[Bug 1482576] Review Request: python3-cryptography-vectors - Test vectors for the cryptography package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482576

Mattia Verga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-05-31 09:26:54



--- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga  ---
This package was approved and imported in repositories, but this review ticket
was never closed.
I'm closing it now.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1482576] Review Request: python3-cryptography-vectors - Test vectors for the cryptography package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482576

Aurelien Bompard  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Package Review  |Package Review
Version|rawhide |epel7
Product|Fedora  |Fedora EPEL



--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard  ---
Since it's a package for EPEL only, switching the Bugzilla category. Sorry for
the mistake.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1482576] Review Request: python3-cryptography-vectors - Test vectors for the cryptography package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482576



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3-cryptography-vectors

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1482576] Review Request: python3-cryptography-vectors - Test vectors for the cryptography package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482576

Jeremy Cline  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1481618




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481618
[Bug 1481618] RFE: python 3 package for python-cryptography in EPEL7
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1482576] Review Request: python3-cryptography-vectors - Test vectors for the cryptography package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482576

Jeremy Cline  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jer...@jcline.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jer...@jcline.org
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Cline  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Apache (v2.0) BSD (unspecified)", "*No
 copyright* Apache (v2.0) BSD (unspecified)", "Unknown or generated",
 "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 2102 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/vagrant/1482576-python3
 -cryptography-vectors/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[-]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if 

[Bug 1482576] Review Request: python3-cryptography-vectors - Test vectors for the cryptography package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482576

Aurelien Bompard  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1482577




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482577
[Bug 1482577] Review Request: python3-cryptography - PyCA's cryptography
library
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org