[Bug 1374948] Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374948 --- Comment #3 from Michal Ruprich --- Please disregard my inquiry about the copr repo. I totally forgot about the outage today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376899] Review Request: pcaudiolib - Portable C Audio Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376899 Petr Menšík changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pemen...@redhat.com Assignee|jskar...@redhat.com |pemen...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376900] Review Request: espeak-ng - eSpeak NG Text-to-Speech
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376900 Petr Menšík changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pemen...@redhat.com Assignee|jskar...@redhat.com |pemen...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377631] New: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-netspeed - A gnome-shell extension to show speed of the internet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377631 Bug ID: 1377631 Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-netspeed - A gnome-shell extension to show speed of the internet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mgans...@alice.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0cfb4boq3dhclu9/gnome-shell-extension-netspeed.spec?dl=0 SRPM URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qsc4khyihlxnm9h/gnome-shell-extension-netspeed-3.20-1.20160806git16a25ec.fc24.src.rpm?dl=0 Description: Add an Internet speed indicator to status area. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg %changelog * Fri Sep 16 2016 Martin Gansser - 3.20-1.20160806git16a25ec - Update to 3.20 rpmlint -i gnome-shell-extension-netspeed.spec /home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gnome-shell-extension-netspeed-3.20-1.20160806git16a25ec.fc24.src.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/gnome-shell-extension-netspeed-3.20-1.20160806git16a25ec.fc24.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1374948] Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374948 Michal Ruprich changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mrupr...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1374948] Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374948 Michal Ruprich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1374947] Review Request: vpcs - Virtual PC Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374947 Michal Ruprich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mrupr...@redhat.com QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |mrupr...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1370096] rubygem-celluloid-essentials - Internally used tools, and superstructural dependencies of Celluloid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370096 Jun Aruga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jar...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jar...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1372718] Review Request: rubygem-puma - A simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372718 --- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Jun Aruga from comment #11) > (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6) > > * Purpose of Patch1? > > - Not sure about purpose of the Patch1, since if I comment it out and use > > the previous commands, I can execute the test suite just fine => I > > suggest > > to drop this patch altogether. > > - You are right that upstream is inconsistent in this regard, but I'd say > > that the particular require you are fixing is the way how the test > > suites > > typically works, while the proposed fix is antipattern. IOW you should > > propose fix fixing all the other files. > > I thinks the Patch1 is needed. > Because I got an error without the Patch1. It depends on the order of test. > > sh-4.3# > RUBYOPT=-I.:lib:/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-puma-3.6.0/usr/lib64/gems/ruby/ > puma-3.6.0 \ > > ruby -r minitest/autorun -e 'Dir.glob "./test/test_http11.rb", > > &method(:require)' -- -v > /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require': > cannot load such file -- testhelp (LoadError) > from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in > `require' > from > /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-puma-3.6.0/usr/share/gems/gems/puma-3.6.0/test/ > test_http11.rb:4:in `' > from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in > `require' > from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in > `require' > from -e:1:in `glob' > from -e:1:in `' > > > > When I add "-r test/testhelp", its test was passed. > > sh-4.3# > RUBYOPT=-I.:lib:/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-puma-3.6.0/usr/lib64/gems/ruby/ > puma-3.6.0 \ > > ruby -r minitest/autorun -r test/testhelp -e 'Dir.glob > > "./test/test_http11.rb", &method(:require)' -- -v > ... > 100% passed Of course you are right in this case, but the scope of the issue is much broader then you think. Please check these lines: https://github.com/puma/puma/blob/master/test/testhelp.rb#L5-L8 You can see that the "." and "./test" gets on the load path at some point. So you can then require either "testhelp" or "test/testhelp". The correct fix would be to unify this, i.e. you should be able to do only "require 'testhelp'" at the end, because this is how it is typically done nowadays. The "." should not get on the load path at all. IOW, you can keep it like this for the moment. But I'd suggest you to work with upstream to make this consistent and up to date. This should be the start of the upstream work: ``` find test -name '*.rb' -exec sed -i "s|test/testhelp|testhelp|" {} \; ``` Otherwise the changes looks reasonable. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375926] Review Request: python-nose2 - Next generation of nicer testing for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-nose2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1149176] Review Request: vdsm-jsonrpc-java - jsonrpc communication lib for ovirt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176 automat...@ovirt.org changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||oVirt gerrit 63673 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377733] New: Review Request: systemd-bootchart - Boot performance graphing tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377733 Bug ID: 1377733 Summary: Review Request: systemd-bootchart - Boot performance graphing tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: f...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/systemd-bootchart.spec SRPM URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/systemd-bootchart-231-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Boot performance graphing tool Fedora Account System Username: fale -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1353224] Review Request: python-tackerclient - Client for OpenStack tacker project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353224 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-tackerclient -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377762] New: Review Request: opendht - A lightweight C++11 Distributed Hash Table implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377762 Bug ID: 1377762 Summary: Review Request: opendht - A lightweight C++11 Distributed Hash Table implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: benjamin.lef...@nwise.se QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://lef.fedorapeople.org/opendht.spec SRPM URL: https://lef.fedorapeople.org/opendht-0.6.3-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: A lightweight C++11 Distributed Hash Table implementation originally based on https://github.com/jech/dht by Juliusz Chroboczek. * Light and fast C++11 Kademlia DHT library. * Distributed shared key->value data-store * Clean and powerful distributed map API with storage of arbitrary binary values of up to 56 KB. * Optional public key cryptography layer providing data signature and encryption (using GnuTLS). * IPv4 and IPv6 support. * Python binding. Fedora Account System Username: lef KOJI: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15717915 COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lef/opendht/build/455451/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375926] Review Request: python-nose2 - Next generation of nicer testing for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-nose2-0.6.5-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-de3d12ca85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375926] Review Request: python-nose2 - Next generation of nicer testing for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377812] New: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag - Sphinx "blockdiag" extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377812 Bug ID: 1377812 Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag - Sphinx "blockdiag" extension Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jp...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag/python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag.spec SRPM URL: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag/python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag-1.5.5-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: A sphinx extension for embedding block diagram using blockdiag_. Fedora Account System Username: jpena Koji scratch build available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15719428 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369534] Review Request: libsass - C/ C++ port of the Sass CSS precompiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369534 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(aurelien@bompard. ||org) --- Comment #3 from Randy Barlow --- Hey Aurelien! The -devel subpackage still has the LICENSE in the %doc macro. Can you fix that one too? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369534] Review Request: libsass - C/ C++ port of the Sass CSS precompiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369534 Aurelien Bompard changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(aurelien@bompard. | |org)| --- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard --- Oops, fixed, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1350257] Review Request: petsc - Portable Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(d.love@liverpool. ||ac.uk) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1338339] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338339 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||till.hofm...@posteo.de Flags||needinfo?(till.hofmann@post ||eo.de) --- Comment #23 from Antonio Trande --- I guess that upstream needs more information about (build log is not accessible anymore). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376710] Review Request: python-packaging - Core utilities for Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376710 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-packaging-16.7-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376710] Review Request: python-packaging - Core utilities for Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376710 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-09-20 13:05:09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1360258] Review Request: qt5-qtserialbus - The Qt Serial Bus API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360258 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-09-20 13:06:45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1342063] Review Request: python-mongoquery - A python implementation of mongodb queries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-mongoquery-1.1.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1342063] Review Request: python-mongoquery - A python implementation of mongodb queries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-09-20 13:06:55 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376207] Review Request: python-fedmsg-atomic-composer - Composes atomic trees when Fedora repositories are updated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-fedmsg-atomic-composer-2016.2-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1360258] Review Request: qt5-qtserialbus - The Qt Serial Bus API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360258 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtserialbus-5.7.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377733] Review Request: systemd-bootchart - Boot performance graphing tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377733 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ignate...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko --- - Use %{_unitdir} - Use %make_build - Add special systemd macro in %post* triggers - Use %{?systemd_requires} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1373486] Review Request: python34 - Version 3.4 of the Python programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486 --- Comment #1 from Charalampos Stratakis --- I plan to test it on Fedora 24 and Fedora 25. Will need to check that the interpreters can work side by side without clashing in any way, meaning firing up python shells and trying various things as well as executing some basic scripts. Upgrade paths should be clean (F24->F25, F25->F26) however I will test that, just for consistency. This should be easier though than python35. Anything else that I might be missing, in order to properly test the package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310873] Review Request: rubygem-async_sinatra - A Sinatra plugin for running on async webservers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310873 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-async_sinatra-1.2.1-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-41326fc2f1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1374035] Review Request: pimd - The original PIM-SM multicast routing daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374035 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- pimd-2.3.2-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5a2920fad0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1354113] Review Request: python-pytest-catchlog - py.test plugin to catch log messages ( fork of pytest-capturelog)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354113 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-pytest-catchlog-1.2.2-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-42f09d7ea7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377252] Review Request: perl-Params-ValidationCompiler - Build an optimized subroutine parameter validator once , use it forever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377252 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Params-ValidationCompiler-0.13-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-04cc921d53 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357724] Review Request: qcint - general GTO integrals for quantum chemistry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357724 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- qcint-1.8.6-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1fe321e1eb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369248] Review Request: jackson-datatype-jdk8 - Add-on module for Jackson to support JDK 8 data types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369248 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|RAWHIDE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- jackson-datatype-jdk8-2.7.6-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eb91de5d24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369224] Review Request: jackson-modules-base - Jackson modules: Base
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369224 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- jackson-modules-base-2.7.6-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a2a9677a7c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357728] Review Request: libcint - general GTO integrals for quantum chemistry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357728 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- libcint-2.8.7-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8bdf95a798 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377228] Review Request: perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings - Fail if tests warn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377228 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings-0.02-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e1d82b2619 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369244] Review Request: jackson-datatype-jsr310 - Add-on module to support JSR-310 ( Java 8 Date & Time API) data types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369244 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|RAWHIDE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- jackson-datatype-jsr310-2.7.6-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-79a8b90357 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1374138] Review Request: vim-syntastic - A vim plugins to check syntax for programming languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- vim-syntastic-3.7.0-6.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f79b82727b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1342839] Review Request: python-pycodestyle - Python style guide checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- python-flake8-import-order-0.9.2-1.fc25, python-pycodestyle-2.0.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dce2f89dec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369232] Review Request: jackson-datatypes-collections - Jackson datatypes: collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369232 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|RAWHIDE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- jackson-datatypes-collections-2.7.6-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-493a0cf1dd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 977116] Review Request: pgmodeler - PostgreSQL Database Modeler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116 --- Comment #52 from Pavel Alexeev --- Add Requires shared-mime-info. hicolor-icon-theme already required. > - For F25+, various scriptlets should not be run according to [1]. For F23, > F24 update-mime-database needs to be invoked in %post. That already there: https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/blob/master/SPECS/pgmodeler.spec#L81 Changes: https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/commit/ca4684e8f693b037c20988337abfea9ffd8faf67 Spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/ca4684e8f693b037c20988337abfea9ffd8faf67/SPECS/pgmodeler.spec Srpm: http://rpm.hubbitus.info/Fedora24/pgmodeler/pgmodeler-0.8.2-4.fc24.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15723164 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377876] New: Review Request: jose - Tools for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377876 Bug ID: 1377876 Summary: Review Request: jose - Tools for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: npmccal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/npmccallum/jose/jose.git/plain/jose.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/npmccallum/jose/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00455561-jose/jose-3-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: Tools for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) Fedora Account System Username: npmccallum -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1369534] Review Request: libsass - C/ C++ port of the Sass CSS precompiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369534 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Randy Barlow --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "BSL", "Unknown or generated". 170 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/rbarlow/reviews/1369534-libsass/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libsass- debuginfo [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains tran
[Bug 1377877] New: Review Request: luksmeta - Utility for storing small metadata in the LUKSv1 header
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377877 Bug ID: 1377877 Summary: Review Request: luksmeta - Utility for storing small metadata in the LUKSv1 header Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: npmccal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/npmccallum/luksmeta/luksmeta.git/plain/luksmeta.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/npmccallum/luksmeta/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00446328-luksmeta/luksmeta-2-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: Utility for storing small metadata in the LUKSv1 header Fedora Account System Username: npmccallum -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377876] Review Request: jose - Tools for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377876 Paul Wouters changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pwout...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pwout...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1373486] Review Request: python34 - Version 3.4 of the Python programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486 --- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok --- (In reply to Charalampos Stratakis from comment #1) > This should be easier though than python35. Anything else that I might be > missing, in order to properly test the package? I think this is going to be pretty straight forward, in case we are not missing anything. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375926] Review Request: python-nose2 - Next generation of nicer testing for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- python-nose2-0.6.5-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-de3d12ca85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377812] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag - Sphinx " blockdiag" extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377812 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377812] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag - Sphinx " blockdiag" extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377812 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Suggestions: 1) You may want to drop versioned BuildRequires or Requires, they should be working from the existing packaged dependency versions. 2) Try to enable %check for both the subpackages. = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (2 clause)", "*No copyright* BSD", "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/parag/1377812-python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/sphinxcontrib(python3-sphinxcontrib-programoutput, python3 -sphinxcontrib-fulltoc, python3-sphinxcontrib-spelling, python3 -sphinxcontrib-issuetracker, python3-sphinxcontrib-bibtex), /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinxcontrib(python2-sphinxcontrib- spelling, python2-sphinxcontrib-programoutput, python2-sphinxcontrib- bibtex, python-sphinxcontrib-cheeseshop, python-sphinxcontrib- httpdomain, python2-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc, python-sphinxcontrib- adadomain, python-sphinxcontrib-issuetracker), /usr/lib/python3.5 /site-packages/sphinxcontrib/__pycache__(python3-sphinxcontrib- programoutput, python3-sphinxcontrib-seqdiag, python3-sphinxcontrib- fulltoc) This looks fine as all these are independent extensions that are getting installed under /usr/lib/pythonx.x/site-packages/sphinxcontrib [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any