[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-04-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG)  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-04-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||jpfcodegen-0.4-3.fc17
 Resolution||ERRATA
Last Closed||2012-04-11 22:40:35

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-04-11 
22:40:35 EDT ---
jpfcodegen-0.4-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2012-03-30 10:56:51 
EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name:  jpfcodegen
Short Description: A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins
Owners:mef
Branches:  f17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-30 11:09:44 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-30 
11:31:53 EDT ---
jpfcodegen-0.4-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jpfcodegen-0.4-3.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-30 
14:01:15 EDT ---
jpfcodegen-0.4-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com 2012-03-29 09:39:37 EDT ---
Very well then.


*** APPROVED ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

--- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2012-03-23 09:24:25 
EDT ---
Updated:
- Add javadoc
- Rename patch filename
- Clean up install section
- Fix line endings in tutorial files
- Fix typo in description


Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jabref/jpfcodegen.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jabref/jpfcodegen-0.4-3.fc15.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||tra...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tra...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

Bug 785694 depends on bug 784592, which changed state.

Bug 784592 Summary: Review Request: jpf - Java Plug-in Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784592

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
 Resolution||ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED

--- Comment #2 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 11:41:14 EDT ---

Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



 Generic 
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[!]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
 Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[-]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[?]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint jpfcodegen-0.4-2.fc18.src.rpm

jpfcodegen.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml - XML, ml, x ml
jpfcodegen.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US simplyfies -
simplifies, simpleness
jpfcodegen.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jpfcodegen-0.4.tbz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.


rpmlint jpfcodegen-0.4-2.fc18.noarch.rpm

jpfcodegen.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml - XML, ml, x ml
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US simplyfies -
simplifies, simpleness
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/jpfcodegen-0.4/tutorials/basic/src/com/example/Main.java
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/jpfcodegen-0.4/tutorials/basic/plugins/plugin2/src/com/example/plugin2/Plugin2Panel.java
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/jpfcodegen-0.4/tutorials/basic/build.xml
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/jpfcodegen-0.4/tutorials/basic/plugins/core/build.xml
jpfcodegen.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG)

--- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2012-02-13 06:26:36 
EST ---
Minor changes:
- Remove defattr from files section

http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jabref/jpfcodegen-0.4-2.fc16.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||784596

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 785694] Review Request: jpfcodegen - A tool for generating classes from JPF plug-ins

2012-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785694

Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||784592

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review