[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6b516c40dc has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-19aff91fad has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-12-23 01:03:46



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-664e6c8c1e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-0fe94debfb has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-664e6c8c1e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-664e6c8c1e \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-664e6c8c1e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6b516c40dc has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6b516c40dc

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-0fe94debfb has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-0fe94debfb \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0fe94debfb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-19aff91fad has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-19aff91fad

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-0fe94debfb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0fe94debfb

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-664e6c8c1e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-664e6c8c1e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-0fe94debfb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0fe94debfb


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-templated-dictionary


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309

Silvie Chlupova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #4 from Silvie Chlupova  ---
Thanks for the changes, now it looks fine.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
Err sorry, that was the test version.
Correct one:

SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/msuchy/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01822670-python-templated-dictionary/python-templated-dictionary.spec
SRC.RPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/msuchy/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01822670-python-templated-dictionary/python-templated-dictionary-1.1-1.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
Updated.
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/msuchy/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01822663-python-templated-dictionary/python-templated-dictionary.spec
SRC.RPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/msuchy/test/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01822663-python-templated-dictionary/python-templated-dictionary-1.1-1.git.0.919f74b.fc34.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309



--- Comment #1 from Silvie Chlupova  ---
Just a few things:

> Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python

%python_provide macro still works for compatibility reasons but it is
deprecated and should not be used and packagers should replace it with an
appropriate %py_provides call. Also, packages must not have dependencies on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix and you have in your spec
file BuildRequires: python-setuptools.

> Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines

See section Issues of this comment. Python packages must not contain
%{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
  Note: Package contains %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
  See: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "Unknown or
 generated". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/schlupov/1899309-python-templated-
 dictionary/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from 

[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion

2020-12-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309

Silvie Chlupova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review?




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org