[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol | |ter.ch) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-12-06 03:04:36 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1a3b7045f0 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1a3b7045f0 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-1a3b7045f0 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1a3b7045f0 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1a3b7045f0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1a3b7045f0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 --- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-jsons -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 --- Comment #12 from Andy Mender --- I think this can be pushed already, since the issues were squared away. Any help needed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol ||ter.ch) --- Comment #11 from Andy Mender --- I see the repo request was not submitted yet. Need any help? :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Andy Mender --- Good news! I tested the most recent release in COPR and the issues with Python 3.8 and 3.9, and python-typish have been resolved! https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andymenderunix/python-iot/build/1769669/ You can go ahead, update to version 1.3.0 (https://github.com/ramonhagenaars/jsons/releases/tag/v1.3.0) and disable the performance test "TestPerformance.test_dump". Package approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 --- Comment #9 from Andy Mender --- > Could we go on with the excluded performance tests? I don't think that's a good idea. The performance tests can be disabled, yes. However, the remaining tests touch on key functionalities of the "python-jsons" library and fail on Python 3.8 and Python 3.9. I received a response to my ticket with upstream a while back so please have a look whether the most recent release builds cleanly on Rawhide (and optionally F33 if you would like to cover that release, too). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter --- Could we go on with the excluded performance tests? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 --- Comment #7 from Andy Mender --- Quick update, unfortunately, I couldn't find a fix. It seems the tests for python-jsons are running into some corner cases in the 'typing' library. The Python docs don't mention any changes in Python 3.9 so it's hard to tell why the tests could be failing. Might as well be a bug in the 'typing' library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 Bug 1875997 depends on bug 1875996, which changed state. Bug 1875996 Summary: Review Request: python-typish - Python library for additional control over types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875996 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 --- Comment #6 from Andy Mender --- > Locally the performance tests are passing but are slowing down the build > process with no real value for us. > > %changelog > * Mon Sep 14 2020 Fabian Affolter - 1.2.0-3 > - Make performance tests optional Yup, these can be optional. Good idea! Since there is still no news from upstream on the ticket I opened, I'll try to work on a patch in the following days. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter --- Locally the performance tests are passing but are slowing down the build process with no real value for us. %changelog * Mon Sep 14 2020 Fabian Affolter - 1.2.0-3 - Make performance tests optional Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-jsons.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-jsons-1.2.0-3.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997
--- Comment #4 from Andy Mender ---
> Added
Thumbs up!
Honestly, I'm not quite sure how to proceed with this, however. I rebuilt the
package in COPR again:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andymenderunix/metrics2mqtt-and-dependencies/build/1654723/
Have a look at the logs specifically.
The reason why the build fails on Fedora 32 is because one of the tests shows
lower than expected performance:
https://github.com/ramonhagenaars/jsons/blob/master/tests/test_performance.py#L44
Below an example on aarch64. It's a lot worse on s390 (94.922601 seconds) and
armhfp (78.928779 seconds). Out of these aarch64, armhfp and x86_64 are
relevant.
> === FAILURES
> ===
> __ TestPerformance.test_dump
> ___
> self =
> def test_dump(self):
> > self._do_test_dump(16)
> tests/test_performance.py:45:
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> _
> tests/test_performance.py:67: in _do_test_dump
> self.assertTrue(delta_sec3 < time_limit, 'The operation took {}
> seconds'.format(delta_sec3))
> E AssertionError: False is not true : The operation took 16.243726 seconds
I'm pretty sure we could argue with upstream to up the number here, since it's
arbitrary anyway. Still, the differences in timings are huge.
Fedora 33 and Rawhide have bigger problems due to the switch to Python 3.9.
Either the test cases need to be revisited or the code they cover. I can have a
look over the weekend to maybe file some PRs, but no earlier.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1) > > Koji scratch build: > > fails due to missing dependency > > Yes, the following needs to be added next to the existing BuildRequires: > BuildRequires:python3dist(typish) Added %changelog * Tue Sep 08 2020 Fabian Affolter - 1.2.0-2 - Add missing BR (rhbz#1875997) Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-jsons.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-jsons-1.2.0-2.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 --- Comment #2 from Andy Mender --- I submitted a ticket with upstream: https://github.com/ramonhagenaars/jsons/issues/115 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997
--- Comment #1 from Andy Mender ---
> Koji scratch build:
> fails due to missing dependency
Yes, the following needs to be added next to the existing BuildRequires:
BuildRequires: python3dist(typish)
Tested in COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andymenderunix/metrics2mqtt-and-dependencies/build/1650399/
There is quite a lot of tests failing, however. I'll look into it.
=== FAILURES
===
TestSpecificVersions.test_dump_dataclass_with_optional
args = (,)
kwargs = {}
@skipUnless(dont_skip, reason=reason)
def _wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
> return decorated(*args, **kwargs)
tests/test_specific_versions.py:31:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tests/test_specific_versions.py:88: in test_dump_dataclass_with_optional
self.assertDictEqual(expected, dumped)
E AssertionError: {'x': [42, None, 123]} != {}
E - {'x': [42, None, 123]}
E + {}
__ TestSpecificVersions.test_namedtuple_with_optional
__
args = (,)
kwargs = {}
@skipUnless(dont_skip, reason=reason)
def _wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
> return decorated(*args, **kwargs)
tests/test_specific_versions.py:31:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tests/test_specific_versions.py:74: in test_namedtuple_with_optional
jsons.load({'arg': None}, NamedTupleWithOptional))
jsons/_load_impl.py:98: in load
return _do_load(json_obj, deserializer, cls, initial, **kwargs_)
jsons/_load_impl.py:110: in _do_load
result = deserializer(json_obj, cls, **kwargs)
jsons/deserializers/default_tuple.py:23: in default_tuple_deserializer
return default_namedtuple_deserializer(obj, cls,
key_transformer=key_transformer, **kwargs)
jsons/deserializers/default_tuple.py:80: in default_namedtuple_deserializer
loaded_field = load(field, cls_, key_transformer=key_transformer, **kwargs)
jsons/_load_impl.py:75: in load
_check_for_none(json_obj, cls)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
json_obj = None, cls = typing.Optional[str]
def _check_for_none(json_obj: object, cls: type):
# Check if the json_obj is None and whether or not that is fine.
if json_obj is None and not can_match_with_none(cls):
cls_name = get_class_name(cls).lower()
> raise DeserializationError(
message='NoneType cannot be deserialized into
{}'.format(cls_name),
source=json_obj,
target=cls)
E jsons.exceptions.DeserializationError: NoneType cannot be
deserialized into optional
jsons/_load_impl.py:213: DeserializationError
_ TestUnion.test_load_optional
_
self =
def test_load_optional(self):
class TestOptionalInt:
def __init__(self, value: Optional[int]):
self.value = value
# This seems fine.
> loaded1 = jsons.load({'value': 42}, cls=TestOptionalInt)
tests/test_union.py:102:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
jsons/_load_impl.py:98: in load
return _do_load(json_obj, deserializer, cls, initial, **kwargs_)
jsons/_load_impl.py:110: in _do_load
result = deserializer(json_obj, cls, **kwargs)
jsons/deserializers/default_object.py:39: in default_object_deserializer
constructor_args = _get_constructor_args(obj, cls, **kwargs)
jsons/deserializers/default_object.py:63: in _get_constructor_args
key, value = _get_value_for_attr(obj=obj,
jsons/deserializers/default_object.py:93: in _get_value_for_attr
result = sig_key, _get_value_from_obj(obj, cls, sig, sig_key,
jsons/deserializers/default_object.py:134: in _get_value_from_obj
value = load(obj[sig_key], cls_, meta_hints=new_hints, **kwargs)
jsons/_load_impl.py:98: in load
return _do_load(json_obj, deserializer, cls, initial, **kwargs_)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
json_obj = 42, deserializer = None, cls = typing.Optional[int], initial = False
kwargs = {'_initial': False, 'attr_getters': None, 'fork_inst': , 'meta_hints': {}, ...}
cls_name = 'typing.Optional'
def _do_load(json_obj: object,
deserializer: callable,
cls: type,
initial: bool,
**kwargs):
cls_name = get_class_name(cls, fully_qualified=True)
if deserializer is None:
> raise DeserializationError('No deserializer for type
> "{}"'.format(cls_name), json_obj, cls)
E jsons.exceptions.DeserializationError: No deserializer for type
"typing.Optional"
jsons/_load_impl.py:108: DeserializationError
__ TestUnion.test_load_union
___
self =
def test_load_union(self):
class A:
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||andymenderu...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|andymenderu...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1875997] Review Request: python-jsons - Python library for (de)serializing objects to/from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1875996 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875996 [Bug 1875996] Review Request: python-typish - Python library for additional control over types -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
