[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2018-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950
Bug 1235950 depends on bug 1241752, which changed state.

Bug 1241752 Summary: opencsv-3.5 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241752

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |EOL



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EG6LOLUJWAEB2ODQZKNQUAOS55HXELF5/


[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-12-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
openrdf-sesame-2.8.7-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
openrdf-sesame-2.8.7-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update openrdf-sesame'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-d02f764986

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-12-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #15 from Roman Mohr  ---
(In reply to Roman Mohr from comment #14)
> Package Review
> ==
> 
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> [ ] = Manual review needed
> 
> 
> 
> = MUST items =
> 
> Generic:
> [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
>  other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
>  Guidelines.
> [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>  Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
>  found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright*
>  Apache (v2.0)". 2033 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
>  licensecheck in /home/rmohr/rpmbuild/1235950-openrdf-
>  sesame/licensecheck.txt
According to the homepage and the source LICENSE.txt everything BSD.

> [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
> [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
> [x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
> [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
> [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
> [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
> [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
> [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
>  names).
> [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
> [x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
> [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
> [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
>  Provides are present.
> [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
> [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
> [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
> [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
> [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
>  (~1MB) or number of files.
>  Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
> [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
> [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
>  one supported primary architecture.
> [x]: Package installs properly.
> [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
>  Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
> [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
>  license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
>  license(s) for the package is included in %license.
> [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
> [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
> [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
>  that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
> [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
>  beginning of %install.
> [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
> [x]: Dist tag is present.
> [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
> [x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
> [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
>  work.
> [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
> [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
> [x]: Package is not relocatable.
> [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
>  provided in the spec URL.
> [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
>  %{name}.spec.
> [x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
> [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
> 
> Java:
> [x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
> [x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
>  Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It
>  is pulled in by maven-local
> [x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
>  subpackage
> [x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
> [x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
> 
> Maven:
> [x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
>  when building with ant
> [x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
> [x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
> [x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
> [x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
>  utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
> [x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
> [x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
> 
> = SHOULD items =
> 
> Generic:
> [-]: If the 

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-12-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #14 from Roman Mohr  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright*
 Apache (v2.0)". 2033 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/rmohr/rpmbuild/1235950-openrdf-
 sesame/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
 Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It
 is pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
 subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
 when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
 utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = 

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
openrdf-sesame-2.8.7-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-d02f764986

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/openrdf-sesame

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

Roman Mohr  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

Roman Mohr  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #16 from Roman Mohr  ---
Sorry for the delay.

Approved!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-11-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo  ---
@Roman
Sorry for the noise, can you proceed with review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-11-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1241752




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241752
[Bug 1241752] opencsv-3.5 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-11-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
gil's scratch build of openrdf-sesame-2.8.7-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11676134

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-11-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo  ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openrdf-sesame.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openrdf-sesame-2.8.7-1.fc22.src.rpm

- update to 2.8.7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950
Bug 1235950 depends on bug 1241447, which changed state.

Bug 1241447 Summary: Review Request: jsonld-java - A JSON-based format to 
serialize Linked Data for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241447

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-10-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #9 from Roman Mohr  ---
Hi gil,

Sorry for the delay. Hope to find rhe time to finish it before friday.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-10-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo  ---
hi Roman
have time for ending the review?
regards

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-10-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1267890




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267890
[Bug 1267890] Review Request: jsonld-java-tools - JSON-LD Java tools
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-10-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
gil's scratch build of openrdf-sesame-2.8.6-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11380552

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1241447 |
 Depends On||1241447



--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo  ---
(In reply to Peter Ansell from comment #5)
> I have opened a task for myself in JSONLD-Java to fix the circular build
> dependency with OpenRDF Sesame which should make this process a little
> smoother:
> 
> https://github.com/jsonld-java/jsonld-java/issues/148

Fixed

Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openrdf-sesame.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openrdf-sesame-2.8.6-1.fc22.src.rpm

- rebuilt with jsonld-java 0.7.0


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241447
[Bug 1241447] Review Request: jsonld-java - A JSON-based format to
serialize Linked Data for Java
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1264337




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264337
[Bug 1264337] Review Request: semweb4j - Java RDF Library
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-09-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #5 from Peter Ansell  ---
I have opened a task for myself in JSONLD-Java to fix the circular build
dependency with OpenRDF Sesame which should make this process a little
smoother:

https://github.com/jsonld-java/jsonld-java/issues/148

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-09-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

Roman Mohr  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ro...@fenkhuber.at
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ro...@fenkhuber.at
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-09-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo  ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10992676

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-09-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On|1235949 |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235949
[Bug 1235949] Review Request: urlrewritefilter - A Java Web Filter with
functionality like Apache's mod_rewrite
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-09-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo  ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openrdf-sesame.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openrdf-sesame-2.8.6-1.fc22.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-07-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950
Bug 1235950 depends on bug 1106256, which changed state.

Bug 1106256 Summary: mysql-connector-java: FTBFS in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106256

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-07-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950
Bug 1235950 depends on bug 1239703, which changed state.

Bug 1239703 Summary: mysql-connector-java: FTBFS in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239703

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-07-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openrdf-sesame.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openrdf-sesame-2.8.4-1.fc22.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-07-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1241447




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241447
[Bug 1241447] Review Request: jsonld-java - A JSON-based format to
serialize Linked Data for Java
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-07-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950



--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openrdf-sesame.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openrdf-sesame-2.7.16-1.fc22.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-07-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1239703




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239703
[Bug 1239703] mysql-connector-java: FTBFS in rawhide
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1106256




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106256
[Bug 1106256] mysql-connector-java: FTBFS in rawhide
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1235949




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235949
[Bug 1235949] Review Request: urlrewritefilter - A Java Web Filter with
functionality like Apache's mod_rewrite
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1235950] Review Request: openrdf-sesame - Java framework for processing and handling RDF data

2015-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review