[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Bug 882512 depends on bug 882508, which changed state. Bug 882508 Summary: Review Request: appmenu-qt - Global application menu to Qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882508 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xIVBUjA9wca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- plasma-widget-menubar-0.1.18-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GMfrtmRj69a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed|2012-12-25 12:47:39 |2013-01-11 20:02:33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=e4hbr6IAKPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #18 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- Since we're being pedantic, the correct status for a bug with a pending, not-yet-pushed update filed is MODIFIED, not ASSIGNED. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=h183Zn0EUva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #19 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #18) Since we're being pedantic, the correct status for a bug with a pending, not-yet-pushed update filed is MODIFIED, not ASSIGNED. :-) OK, you're right ;) Usually I let Bodhi do this job, but in this case ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nU1Fu77B5Wa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- plasma-widget-menubar-0.1.18-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=41NHJR35qna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6iDnAQOmUxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- plasma-widget-menubar-0.1.18-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/plasma-widget-menubar-0.1.18-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D0JfJixTwpa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #16 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #14) sorry, I was closing it specifically because its git scm work was completed. I know the contributor normally closes it, but I was cleaning up my bug list for the holidays and I figured it didn't matter which one of us closed it. The NOTABUG was just a fat finger on my part, sorry. In almost all cases I use the automatism in Bodhi which closes the bug once the package(s) are stable. No need to close it manually before the status is ON_QA. It could be insufficient to recognize it as resolved once the Git repo has been created. Imagine, some review-related issues come up during the build process... I don't like this way to clean up one's bug list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WGWf5JYF28a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #17 from Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com --- Well, then you did just the right thing by reopening it didn't you? You dont have to get bent out of shape over it. Speaking of open, I've had new spec and srpm files posted in bz 884291 for a few days now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BKAhSZqAvBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2012-12-25 12:47:39 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=15HAqXahM6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #13 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- Huh? Neil Horman, why did you close this as NOTABUG? The package was already approved and the git module created. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FdOqPBCqeEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |CURRENTRELEASE Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #14 from Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com --- sorry, I was closing it specifically because its git scm work was completed. I know the contributor normally closes it, but I was cleaning up my bug list for the holidays and I figured it didn't matter which one of us closed it. The NOTABUG was just a fat finger on my part, sorry. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Mo7GwvRQOIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wY6QnUX47Ta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ Flags||needinfo?(mario.blaetterman ||n...@gmail.com) --- Comment #8 from Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com --- ACK, looks good! Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BkRLPDuVpDa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mario.blaetterman | |n...@gmail.com)| Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Thanks for your review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: plasma-widget-menubar Short Description: Show window menubars Owners: mariobl Branches: f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3FRKZmY2Lya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- IMHO, menu bars, not menu bars is the correct spelling. (But then again I'm a pedant. ;-) ) --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- Oops, that didn't make much sense. ;-) Let's try again: IMHO, menu bars, not menubars, is the correct spelling. (But then again I'm a pedant. ;-) ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=n4cFXm1bNqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- IMHO, menu bars, not menu bars is the correct spelling. (But then again I'm a pedant. ;-) ) --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- Oops, that didn't make much sense. ;-) Let's try again: IMHO, menu bars, not menubars, is the correct spelling. (But then again I'm a pedant. ;-) ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HfuuEOk0LAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512
--- Comment #6 from Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com ---
MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]
check
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
check
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
check
MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
check
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
check
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
[3]
check
MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
check
MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
check
MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
check
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is
used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
check
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. [7]
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4811381
check
MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
N/A
MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
check
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
no language files (N/A)
MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
NAK, need to run ldconfig in post and postun
MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11]
check
MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. [12]
check
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory. [13]
check
MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations)[14]
check
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. [15]
check
MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
check
MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
check
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
check
MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. [18]
check
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [19]
N/A
MUST: Development files must be in a -devel package. [20]
N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release} [21]
N/A
MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.[19]
N/A
MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
[22]
check
MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed
should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This
means, for example, that no
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #6) MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] NAK, need to run ldconfig in post and postun OK, here are the new files: Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/plasma-widget-menubar.spec SRPM URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/plasma-widget-menubar-0.1.18-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AJokHCtfPta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nhor...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nhor...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9VsbAKvJrFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1t4Vp5ATlxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #5 from Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com --- [nhorman@shamino SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i -v plasma-widget-menubar-0.1.18-1.fc18.src.rpm plasma-widget-menubar.src: I: checking plasma-widget-menubar.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) menubars - menu bars, menu-bars, menswear The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. plasma-widget-menubar.src: I: checking-url http://launchpad.net/plasma-widget-menubar/ (timeout 10 seconds) plasma-widget-menubar.src: I: checking-url https://launchpad.net/plasma-widget-menubar/trunk/0.1.18/+download/plasma-widget-menubar-0.1.18.tar.bz2 (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I wouldn't worry about the spelling error, I think rpmlint is overly sensitive about that anyway. I'll do a line item check in the morning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HvwmRd78C2a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #3) FYI, Unity 2D is dead, discontinued by upstream (Canonical). It relies on QML, and QML will require OpenGL in Qt 5, which defeats the purpose of Unity 2D. So now I think the fallback plan is the normal (3D) Unity on llvmpipe. In any case, they dropped support for Unity 2D already. I also don't see how it would be any more convenient for non-Unity users than plasma-widget-menubar is for non-Plasma users. You have to switch to Unity to use it, just like you have to switch to Plasma to use any plasma-widget-*. Oh, I wasn't aware of this... I thought the qt based 2d version will remain as a fallback solution, but it seems to go the same way as the fallback mode in gnome3. In unity-2d it was obviously possible to run the panel only, while dropping the dash and probably some other stuff. The native 3d version doesn't have this feature, so that is no real solution for Xfce users. BTW, probably I will switch from Xfce to KDE within the next months. I have never thought about this, but assuming KDE is at least as configurable as Xfce (and shrinkable, if needed), I could imagine that step. So I remove the NotReady tag now. If someone has time left for a review, please do it. The dependency appmenu-qt is built for f18 and rawhide now and the latter should be available soon for a Koji scratch build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mTQTT5vjUUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- libdbusmenu is currently under review (bug #842509) and actually approved, so that I assume I can continue on this package in the nearest future. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D1zDzMMSYFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- FYI, Unity 2D is dead, discontinued by upstream (Canonical). It relies on QML, and QML will require OpenGL in Qt 5, which defeats the purpose of Unity 2D. So now I think the fallback plan is the normal (3D) Unity on llvmpipe. In any case, they dropped support for Unity 2D already. I also don't see how it would be any more convenient for non-Unity users than plasma-widget-menubar is for non-Plasma users. You have to switch to Unity to use it, just like you have to switch to Plasma to use any plasma-widget-*. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QxzAalw7Gja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- I set this request to NotReady. Well, it is actually ready, but I want to package libdbusmenu and appmenu-gtk first, to make sure to have a complete global menu bar, not only for the Plasma desktop. Perhaps I try to package Unity-2D, which could be a more convenient solution for non-KDE users. I don't use KDE, and for the time being I run plasma-desktop under Xfce, but that's not really fine. However, once appmenu-qt has been approved (bug #882508) and someone wants to maintain plasma-widget-menubar, feel free to do so. Otherwise, I will maintain it, but once we have another solution (like the mentioned Unity-2D) I will probably orphan it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZMrhjfw5hFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|882508 (appmenu-qt) | Depends On||882508 (appmenu-qt) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||882508 (appmenu-qt) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
