[Bug 2031585] Review Request: golang-github-gohugoio-localescompressed - Go library for compressed locales
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031585 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-d0acda7409 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031585 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2049772] Review Request: openrgb - Open source RGB lighting control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049772 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-4893b5ab17 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049772 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2068176] Review Request: python-google-cloud-common - Python Client for Google Cloud Common
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068176 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6f400e490a has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068176 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2038647] Review Request: rust-sys-locale - Small and lightweight library to obtain the active system locale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038647 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-fa4414ef1f has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038647 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2071828] Review Request: rust-nu-utils - Nushell utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071828 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-ffdbd6e5e7 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071828 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064141] Review Request: rust-micro-timer - Dumb tiny logging timer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064141 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:17:42 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c7ededf903 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064141 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2060710] Review Request: golang-github-bep-goat - C bindings and an API for generating diagrams from ASCII art
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060710 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-e340b00ea4 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060710 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2038612] Review Request: rust-nu-protocol - Core values and protocols for Nushell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038612 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-4f48ae2d1a has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038612 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2051073] Review Request: vakzination - Vakzination manages your health certificates like vaccination, test, and recovery certificates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051073 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-ed44f9aa11 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051073 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2073196] Review Request: rtl-433 - Generic radio data receiver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073196 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-24f62591a5 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073196 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2072634] Review Request: zcfan - Zero-configuration fan daemon for ThinkPads
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072634 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-345583715d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072634 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2060711] Review Request: golang-github-hairyhenderson-codeowners - Package that finds and parses CODEOWNERS files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060711 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6dd3928cb7 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060711 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2010029] Review Request: ghc-bytes - Sharing code for serialization between binary and cereal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010029 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-bd52422363 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010029 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2074312] Review Request: unrar-free - Free software version of the non-free unrar utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074312 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-3d84381489 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074312 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2031239] Review Request: golang-github-bep-gowebp - Go library for Webp images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031239 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-8700bb8fb1 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031239 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2073772] Review Request: qalculate-qt - A multi-purpose desktop calculator for GNU/Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073772 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-8d5491b38d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073772 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2066206] Review Request: diskscan - Scan disk for bad or near failure sectors, performs disk diagnostics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066206 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-afe332bd79 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066206 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2028702] Review Request: ansible-collection-community-docker - Ansible modules and plugins for working with Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028702 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-48dafaa351 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028702 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2038636] Review Request: rust-nu-path - Path handling library for Nushell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038636 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-a7b8406617 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038636 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2072599] Review Request: pdfsign - Sign PDF (PAdES compatible)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072599 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-b873eeb689 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072599 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2068106] Review Request: python-google-cloud-source-context - Python Client for Google Cloud Source Context
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068106 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-9d37729fcc has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068106 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2071875] Review Request: rust-eyre - Flexible concrete Error Reporting type built on std::error::Error with customizable Reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071875 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-1b55e56eb9 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071875 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2068117] Review Request: python-google-cloud-deploy - Python Client for Google Cloud Deploy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068117 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6d663afd30 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068117 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064136] Review Request: rust-format-bytes-macros - Macros for the format-bytes crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064136 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:17:32 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c7ededf903 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064136 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2028900] Review Request: rust-tree-sitter-cli - CLI tool for developing, testing, and using Tree-sitter parsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028900 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-fc2f24385e has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028900 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064137] Review Request: rust-format-bytes - Macro to format bytestrings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064137 Bug 2064137 depends on bug 2064136, which changed state. Bug 2064136 Summary: Review Request: rust-format-bytes-macros - Macros for the format-bytes crate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064136 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064137 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2069453] Review Request: SDL2_sound - An abstract soundfile decoder library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:17:01 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-4cfb2ca145 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2038788] Review Request: rust-nu-json - Fork of serde-hjson
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038788 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-a7b8406617 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038788 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064137] Review Request: rust-format-bytes - Macro to format bytestrings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064137 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:17:35 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c7ededf903 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064137 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064140] Review Request: rust-micro-timer-macros - Macros for the micro-timer crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064140 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:17:39 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c7ededf903 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064140 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064141] Review Request: rust-micro-timer - Dumb tiny logging timer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064141 Bug 2064141 depends on bug 2064140, which changed state. Bug 2064140 Summary: Review Request: rust-micro-timer-macros - Macros for the micro-timer crate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064140 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064141 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064155] Review Request: rust-vcsgraph - Library to perform various computation of a version control graph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064155 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:17:49 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c7ededf903 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064155 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064132] Review Request: rust-bytes-cast-derive - Safely re-interpreting &[u8] bytes as custom structs without copying, for efficiently reading structured binary data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064132 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:17:24 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c7ededf903 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064132 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064142] Review Request: rust-twox-hash - Rust implementation of the XXHash and XXH3 algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064142 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:17:45 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c7ededf903 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064142 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064133] Review Request: rust-bytes-cast - Safely re-interpreting &[u8] bytes as custom structs without copying, for efficiently reading structured binary data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064133 Bug 2064133 depends on bug 2064132, which changed state. Bug 2064132 Summary: Review Request: rust-bytes-cast-derive - Safely re-interpreting &[u8] bytes as custom structs without copying, for efficiently reading structured binary data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064132 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064133 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2064133] Review Request: rust-bytes-cast - Safely re-interpreting &[u8] bytes as custom structs without copying, for efficiently reading structured binary data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064133 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:17:28 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c7ededf903 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064133 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2069341] Review Request: sdl-crypto - Simple AES/DES encryption and SHA1/SHA2 hashing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069341 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-79cb71544f has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069341 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2074652] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-builder - Streamline the Sphinx theme development workflow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074652 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:12:50 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-9161e75532 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074652 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2069321] Review Request: sdl-softfloat - Berkeley IEEE Binary Floating-Point Library (SDL version)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069321 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-59cef5d94d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069321 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2074652] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-builder - Streamline the Sphinx theme development workflow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074652 Bug 2074652 depends on bug 2074647, which changed state. Bug 2074647 Summary: Review Request: python-pep621 - PEP 621 metadata parsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074647 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074652 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2074651] Review Request: python-sphinx-autobuild - Autobuild a Sphinx directory when a change is detected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074651 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:12:48 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-9161e75532 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074651 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2069348] Review Request: sdl-decnumber - ANSI C General Decimal Arithmetic Library (SDL version)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069348 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-dd96b3234b has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069348 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2074647] Review Request: python-pep621 - PEP 621 metadata parsing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074647 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:12:44 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-9161e75532 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074647 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2074652] Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-builder - Streamline the Sphinx theme development workflow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074652 Bug 2074652 depends on bug 2074651, which changed state. Bug 2074651 Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx-autobuild - Autobuild a Sphinx directory when a change is detected https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074651 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074652 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2068772] Review Request: ghc-formatting - Combinator-based type-safe formatting (like printf() or FORMAT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068772 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c44bbee5c1 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068772 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2061570] Review Request: python-primecountpy - Python Primecount wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061570 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-05-07 04:12:00 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-2569b55c7b has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061570 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2082157] Review Request: rust-bevy-macro-utils - Collection of utils for Bevy Engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082157
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags||fedora-review?
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini ---
The published crates for bevy_macro_utils do not contain any license texts.
However, both the MIT and Apache-2.0 license terms require that redistributed
sources contain a copy of the license text.
For example, choosealicense.com lists this under "Conditions" for both
licenses:
https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/
https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/
The sources for this crate live here, and don't link any license files:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/tree/main/crates/bevy_macro_utils
Looks like none of the crates that are published for the bevy project do,
and the license files are only included in the docs folder:
https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/tree/main/docs
It might be good to file an issue with the GitHub project to remind them of the
fact that their own published crates are not in line with the licenses they
themselves chose. :)
In the meantime, if you want to continue packaging this crate, you can include
the upstream license texts as separate sources:
Source1: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/raw/v0.7.0/docs/LICENSE-APACHE
Source2: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/raw/v0.7.0/docs/LICENSE-MIT
Then copy them to the build directory in %prep:
cp %{SOURCE1} %{SOURCE2} .
And list them in %files of the "-devel" subpackage with:
%license %{crate_instdir}/LICENSE-APACHE
%license %{crate_instdir}/LICENSE-MIT
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082157
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2053959] Review Request: yaksa - High-performance library for noncontiguous data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053959 --- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Oh, I see Ben took in the meantime. If you have something else, I can do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053959 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2082693] Review Request: rust-local-channel - Non-threadsafe multi-producer, single-consumer, futures-aware, FIFO queue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082693 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ Status|NEW |POST CC||decatho...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. - package builds and installs without errors on rawhide - test suite is run and all unit tests pass - latest version of the crate is packaged - license matches upstream specification (MIT or ASL 2.0) and is acceptable for Fedora - license files are included with %license in %files - package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines Package APPROVED. === Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks: - add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer - set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional) - set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate - track package in koschei for all built branches -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082693 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2072428] Review Request: python-vcert - Automate key generation and certificate enrollment using Venafi machine identity services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072428 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- It turns out I need two more packages: python-certvalidator and python-oscrypto. I'll submit review bugs shortly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072428 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2027121] Review Request: casc - Colored Abstract Simplicial Complex (CASC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027121
Major Hayden 鸞 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #7 from Major Hayden 鸞 ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: casc-doc : /usr/share/doc/casc-
doc/examples/surfacemesh/include/SurfaceMesh.h casc-doc :
/usr/share/doc/casc-doc/examples/surfacemesh/include/Vertex.h casc-doc :
/usr/share/doc/casc-doc/examples/surfacemesh/include/tensor.h
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_devel_packages
Ignoring this one since the package only has headers.
- Using the forgemeta macros might make things a little easier for maintenance,
but it's not required.
- This one looks good to go! ✅
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1
or later", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License, Version
2.1". 23 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/casc/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Reviewer
[Bug 2053959] Review Request: yaksa - High-performance library for noncontiguous data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053959 --- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- - Package contains bundled files from uthash-devel: src/external/yuthash.h and src/external/yutlist.h. Can it be unbundled? Done. - Note the rpmlint complaint about strange permission on yaksa.spec I think this is some artefact of rpmautospec. Locally the spec file has normal mode. Regardless, it should go away once the import to dist-git happens, since git doesn't track the full permission set anyway. Spec URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/yaksa.spec SRPM URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/yaksa-0.2-2.fc37.src.rpm -- > I could use a review of bug 2080472. I'll try to do it this weekend. Sorry for the delay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053959 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2082693] New: Review Request: rust-local-channel - Non-threadsafe multi-producer, single-consumer, futures-aware, FIFO queue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082693 Bug ID: 2082693 Summary: Review Request: rust-local-channel - Non-threadsafe multi-producer, single-consumer, futures-aware, FIFO queue Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ansas...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ansasaki.fedorapeople.org/rust-local-channel.spec SRPM URL: https://ansasaki.fedorapeople.org/rust-local-channel-0.1.3-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Non-threadsafe multi-producer, single-consumer, futures-aware, FIFO queue Fedora Account System Username: ansasaki Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ansasaki/rust-local-channel/build/4374027/ This is a new introduced dependency for the new version of rust-actix-http -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082693 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2027121] Review Request: casc - Colored Abstract Simplicial Complex (CASC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027121 --- Comment #6 from Ben Beasley --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027121 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2027121] Review Request: casc - Colored Abstract Simplicial Complex (CASC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027121 --- Comment #5 from Major Hayden 鸞 --- Oh boy, it would be nice if I didn't get my tickets crossed. 臘♂️ I am reviewing this one now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027121 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2027121] Review Request: casc - Colored Abstract Simplicial Complex (CASC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027121 Major Hayden 鸞 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|needinfo?(mhay...@redhat.co |fedora-review? |m) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027121 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2027121] Review Request: casc - Colored Abstract Simplicial Complex (CASC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027121 Ben Beasley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhay...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(mhay...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley --- @mhay...@redhat.com, is this in your comfort zone? It’s a mostly-straightforward C++ header-only library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027121 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2068182] Review Request: python-google-cloud-filestore - Python Client for Google Cloud Filestore
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068182 Ben Beasley changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(code@musicinmybra | |in.net) | --- Comment #1 from Ben Beasley --- Package approved! There are some additional documentation files that you might want to add. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = Issues = - Consider adding: %doc CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md %doc CONTRIBUTING.rst %doc SECURITY.md %doc samples/ = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* [generated file]". 74 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/reviewer/2068182-python-google-cloud-filestore/licensecheck.txt [-]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.10/site- packages/google(python3-google-cloud-shell, python3-google-cloud- datacatalog, python3-google-cloud-dataproc-metastore, python3-google- cloud-domains, python3-google-cloud-bigquery-storage, python3-google- cloud-org-policy, python3-google-cloud-apigee-connect, python3-google- cloud-common, python3-google-cloud-os-config, python3-google-cloud- access-context-manager, python3-google-cloud-automl, python3-google- api-core, python3-google-cloud-billing, python3-google-cloud- firestore, python3-protobuf, python3-google-cloud-source-context, python3-google-cloud-build, python3-google-cloud-containeranalysis, python3-google-cloud-dataproc, python3-google-cloud-asset, python3-google-cloud-dlp, python3-google-cloud-bigtable, python3-google-cloud-data-fusion, python3-googleapis-common-protos, python3-google-cloud-bigquery-connection, python3-google-cloud-iam, python3-google-cloud-container, python3-google-cloud-kms, python3-google-cloud-bigquery, python3-google-cloud-api-gateway, python3-google-cloud-appengine-admin, python3-google-cloud-deploy, python3-google-cloud-core, python3-google-cloud-dms, python3-google- cloud-storage, python3-google-cloud-debugger-client, python3-google- cloud-bigquery-datatransfer, python3-google-cloud-access-approval, python3-google-cloud-dns, python3-google-cloud-billing-budgets, python3-google-resumable-media, python3-grpc-google-iam-v1, python3-google-cloud-functions, python3-google-cloud-private-ca, python3-google-cloud-spanner, python3-google-cloud-redis, python3-google-cloud-bigquery-reservation), /usr/lib/python3.10/site- packages/google/cloud(python3-google-cloud-shell, python3-google- cloud-datacatalog, python3-google-cloud-dataproc-metastore, python3-google-cloud-domains, python3-google-cloud-bigquery-storage, python3-google-cloud-org-policy, python3-google-cloud-apigee-connect, python3-google-cloud-common, python3-google-cloud-os-config, python3-google-cloud-automl, python3-google-cloud-billing, python3-google-cloud-firestore, python3-google-cloud-source-context, python3-google-cloud-build, python3-google-cloud-containeranalysis, python3-google-cloud-dataproc, python3-google-cloud-asset, python3-google-cloud-dlp, python3-google-cloud-bigtable, python3-google-cloud-data-fusion, python3-googleapis-common-protos, python3-google-cloud-bigquery-connection, python3-google-cloud-iam, python3-google-cloud-container, python3-google-cloud-kms, python3-google-cloud-bigquery, python3-google-cloud-appengine-admin, python3-google-cloud-api-gateway, python3-google-cloud-deploy, python3-google-cloud-core, python3-google-cloud-dms, python3-google- cloud-storage, python3-google-cloud-debugger-client, python3-google- cloud-bigquery-datatransfer, python3-google-cloud-access-approval, python3-google-cloud-dns, python3-google-cloud-billing-budgets, python3-google-cloud-functions, python3-google-cloud-private-ca, python3-google-cloud-spanner, python3-google-cloud-redis, python3-google-cloud-bigquery-reservation) Appropriate shared ownership of Python namespace package directories. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a
[Bug 2069413] Review Request: rust-ciborium-io - Simplified Read/Write traits for no_std usage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069413
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|NEW |POST
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini ---
> not sure how review bumps work with autospec but they're updated on the
> original links
That's fine with me.
> Source2:https://github.com/enarx/ciborium/blob/main/ciborium/LICENSE
This is a link to an HTML page on GitHub you probably meant to use the URL to
the raw file:
Source2:https://github.com/enarx/ciborium/raw/b77f979/ciborium/LICENSE
Please fix this before importing the package (and you could use Source1 instead
of Source2, since there is no Source1).
You can also drop this (now inaccurate) comment from the .spec file's %files
section:
# FIXME: no license files detected
And please use "%license %{crate_instdir}/LICENSE" instead of "%license
LICENSE".
This will result in the file being included only once in the built RPM files
instead of twice.
That string also matches what will be generated once the published crate will
contain the LICENSE file.
But these are all minor issues that you can fix when importing the package,
otherwise LGTM.
===
Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.
- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
- test suite is run and all unit tests pass
- latest version of the crate is packaged
- license matches upstream specification (MIT) and is acceptable for Fedora
- license file is included with %license in %files
- package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines
Package APPROVED.
===
Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks:
- add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer
- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)
- set up package on release-monitoring.org:
project: $crate
homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
backend: crates.io
version scheme: semantic
version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre
distro: Fedora
Package: rust-$crate
- track package in koschei for all built branches
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069413
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2082662] Review Request: liblerc - Limited Error Raster Compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082662 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani --- Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86734525 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082662 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2082662] New: Review Request: liblerc - Limited Error Raster Compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082662 Bug ID: 2082662 Summary: Review Request: liblerc - Limited Error Raster Compression Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: manisan...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/liblerc.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/liblerc-3.1-0.1.gitb1de4cd.fc37.src.rpm Description: Limited Error Raster Compression Fedora Account System Username: smani -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082662 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2069413] Review Request: rust-ciborium-io - Simplified Read/Write traits for no_std usage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069413 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson --- Updated/fixed (not sure how review bumps work with autospec but they're updated on the original links) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069413 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2069413] Review Request: rust-ciborium-io - Simplified Read/Write traits for no_std usage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069413 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson --- I'll add the license as a source in the mean time -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069413 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2069413] Review Request: rust-ciborium-io - Simplified Read/Write traits for no_std usage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069413 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||perob...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson --- They fixed the license issue upstream: https://github.com/enarx/ciborium/commit/b77f979c35a00f1fc65fb09bcf452e6ce0a90bcf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069413 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2076374] Review Request: trafficserver - Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 caching proxy server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374
--- Comment #26 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Jered Floyd from comment #23)
> > > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
> > > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
> > > trafficserver-selinux , trafficserver-devel , trafficserver-perl
> >
> > The selinux subpackage is fine as-is, but the rest need their "%{name} =
> > %{version}-%{release}" dependency updated to "%{name}%{?_isa} =
> > %{version}-%{release}".
>
> For trafficserver-perl, would it actually be more correct to add:
>
>BuildArch: noarch
>
> rather than adding the architecture to the dependencies?
Yes. I also just noticed you should probably be using "%{perl_vendorlib}"
instead of "%{_datadir}/perl5" in your file lists.
You need to add BuildRequires for perl-generators and perl-interpreter too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2076374] Review Request: trafficserver - Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 caching proxy server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374 --- Comment #25 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Jered Floyd from comment #24) > > > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > > > Note: No known owner of /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200, > > > /usr/share/selinux/packages/targeted, /usr/share/perl5/Apache/TS, > > > /usr/share/perl5/Apache/TS/Config, > > > /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/distributed, > > > /usr/share/perl5/Apache, > > > /usr/include/tscpp > > > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > > > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/tscpp, > > > /usr/share/perl5/Apache/TS/Config, > > > /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/distributed, > > > /usr/share/selinux/devel, > > > /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200, > > > /usr/share/perl5/Apache, > > > /usr/share/selinux/devel/include, > > > /usr/share/selinux/packages/targeted, /usr/share/perl5/Apache/TS > > > > The SELinux and Perl module subpackages need correct ownership of their > > directories. > > I agree regarding the Perl directories (and will fix, as well as > /usr/include/tscpp) but I don't think this is correct for selinux. All of > those are system-created directories that are not specific to this package. Please file a bug with selinux-policy to ensure those directories are owned, then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492 Guy Streeter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(cz172...@gmail.co |needinfo?(cz172...@gmail.co |m) |m) --- Comment #26 from Guy Streeter --- I can't see a way for me to close this issue. I opened it, and I don't care about it any more. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Guy Streeter has canceled Package Review 's request for Jiri Kastner 's needinfo: Bug 1256492: Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492 --- Comment #26 from Guy Streeter --- I can't see a way for me to close this issue. I opened it, and I don't care about it any more. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2078592] Review Request: subscription-manager-rhsm-certificates - certificates for communication with RHSM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078592 Rehana changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(pemensik@redhat.c ||om) CC||redak...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078592 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2052407] Review Request: greetd - Generic greeter daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052407 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-47dae53a20 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-47dae53a20 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-47dae53a20 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052407 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2081830] Review Request: ini2toml - Automatic conversion of .ini/.cfg files to TOML equivalents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081830
Lumír Balhar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Lumír Balhar ---
The package looks good, I'd just improve testing. Tests can be run by:
%pytest -vv --ignore tests/test_examples.py --deselect
tests/test_cli.py::test_auto_formatting
…
=== 55 passed, 1 deselected in 0.71s ===
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License
2.0", "MIT License BSD 3-Clause License Mozilla Public License 2.0",
"*No copyright* [generated file]", "*No copyright* MIT License", "BSD
3-Clause License", "MIT License". 80 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/lbalhar/temp/reviews/2081830-ini2toml/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the
[Bug 2081659] Review Request: extra-enforcer-rules - extra rules for maven-enforcer-plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081659 Marián Konček changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2022-05-06 07:54:15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081659 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2081830] Review Request: ini2toml - Automatic conversion of .ini/.cfg files to TOML equivalents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081830 Lumír Balhar changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lbal...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? CC||lbal...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081830 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2051879] Review Request: fbf-ani-fonts - Script like Bengali Font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051879 --- Comment #7 from Dr Anirban Mitra --- SPEC:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/fbf-fonts-all/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04369233-fbf-ani-fonts/fbf-ani-fonts.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/fbf-fonts-all/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04369233-fbf-ani-fonts/fbf-ani-fonts-1.0.2-3.fc37.src.rpm To build properly in copr the build number had to be incremented with each change in spec and changelog added -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051879 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 840551] Review Request: sugar-kuku - arithmetic education game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551 Katharine J Walker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wkatharine...@gmail.com --- Comment #75 from Katharine J Walker --- Package sugar-kuku-5-0.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * Should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing sugar-kuku-5-0.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following URL: https://sites.google.com/site/bestessaywritingservicereview/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
