[Bug 1910504] Review Request: libucl - Universal configuration library parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910504 --- Comment #11 from Timothée Floure --- Spec URL: https://paste.sr.ht/blob/4cc7741a92b9e6c153e22c907dee186348be1530 SRPM URL: https://paste.gnugen.ch/paste/54wq Here's an updated SRPM URL (the previous one expired) as mentionned on the sway-sig mailing list. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944117] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-no-overview - GNOME Shell extension for no overview at startup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944117 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-no-overview -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946365] Review Request: butane - Butane config transpiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946365 Jonathan Lebon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonat...@jlebon.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Lebon --- And now with my Fedora account. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946365] Review Request: butane - Butane config transpiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946365 Jonathan Lebon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpeg-xl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Built in COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/jpeg-xl/build/2123459/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpeg-xl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 Bug 1922638 depends on bug 1912726, which changed state. Bug 1912726 Summary: GCC11: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn when compiling jpeg-xl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912726 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpeg-xl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/jpeg-xl.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/jpeg-xl-0.3.7-1.fc35.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1906980] Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMDEfficient and performance-portable SIMD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980 --- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65535439 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1906980] Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMDEfficient and performance-portable SIMD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- (In reply to Egor Artemov from comment #1) > I'm not in the packagers group however has some recommendations: > Thanks for your informative review. > 1) Build fails on aarch64, s390x, and ppc64le. >It looks like you should list these architectures using the `ExcludeArch:` >tag, as per packaging guidelines. > >Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57335109 >Guideline: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > #_architecture_build_failures > I added a ExclusiveArch since ppc and s390 are not supposed to be supported. > 2) Since the package provides only a static library, it will be better to >package it as a `highway-devel` package with virtual '-static' provide as > per >packaging guidelines. >See: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static- > libraries Indeed, fixed. > 3) It seems documentation includes large PDF files like slides from the > presentation, >examples, and project skeleton >might be it is better to move them into the separate `-doc` package? > Done. > 4) It seems you shouldn't install all headers, that upstream installs. >As per > https://github.com/google/highway/blob/master/g3doc/quick_reference.md >The only public headers that should be installed are (with dependencies): > hwy/highway.h > hwy/base.h > hwy/foreach_target.h > hwy/aligned_allocator.h > hwy/cache_control.h > hwy/targets.h > hwy/ops/x86_128-inl.h > hwy/ops/x86_256-inl.h > hwy/ops/x86_512-inl.h > hwy/ops/arm_neon-inl.h > hwy/ops/wasm_128-inl.h > hwy/ops/scalar-inl.h > hwy/ops/shared-inl.h > hwy/set_macros-inl.h > >But looks like it is better to fire an issue upstream to fix > CMakeFiles.txt > I removed the non useful headers and filed a bug upstream. > 5) It seems it is better to move commands for tests running into `%check` > section. Done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1906980] Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMDEfficient and performance-portable SIMD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/highway.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/highway-0.11.1-1.fc35.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947685] New: Review Request: ocaml-atd - Static Types for Json APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685 Bug ID: 1947685 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-atd - Static Types for Json APIs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mic...@michel-slm.name QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/ocaml/ocaml-atd.spec SRPM URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/ocaml/ocaml-atd-2.2.1-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: ATD stands for Adaptable Type Definitions. It is a syntax for defining cross-language data types. It is used as input to generate efficient and type-safe serializers, deserializers and validators. The current target languages are OCaml and Java. The following opam packages are provided by the atd project: * atdgen: executable that generates OCaml code dealing with json and biniou data formats * atdj: executable that generates Java code dealing with json * atd: library for parsing atd files used by code generators Fedora Account System Username: salimma -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922797] Review Request: golang-github-goki-freetype - The Freetype font rasterizer in the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922797 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-goki-freetype -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941896] Review Request: rust-rudo - rudo is a small equivalent of sudo writen in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941896 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #13 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Sponsored. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947059] Review Request: python-interrogate - Interrogate a codebase for docstring coverage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947059 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-861fcdf259 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-861fcdf259 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-861fcdf259 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946660] Review Request: python-drgn - Scriptable debugger library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946660 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1df61eda3b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-1df61eda3b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1df61eda3b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1945909] Review Request: libkdumpfile - Kernel coredump file access
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945909 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1df61eda3b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-1df61eda3b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1df61eda3b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946060] Review Request: golang-github-cyberdotgent-route3270 - A simple 3270 application/connection router
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946060 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-cf08a83d02 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-cf08a83d02 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cf08a83d02 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944471] Review Request: golang-github-racingmars-go3270 - 3270 server library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944471 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-cf08a83d02 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-cf08a83d02 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cf08a83d02 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946660] Review Request: python-drgn - Scriptable debugger library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946660 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5dc35d48dd has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5dc35d48dd See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1945909] Review Request: libkdumpfile - Kernel coredump file access
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945909 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5dc35d48dd has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5dc35d48dd See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946365] Review Request: butane - Butane config transpiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946365
Jonathan Lebon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jle...@redhat.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Lebon ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No
copyright* Apache License 2.0", "Apache License 2.0", "Expat License",
"Expat License Apache License 2.0", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License", "ISC License". 134 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/jlebon/butane-
review/1946365-butane/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
- Package bundles a bunch of stuff. This is not new (we bundled before
the rename as well), and isn't special among golang-based packages.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 266240 bytes in 21 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in butane-
nonlinux
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: g
[Bug 1940937] Review Request: rpi-imager - Graphical user-interface to write disk images and format SD cards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940937 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-5926f0a056 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-5926f0a056` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5926f0a056 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947059] Review Request: python-interrogate - Interrogate a codebase for docstring coverage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947059 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-46d104aa13 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-46d104aa13 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-46d104aa13 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946151] Review Request: golang-github-pkg-diff - Create, modify, and print diffs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946151 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b5309245c8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-b5309245c8 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b5309245c8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946660] Review Request: python-drgn - Scriptable debugger library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946660 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-505a82b5ae has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-505a82b5ae \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-505a82b5ae See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1945909] Review Request: libkdumpfile - Kernel coredump file access
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945909 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-505a82b5ae has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-505a82b5ae \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-505a82b5ae See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946060] Review Request: golang-github-cyberdotgent-route3270 - A simple 3270 application/connection router
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946060 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1642119946 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-1642119946 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1642119946 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944471] Review Request: golang-github-racingmars-go3270 - 3270 server library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944471 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1642119946 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-1642119946 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1642119946 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941994] Review Request: cockpit-machines - Cockpit component for managing virtual machines (split out from existing cockpit package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941994 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-04-08 20:57:03 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f8e5a0b546 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941388] Review Request: softfloat - Berkeley IEEE Binary Floating-Point Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-2cb552bdcd has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942104] Review Request: ghc-hosc - Haskell Open Sound Control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942104 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1271ec83fd has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1906980] Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMDEfficient and performance-portable SIMD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1922638 (jpeg-xl) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 [Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpeg-xl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1941388] Review Request: softfloat - Berkeley IEEE Binary Floating-Point Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6bb1ba4bd0 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922638] Review Request: jpeg-xl - JPEG XL image format reference implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1906980 (highway) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980 [Bug 1906980] Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMDEfficient and performance-portable SIMD -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947239] Review Request: python-fixit - A lint framework that writes better Python code for you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947239 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-7cbebf83fb has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-7cbebf83fb` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7cbebf83fb See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947670] New: Review Request: Monocypher - Boring crypto that simply works
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947670 Bug ID: 1947670 Summary: Review Request: Monocypher - Boring crypto that simply works Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppola...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://gist.github.com/ppolakov/b51d20a4ee53d42719bbb7e280dd9370 SRPM URL: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/patrikp/Monocypher/ Description: Hello. This is my first package and I would be very thankful if somebody could review it. I am also in need of a sponsor. I have used rpmlint on the SPEC file, the Binary RPM, and the SRPM -- I am getting no errors and no warnings. I am also including a link for a successful koji build (for bonus points). Disclaimer: I am merely the packager, not the upstream maintainer. Fedora Account System Username: patrikp koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65520685 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947059] Review Request: python-interrogate - Interrogate a codebase for docstring coverage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947059 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-24e8b8e3ba has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-24e8b8e3ba \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-24e8b8e3ba See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947046] Review Request: uredir - UDP port redirector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947046 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-75c18c986f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-75c18c986f \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-75c18c986f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946060] Review Request: golang-github-cyberdotgent-route3270 - A simple 3270 application/connection router
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946060 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1f851acc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-1f851acc26 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1f851acc26 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940937] Review Request: rpi-imager - Graphical user-interface to write disk images and format SD cards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940937 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-fc63def3f8 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-fc63def3f8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fc63def3f8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1849303] Review Request: golang-storj-common - Storj common packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849303 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2021-04-08 20:25:24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1849305] Review Request: golang-storj-uplink - Storj network Go library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849305 Bug 1849305 depends on bug 1849303, which changed state. Bug 1849303 Summary: Review Request: golang-storj-common - Storj common packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849303 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1849305] Review Request: golang-storj-uplink - Storj network Go library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849305 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-04-08 20:22:02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1922797] Review Request: golang-github-goki-freetype - The Freetype font rasterizer in the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922797 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1834731] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer to Peer Cryptographic Currency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 --- Comment #70 from Warren Togami --- I looked into packaging Guix for Fedora. It would be possible but difficult. For now I give up on the reproducible build goal as that is a problem that needs to be solved for the entire Fedora build system. These are my remaining recommendations to align best with upstream's intent. * Fedora's package should be named "bitcoincore". It should conflict with "bitcoin". This would allow a popular feature-fork "bitcoinknots" would have the same binary and configuration files and would thus conflict with these other names. * Ask FESCO to disallow any package named "bitcoin". There are multiple reasons for this including unexpected upgrade conflicts with ways it was previously packaged. It is also convenient for distributors to entirely sidestep political fights over what has the right to be called "bitcoin". * Less important: Another upstream concern is the risk of old bitcoin binaries in the wild when Fedora goes EOL. The simplest safeguard is to ship a final RPM update before a Fedora release's EOL that simply removes the binary. We would ask FESCO if they're OK with this. Thoughts? FYI: Years ago the linked library dependencies were a terrible risk of causing consensus failure. It was beyond hypothetical risk, it actually happened to unmaintained clones who failed to heed CVE's. That previous risk was mostly mitigated by the removal of openssl. Upstream aims to eventually eliminate the boost dependency which would further reduce risk. In any case the risk is low enough now that it might be OK to ship in downstream distros. Don't mistake this as endorsement. I intend for upstream to distribute a reproducibly built RPM that would Epoch override the Fedora package for those who prefer static libraries exactly as tested by upstream. Upstream opposes automatic upgrades of Bitcoin Core so this would be a way for Fedora users to opt-in to upstream's recommended deployment method. This isn't Fedora's concern but just explaining the line of reasoning here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1945771] Review Request: weldr-client - command line utility for osbuild-composer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945771 Brian Lane changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com ||) --- Comment #8 from Brian Lane --- Spec URL: https://bcl.fedorapeople.org/weldr-client/weldr-client.spec SRPM URL: https://bcl.fedorapeople.org/weldr-client/weldr-client-35.0-3.fc32.src.rpm Description: Command line utility to control osbuild-composer Fedora Account System Username: bcl Thanks for your patience, I think this is now all cleaned up for Fedora at least. The rhel checks are there for RHEL9, which I hope is closer to Fedora behavior than RHEL8 was, but I haven't had a chance to setup a VM to test it on yet so I didn't change any of that. I don't think cobra/doc needs to be a separate BuildRequire, it comes from the same package as cobra. I did fix the testify modules though. In general how do you decide what to list in BuildRequires? I was using the go.mod direct dependencies as my guide, but obviously that doesn't match how Fedora is packaging things. Thanks for the explanation of the build flags, I rearranged the way I did because the Makefile needs to also work standalone so it's better to just duplicate things in the spec and pass them as part of GOBUILDFLAGS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947239] Review Request: python-fixit - A lint framework that writes better Python code for you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947239 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-7cbebf83fb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7cbebf83fb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947499] Review Request: rust-webbrowser - Open URLs in web browsers available on a platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947499 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-webbrowser -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1946151] Review Request: golang-github-pkg-diff - Create, modify, and print diffs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946151 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b5309245c8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b5309245c8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947239] Review Request: python-fixit - A lint framework that writes better Python code for you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947239 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||python-fixit-0.1.3-1.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947239] Review Request: python-fixit - A lint framework that writes better Python code for you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947239 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fixit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947088] Review Request: rust-oauth2 - Extensible, strongly-typed implementation of OAuth2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947088 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-oauth2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947239] Review Request: python-fixit - A lint framework that writes better Python code for you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947239 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo python-fixit 1947239 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33389 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947499] Review Request: rust-webbrowser - Open URLs in web browsers available on a platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947499 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947112] Review Request: golang-mvdan-sh-3 - A shell parser, formatter, and interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947112 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||golang-mvdan-sh-3-3.2.4-1.f ||c35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947499] New: Review Request: rust-webbrowser - Open URLs in web browsers available on a platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947499 Bug ID: 1947499 Summary: Review Request: rust-webbrowser - Open URLs in web browsers available on a platform Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jreim...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dentrassi.de/download/rust-webbrowser/rust-webbrowser.spec SRPM URL: https://dentrassi.de/download/rust-webbrowser/rust-webbrowser-0.5.5-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Open URLs in web browsers available on a platform. Fedora Account System Username: ctron -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947088] Review Request: rust-oauth2 - Extensible, strongly-typed implementation of OAuth2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947088 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947239] Review Request: python-fixit - A lint framework that writes better Python code for you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947239
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "Expat License Python
Software Foundation License version 2", "*No copyright* Expat
License". 66 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-fixit/review-python-
fixit/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Re
[Bug 1941896] Review Request: rust-rudo - rudo is a small equivalent of sudo writen in rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941896 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- I don't think this is necessary. Package approved. You still need to find a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944422] Review Request: rust-systemd - A rust interface to libsystemd/libelogind provided APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944422 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 --- Package approved. You still need to find a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947086] Review Request: ghc-tidal - Pattern language for improvised music
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947086 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-tidal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947112] Review Request: golang-mvdan-sh-3 - A shell parser, formatter, and interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947112 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-mvdan-sh-3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1686410] Review Request: R-nycflights13 - Flights that Departed NYC in 2013
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686410 David Clarx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clarxda...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from David Clarx --- Hi, If you have any query related to Allegiant Airlines Reservations, reach this website ( https://airlinesreservation.org/allegiant-airlines/ ) and get all the relevant information. You can also call at the toll-free number. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944658] Review Request: htppu - Hessu's Tampa Ping-Pong conversd URO modified version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944658 --- Comment #2 from Richard Lescak --- rpmlint found few warnings and error: htppu.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/htppu/convers.conf 640 htppu.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/htppu/ChangeLog ./doc/ChangeLog htppu.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/htppu/README ./doc/README htppu.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Hessu's -> Hess's, Hesse's, Hessian's htppu.x86_64: W: spelling-error rpmlint error: Rpmlint complains about readability of a file, if there is a specific reason for that (like a security reason), then it is fine I guess. rpmlint warnings: Packages contain both symbolic links and the files so I think that all warnings can be ignored, rest of them were just warnings from spell check. Except that, and mentioned missing license I didn't find anything. All looks fine to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940937] Review Request: rpi-imager - Graphical user-interface to write disk images and format SD cards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940937 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-fc63def3f8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fc63def3f8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1940937] Review Request: rpi-imager - Graphical user-interface to write disk images and format SD cards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940937 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-5926f0a056 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5926f0a056 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947046] Review Request: uredir - UDP port redirector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947046 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-75c18c986f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-75c18c986f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
