Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Am Freitag, 30. Dezember 2011 schrieb Detlef Reichelt: Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:47:46 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Ok, found claws-mail in gnome-apps: 187 packages 141 build errors Oh, great repository! Thats the problem of OBS, many repos and many errors, fire and forget... +1 Detlef ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman -- have fun Toni ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
* Detlef Reichelt det...@die-mafia.de [2011-12-30 23:06]: Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:47:46 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Ok, found claws-mail in gnome-apps: 187 packages 141 build errors Oh, great repository! Thats the problem of OBS, many repos and many errors, fire and forget... Removing a package without contacting the maintainer is certainly not appropriate behavior, however, claws-mail seems to have been in Factory forever, why was there even a separate Packman package? I'd also argue that the shape of the development project doesn't matter, people can get it either through the oss repo of a released version or through Tumbleweed/Factory if they want to live on the bleeding edge. But more generally it would be helpful if there was some consensus among Packman contributors what the scope of Packman actually should be. Currently everyone seems to have a different perception of that and things have changed considerably since the project was founded. -- Guido Berhoerster ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
* Marc Schiffbauer m...@schiffbauer.net [2011-12-30 21:44]: * Mariusz Fik schrieb am 30.12.11 um 18:47 Uhr: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Why? Why not, why shouldn't such packages (excluding patented/non-free software or games) be part of the main distribution, ie. what keeps you from maintaining them on OBS and getting them into Factory which means additional reviews and handlying of security issues in released products by the security team? -- Guido Berhoerster ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 01:22:10 +0100 wrote Smartysmart34 smartysmar...@web.de: Packman used to be THE one stop shop for everything that mattered besides the main Repo (by MAIN I mean the setup repos OSS and Non-OSS, not OBS) I could not have described this more accurate. Started loving Linux with SuSE Linux 7.3 and whenever I did not find a package in OSS or non-OSS I went to the de-facto-standard-repo at packman and my search always ended successfully. Now many packages are distributed widely over OBS. Sure, they can be found via http://software.opensuse.org/search but from a users point of view this is not very comfortable for me to keep my installation up-to-date. I understand, that it makes no sense to maintain a package twice - once in OBS and a second time at packman - but this fact is closely linked to the question of what target will be followed by the packman team. Will Packman concentrate on multimedia packages or will Packman disappear once all or the most packages are in OBS? Jon. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Am 31.12.2011 11:26, schrieb Guido Berhoerster: ...people can get it either through the oss repo of a released version or through Tumbleweed/Factory if they want to live on the bleeding edge. Maybe someone can enlighten me on a specific topic: I am reading different Mails here and someone speaks of OBS (Build Service) others talk about OSS (which for me is the open Source software setup repository of a Suse installaton?) So as long as a specific Software is available in the default setup repository, I'm fine with that. But if it is in Build service which for me seems like a bunch of different repos of various quality and unclear maintenance, then that's not an option. To get my Suse setup up and running i used to have oss, non-oss, update and packman in the past. Now I have (besides the 4 mentioned above): KDE:Extra for knutclient Security:Passwordmanagement for Keepassx KDE:Extra:KDE_Release_46_... for Luminance HDR Graphics:Opensuse for Rawtherapee Education for Scribus newer then 1.4 RC1 Videolan for libdvdcss And if I want to check now, where Scribus 1.4 RC6 can be found: it is available under - KDE:Release:47 - KDE:Distro:Factory - KDE:UpdatedApps - KDE:Distro:Stable - Education And I'm only talking about Suse 11.4 here. This is close to ridiculous. Fact is, that Suse 11.4 delivered scribus 1.4 RC1 through the default setup-repository, which was almost unusable due to major bugs. And instead of delivering subsequent RCs (2, 3, 4, 5, 6 - which fixed most of the bugs) via update - where they belong - one is now forced to include suspicious OBS-repos. That's just one example of why I think OBS is the worst idea ever. I'd rather go for default oss, non-oss and update together with all the rest in packman. Cheers, Martin ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:44:46 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: Dnia piątek, 30 grudnia 2011 23:06:01 Detlef Reichelt pisze: Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:47:46 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Ok, found claws-mail in gnome-apps: 187 packages 141 build errors Oh, great repository! Thats the problem of OBS, many repos and many errors, fire and forget... It looks much better then ie: packman:multimedia: http://goo.gl/XmKSM yes, and thats the problem ... Someone decided to link mjpegtools2 to OBS and he doesn't care about the problems: Fire and forget. Detlef ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Am Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:14:43 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Hooverman jonathan.hoover...@gmail.com: On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 01:22:10 +0100 wrote Smartysmart34 smartysmar...@web.de: Packman used to be THE one stop shop for everything that mattered besides the main Repo (by MAIN I mean the setup repos OSS and Non-OSS, not OBS) I could not have described this more accurate. Started loving Linux with SuSE Linux 7.3 and whenever I did not find a package in OSS or non-OSS I went to the de-facto-standard-repo at packman and my search always ended successfully. Now many packages are distributed widely over OBS. Sure, they can be found via http://software.opensuse.org/search but from a users point of view this is not very comfortable for me to keep my installation up-to-date. We never get mails with topic Stop building X, it is in OBS/foo from users... Why? ;) Detlef ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Dnia sobota, 31 grudnia 2011 13:45:31 Detlef Reichelt pisze: Am Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:39:28 +0100 schrieb Guido Berhoerster guido+links2linux...@berhoerster.name: * Marc Schiffbauer m...@schiffbauer.net [2011-12-30 21:44]: * Mariusz Fik schrieb am 30.12.11 um 18:47 Uhr: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Why? Why not, why shouldn't such packages (excluding patented/non-free software or games) be part of the main distribution, ie. what keeps you from maintaining them on OBS and getting them into Factory which means additional reviews and handlying of security issues in released products by the security team? Why should i build claws-mail 3.8(!) in factory? I want 3.8 for 12.1 and 11.4. Detlef GNOME:Apps builds also for 11.4 (even with GNOME 3 or 3.2), 12.1. -- Pozdrawiam / Best regards, Mariusz Fik openSUSE Community Member GPG: 5FCE 7241 B3B9 32FD 455B C30E 42D6 6C88 9E83 7C3D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
* Detlef Reichelt det...@die-mafia.de [2011-12-31 13:45]: Am Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:39:28 +0100 schrieb Guido Berhoerster guido+links2linux...@berhoerster.name: * Marc Schiffbauer m...@schiffbauer.net [2011-12-30 21:44]: * Mariusz Fik schrieb am 30.12.11 um 18:47 Uhr: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Why? Why not, why shouldn't such packages (excluding patented/non-free software or games) be part of the main distribution, ie. what keeps you from maintaining them on OBS and getting them into Factory which means additional reviews and handlying of security issues in released products by the security team? Why should i build claws-mail 3.8(!) in factory? I want 3.8 for 12.1 and 11.4. I bet the GNOME guys would be happy if you took over maintainership and updated it to 3.8. If it is backports what matters so much here that'd be easily achievable with links to a new Backports toplevel project or even Extra in pmbs. -- Guido Berhoerster ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:04:00 +0100 Guido Berhoerster guido+links2linux...@berhoerster.name wrote: * Smartysmart34 smartysmar...@web.de [2011-12-31 13:31]: Am 31.12.2011 11:26, schrieb Guido Berhoerster: ...people can get it either through the oss repo of a released version or through Tumbleweed/Factory if they want to live on the bleeding edge. Maybe someone can enlighten me on a specific topic: I am reading different Mails here and someone speaks of OBS (Build Service) others talk about OSS (which for me is the open Source software setup repository of a Suse installaton?) I meant part of the released distribution above. So as long as a specific Software is available in the default setup repository, I'm fine with that. But if it is in Build service which for me seems like a bunch of different repos of various quality and unclear maintenance, then that's not an option. To get my Suse setup up and running i used to have oss, non-oss, update and packman in the past. Now I have (besides the 4 mentioned above): KDE:Extra for knutclient Security:Passwordmanagement for Keepassx KDE:Extra:KDE_Release_46_... for Luminance HDR Graphics:Opensuse for Rawtherapee So the problem here is that these packages are not provided by the regular distribution, ie. that they are not part of Factory because there is no maintainer willing to maintain them there. I don't see how this relates to Packman. Education for Scribus newer then 1.4 RC1 See below. Videolan for libdvdcss This cannot be legally distributed in Germany or the US so there's no way for Packman or openSUSE to provide it. And if I want to check now, where Scribus 1.4 RC6 can be found: it is available under - KDE:Release:47 - KDE:Distro:Factory - KDE:UpdatedApps - KDE:Distro:Stable - Education And I'm only talking about Suse 11.4 here. This is close to ridiculous. Fact is, that Suse 11.4 delivered scribus 1.4 RC1 through the default setup-repository, which was almost unusable due to major bugs. And instead of delivering subsequent RCs (2, 3, 4, 5, 6 - which fixed most of the bugs) via update - where they belong - one is now forced to include suspicious OBS-repos. In this particular case the right way to deal with this is to file a bug and ask the maintainer to issue an update for 11.4. Was this done and if so why was it rejected? I'd rather go for default oss, non-oss and update together with all the rest in packman. If the packages you cited above actually had a maintainer willing to maintain them properly they could go into Factory just as well, again I think this issue has little to do with Packman. Hi All GNOME:Apps is the development project for claws-mail; https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=claws-mailproject=GNOME%3AApps So that (when updated get's pushed to factory). It will then be available in the other repositories. If vuntz or DimStar allow an updated into oss, it will get pushed to the 12.1 update channel... -- Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890) openSUSE 12.1 (x86_64) Kernel 3.1.0-1.2-desktop up 9:36, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.08 CPU Intel i5 CPU M520@2.40GHz | Intel Arrandale GPU ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Am Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:56:45 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: We have claws-mail in OSS repository (at least for 12.1). It's maintained in GNOME:Apps and IMHO we should update it there and not duplicate package unless we can gain additional features. An additional feature on packman was Tumbleweed! No packages found in the openSUSE build service that matched your query.¹ Can it be linked into packman? Where is it communicated which package from packman goes to OBS:X:Y:Z? From a user perspective it isn't a good idea to move packages, which are hosted on packman since years, to different repositorys on OBS. [1] http://software.opensuse.org/search?q=claws-mailbaseproject=openSUSE:Tumbleweedlang=en -- Oliver Bengs ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Dnia piątek, 30 grudnia 2011 14:03:34 Oliver Bengs pisze: Am Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:56:45 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: We have claws-mail in OSS repository (at least for 12.1). It's maintained in GNOME:Apps and IMHO we should update it there and not duplicate package unless we can gain additional features. An additional feature on packman was Tumbleweed! No packages found in the openSUSE build service that matched your query.¹ Can it be linked into packman? Where is it communicated which package from packman goes to OBS:X:Y:Z? From a user perspective it isn't a good idea to move packages, which are hosted on packman since years, to different repositorys on OBS. No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... [1] http://software.opensuse.org/search?q=claws-mailbaseproject=openSUSE:Tumble weedlang=en -- Pozdrawiam / Best regards, Mariusz Fik openSUSE Community Member GPG: 5FCE 7241 B3B9 32FD 455B C30E 42D6 6C88 9E83 7C3D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:47:46 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Why should we don't have a big repo (packman/extra) for most wanted packages? Whats your problem with that? Detlef ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
* Mariusz Fik schrieb am 30.12.11 um 18:47 Uhr: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Why? -- 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 pgp7Kj40LP3eT.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Dnia piątek, 30 grudnia 2011 19:01:05 Detlef Reichelt pisze: Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:47:46 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Why should we don't have a big repo (packman/extra) for most wanted packages? Whats your problem with that? Detlef Because it's much easier for 'end user' to find it in main repo instead adding a new one every time when she/he needs install extra software. The stories like, 'add this repo to install X, add this one to get Y, etc' - don't sound good, especially for new users... Why do You want to push 'most wanted' packages to repo other then official one? What's wrong with that from Your pov? -- Pozdrawiam / Best regards, Mariusz Fik openSUSE Community Member GPG: 5FCE 7241 B3B9 32FD 455B C30E 42D6 6C88 9E83 7C3D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:47:46 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Ok, found claws-mail in gnome-apps: 187 packages 141 build errors Oh, great repository! Thats the problem of OBS, many repos and many errors, fire and forget... Detlef ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Dnia piątek, 30 grudnia 2011 23:06:01 Detlef Reichelt pisze: Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:47:46 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Ok, found claws-mail in gnome-apps: 187 packages 141 build errors Oh, great repository! Thats the problem of OBS, many repos and many errors, fire and forget... Detlef But for all repos. Look on it: http://goo.gl/6dBRY It looks much better then ie: packman:multimedia: http://goo.gl/XmKSM But feel free to update it and host on packman ;) -- Pozdrawiam / Best regards, Mariusz Fik openSUSE Community Member GPG: 5FCE 7241 B3B9 32FD 455B C30E 42D6 6C88 9E83 7C3D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:06:01 +0100 Detlef Reichelt det...@die-mafia.de wrote: Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:47:46 +0100 schrieb Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl: No. If it doesn't require any restricted 'stuff' it should be in main OSS. Even it was hosted by packman for years... Ok, found claws-mail in gnome-apps: 187 packages 141 build errors Oh, great repository! Thats the problem of OBS, many repos and many errors, fire and forget... Detlef Hi That's because of the typelib changes AFAIK, most are unresolvable, plus new changes to factory requirements cause a few failures, new macros etc...all good fun. -- Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890) openSUSE 12.1 (x86_64) Kernel 3.1.0-1.2-desktop up 23:44, 3 users, load average: 0.04, 0.04, 0.05 CPU Intel i5 CPU M520@2.40GHz | Intel Arrandale GPU ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Am 30.12.2011 22:35, schrieb Mariusz Fik: Because it's much easier for 'end user' to find it in main repo instead adding a new one every time when she/he needs install extra software. The stories like, 'add this repo to install X, add this one to get Y, etc' - don't sound good, especially for new users... Sorry, but: lol Packman used to be THE one stop shop for everything that mattered besides the main Repo (by MAIN I mean the setup repos OSS and Non-OSS, not OBS) And today? - Assault-Cube is in OBS games - RawTherapee is in graphics - Sometimes when asking for current Firefox one is linked to the OBS mozilla-repo instead of Suse-Update (ok, not a Packman issue here) - plus a whole bunch of others, sometimes even suspicious homebrew repos To me, OBS is the exact opposite of what packman used to be: - No quality assured - various repos which hopefully add up to a runing system - unclear what can be found where While one used to need oss, non-oss, update and packman in the past, there is the need for half a dozend other repos today. So what have you been talking about when saying find it in main repo? Let me copy it again: The stories like, 'add this repo to install X, add this one to get Y, etc' - don't sound good, especially for new users... Right. So very right. And it is exactly what the Packman reorganisation made reality. I clearly vote to go back to the old approach: Packman as a high quality one stop shop. Cheers, Martin ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 01:22:10 +0100 Smartysmart34 smartysmar...@web.de wrote: Am 30.12.2011 22:35, schrieb Mariusz Fik: Because it's much easier for 'end user' to find it in main repo instead adding a new one every time when she/he needs install extra software. The stories like, 'add this repo to install X, add this one to get Y, etc' - don't sound good, especially for new users... Sorry, but: lol Packman used to be THE one stop shop for everything that mattered besides the main Repo (by MAIN I mean the setup repos OSS and Non-OSS, not OBS) And today? - Assault-Cube is in OBS games - RawTherapee is in graphics - Sometimes when asking for current Firefox one is linked to the OBS mozilla-repo instead of Suse-Update (ok, not a Packman issue here) - plus a whole bunch of others, sometimes even suspicious homebrew repos To me, OBS is the exact opposite of what packman used to be: - No quality assured - various repos which hopefully add up to a runing system - unclear what can be found where While one used to need oss, non-oss, update and packman in the past, there is the need for half a dozend other repos today. So what have you been talking about when saying find it in main repo? Let me copy it again: The stories like, 'add this repo to install X, add this one to get Y, etc' - don't sound good, especially for new users... Right. So very right. And it is exactly what the Packman reorganisation made reality. I clearly vote to go back to the old approach: Packman as a high quality one stop shop. Cheers, Martin Hi No quality?? sorry I don't agree. The main reason for the various repositories is they are the 'development' ones for factory and ultimately the next openSUSE release. Build power is the main reason AFAIK, if it can be built on OBS then that's were it will be -- Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890) openSUSE 12.1 (x86_64) Kernel 3.1.0-1.2-desktop up 23:56, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.05 CPU Intel i5 CPU M520@2.40GHz | Intel Arrandale GPU ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Hello Packman Team, may I ask you to update claws-mail to the latest version? Thank you for your excellent work! Regards, Jon. Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:01:53 + From: Paul cl...@thewildbeast.co.uk To: us...@lists.claws-mail.org Subject: [Users] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!! 16th December 2011 Claws Mail 3.8.0 CLAWS MAIL RELEASE NOTES http://www.claws-mail.org Claws Mail is a GTK+ based, user-friendly, lightweight, and fast email client. New in this release: * GnuTLS 2.2 is now a minimum requirement if encrypted connections to servers are required. * The list displays have been updated to use newer GTK+ functions, this means that the expanders look different and the optional dotted lines have been dropped. * A hidden option, 'summary_from_show', which controls the display in the From column of the Message List: 0 (default): show name, 1: show address, 2: show name + address * The image viewer now uses the EXIF Orientation. * 'Generate X-Mailer header' has been added as an Account option. * /View/Message scroll has been added, allowing keyboard shortcuts to be added and used for message scrolling. * Home and End keys now function in the Message View. * /Message/Print has been added to the Compose window. * Updated manuals * Update man page * Updated translations: Brazilian Portuguese, Czech, French, Hungarian, Indonesian, Russian, Slovak, Spanish, Ukrainian. * Bug fixes: o bug 1489, 'Filter action mark_as_read inoperative following move action o bug 1563, 'Folder view: show complete threads if they contain unread messages' o bug 1870, 'arrow scrolling in filters' o bug 2116, 'Rip spaces off server names in account configuration' o bug 2127, 'SSL cert check uses canonical name instead of specified name' o bug 2177, 'addrbook/addrbook-0?.xml is not deleted after removing the address book in the GUI' o bug 2303, 'Next unread message enables message view' o bug 2310, 'Crash when hitting Ctrl+R to reply to a particular mail' o bug 2377, 'Show All Headers - make change persistent between sessions' o bug 2402, 'GnuTLS change breaks socket communication' o bug 2404, 'matcherrc updates upon account renaming' o bug 2406, 'some part of accountrc not updated upon account rename' o bug 2408, 'Some UI elements are not persistent between sessions' o bug 2422, 'Toggle Message View w/ V crashes Claws' o bug 2479, 'LDIF address book import matches tags case sensitive' o bug 2481, 'do not scroll from dropdown list and sender address' o bug 2493, 'Subscription pull down should be alphabetized' o bug 2502, 'gnutls_transport_set_lowat removed in gnutls 3.0.3' o bug 2505, 'tagsdb becomes polluted with old folder entries' o bug 2509, 'manually added headers are lost unless mail is sent inmediately' o bug 2520, 'Please remove verbose No further processing after rule %s message.' o bug 2525, 'Address completion window does not get keyboard focus' o bug 2526, 'When reading message in separate window, n and p keys do not work' o bug 2529, 'crash in mimeview_start_drag after deleting message' o bug 2543, 'filter actions in actionsrc not updated upon account renaming' o bug 2560, 'crash when unsubscribing newsgroup and having active search field' o Fix focus problem on Gnome shell o Fix flicker on recursive quicksearch o Fix huge slowness induced by spellcheck while typing during initial quote rewraps. o Fix build with GLib 2.31. o Fix crasher when spellchecking is not enabled o Fix compose window size saving/restoring For further details of the numbered bugs listed above consult http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/ - See ChangeLog for full information regarding changes in this release. ___ Users mailing list us...@lists.claws-mail.org http://lists.claws-mail.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Hi Jonathan, On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:49:23 +0100, Jonathan Hooverman wrote: may I ask you to update claws-mail to the latest version? claws-mail was deleted on packman, don't ask me who did that and why he did that... Detlef ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
Dnia czwartek, 29 grudnia 2011 23:48:19 Jonathan Hooverman pisze: Hi Jonathan, Good evening Detlef, may I ask you to update claws-mail to the latest version? claws-mail was deleted on packman, don't ask me who did that and why he did that... will there be a chance to get claws-mail back on packman? Jonathan We have claws-mail in OSS repository (at least for 12.1). It's maintained in GNOME:Apps and IMHO we should update it there and not duplicate package unless we can gain additional features. -- Pozdrawiam / Best regards, Mariusz Fik openSUSE Community Member GPG: 5FCE 7241 B3B9 32FD 455B C30E 42D6 6C88 9E83 7C3D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Claws Mail 3.8.0 unleashed!!
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:56:45 +0100 Mariusz Fik fisi...@jabster.pl wrote: Dnia czwartek, 29 grudnia 2011 23:48:19 Jonathan Hooverman pisze: Hi Jonathan, Good evening Detlef, may I ask you to update claws-mail to the latest version? claws-mail was deleted on packman, don't ask me who did that and why he did that... will there be a chance to get claws-mail back on packman? Jonathan We have claws-mail in OSS repository (at least for 12.1). It's maintained in GNOME:Apps and IMHO we should update it there and not duplicate package unless we can gain additional features. Hi I've built in my home repository on OBS (with some extra specific tweaks for me) and was planning to update it next week after the holidays ;) I've been working on getting the GTK3 version built as well... There is also some new patches I need to push upstream as well. -- Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890) openSUSE 12.1 (x86_64) Kernel 3.1.0-1.2-desktop up 2:44, 3 users, load average: 0.07, 0.07, 0.05 CPU Intel i5 CPU M520@2.40GHz | Intel Arrandale GPU ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
