Re: [packman] [PM] MPlayer 1.0rc2_r29796-2.pm.3.2 (openSUSE 11.2/i586)

2009-12-13 Diskussionsfäden Hendrik Vogelsang
Hi,


Kalle wrote:

 I have seen that you are the creator of MPlayer rpms on packman. To my 
 knowledge 1.0 rc2 is about 2 years old. Is there any reason why the svn 
 version isn't provided from time to time? It looks like that mplayer doesn't 
 release new versions but just refers to the svn.

Guess what the r29796 in the version stands for. :)

Henne

-- 
Henne Vogelsang,  http://hennevogel.de
To die. In the rain. Alone.
   Ernest Hemingway


___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman


[packman] [PM] MPlayer 1.0rc2_r29796-2.pm.3.2 (openSUSE 11.2/i586)

2009-12-12 Diskussionsfäden Kalle
Hi Henne,

I have seen that you are the creator of MPlayer rpms on packman. To my 
knowledge 1.0 rc2 is about 2 years old. Is there any reason why the svn 
version isn't provided from time to time? It looks like that mplayer doesn't 
release new versions but just refers to the svn.

What is your take on this?

Regards,
K.

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman


Re: [packman] [PM] MPlayer 1.0rc2_r29796-2.pm.3.2 (openSUSE 11.2/i586)

2009-12-12 Diskussionsfäden Cristian Morales Vega
2009/12/12 Kalle karl-heinz-1...@web.de:
 Hi Henne,

 I have seen that you are the creator of MPlayer rpms on packman. To my
 knowledge 1.0 rc2 is about 2 years old. Is there any reason why the svn
 version isn't provided from time to time? It looks like that mplayer doesn't
 release new versions but just refers to the svn.

 What is your take on this?

The subject of your email clearly states that the packaged version is
r29796, not plain 1.0RC2. A quick look at MPlater SVN says that's from
2009-10-24 15:19:20 +0200... seems recent enough to me.

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman