[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(callkalpa@gmail.c ||om) --- Comment #17 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. If you still want to include this package in Fedora, please clear the needinfo tag and explain how you intend to continue. I can review. Otherwise, just leave the tag in place and this request should be automatically closed in a month. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
needinfo canceled: [Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for Narasimhan 's needinfo: Bug 783294: Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #16 from Package Review --- This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294
--- Comment #14 from Michael Shigorin ---
Created attachment 652233
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=652233&action=edit
spec accepted into ALT Linux Sisyphus
Here's a brief overview of changes to get it working (basically a closer look
at the INSTALL file and translation into spec lingo without trying to be even
smarter ass):
%define _libdir %_usr/lib
# ...
%install
mkdir -p %buildroot{%_bindir,%_libdir/%name,%_datadir}
cp -a bin/{picolisp,pil} %buildroot%_bindir/
# TODO: emacs subpackage
rm -rf lib/el
# lib/ and lib.l
cp -a lib* %buildroot%_libdir/%name/
# as per INSTALL
ln -s ../lib/%name %buildroot%_datadir/%name
%files
%doc CHANGES CREDITS README
%_bindir/*
%_libdir/%name/
%_datadir/%name/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #13 from Lakshmi Narasimhan --- @Kalpa, After installing picolisp,I ran pil on the command line and got an error but it recovered. $pil "/usr/lib/picolisp/lib.l" -- Open error: No such file or directory The executable looks for the .l files in /usr/lib. But they are packaged in /usr/lib64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #12 from Kalpa Welivitigoda --- removed "Requires: java" Spec URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/picolisp/picolisp.spec SRPM URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/picolisp/picolisp-3.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Lakshmi Narasimhan --- @Kalpa Thanks. Will review this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #10 from Michael Shigorin --- "Requires: java" looks a bit overrated to me as it's only needed for "Ersatz PicoLisp" (see http://software-lab.de/down.html), not for the native binary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #9 from Kalpa Welivitigoda --- Spec URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/picolisp/picolisp.spec SRPM URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/picolisp/picolisp-3.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Now it seems ok -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #8 from Kalpa Welivitigoda --- Spec URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/picolisp/picolisp.spec SRPM URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/picolisp/picolisp-3.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm I did a scratch build for 3.1.0. 64 bit failed while 32 bit was a success. Can any of you help me spot the issue with 64 bit? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 Michael Shigorin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shigo...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Michael Shigorin --- (In reply to comment #4) > Patch for fixing the empty debuginfo package issue Pushing $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) inside Cygwin ifdef looks spectacular :) Kalpa, you might have a look at Debian patches either, and there's 3.1.0 by now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #6 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2012-03-05 03:33:11 EST --- I have added RPM_OPT_FLAGS and LDFLAGS. I am not sure LDFLAGS are needed though. But it will be better to have RPM_OPT_FLAGS. The actual fix for debuginfo package is replacing strip with echo and adding -g to "as" or gcc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #5 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2012-03-05 03:29:06 EST --- Created attachment 567519 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=567519 Patch for fixing the empty debuginfo package issue for 64 bit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2012-03-05 03:28:22 EST --- Created attachment 567517 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=567517 Patch for fixing the empty debuginfo package issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #3 from Kalpa Welivitigoda 2012-03-05 02:05:45 EST --- Thanks Lakshmi. Waiting for your patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2012-03-05 00:33:10 EST --- Hi, Some additional rpmlint issues 1)Issue about exectuable stack. I am not sure whether picoLisp would require executable stack. We can leave this for now 2) Empty debuginfo package issue. I checked the makefile and executables are being stripped. Also, for 64 bit platform, the "as" program needs to be run with -g option. I have created patches for these. I will attach them here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan 2012-01-29 00:08:14 EST --- The license text attached in the sources indicates it is MIT license. Any reason why the license is mentioned as GPLV2+ in the spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|unspecified |medium Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lakshminaras2...@gmail.com Severity|unspecified |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 783294] Review Request: picolisp - Lisp Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294 Kalpa Welivitigoda changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|picolisp - Lisp Interpreter |Review Request: picolisp - ||Lisp Interpreter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
