[Bug 1992931] Review Request: rubygem-image_size - Measure image size using pure Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992931 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru TASAKA --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36436 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36437 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36438 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36439 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 976793] Review Request: lunchbox - C++ library for multi-threaded programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976793 --- Comment #39 from Otto Urpelainen --- If you still wish to complete this, just reopen the bug when you have had time to look at my comments. I can still complete the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983841] Review Request: fatcat - FAT filesystems explore, extract, repair, and forensic tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983841 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-08-22 00:41:02 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-8829cca42c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986613] Review Request: iotools - Set of command line tools to access hardware device registers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986613 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-08-22 00:40:44 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-15a8abf296 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996325] Review Request: uvw - Header-only easy to use libuv C++ wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996325 --- Comment #1 from Petr Menšík --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74294942 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996325] New: Review Request: uvw - Header-only easy to use libuv C++ wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996325 Bug ID: 1996325 Summary: Review Request: uvw - Header-only easy to use libuv C++ wrapper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pemen...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/uvw.spec SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/uvw-2.9.0-2.fc36.src.rpm Description: Not used. Fedora Account System Username: pemensik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989300] Review Request: fontawesome5-fonts - Iconic font set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300
--- Comment #9 from Jerry James ---
I have added "%dir %{_datadir}/fontawesome5" to the web subpackage. I updated
the spec file and srpm at the URLs in comment 2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1977987] Review Request: anarch - minimalist first person shooter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977987 niohiani changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai ||l.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978188] Review Request: qt6ct - Qt6 - Configuration Tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978188
niohiani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai
||l.com)
--- Comment #7 from niohiani ---
The review of your most recent package leads me to believe that this is ready
for approval. If I could approve it myself, I would. I will update Ankur and
hopefully this can be moved through the pipeline soon.
---
Output below:
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such
a list, create one.
- Add your own remarks to the template checks.
- Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not
listed by fedora-review.
- Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this
case you could also file a bug against fedora-review
- Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines
in what you paste.
- Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint
ones are mandatory, though)
- Remove this text
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
file-validate if there is such a file.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD (2 clause)". 99 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
Public/FedReviews/review-qt6ct/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/lib64/qt6/plugins/platformthemes(qt6-qtbase)
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build
[Bug 1348932] Review Request: bash-git-prompt - An informative and fancy bash prompt for Git users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348932 Didik Supriadi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(shopkeeper88-fedo ||r...@yahoo.co.in) --- Comment #18 from Didik Supriadi --- Hi, It's been a while. Could you continue this process? If you have questions, just ask! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1396847] Review Request: screencloud - Easy to use screenshot sharing application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396847 Didik Supriadi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Last Closed||2021-08-21 15:51:54 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1823860] Review Request: golang-github-henvic-httpretty - Prints the HTTP requests you make with Go pretty on your terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823860 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-08-21 15:44:59 --- Comment #5 from Mattia Verga --- Package is available in repos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1314851] Review Request: novaclient-os-diskconfig - Disk Config extension for python-novaclient
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314851 Didik Supriadi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||didiksupriad...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(ricardo.cordeiro@ ||tux.com.pt) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1836768] Review Request: postfix-mta-sts-resolver - Daemon providing MTA-STS map to Postfix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836768 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-08-21 15:42:31 --- Comment #7 from Mattia Verga --- Package is available in repos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1883977] Review Request: llmnrd - Link-Local Multicast Resolution Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883977 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Last Closed||2021-08-21 15:41:35 --- Comment #6 from Mattia Verga --- Package is available in repos. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1581318] Review Request: python-requests-credssp - HTTPS CredSSP authentication using the requests library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581318 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Status|POST|CLOSED Last Closed||2021-08-21 15:38:52 --- Comment #5 from Mattia Verga --- Package is available in repos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987298] Review Request: stb - Single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 --- Comment #8 from Ben Beasley --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983745] Review Request: rust-ed25519-dalek - Fast and efficient ed25519 EdDSA key generations, signing, and verification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983745 Stuart D Gathman changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1981114 ||(rust-curve25519-dalek), ||1981119 (rust-ed25519) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981114 [Bug 1981114] Review Request: rust-curve25519-dalek - Pure-Rust implementation of group operations on ristretto255 and Curve25519 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981119 [Bug 1981119] Review Request: rust-ed25519 - Edwards Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) over Curve25519 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981114] Review Request: rust-curve25519-dalek - Pure-Rust implementation of group operations on ristretto255 and Curve25519
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981114 Stuart D Gathman changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1983745 ||(rust-ed25519-dalek) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983745 [Bug 1983745] Review Request: rust-ed25519-dalek - Fast and efficient ed25519 EdDSA key generations, signing, and verification -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981119] Review Request: rust-ed25519 - Edwards Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) over Curve25519
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981119 Stuart D Gathman changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1983745 ||(rust-ed25519-dalek) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983745 [Bug 1983745] Review Request: rust-ed25519-dalek - Fast and efficient ed25519 EdDSA key generations, signing, and verification -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983181] Review Request: python-google-cloud-storage - Python Client for Google Cloud Storage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983181 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ CC||ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Review notes: - Packaging follows naming guidelines - Package follows Python packaging guidelines - Package licensing is indicated correctly - Packaging builds and installs (when dependencies are installed and pre-populated in the chroot) - No serious issues from rpmlint PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983177] Review Request: python-google-resumable-media - Utilities for Google media downloads and resumable uploads
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983177 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Review notes: - Packaging follows naming guidelines - Package follows Python packaging guidelines - Package licensing is indicated correctly - Packaging builds and installs - No serious issues from rpmlint PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983176] Review Request: python-google-crc32c - Python wrapper for CRC32C hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983176 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ Status|NEW |POST CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Review notes: - Packaging follows naming guidelines - Package follows Python packaging guidelines - Package licensing is indicated correctly - Packaging builds and installs (when dependencies are installed and pre-populated in the chroot) - No serious issues from rpmlint PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1983175] Review Request: google-crc32c - CRC32C implementation with support for CPU-specific acceleration instructions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983175 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa --- Review notes: - Packaging follows naming guidelines - Package licensing is indicated correctly - Packaging builds and installs - No serious issues from rpmlint PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981114] Review Request: rust-curve25519-dalek - Pure-Rust implementation of group operations on ristretto255 and Curve25519
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981114 Stuart D Gathman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com ||) --- Comment #9 from Stuart D Gathman --- Several packages waiting on this. Eagerly looking for files to be imported. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938451] Review Request: stellarsolver - The Cross Platform Sextractor and Internal Astrometric Solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938451 Petr Menšík changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(lupinix.fedora@gm ||ail.com) --- Comment #12 from Petr Menšík --- Are you able to build stellarsolver against shared astrometry library as proposed in comment #11? Do you know any reason why it should not be linked that way? Would it work different way than with bundled static library? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989300] Review Request: fontawesome5-fonts - Iconic font set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300
--- Comment #8 from Wolfgang Ulbrich ---
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/fontawesome5
This is caused by fontawesome5-fonts-web sub-package which can be installed
without the main package (fontawesome5-fonts), which owns the directory.
Is this the intended behavior?
If yes, than the -web sub-package needs to own the directory too
```
%files web
%doc CHANGELOG.md README* UPGRADING.md
%license LICENSE.txt
%dir %{_datadir}/fontawesome5
%{_datadir}/fontawesome5/js/
%{_datadir}/fontawesome5/sprites/
%{_datadir}/fontawesome5/svgs/
```
This silences the warning.
Or you need to add a Requires to the -web sub-package, which pointed to the
main package.
Rest looks ok ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989300] Review Request: fontawesome5-fonts - Iconic font set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300 --- Comment #7 from Wolfgang Ulbrich --- Yeah, the problem is that dnf can't resolve the dependency at repos, because missing packages aren't at repos. I agree it is a fault by fedora-review-tool not to install all packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1984451] Review Request: apache-commons-text - Apache Commons Text is a library focused on algorithms working on strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984451 Didik Supriadi changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Didik Supriadi --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74260404 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1984451] Review Request: apache-commons-text - Apache Commons Text is a library focused on algorithms working on strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984451 Didik Supriadi changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://didiksupriadi41.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-text.spec SRPM URL: https://didiksupriadi41.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-text-1.9-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: The Commons Text library provides additions to the standard JDK's text handling. Our goal is to provide a consistent set of tools for processing text generally from computing distances between Strings to being able to efficiently do String escaping of various types. Fedora Account System Username: didiksupriadi41 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
