[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191

Ben Rosser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||rosser@gmail.com
 Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2017-08-11 18:03:34



--- Comment #8 from Ben Rosser  ---
Jon has been absent since 2015 and nonresponsive on other tickets; therefore
I'm marking this as a dead review and resubmitting it here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1480794 ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191



--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jonludlam's scratch build of ocaml-cudf-0.8-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11536796

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191



--- Comment #7 from Jon Ludlam  ---
New upstream release.

Spec URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf-0.8-1.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191



--- Comment #5 from Jon Ludlam j...@recoil.org ---
Updated to add in a license file (COPYING) and to fix a missing {?_isa} macro
in the devel package Requires line.

Spec URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf-0.7-3.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191

Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rjo...@redhat.com



--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
You can probably ignore the error
ocaml-cudf.x86_64: E: no-binary
rpmlint has some problems with OCaml packages, although it has
improved over time.

The spec file looks reasonable to me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191

Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1185099




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185099
[Bug 1185099] Review Request: opam - A source-based package manager for
OCaml
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191

Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1183826




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183826
[Bug 1183826] Review Request: ocaml-dose3 - a framework for managing
distribution packages and their dependencies
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ludlam j...@recoil.org ---
Updated SRPM URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf-0.7-2.fc21.src.rpm
Updated SPEC URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cudf.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ludlam j...@recoil.org ---
I noticed that I have accidentally included the .o files into the main package.
However, on removing these, I now have a hard error: 

ocaml-cudf.x86_64: E: no-binary

I'm not convinced this is a real error though - the package contents are now:

/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/META
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf.cma
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_822_lexer.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_822_parser.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_c.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_checker.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_conf.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_parser.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_printer.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_type_lexer.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_type_parser.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_types.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_types_pp.cmi
/usr/share/doc/ocaml-cudf
/usr/share/doc/ocaml-cudf/README

and I'm not sure that these are really noarch material.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191



--- Comment #1 from Jon Ludlam j...@recoil.org ---
koji link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8647847

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review