focusing on ease of use

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884608



--- Comment #15 from Kamil Páral  ---
Patryk, at this point I believe you should ask for a different package
reviewer/sponsor on the devel list [1]. I'm sure François means well, but he
clearly isn't responsive enough to move this forward :-/

[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911565] Review Request: snebu-1.1.1-1 - Simple Network Encrypting Backup Utility

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911565

Derek Pressnall  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911565] New: Review Request: snebu-1.1.1-1 - Simple Network Encrypting Backup Utility

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911565

Bug ID: 1911565
   Summary: Review Request: snebu-1.1.1-1 - Simple Network
Encrypting Backup Utility
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: dere...@needcaffeine.net
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://github.com/derekp7/snebu/releases/download/v1.1.1/snebu.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/derekp7/snebu/releases/download/v1.1.1/snebu-1.1.1-1.fc33.src.rpm
Description: Snebu is a backup system for Linux which supports single-host
installs or server-based installs.  It supports arbitrarily named retention
schedules (typically "daily", "weekly", "monthly", etc), compression,
encryption, file-level de-duplication (across multiple clients), granular user
access permissions, client-initiated push or server-initiated pull backups, and
agent-less client backups.

See https://www.snebu.com.

Fedora Account System Username: derekp

Other info: I am a first-time Fedora package contributor, and require
sponsorship.  I am also the upstream package author / maintainer.

Koji test scratch build URL:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58580246


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1872427] Review Request: ec2-hibinit-agent - support for hibernation for Amazon ec2

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427

David Duncan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co
   ||m)



--- Comment #34 from David Duncan  ---
@ngomp...@gmail.com 

https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/ec2-hibinit-agent-1.0.3-3.fc33.src.rpm
Updated Spec file: https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/ec2-hibinit-agent.spec


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1872427] Review Request: ec2-hibinit-agent - support for hibernation for Amazon ec2

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co |
   |m)  |



--- Comment #33 from Neal Gompa  ---
I need both the spec file and the SRPM updated, otherwise fedora-review will
choke on it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1887671] Review Request: golang-github-redteampentesting-monsoon - Fast HTTP enumerator

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887671

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-12-30 01:38:16



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-6168b864e4 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1893562] Review Request: golang-github-muesli-crunchy - Finds common flaws in passwords

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893562

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-12-30 01:38:15



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-2c9bef21fd has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1888167] Review Request: golang-nanomsg-mangos-3 - Golang implementation of nanomsg's "Scalablilty Protocols"

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888167

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-12-30 01:37:14



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-d47e59b0c5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6b516c40dc has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-19aff91fad has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1910991] Review Request: PyQt-builder - The PEP 517 compliant PyQt build system

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910991

José Matos  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from José Matos  ---
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #2)
> Good question. Those dll files are for pyqt-bundler which allows someone to
> bundle os stuff in their windows binary. Some of them are openssl, and some
> of them are microsoft visual basic (redistributable). They aren't made from
> source, and I don't think too many people will be using this package on
> linux to build and bundle windows binaries, so I am fine with just dropping
> them. 
> 
> I did look and opensuse ships them. Debian doesn't seem to package
> pyqt-builder at all, so no help there. 
> 
> New version, with dlls removed:
> 
> Spec URL:
> https://scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/review/PyQt-builder/PyQt-builder.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/review/PyQt-builder/PyQt-builder-1.6.0-2.
> fc34.src.rpm

My view point was from the license angle, at most that status should have been
declared in the spec file. :-)
Something like BSD and Redistributable or something equivalent.

Honestly I trust your judgement here. :-)
The package is approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1908042] Review Request: material-icons-fonts - Google material design system icons

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908042



--- Comment #7 from Jerry James  ---
(In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #6)
> Per guidelines on your spec files:
> 
> BuildRequires: libappstream-glib
> 
> On %install or %check
> 
> appstream-util validate-relax --nonet
> %{buildroot}%{_metainfodir}/org.fedoraproject.material-icons-fonts.metainfo.
> xml

Oh, right.  I did forget that.  Although one would hope that Fedora's font
macros would generate valid appstream metadata. :-)  New URLs:

Spec URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/material-icons-fonts/material-icons-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/material-icons-fonts/material-icons-fonts-4.0.0-2.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1910990] Review Request: python-sgmllib3k - python3 copy of sgmllib

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910990



--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Oops. Very sorry about the typo there. :( 

Will fix those things up! Thanks for the review!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1910991] Review Request: PyQt-builder - The PEP 517 compliant PyQt build system

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910991



--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Good question. Those dll files are for pyqt-bundler which allows someone to
bundle os stuff in their windows binary. Some of them are openssl, and some of
them are microsoft visual basic (redistributable). They aren't made from
source, and I don't think too many people will be using this package on linux
to build and bundle windows binaries, so I am fine with just dropping them. 

I did look and opensuse ships them. Debian doesn't seem to package pyqt-builder
at all, so no help there. 

New version, with dlls removed:

Spec URL: https://scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/review/PyQt-builder/PyQt-builder.spec
SRPM URL:
https://scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/review/PyQt-builder/PyQt-builder-1.6.0-2.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1872427] Review Request: ec2-hibinit-agent - support for hibernation for Amazon ec2

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427

David Duncan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co
   ||m)



--- Comment #32 from David Duncan  ---
@ngomp...@gmail.com 
https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/ec2-hibinit-agent-1.0.3-3.fc33.src.rpm updated
with the content modifications for sleep-handler.sh and 00-hibinitagent.conf


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1807981] Review Request: dnstwist - domain name permutation engine

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807981



--- Comment #13 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  ---
*** Bug 1910983 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1910983] Review Request: dnstwist - Domain name permutation engine

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910983

Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||fed...@svgames.pl
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2020-12-29 21:05:07



--- Comment #1 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  ---
dnstwist is already packaged for Fedora:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnstwist

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1807981 ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911500] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911500

Igor Raits  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-12-29 21:05:04




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911500] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911500
Bug 1911500 depends on bug 1867357, which changed state.

Bug 1867357 Summary: Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google 
Cloud Platform collection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867360] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867360
Bug 1867360 depends on bug 1867357, which changed state.

Bug 1867357 Summary: Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google 
Cloud Platform collection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867357] Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google Cloud Platform collection

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357

Igor Raits  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed|2020-11-03 00:45:24 |2020-12-29 21:04:23




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911500] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911500

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa  ---
Review notes:

* Package follows packaging guidelines
* Package builds and installs correctly
* Licensing is correctly marked and license files are installed


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867357] Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google Cloud Platform collection

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357



--- Comment #11 from Igor Raits  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ansible-collection-google-cloud


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911500] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911500

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa  ---
Taking this review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867357] Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google Cloud Platform collection

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa  ---
It seems like everything has been addressed from the earlier review.

PACKAGE APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867357] Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google Cloud Platform collection

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
 Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)  |
   Assignee|andymenderu...@gmail.com|ngomp...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa  ---
Taking this review.



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response
should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911500] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911500



--- Comment #1 from Igor Raits  ---
New Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/ansible-collection-community-general.spec
New SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/ansible-collection-community-general-1.3.1-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867357] Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google Cloud Platform collection

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357



--- Comment #8 from Igor Raits  ---
New Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/ansible-collection-google-cloud.spec
New SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/ansible-collection-google-cloud-1.0.1-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867360] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867360
Bug 1867360 depends on bug 1867357, which changed state.

Bug 1867357 Summary: Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google 
Cloud Platform collection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |NEW
 Resolution|NOTABUG |---




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911500] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911500
Bug 1911500 depends on bug 1867357, which changed state.

Bug 1867357 Summary: Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google 
Cloud Platform collection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |NEW
 Resolution|NOTABUG |---




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867357] Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google Cloud Platform collection

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357

Igor Raits  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |NEW
 Resolution|NOTABUG |---
   Keywords||Reopened




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911500] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911500

Igor Raits  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1867357
   ||(ansible-collection-google-
   ||cloud)
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357
[Bug 1867357] Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google Cloud
Platform collection
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867357] Review Request: ansible-collection-google-cloud - Google Cloud Platform collection

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867357

Igor Raits  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1911500
   ||(ansible-collection-communi
   ||ty-general)





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911500
[Bug 1911500] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules
and plugins supported by Ansible community
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911500] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911500

Igor Raits  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1907155





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907155
[Bug 1907155] F34FailsToInstall: ansible-collection-netbox-netbox
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911500] New: Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911500

Bug ID: 1911500
   Summary: Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general -
Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: igor.ra...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/ansible-collection-community-general.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/ansible-collection-community-general-1.0.0-1.fc34.src.rpm
Description:
Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867360] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867360

Igor Raits  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias|ansible-collection-communit |
   |y-general   |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1867360] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-general - Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867360



--- Comment #7 from Igor Raits  ---
New Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/ansible-collection-community-general.spec
New SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/ansible-collection-community-general-1.0.0-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1908042] Review Request: material-icons-fonts - Google material design system icons

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908042



--- Comment #6 from Luya Tshimbalanga  ---
Hi Jerry,

(In reply to Jerry James from comment #5)
> Hi Luya.  I don't understand.  The binary package contains
> /usr/share/metainfo/org.fedoraproject.material-icons-fonts.metainfo.xml,
> which has a ... definition.  If you are
> asking for something else, I don't know what it is.

Per guidelines on your spec files:

BuildRequires: libappstream-glib

On %install or %check

appstream-util validate-relax --nonet
%{buildroot}%{_metainfodir}/org.fedoraproject.material-icons-fonts.metainfo.xml

See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/#_app_data_validate_usage


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911012] Review Request: R-gert - Simple Git Client for R

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911012



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-gert


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1911002] Review Request: R-zip - Cross-Platform 'zip' Compression

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911002



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-zip


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1909468] Review Request: vdr-extrecmenung - VDR plugin for extended recording menu NG

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909468



--- Comment #3 from Peter Bieringer  ---
utf8: fixed
defattr: fixed

Spec URL(updated file): ftp://ftp.bieringer.de/pub/tmp/vdr-extrecmenung.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8622/58548622/vdr-extrecmenung-2.0.5-3.fc33.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1909468] Review Request: vdr-extrecmenung - VDR plugin for extended recording menu NG

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909468



--- Comment #2 from MartinKG  ---
please remove %defattr

- Drop %%defattr no longer needed with rpmbuild >= 4.4.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1909468] Review Request: vdr-extrecmenung - VDR plugin for extended recording menu NG

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909468

MartinKG  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mgans...@online.de
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mgans...@online.de
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from MartinKG  ---
I will take the review.

$ rpmlint -v vdr-extrecmenung.spec
/home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/vdr-extrecmenung-2.0.5-1.fc33.src.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/vdr-extrecmenung-2.0.5-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/vdr-extrecmenung-debuginfo-2.0.5-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/vdr-extrecmenung-debugsource-2.0.5-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm
vdr-extrecmenung.spec: I: checking
vdr-extrecmenung.spec: I: checking-url
https://gitlab.com/kamel5/extrecmenung/-/archive/v2.0.5/extrecmenung-v2.0.5.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
vdr-extrecmenung.src: I: checking
vdr-extrecmenung.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US extrecmenu ->
extremeness
vdr-extrecmenung.src: I: checking-url https://gitlab.com/kamel5/extrecmenung
(timeout 10 seconds)
vdr-extrecmenung.src: I: checking-url
https://gitlab.com/kamel5/extrecmenung/-/archive/v2.0.5/extrecmenung-v2.0.5.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
vdr-extrecmenung.x86_64: I: checking
vdr-extrecmenung.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US extrecmenu ->
extremeness
vdr-extrecmenung.x86_64: I: checking-url https://gitlab.com/kamel5/extrecmenung
(timeout 10 seconds)
vdr-extrecmenung.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/vdr-extrecmenung/HISTORY
vdr-extrecmenung-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
vdr-extrecmenung-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url
https://gitlab.com/kamel5/extrecmenung (timeout 10 seconds)
vdr-extrecmenung-debugsource.x86_64: I: checking
vdr-extrecmenung-debugsource.x86_64: I: checking-url
https://gitlab.com/kamel5/extrecmenung (timeout 10 seconds)
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

please add to prep section:
iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 HISTORY > HISTORY.utf8 ; mv HISTORY.utf8 HISTORY


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org