[Bug 918801] Review Request: schroedinger-cat-backgrounds - Schrödinger's Cat desktop backgrounds

2013-03-13 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918801

Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2013-03-13 06:01:27

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4xG8HP89NHa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918801] Review Request: schroedinger-cat-backgrounds - Schrödinger's Cat desktop backgrounds

2013-03-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918801

--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iuczNVC6u9a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918801] Review Request: schroedinger-cat-backgrounds - Schrödinger's Cat desktop backgrounds

2013-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918801

Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||l...@fedoraproject.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@fedoraproject.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=btUJsO1OGMa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918801] Review Request: schroedinger-cat-backgrounds - Schrödinger's Cat desktop backgrounds

2013-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918801

Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=htNaxZ90KDa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918801] Review Request: schroedinger-cat-backgrounds - Schrödinger's Cat desktop backgrounds

2013-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918801

--- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org ---
Here is the generated package review:

Package Review
==

Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 schroedinger-cat-backgrounds-base , schroedinger-cat-backgrounds-animated
 , schroedinger-cat-backgrounds-kde , schroedinger-cat-backgrounds-gnome ,
 schroedinger-cat-backgrounds-mate , schroedinger-cat-backgrounds-xfce
[x] Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
 Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Uses parallel make.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

= EXTRA items =

Generic:
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
 arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed 

[Bug 918801] Review Request: schroedinger-cat-backgrounds - Schrödinger's Cat desktop backgrounds

2013-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918801

--- Comment #2 from Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 Could you fix the URL and spelling error (en)US) as displayed by rpmlint?
 Schrödinger's - Schrodinger's, Schlesinger's, Schwinger's

AFAIK, false positive. Fedora 19 official release name is Schrödinger's Cat,
which is also the correct name (the physicist was called Schrödinger,
Schrodinger and Schroedinger are simplifications to avoid having to type ö with
the first one just dropping the accent, the second one being, IMHO, generally
accepted transliteration).
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/History_of_Fedora_release_names#Fedora_19_.28Schr.C3.B6dinger.27s_Cat.29

 schroedinger-cat-backgrounds.noarch: W: invalid-url URL:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F19_Artwork HTTP Error 404: Not Found
This was fixed between the time you run the test suite and posted the result.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F19_Artwork

Thanks for taking up the review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6JOxLbhUGza=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918801] Review Request: schroedinger-cat-backgrounds - Schrödinger's Cat desktop backgrounds

2013-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918801

Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CRpbI3twtAa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918801] Review Request: schroedinger-cat-backgrounds - Schrödinger's Cat desktop backgrounds

2013-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918801

Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |
  Flags||fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org ---
No problem. No documentation part from rpmlint can be ignored because the
packages are backgrounds set. Consider this review successfully passed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wazwdCuBfVa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 918801] Review Request: schroedinger-cat-backgrounds - Schrödinger's Cat desktop backgrounds

2013-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918801

Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #4 from Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: schroedinger-cat-backgrounds 
Short Description: Schrödinger's Cat desktop backgrounds
Owners: mso
Branches: 
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8pEqBYPsvza=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review