Re: [packman] Distributing Metasploit On Packman
On 06/28/2016 02:00 PM, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, Uzair Shamim wrote: > >> I'm curious about if it is legal/within rules to distribute Metasploit >> on packman? I have asked about OpenSUSE build service and it seems >> that is not allowed due to German laws, would it possible on packman? > > Quoting an earlier reply on this topic: > > # Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:16:47 +0200 > # Subject: Re: [opensuse-packaging] Distributing Metasploit on OBS? > # From: Marcus Meissner <meiss...@suse.de> > # To: Uzair Shamim <usha...@linux.com> > # Cc: opensuse-packaging <opensuse-packag...@opensuse.org> > # > # German law prohibits delivery of tools explicitly designed for hacking > # other machines, so the answer is "No". > # > # Ciao, Marcus > > PMBS is hosted in Germany, so I suspect the answer remains "No". > > > Olaf > Then what is the best way to distribute the RPM? -- Regards, Uzair Shamim ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Distributing Metasploit On Packman
Hi, I'm curious about if it is legal/within rules to distribute Metasploit on packman? I have asked about OpenSUSE build service and it seems that is not allowed due to German laws, would it possible on packman? -- Regards, Uzair Shamim ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] freshplayer plugin not working in Leap 42.1
What version does arch use? On June 16, 2016 11:34:00 PM EDT, Chun Yu Charlie CHAN <10014...@life.hkbu.edu.hk> wrote: >Hi. > >I am not sure whether I should post here or not, since not only the >Packman package mentioned in the subject has this issue, but also the >one in official repository. > >I installed freshplayer plugin from Packman with Chromium pepper flash >installed, then relaunched Firefox. In the about:plugins page I could >not find an entry stating that Flash is enabled in the browser. > >At the same time I have an Arch Linux system installed, with a >functioning freshplayer plugin. I copy the .so wrapper from the >system, removed the package from my openSUSE system, and put the .so >from Arch Linux into it. Everything works fine, the about:plugins page >in Firefox is just able to detect the installed Chromium pepper. > >Does anyone have the same problem as well? Is it a bug from >Packman/OpenSUSE packages? > >Regards, >Charlie > >___ >Packman mailing list >Packman@links2linux.de >http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Fw: new important message
On 03/23/2016 04:03 PM, Hartmut Krummrei wrote: > almost certainly likely SPAM, if not worse (Crossscripting) > > Hartmut > > Am 23.03.2016 um 19:36 schrieb antoine.belv...@laposte.net: >> Hello! >> >> >> New message, please read <http://columbusuc.com/following.php?iv39b> >> >> >> antoine.belv...@laposte.net >> >> ___ >> Packman mailing list >> Packman@links2linux.de >> http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman >> >> > Yep seems to show up on an exploits blacklist... http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://columbusuc.com/following.php?iv39b -- Regards, Uzair Shamim signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] [13.2] Chromium dep missing in patch (openSUSE-2015-679)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I tried to update the system using apper and got the following message: A package dependency could not be found. More information is available in the detailed report. chromium-ffmpeg-45.0.2454.101-54.1.x86_64 requires chromium = 45.0.2454.101, but this requirement cannot be provided Running zypper patch gives the same error: user:~ # zypper patch Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Resolving package dependencies... Problem: chromium-ffmpeg-45.0.2454.101-54.1.x86_64 requires chromium = 45.0.2454.101, but this requirement cannot be provided Solution 1: deinstallation of chromium-ffmpeg-45.0.2454.101-54.1.x86_64 Solution 2: do not install patch:openSUSE-2015-679-1.noarch Solution 3: do not install patch:openSUSE-2015-679-1.noarch Solution 4: break chromium-ffmpeg-45.0.2454.101-54.1.x86_64 by ignoring some of its dependencies Choose from above solutions by number or cancel [1/2/3/4/c] (c): c It seems like the issue is with patch openSUSE-2015-679? - -- Regards, Uzair Shamim -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWK9obAAoJEKk4ocK8JbkdEtkP/2nx9yH6vCF6OE2+obAf466/ oMzlu+Bc6Y8GtF+8WfKLSBEC2gvjtNY3Znztn0BLtjfqWPO/J0ouICy5cQbhjzW/ qCbjsyZct8ypPGcM/mUqnuZQ6lJasPMDEtVk033Oev2diHCtqI2BdBJhRgRUMaxV N8q87y0OmNQcsjTii8757aYB6a6Xai9TkRRnSxSULVZbPs/Az5/A//Pp9rupQvJA /0KMm+kicRJB65gGLoe+3cLcVqoBlV+dmwghlNhDdagRdMK7R4LCbJa8KubQ5ZDz vyRrx/zTv33IXNj0oP6xMMEp72/qNZ6PKoc0B2TOka337Bs6wF+bIIZoOMP6VHfc ii82wrQa7gC4CS/bLFtmHUXbnoLL2ow1UScNVAdIRUYuKiIg+QbzCEOArt0o58Bo W1oBCSiCUKwi2HssRoG0T6SaExhqF+eMBO5AIofTn8u8JX3fixJ8D5mPt4NWbtdm +xtokcKJcMdcMlhTff0tyM3pEoBxINcUk21EzkULbTdZ5hwhz/DD14ulkGZN692I zfYcHqen/hnGhgUpPD5AfoZWdIMTy21NXe5Q0Rr0wpvTc+RWLgm24OXX3Hg263di LfODz2/73B0ZPM0bOTiAdSVZoMB+QkJBur3IxtJXKbud00j562Hg0pIYlYEHm0bV zP/rX5Ooh5vGU1QmfMW0 =KZxb -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
