[Bug 1166851] Review Request: python-husl - A Python implementation of HUSL

2015-01-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166851

Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2015-01-23 19:45:31



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1166851] Review Request: python-husl - A Python implementation of HUSL

2014-11-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166851

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1166851] Review Request: python-husl - A Python implementation of HUSL

2014-11-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166851



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1166851] Review Request: python-husl - A Python implementation of HUSL

2014-11-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166851

Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-husl
Short Description: A Python implementation of HUSL
Upstream URL: http://github.com/boronine/pyhusl
Owners: sergiopr
Branches: f21 f20 f19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1166851] Review Request: python-husl - A Python implementation of HUSL

2014-11-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166851

Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1167136




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167136
[Bug 1167136] Review Request: python-seaborn - Statistical data
visualization in Python
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1166851] Review Request: python-husl - A Python implementation of HUSL

2014-11-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166851

Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||d...@der-flo.net
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 Unknown or generated. 4 files have unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 python3-husl
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text