needinfo canceled: [Bug 1801519] Review Request: golang-github-google-licenseclassifier - A License Classifier
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Robert-André Mauchin has canceled Package Review 's request for Robert-André Mauchin 's needinfo: Bug 1801519: Review Request: golang-github-google-licenseclassifier - A License Classifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801519 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 1801519] Review Request: golang-github-google-licenseclassifier - A License Classifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801519 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|quantum.anal...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Status|POST|NEW Flags|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #8 from Mattia Verga --- Resetting ticket status, since the review-flag it's too old to allow repository creation. This package will need a fresh review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801519 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1801519] Review Request: golang-github-google-licenseclassifier - A License Classifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801519 --- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Thanks I will update as toon as I can. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801519] Review Request: golang-github-google-licenseclassifier - A License Classifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801519 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) | Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Legal appears fine: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/53YMC6DJM6T4BYXWE4E25BMTAN3LQX5X/ There are a couple new commits, so you probably want to update. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801519] Review Request: golang-github-google-licenseclassifier - A License Classifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801519 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(quantum.analyst@g | |mail.com) | |needinfo?(quantum.analyst@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #5 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- It makes sense that licenses on the Good list are fine, since they would be in packages already. But there are licenses that are not on that list. For example, AFL 3.0 is Good, but there is also AFL 1.1 and AFL 2.0, and they have different distribution rights (or at least they're written a bit differently). And then there's stuff like Artistic 1.0, which is Bad, but is the text of the license okay? I suggest asking legal@. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801519] Review Request: golang-github-google-licenseclassifier - A License Classifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801519 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(quantum.analyst@g ||mail.com) --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Bump, Elliott could you help me finish this review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801519] Review Request: golang-github-google-licenseclassifier - A License Classifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801519 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(quantum.analyst@g ||mail.com) --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Do I need to do something else? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801519] Review Request: golang-github-google-licenseclassifier - A License Classifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801519 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- I've only kept the license of the code, seems to me it's a bit excessive to include the license of the licenses. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1801519] Review Request: golang-github-google-licenseclassifier - A License Classifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801519 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal) Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Technically many of these licenses are themselves "All Rights Reserved", and part of the data, so not covered by the license of the code itself. I'm not sure how to tag this in License though. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file identify_license is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "Apache License (v2.0)", "Apache License (v2.0) Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Public License (v2.0)", "do What The Fuck you want to Public License Apache License (v2.0) GNU Affero General Public License", "Apache License (v2.0) Creative Commons Attribution Public License (v1.0)", "*No copyright* Academic Free License (v1.1)", "*No copyright* Academic Free License (v1.2)", "Academic Free License (v1.2)", "*No copyright* Academic Free License (v2.0)", "Academic Free License (v2.0)", "*No copyright* Academic Free License (v2.1)", "Academic Free License (v2.1)", "*No copyright* Academic Free License (v3.0)", "Academic Free License (v3.0)", "GNU Affero General Public License (v1)", "*No copyright* AGPL (v3 or later)", "GNU Affero General Public License (v3)", "Apache License (v1.1)", "*No copyright* Artistic License", "Artistic License (v2.0)", "*No copyright* BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "*No copyright* BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "*No copyright* BSD 4-clause "Original" or "Old" License", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License", "*No copyright* Boost Software License (v1.0) Boost Software License 1.0", "*No copyright* Beerware License", "Creative Commons Attribution Public License (v1.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution Public License (v2.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution Public License (v2.5)", "Creative Commons Attribution Public License (v4.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Public License (v1.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Public License (v2.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Public License (v2.5)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Public License (v4.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Public License (v1.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives Public License (v2.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Public License (v2.5)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Public License (v4.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Public License (v1.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Public License (v2.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike Public License (v2.5)", "Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike Public License (v4.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives Public License (v1.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives Public License (v2.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives Public License (v2.5)", "Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives Public License (v4.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Public License (v1.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Public License (v2.0)", "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Public License (v2.5)", "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Public License (v4.0)", "*No copyright* Creative Commons
