[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API

2012-04-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||jboss-jstl-1.2-api-1.0.3-2.
   ||fc17
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-04-11 
22:55:08 EDT ---
jboss-jstl-1.2-api-1.0.3-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-28 
05:37:30 EDT ---
jboss-jstl-1.2-api-1.0.3-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jboss-jstl-1.2-api-1.0.3-2.fc17

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API

2012-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011

Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mgold...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-27 05:51:15 
EDT ---
Taking this one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API

2012-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011

Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG)  |
   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-27 06:24:54 
EDT ---
Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x]  Rpmlint output:

$ rpmlint SPECS/jboss-jstl-1.2-api.spec 
SPECS/jboss-jstl-1.2-api.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
jboss-jstl-1.2-api-1.0.3.Final.tar.xz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint SRPMS/jboss-jstl-1.2-api-1.0.3-2.fc17.src.rpm 
jboss-jstl-1.2-api.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
jboss-jstl-1.2-api.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
jboss-jstl-1.2-api.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
jboss-jstl-1.2-api-1.0.3.Final.tar.xz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/jboss-jstl-1.2-api-1.0.3-2.fc17.noarch.rpm 
jboss-jstl-1.2-api.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
jboss-jstl-1.2-api.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

[x]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x]  Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x]  Buildroot definition is not present
[x]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions
[x]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x]  All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: 4398339465ea305c78d8f6e40478f89d
MD5SUM upstream package: 4398339465ea305c78d8f6e40478f89d
[x]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x]  Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other
packages for directories it uses.
[x]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]  File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]  Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x]  Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]  Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]  Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x]  Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]  Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x]  Package uses %global not %define
[x]  If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-]  If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x]  All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x]  Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x]  If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x]  pom files has correct add_maven_depmap

=== Maven ===
[x]  Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-]  If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-]  If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x]  Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]  Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro

=== Other suggestions ===
[x]  If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x]  Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[X]  Package has BuildArch: noarch (if 

[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API

2012-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011

Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #4 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-27 
06:29:34 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: jboss-jstl-1.2-api
Short Description: JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API
Owners: jhernand
Branches: f17
InitialCC: goldmann

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API

2012-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011

--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-27 08:22:53 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API

2012-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011

Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-03-27 12:34:59

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011

Bug 806011 depends on bug 804824, which changed state.

Bug 804824 Summary: Review Request: jboss-jsp-2.2-api - JavaServer(TM) Pages 
2.2 API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804824

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011

--- Comment #1 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-23 
14:06:51 EDT ---
Fixed to use %global instead of %define:

http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-jstl-1.2-api/1.0.3-2/jboss-jstl-1.2-api.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 806011] Review Request: jboss-jstl-1.2-api - JSP Standard Template Library 1.2 API

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806011

Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||804824

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review