[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2020-09-24 09:44:00




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-91532104d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923

Adam Williamson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||awill...@redhat.com
 Whiteboard||AcceptedFreezeException



--- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson  ---
+5 votes in the ticket (https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/97 ),
setting accepted. Note however that some folks may be expecting the follow-up
change to enable this by default in IoT to be separately considered.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-91532104d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-91532104d0`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-91532104d0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923

Fedora Blocker Bugs Application  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com
 Blocks||1766776
   ||(BetaFreezeException,F33Bet
   ||aFreezeException)



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Blocker Bugs Application 
 ---
Proposed as a Freeze Exception for 33-beta by Fedora user pbrobinson using the
blocker tracking app because:

 For the PARSEC feature (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PARSEC), it's a
bit late but also completely self contained by default to IoT (but also others
have expressed interest in it).

Also needs the following PR to enable services in IoT:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/pull-request/150



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766776
[Bug 1766776] Fedora 33 Beta freeze exception bug tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-91532104d0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-91532104d0


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923
Bug 1878923 depends on bug 1878237, which changed state.

Bug 1878237 Summary: Review Request: rust-picky-asn1-x509 - Provides ASN1 types 
defined by X.509 related RFCs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878237

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/parsec


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923
Bug 1878923 depends on bug 1879482, which changed state.

Bug 1879482 Summary: Review Request: rust-pkcs11 - Rust PKCS#11 Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879482

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Jared Smith  ---
Please double-check whether the config.toml config file should be
config(noreplace), and
double-check the permissions on the /etc/parsec directory.  Otherwise, the
package is APPROVED.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 105 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/jsmith/Documents/Fedora/Reviews/parsec/review-
 parsec/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[?]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
 Note: No (noreplace) in %config /etc/parsec/config.toml
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
 systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
 Note: Systemd service file(s) in parsec
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
 justified.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or 

[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923



--- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson  ---
SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/parsec.spec
SRPM: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/parsec-0.4.0-2.fc32.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923



--- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson  ---
SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/parsec.spec
SRPM: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51587790

koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=51587790


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1879482 (rust-pkcs11)





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879482
[Bug 1879482] Review Request: rust-pkcs11 - Rust PKCS#11 Library
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1859994 (PARSEC)
 Depends On||1862796
   ||(rust-parsec-interface),
   ||1878237
   ||(rust-picky-asn1-x509),
   ||1862548 (rust-ring),
   ||1859151 (rust-rsa), 1859159
   ||(rust-psa-crypto), 1847906
   ||(rust-tss-esapi)
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847906
[Bug 1847906] Review Request: rust-tss-esapi - Wrapper around TSS 2.0 Enhanced
System API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859151
[Bug 1859151] Review Request: rust-rsa - Pure Rust RSA implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859159
[Bug 1859159] Review Request: rust-psa-crypto - Wrapper around the PSA
Cryptography API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859994
[Bug 1859994] Support PARSEC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862548
[Bug 1862548] Review Request: rust-ring - Safe, fast, small crypto using Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862796
[Bug 1862796] Review Request: rust-parsec-interface - Parsec interface library
to communicate using the wire protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878237
[Bug 1878237] Review Request: rust-picky-asn1-x509 - Provides ASN1 types
defined by X.509 related RFCs
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1878923] Review Request: parsec - The PARSEC daemon

2020-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878923
Bug 1878923 depends on bug 1862796, which changed state.

Bug 1862796 Summary: Review Request: rust-parsec-interface - Parsec interface 
library to communicate using the wire protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862796

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org