[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 Didik Supriadi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||didiksupriad...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(villadalmine@gmai ||l.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for Christopher Meng 's needinfo: Bug 1092828: Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #18 from Package Review --- This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- How i can continue to have the python-py more than 1.4.18 ... I need 1.4.24 Development of packages in the distribution typically starts in Rawhide (git master and rawhide repository), and when/whether version upgrades will be propagated to stable dist releases depends on how it would affect stability (API, ABI, runtime, buildtime). There is 1.4.25 for F21 and Rawhide since Oct 11: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-py.git/tree/ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7479 If not, you would open a ticket against python-py: http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/python-py -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #16 from Rino Rondan villadalm...@gmail.com --- I prepare turses 0.2.21 with older version of python-py when it will be ok, i will prepare new version for only Fedora 21. Regards! New specs and source for 0.2.21 of turses.. https://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses-0.2.21-1.fc20.src.rpm https://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #14 from Rino Rondan villadalm...@gmail.com --- https://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses-0.2.22-5.fc20.src.rpm https://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828
--- Comment #12 from Rino Rondan villadalm...@gmail.com ---
Hi, i create new spec for new version of turses (2.2.23)
BUt i have a blocked package.
raise VersionConflict(dist,req) # XXX put more info here
pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (py 1.4.18 (/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages),
Requirement.parse('py=1.4.24'))
[makerpm@restaurador SPECS]$ yum info python-py
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
Name: python-py
Arch: noarch
Version : 1.4.18
How i can continue to have the python-py more than 1.4.18 ... I need 1.4.24
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #13 from Rino Rondan villadalm...@gmail.com --- added spec for new version that have blocked package.. https://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses-new.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #10 from Rino Rondan villadalm...@gmail.com --- what i need to do with manual and apache2 license ? just add the type of license in spec ? And about manual do i need to create a manual ? https://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses-0.2.22-4.fc20.src.rpm https://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses.spec Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- (In reply to Rino Rondan from comment #10) what i need to do with manual and apache2 license ? just add the type of license in spec ? I don't know about other solutions so far. ;) And about manual do i need to create a manual ? No. But you can advise upstream to do that. https://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses-0.2.22-4.fc20.src.rpm https://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses.spec Will review again later, it depends on my time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Apache (v2.0), Unknown or generated. 23 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck:
Apache (v2.0)
-
turses-0.2.22/turses/api/base.py
Unknown or generated
turses-0.2.22/setup.py
turses-0.2.22/tests/__init__.py
turses-0.2.22/tests/test_api.py
turses-0.2.22/tests/test_config.py
turses-0.2.22/tests/test_core.py
turses-0.2.22/tests/test_meta.py
turses-0.2.22/tests/test_models.py
turses-0.2.22/tests/test_session.py
turses-0.2.22/tests/test_ui.py
turses-0.2.22/tests/test_utils.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/__init__.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/api/__init__.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/api/backends.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/api/debug.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/api/helpers.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/cli.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/config.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/core.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/meta.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/models.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/session.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/ui.py
turses-0.2.22/turses/utils.py
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #8 from Rino Rondan villadalm...@gmail.com --- updated -- http://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses.spec http://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/turses-0.2.22-3.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 Bug 1092828 depends on bug 1092835, which changed state. Bug 1092835 Summary: Update tweepy to the latest version. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092835 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #7 from Rino Rondan villadalm...@gmail.com --- [restaurador@/etc/yum.repos.d $] sudo yum info tweepy --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit Available Packages Name: tweepy Arch: noarch Version : 2.0 Release : 2.fc20 Size: 56 k Repo: rawhide/x86_64 Summary : Twitter library for python URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/tweepy/ License : MIT Description : A library for accessing the Twitter.com API. Supports OAuth, covers the : entire API, and streaming API. let me know when it will be available and i will update my spec and sources Thanks!!! Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #6 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com --- Ok tweepy has been updated by me in rawhide and f20, please go ahead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|turses - A Twitter client |Review Request: turses - A |for the console |Twitter client for the ||console --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me --- (In reply to Rino Rondan from comment #3) fasid: villadalmine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6797361 an error with tweepy (Requirement not accomplished, missing update to 2.2) need to contact packager of tweepy maybe It's not maybe, it's MUST. Please open a bug against tweepy and block this one if you want to package it. Also IIRC nose is also a BR of this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||echevemas...@gmail.com Depends On||1092835 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092835 [Bug 1092835] Update tweepy to the latest version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #5 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com --- I've packaged the latest version of tweepy, and has sent to the packager the link of my fedorapeople, Just wait -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
