Re: [PacketFence-users] Sponsor email validation
Hello Luis, Your PF server needs to be reachable over the internet. Regards, Kehinde On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Luís Torres via PacketFence-users < packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Im rookie on packetfence configuration. I facing a "problem" regarding the > sponsor validation email. > > > > Everything works fine until I receveid ( as a sponsor ) an email to > validate de guest access. When I hit the but it redirects to an url ( ex > https://packetfence/activate/email/sponsor/74696188aa93e8abdf64ad1016d796 > 2c ) but it dont work. > > > > I checked the open ports and I got: > > > > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN > tcp 0 0 10.1.2.130:443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN > tcp 0 0 10.1.2.130:1443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN > tcp 0 0 10.252.2.45:1443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN > > > > I manually changed the packetfence url with the 10.1.2.130 but still > doesnt work... > > > > Can you point me some directions? > > > > regards to all > > LT > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > PacketFence-users mailing list > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
[PacketFence-users] Sponsor email validation
Hello, Im rookie on packetfence configuration. I facing a "problem" regarding the sponsor validation email. Everything works fine until I receveid ( as a sponsor ) an email to validate de guest access. When I hit the but it redirects to an url ( ex https://packetfence/activate/email/sponsor/74696188aa93e8abdf64ad1016d7962c ) but it dont work. I checked the open ports and I got: tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 10.1.2.130:443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 10.1.2.130:1443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 10.252.2.45:1443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN I manually changed the packetfence url with the 10.1.2.130 but still doesnt work... Can you point me some directions? regards to all LT -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
Re: [PacketFence-users] Unifi IP Accounting
Hello Ian, it's an option to enable in PacketFence where you update the iplog information based on the radius accounting. Regards Fabrice Le 2017-08-28 à 23:10, Ian Halliday via PacketFence-users a écrit : > Hello Listmates, > > We just completed a PF install in a routed environment using Ubiquity > Unifi APs for wireless access. We started with portal authentication, > but eventually went with 802.1X for the vlan separation. > > One question: should we be seeing the node IP addresses populated > through Radius accounting data for any non-DHCP host? The IP populates > correctly in the database radacct table, but its not making it over to > the ip4log/ipv6 table. I modified the acct_update stored procedure in > our setup to populate/update that row right away when a valid > IPv4/IPv6 radius update comes in, but if there is a better way to do > it, I'm all for it! > > Thanks in advance for any input! > > -- Ian > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > ___ > PacketFence-users mailing list > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users -- Fabrice Durand fdur...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135) :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
Re: [PacketFence-users] domain trouble shooting commands fail
Hello Jon, does winbind run ? Regards Fabrice Le 2017-08-28 à 23:19, Jon Falconer via PacketFence-users a écrit : > Greetings all, > > I have done a fresh install of Packet Fence 7.2.0, and in configuring it, > have setup an Active Directory domain join. Packet Fence seems to think that > the domain join succeeded since it says "Test join succeed!" for the domain > (the only domain) configured on the Configuration > Policies and Access > Control > Active Directory Domains page. However, when I run the trouble > shooting commands listed on page 34 of the Administration Guide for version > 7.2.0, I get the following results: > > root@pf2:/etc/samba# chroot /chroots/PUCAD/ wbinfo -u > could not obtain winbind interface details: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE > could not obtain winbind domain name! > Error looking up domain users > root@pf2:/etc/samba# > > root@pf2:/etc/samba# chroot /chroots/PUCAD/ ntlm_auth --username=joetest > Password: > could not obtain winbind separator! > Reading winbind reply failed! (0x01) > : (0x0) > root@pf2:/etc/samba# > > This is all running on Debian 8 with all updates as of mid August 2017. > > ---domain.conf--- > root@pf2:/usr/local/pf/conf# cat domain.conf > [PUCAD] > ntlm_cache_filter=(&(samAccountName=*)(!(|(lockoutTime=>0)(userAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2 > registration=0 > sticky_dc=10.xxx.yyy.zzz > ou=Computers > ntlm_cache_batch_one_at_a_time=disabled > ad_server=10. xxx.yyy.zzz > dns_name=puc.edu > ntlm_cache_expiry=3600 > bind_dn= > workgroup=PUC > ntlm_cache_batch=disabled > bind_pass= > ntlm_cache=disabled > server_name=%h > ntlm_cache_on_connection=disabled > dns_servers=10. xxx.yyy.zzz > root@pf2:/usr/local/pf/conf# > > > -realm.conf--- > root@pf2:/usr/local/pf/conf# cat realm.conf > [DEFAULT] > source=PUC_AD1 > domain=PUCAD > options=strip > root@pf2:/usr/local/pf/conf# > > > Any other info needed to diagnose this problem? > > Thanks, > > Jon > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > PacketFence-users mailing list > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users -- Fabrice Durand fdur...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135) :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
[PacketFence-users] Packetfence 7.2.0 Cannot set authentication rules in radius source.
Hi,
I'm deploying new version of packetfence and when i adding new radius
authentication source and
set authentication rules I got message "Error! An error condition has
occured. See server side logs for details."
Logs from httpd.admin.log are as follows
Aug 30 09:01:33 PacketFence-ZEN httpd_admin: httpd.admin(2349) ERROR:
[mac:unknown] Caught exception in
pfappserver::Controller::Config::Source->update "Attribute (timeout) does
not pass the type constraint because: Validation failed for 'Maybe[Int]'
with value at constructor pf::Authentication::Source::RADIUSSource::new
(defined at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/Authentication/Source/RADIUSSource.pm line
233) line 136.
pf::Authentication::Source::RADIUSSource::new('pf::Authentication::Source::R
ADIUSSource', 'HASH(0x7ffb9b826ae8)') called at
/usr/local/pf/lib/pf/authentication.pm line 121
pf::authentication::newAuthenticationSource('RADIUS', 'source',
'HASH(0x7ffb9b826530)') called at
/usr/local/pf/html/pfappserver/lib/pfappserver/Form/Config/Source.pm line
346
pfappserver::Form::Config::Source::get_source('pfappserver::Form::Config::So
urce::RADIUS=HASH(0x7ffb9b6ee2a0)') called at
/usr/local/pf/html/pfappserver/lib/pfappserver/Form/Field/SourceRuleConditio
n.pm line 72
pfappserver::Form::Field::SourceRuleCondition::options_attributes('HTML::For
mHandler::Field::Select::16=HASH(0x7ffb9b825ee8)') called at native
delegation method HTML::FormHandler::Field::Select::get_options
(execute_method) of attribute options_method (defined at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTML/FormHandler/Field/Select.pm line 52) line
3
HTML::FormHandler::Field::Select::get_options('HTML::FormHandler::Field::Sel
ect::16=HASH(0x7ffb9b825ee8)') called at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTML/FormHandler/Field/Select.pm line 265
HTML::FormHandler::Field::Select::_load_options('HTML::FormHandler::Field::S
elect::16=HASH(0x7ffb9b825ee8)') called at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTML/FormHandler/Field/Select.pm line 251
HTML::FormHandler::Field::Select::_result_from_input('HTML::FormHandler::Fie
ld::Select::16=HASH(0x7ffb9b825ee8)',
'HTML::FormHandler::Field::Result=HASH(0x7ffb9b825ed0)', 'username', 1)
called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTML/FormHandler/InitResult.pm line
59
HTML::FormHandler::InitResult::_result_from_input('pfappserver::Form::Field:
:SourceRuleCondition::22=HASH(0x7ffb...',
'HTML::FormHandler::Field::Result=HASH(0x7ffb9b804d28)',
'HASH(0x7ffb9b73ea00)', 1) called at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTML/FormHandler/Field/Compound.pm line 74
Class::MOP::Class:::around('CODE(0x7ffb798c81c0)',
'pfappserver::Form::Field::SourceRuleCondition::22=HASH(0x7ffb...',
'HTML::FormHandler::Field::Result=HASH(0x7ffb9b804d28)',
'HASH(0x7ffb9b73ea00)', 1) called at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Class/MOP/Method/Wrapped.pm line 162
Class::MOP::Method::Wrapped::__ANON__('pfappserver::Form::Field::SourceRuleC
ondition::22=HASH(0x7ffb...',
'HTML::FormHandler::Field::Result=HASH(0x7ffb9b804d28)',
'HASH(0x7ffb9b73ea00)', 1) called at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Class/MOP/Method/Wrapped.pm line 91
HTML::FormHandler::Field::Compound::_result_from_input('pfappserver::Form::F
ield::SourceRuleCondition::22=HASH(0x7ffb...',
'HTML::FormHandler::Field::Result=HASH(0x7ffb9b804d28)',
'HASH(0x7ffb9b73ea00)', 1) called at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTML/FormHandler/Field/Repeatable.pm line 159
HTML::FormHandler::Field::Repeatable::_result_from_input('pfappserver::Form:
:Field::DynamicList::18=HASH(0x7ffb9b814880)',
'HTML::FormHandler::Field::Result=HASH(0x7ffb9b81d618)',
'ARRAY(0x7ffb9b73e940)', 1) called at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTML/FormHandler/InitResult.pm line 59
HTML::FormHandler::InitResult::_result_from_input('pfappserver::Form::Field:
:SourceRule::21=HASH(0x7ffb9b49cba0)',
'HTML::FormHandler::Field::Result=HASH(0x7ffb9b793108)',
'HASH(0x7ffb9b761180)', 1) called at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTML/FormHandler/Field/Compound.pm line 74
Class::MOP::Class:::around('CODE(0x7ffb798c81c0)',
'pfappserver::Form::Field::SourceRule::21=HASH(0x7ffb9b49cba0)',
'HTML::FormHandler::Field::Result=HASH(0x7ffb9b793108)',
'HASH(0x7ffb9b761180)', 1) called at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Class/MOP/Method/Wrapped.pm line 162
Class::MOP::Method::Wrapped::__ANON__('pfappserver::Form::Field::SourceRule:
:21=HASH(0x7ffb9b49cba0)',
'HTML::FormHandler::Field::Result=HASH(0x7ffb9b793108)',
'HASH(0x7ffb9b761180)', 1) called at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Class/MOP/Method/Wrapped.pm line 91
HTML::FormHandler::Field::Compound::_result_from_input('pfappserver::Form::F
ield::SourceRule::21=HASH(0x7ffb9b49cba0)',
'HTML::FormHandler::Field::Result=HASH(0x7ffb9b793108)',
'HASH(0x7ffb9b761180)', 1) called at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTML/FormHandler/Field/Repeatable.pm line 159
HTML::FormHandler::Field::Repeatable::_result_from_input('pfappserver::Form:
:Field::DynamicList::18=HASH(0x7ffb9b741470)',
