[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

2018-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472

Tomas Popela  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||webkit2gtk3-2.19.5-2.fc28
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2018-01-12 09:41:28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

2018-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #9 from Michael Catanzaro  ---
I strongly recommend sticking with the name webkit2gtk3 to avoid confusion with
any future webkitgtk4 package. And we can drop the 2 in the middle in future
packages, since WebKit2 has been renamed to WebKit upstream, except in the GTK+
3 API where it's part of the API.

In the future, WebKitGTK+ for GTK+ 4 can just be called webkitgtk4. (What we
have now. Which is what has prompted this renaming.) And for GTK+ 5, we can
call it webkitgtk5.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

2018-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #8 from Sergio Monteiro Basto  ---
(In reply to Tomas Popela from comment #6)
> Could be, but from webkit2gtk you can't distinguish anything and we are on
> the same boat as we are now before the rename. But with webkit2gtk3 you can
> clearly distinguish on what WebKit and GTK+ versions it is based on.

OK

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

2018-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/webkit2gtk3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

2018-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #6 from Tomas Popela  ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #5)
> yes webkit2gtk , maybe the correct name , also checked arch Linux [1]
> 
> - Look at this commit [2] internally is webkit2gtk-4.0 
> - When Gtk+ 4 [3] the same webkit2gtk IIRC should support the 2 gtk+ 3 and 4
> .
> 
> For these reasons, IMHO, seems to me webkit2gtk is more appropriate , or
> even webkit2gtk-4.0 (with - , to not confuse with gtk4) .
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> [1]
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/webkit2gtk/
> 
> [2]
> https://github.com/hyperair/geany-plugins/commit/
> 1fd266a97b9fedb0ae463a2cf9a409af27bb0ae6 
> 
> [3]
> https://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2016/06/13/gtk-4-0-is-not-gtk-4/ 
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GTK%2B/Roadmap/GTK4

Could be, but from webkit2gtk you can't distinguish anything and we are on the
same boat as we are now before the rename. But with webkit2gtk3 you can clearly
distinguish on what WebKit and GTK+ versions it is based on.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

2018-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472

Sergio Monteiro Basto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ser...@serjux.com



--- Comment #5 from Sergio Monteiro Basto  ---
yes webkit2gtk , maybe the correct name , also checked arch Linux [1]

- Look at this commit [2] internally is webkit2gtk-4.0 
- When Gtk+ 4 [3] the same webkit2gtk IIRC should support the 2 gtk+ 3 and 4 .

For these reasons, IMHO, seems to me webkit2gtk is more appropriate , or even
webkit2gtk-4.0 (with - , to not confuse with gtk4) .

Best regards, 

[1]
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/webkit2gtk/

[2]
https://github.com/hyperair/geany-plugins/commit/1fd266a97b9fedb0ae463a2cf9a409af27bb0ae6
 

[3]
https://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2016/06/13/gtk-4-0-is-not-gtk-4/ 
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GTK%2B/Roadmap/GTK4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

2018-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #4 from Tomas Popela  ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #2)
> That's incorrect according to my findings. Debian and Ubuntu are using
> webkit2gtk source package name and libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 for the binary
> package with the library and libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev for the development
> files: https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/webkit2gtk

Indeed. Thank you for correcting me!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

2018-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|klem...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember  ---
I've verified the obsoletes and provides and they all look good to me and all
subpackages should be correctly covered for webkitgtk4->webkit2gtk3 rename.
Beyond that, the packaging and upstream sources are the same as in the existing
webkitgtk4 package and no changes there.

APPROVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

2018-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||klem...@redhat.com



--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember  ---
That's incorrect according to my findings. Debian and Ubuntu are using
webkit2gtk source package name and libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 for the binary package
with the library and libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev for the development files:
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/webkit2gtk

openSUSE indeed uses webkit2gtk3:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/GNOME:Factory/webkit2gtk3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library

2018-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472



--- Comment #1 from Tomas Popela  ---
I should also note, that other distributions (Debian, Suse) are using the
webkit2gtk3 name.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org