[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc16 |httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.el6 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-24 15:04:14 EDT --- httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc17 |httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc16 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-17 19:34:01 EDT --- httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc17 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-03-16 17:22:38 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-16 17:22:38 EDT --- httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-08 07:41:24 EST --- httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-08 08:14:40 EST --- httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-08 08:20:59 EST --- httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-08 11:15:38 EST --- Package httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3388/httpd-itk-2.2.22-5.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #19 from Nikos Roussos ni...@autoverse.net 2012-03-06 07:50:54 EST --- It seems ok. Here is the review +: OK -: must be fixed =: should be fixed (at your discretion) ?: Question or clarification needed N: not applicable MUST: [+] rpmlint output: shown in comment: none [+] follows package naming guidelines [+] spec file base name matches package name [+] package meets the packaging guidelines [+] package uses a Fedora approved license: ASL 2.0 [+] license field matches the actual license. [-] license file is included in %doc Please include LICENSE on %doc (also README) [+] spec file is in American English [+] spec file is legible [+] sources match upstream: md5sum matches [+] package builds on at least one primary arch: Tested F16 x86_64 [N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch [+] all build requirements in BuildRequires [N] spec file handles locales properly [N] ldconfig in %post and %postun [+] no bundled copies of system libraries [+] no relocatable packages [+] package owns all directories that it creates [+] no files listed twice in %files [+] proper permissions on files [+] consistent use of macros [+] code or permissible content [N] large documentation in -doc [+] no runtime dependencies in %doc [N] header files in -devel [N] static libraries in -static [N] .so in -devel [N] -devel requires main package [+] package contains no libtool archives [N] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install/validate [+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages [+] all filenames in UTF-8 SHOULD: [N] query upstream for license text [=] description and summary contains available translations [+] package builds in mock [=] package builds on all supported arches: Tested x86_64 [+] package functions as described: [N] sane scriptlets [N] subpackages require the main package [N] placement of pkgconfig files [+] file dependencies versus package dependencies [=] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts Have you considered adding man pages or are the same as httpd package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #20 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2012-03-06 14:03:17 EST --- There nothing place in separate man. It's just apache MPM providing another inner security model. Installation note placed in rpm description. Each other help and utilities come from main httpd package which in dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #21 from Nikos Roussos ni...@autoverse.net 2012-03-06 14:41:03 EST --- See also the comment about license. You should include the LICENSE on %doc (and README) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #22 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2012-03-06 14:47:34 EST --- LICENSE and README from apache? For what? It will be just duplication of that files in main required package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 Nikos Roussos ni...@autoverse.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #23 from Nikos Roussos ni...@autoverse.net 2012-03-06 15:01:56 EST --- Now I see what you mean :) You're right. My bad. Package is *approved*. You may proceed with the SCM request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2012-03-06 15:24:42 EST --- Nikos, thank you very much for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: httpd-itk Short Description: MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server Owners: hubbitus Branches: F16 F17 EL-5 EL-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-06 16:18:44 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #18 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2012-03-01 14:54:43 EST --- Good catch. Thank you. Fixed: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora16/httpd-itk/httpd-itk.spec http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora16/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.22-3.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #17 from Nikos Roussos ni...@autoverse.net 2012-02-28 11:25:16 EST --- cp: cannot stat `README.Fedora': No such file or directory You have to include README.Fedora on src.rpm and add it on SOURCES on spec. See a spec example on how to do it: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/idjc.spec Fix this and I think the package is ready for review and approval -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2012-02-23 12:45:12 EST --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #13) Actually you're using tabs instead of spaces :) And in some cases you're mixing them. I believe it is not. Please say on what line and I'll fix it. Rpmlint silent about that. For instance you use tabs on BuildRequires lines but spaces on if block at line 79. Yes, you are right there. Thank you. Fixed. I meant the opposite :) Some lines should be longer. For instance the first one on the description block. Fixed. http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora16/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.22-2.fc16.src.rpm http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora16/httpd-itk/httpd-itk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #15 from Nikos Roussos ni...@autoverse.net 2012-02-21 04:09:30 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) Actually you're using tabs instead of spaces :) And in some cases you're mixing them. I believe it is not. Please say on what line and I'll fix it. Rpmlint silent about that. For instance you use tabs on BuildRequires lines but spaces on if block at line 79. You could add build requires dependencies one per line. It's more readable. It then increase size of file which already not so small. I think it is not block. Both this and the above are definitely not blockers. It's just friendly suggestions to make the spec more readable. Use the full length of a line for description, up to 80 characters. There no lines longer already. I meant the opposite :) Some lines should be longer. For instance the first one on the description block. Add some descriptive comments or/and upstream links on patches It there. I have slightly fix it and add URL on comment. Nice. Please keep track of this in order to update your spec in a future release. I'll do a format review asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #14 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2012-02-18 10:19:30 EST --- Firstly thank you for the review, Nikos. (In reply to comment #13) Actually you're using tabs instead of spaces :) And in some cases you're mixing them. I believe it is not. Please say on what line and I'll fix it. Rpmlint silent about that. Add some descriptive comments or/and upstream links on patches https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment It there. I have slightly fix it and add URL on comment. You could add build requires dependencies one per line. It's more readable. It then increase size of file which already not so small. I think it is not block. Use the full length of a line for description, up to 80 characters. There no lines longer already. I'm not sure it's a good idea to add an echo command on %install section. If you want to give some information to the user, better add a README.Fedora or add some info on description. I have no any serious advantages of it, but it moved. Also update to new version: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora16/httpd-itk/httpd-itk.spec http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora16/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.22-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #13 from Nikos Roussos ni...@autoverse.net 2012-02-14 16:32:22 EST --- Actually you're using tabs instead of spaces :) And in some cases you're mixing them. Use either spaces or tabs (spaces preferable). It's not against the policy, but it would make the spec far more readable. Add some descriptive comments or/and upstream links on patches https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment You could add build requires dependencies one per line. It's more readable. Use the full length of a line for description, up to 80 characters. I'm not sure it's a good idea to add an echo command on %install section. If you want to give some information to the user, better add a README.Fedora or add some info on description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 Nikos Roussos ni...@autoverse.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ni...@autoverse.net AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ni...@autoverse.net Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #11 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) m...@ryanlewis.net 2012-01-02 15:16:32 EST --- P.S. Spec file formatted by tabs with 5 space width ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PavelAlexeev/tabsize ). Please, do not start review if it is a problem for you. Make it so that I don't need to do this. I should be able to view the spec file so that it is legible: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Spec_Legibility I'm not modifying my tabsize to deal with your spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #12 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2012-01-02 15:26:11 EST --- How I can known what tab size you are using? Now, today, tomorrow?? May be we start real work? Or do not start it. I'm ready continue this discussion if you want, but I think mail list or private conversation, forum or jabber will be much more appropriate place for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #10 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2012-01-01 15:57:14 EST --- I believe what provided below links are works, at least for src.rpm: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora15/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.21-1.fc15.src.rpm http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora15/httpd-itk/httpd-itk.spec I'll be glad if you take it, but what you are mean under a normal fedora system?? Could you please provide link to guideline or policy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #9 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) m...@ryanlewis.net 2011-12-23 21:19:59 EST --- ... and if you fix your crazy file spacing to that of a normal fedora system. I'll undertake your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) m...@ryanlewis.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@ryanlewis.net --- Comment #8 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) m...@ryanlewis.net 2011-12-23 21:15:40 EST --- Hi, links to working spec files + rpmlint -v on the .rpms please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2011-09-13 10:51:46 EDT --- Next update http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora15/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.21-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2011-09-10 11:17:34 EDT --- http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora15/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.20-1.fc15.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Sep 10 2011 Pavel Alexeev pa...@hubbitus.info - 2.2.20-1 - Security upstream update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2011-08-21 07:21:33 EDT --- New version 2.2.19 http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora15/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.19-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2011-03-23 16:11:30 EDT --- Update follow to Fedora upstream httpd: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora13/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.17-4.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-10-30 07:19:27 EDT --- Update follow to upstream: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.17-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-09-22 09:41:20 EDT --- New update follow to httpd: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.16-4.fc13.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/httpd-itk/httpd-itk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-07-28 10:06:33 EDT --- New apache version: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/httpd-itk/httpd-itk-2.2.16-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
