[Bug 1081726] Review Request: CutyCapt - A small command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081726] Review Request: CutyCapt - A small command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081726] Review Request: CutyCapt - A small command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-31 15:14:18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081726] Review Request: CutyCapt - A small command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: CutyCapt - |qt5-CutyCapt - A small |A small command-line |command-line utility to |utility to capture WebKit's |capture WebKit's rendering |rendering of a web page |of a web page | --- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- I noticed that I missed the reference to LGPL, so I've amended the License tag. I believe I also incorrectly named this package with a qt5- prefix, which I think is just for packages that are part of the base Qt5 software. I've renamed to just CutyCapt. Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/CutyCapt/CutyCapt.spec SRPM URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/CutyCapt/SRPMS/CutyCapt-0-0.2.20130714svn.fc21.src.rpm * Sat Mar 29 2014 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org - 0-0.2.20130714svn - rename to CutyCapt - include copies of both GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 - amend License tag (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #4) I only have one question about the license - It is my understanding that license not provided by upstream cannot be included. Please clarify. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text which states: In cases where the upstream has chosen a license that requires that a copy of the license text be distributed along with the binaries and/or source code, but does not provide a copy of the license text (in the source tree, or in some rare cases, anywhere), the packager should do their best to point out this confusion to upstream. However, in situations where upstream is unresponsive, unable, or unwilling to provide proper full license text as part of the source code, and the indicated license requires that the full license text be included, Fedora Packagers must either: - Include a copy of what they believe the license text is intended to be, as part of the Fedora package in %doc, in order to remain in compliance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081726] Review Request: CutyCapt - A small command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 --- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #4) I only have one question about the license - It is my understanding that license not provided by upstream cannot be included. Please clarify. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text which states: In cases where the upstream has chosen a license that requires that a copy of the license text be distributed along with the binaries and/or source code, but does not provide a copy of the license text (in the source tree, or in some rare cases, anywhere), the packager should do their best to point out this confusion to upstream. However, in situations where upstream is unresponsive, unable, or unwilling to provide proper full license text as part of the source code, and the indicated license requires that the full license text be included, Fedora Packagers must either: - Include a copy of what they believe the license text is intended to be, as part of the Fedora package in %doc, in order to remain in compliance. Hi! Sorry - I think I was not very clear. I had referred to the guidelines and what I wanted to ask is actually in the quoted text - However, in situations where upstream is unresponsive, unable, or unwilling to provide proper full license text as part of the source code, and the indicated license requires that the full license text be included Is this (unresponsive/unable, etc.) the case or would you prefer to wait a couple of days for upstream to (potentially) add the license? If you think it does not make a big difference, I am perfectly fine with approving the package as my understanding is that the current status is still in compliance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081726] Review Request: CutyCapt - A small command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 --- Comment #7 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #6) Is this (unresponsive/unable, etc.) the case or would you prefer to wait a couple of days for upstream to (potentially) add the license? Unfortunately, the response from upstream so far comes under the unwilling category. There is a possibility that upstream will change their mind. I don't think that should by itself hold back the introduction of this package into Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081726] Review Request: CutyCapt - A small command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com --- Yup! Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081726] Review Request: CutyCapt - A small command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 --- Comment #9 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- Thanks Mukundan! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081726] Review Request: CutyCapt - A small command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: CutyCapt Short Description: A small command-line utility to capture WebKit's rendering of a web page Owners: jamielinux Branches: f20 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
