[Paraview] fontconfig warnings

[Scott, W Alan]

I downloaded the Linux tarball from Kitware, and am getting a bazillion 
warnings about the fontconfig.  It looks like this.  Any ideas?

Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-metric-aliases.conf", line 84: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-metric-aliases.conf", line 84: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-metric-aliases.conf", line 93: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-metric-aliases.conf", line 93: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-metric-aliases.conf", line 102: 
Having multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-metric-aliases.conf", line 102: 
Having multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/40-nonlatin.conf", line 33: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/40-nonlatin.conf", line 59: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/40-nonlatin.conf", line 68: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/40-nonlatin.conf", line 68: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/40-nonlatin.conf", line 79: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/40-nonlatin.conf", line 79: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/40-nonlatin.conf", line 88: Having 
multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/41-ttf-arphic-uming.conf", line 16: 
Having multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/41-ttf-arphic-uming.conf", line 28: 
Having multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/41-ttf-arphic-uming.conf", line 40: 
Having multiple  in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/44-wqy-zenhei.conf", line 11: Having 
multiple values in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf", line 23: Having multiple 
 in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf", line 39: Having multiple 
 in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf", line 39: Having multiple 
 in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf", line 56: Having multiple 
 in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf", line 56: Having multiple 
 in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf", line 66: Having multiple 
 in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf", line 66: Having multiple 
 in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf", line 66: Having multiple 
 in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf", line 75: Having multiple 
 in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf", line 75: Having multiple 
 in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 29: Having 
multiple values in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 41: Having 
multiple values in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-un-core-dotum.conf", line 8: Having 
multiple values in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-1-vlgothic-gothic.conf", line 23: 
Having multiple values in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-1-vlgothic-gothic.conf", line 36: 
Having multiple values in  isn't supported and may not work as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-kurdit-unikurd-web.conf", line 16: 
Having multiple values in  isn't supported and may not work as expected


Thanks,

alan
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: 

Re: [Paraview] Project polygon onto surface

[Shawn Waldon]

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Adam Dershowitz 
wrote:

> I may mess with it some.
>
> FYI, I did convert my polygon to a polyline, and got it to work.  But, if
> I have two polylines (actually two completely separate regions) the slice
> along polyline filter then connects them even though they should not be
> connected.  Perhaps this is just what you mentioned below about having the
> same first and last point?
>

No, that another issue and was done intentionally.  When running ParaView
in client-server mode with multiple MPI server processes, it is possible
the input polyline could be spread across the servers.  So it gathers them
from all the processes and merges all the polylines into one long line
before executing the filter.  I don't think there is a good way (other than
running multiple Slice Along Polyline filters) to get two separate regions
to work.  Also, the math for the implicit function you have to write gets
more complicated with two regions.  The current vtkPolyPlane won't handle
it.

HTH,
Shawn


> I appreciate both the filter and the feedback below.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Adam
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Shawn Waldon 
> *Date: *Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM
> *To: *Dershowitz Adam 
> *Cc: *"postgu...@web.de" , "paraview@paraview.org" <
> paraview@paraview.org>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [Paraview] Project polygon onto surface
>
>
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> The Slice Along PolyLine filter looks for a vtkPolyLine type cell.  But
> there is no reason the algorithm itself can't work with a polygon (the
> current implementation just doesn't look for one and may not handle it the
> way you want if you pass a polyline that happens to have a first and last
> point that are the same).  You would have to modify vtkPolyPlane to handle
> a polygon input rather than assuming the first and last segments go off to
> infinity (add an option for this).
>
> If you want to color the inside, you have to get into how the algorithm
> works a bit.  Internally I am using a vtkImplicitFunciton (vtkPolyPlane) to
> compute the distance of each point in the dataset (or its projection into
> the plane of the polyline) from the polyline.  Then I run a Contour filter
> (vtkCutter), contouring where that filter's value is 0 and the output is
> the slice along the polyline.  But if you directly applied the vtkPolyPlane
> implicit function to your dataset and appended that as a data array rather
> than contouring by it and throwing it away, you could get colors for
> distance from the line.  You could then use the Calculator filter to scale
> and color this however you wanted since the distance will be negative for
> one side of the line.
>
> HTH,
>
> Shawn
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Adam Dershowitz 
> wrote:
>
> The problem I was having is that I was planning and trying  to use a
> polygon.  It seems that if you try to use that Slice Along Polyline, but
> select a polygon for the input, it crashes paraview (it should probably
> bring up an error, or only allow a polyline!).  I realized that it actually
> wants a polyline, and once I created one for my region, the filter does
> what I had been looking for.
> But, that leads to another question…  If I want a whole region to be
> another color, is there a way to fill the output of SliceAlongPolyLine?
> So, instead of just an outline, I can get the inside to also be a certain
> color?
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
>
> -- Adam
>
>
>
> On 10/26/16, 10:10 AM, "Adam Dershowitz"  wrote:
>
> I tried it a few times, and it kept crashing Paraview.  So, then I
> read up on, it and seemed, from the description, that it was not what I
> wanted anyway.  But, if you think it is, I will see if I can get it to work.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/26/16, 1:01 AM, "postgu...@web.de"  wrote:
>
> >Adam,
> >
> >Have you actually tried the filter? Because I think the output is
> exactly what
> >you're asking for: the "section" of the surface is the part of the
> surface where
> >the polyline is proceted onto it, hence a polyline with the regarding
> topography
> >values for the respective z coordinates.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Venke
> >
> >
> >
> >> Adam Dershowitz  hat am 25. Oktober 2016
> um 17:29
> >> geschrieben:
> >>
> >>
> >> I don't think that will do it.  Because, I don't want to slice
> anything.
> >> I just want to show the boundaries on the 3D surface.  I want to
> project the
> >> polygon that marks the edges of a region, onto the 3D topography.
> >> It seems that Slice Along Polyline uses a laser to cut a section of
> the
> >> surface, according to the instructions.  Instead I want to see each
> spot where
> >> the laser hits on the surface.
> >>
> >> 

Re: [Paraview] Project polygon onto surface

[Adam Dershowitz]

I may mess with it some.
FYI, I did convert my polygon to a polyline, and got it to work.  But, if I 
have two polylines (actually two completely separate regions) the slice along 
polyline filter then connects them even though they should not be connected.  
Perhaps this is just what you mentioned below about having the same first and 
last point?
I appreciate both the filter and the feedback below.

Thank you,



-- Adam


From: Shawn Waldon 
Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM
To: Dershowitz Adam 
Cc: "postgu...@web.de" , "paraview@paraview.org" 

Subject: Re: [Paraview] Project polygon onto surface

Hi Adam,
The Slice Along PolyLine filter looks for a vtkPolyLine type cell.  But there 
is no reason the algorithm itself can't work with a polygon (the current 
implementation just doesn't look for one and may not handle it the way you want 
if you pass a polyline that happens to have a first and last point that are the 
same).  You would have to modify vtkPolyPlane to handle a polygon input rather 
than assuming the first and last segments go off to infinity (add an option for 
this).
If you want to color the inside, you have to get into how the algorithm works a 
bit.  Internally I am using a vtkImplicitFunciton (vtkPolyPlane) to compute the 
distance of each point in the dataset (or its projection into the plane of the 
polyline) from the polyline.  Then I run a Contour filter (vtkCutter), 
contouring where that filter's value is 0 and the output is the slice along the 
polyline.  But if you directly applied the vtkPolyPlane implicit function to 
your dataset and appended that as a data array rather than contouring by it and 
throwing it away, you could get colors for distance from the line.  You could 
then use the Calculator filter to scale and color this however you wanted since 
the distance will be negative for one side of the line.
HTH,
Shawn

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Adam Dershowitz 
> wrote:
The problem I was having is that I was planning and trying  to use a polygon.  
It seems that if you try to use that Slice Along Polyline, but select a polygon 
for the input, it crashes paraview (it should probably bring up an error, or 
only allow a polyline!).  I realized that it actually wants a polyline, and 
once I created one for my region, the filter does what I had been looking for.
But, that leads to another question…  If I want a whole region to be another 
color, is there a way to fill the output of SliceAlongPolyLine?  So, instead of 
just an outline, I can get the inside to also be a certain color?

Thanks for the help.


-- Adam


On 10/26/16, 10:10 AM, "Adam Dershowitz" 
> wrote:

I tried it a few times, and it kept crashing Paraview.  So, then I read up 
on, it and seemed, from the description, that it was not what I wanted anyway.  
But, if you think it is, I will see if I can get it to work.

-- Adam









On 10/26/16, 1:01 AM, "postgu...@web.de" 
> wrote:

>Adam,
>
>Have you actually tried the filter? Because I think the output is exactly 
what
>you're asking for: the "section" of the surface is the part of the surface 
where
>the polyline is proceted onto it, hence a polyline with the regarding 
topography
>values for the respective z coordinates.
>
>Cheers
>Venke
>
>
>
>> Adam Dershowitz 
> hat am 25. Oktober 
2016 um 17:29
>> geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> I don't think that will do it.  Because, I don't want to slice anything.
>> I just want to show the boundaries on the 3D surface.  I want to project 
the
>> polygon that marks the edges of a region, onto the 3D topography.
>> It seems that Slice Along Polyline uses a laser to cut a section of the
>> surface, according to the instructions.  Instead I want to see each spot 
where
>> the laser hits on the surface.
>>
>> 
>> From: postgu...@web.de 
[postgu...@web.de]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:13 AM
>> To: Adam Dershowitz; paraview@paraview.org
>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Project polygon onto surface
>>
>> Hi Adam
>>
>> I think the Slice Along Polyline Filter is what you need. Just select 
the data
>> set and the poly line in the window popping up and then proceed in the
>> properties section as usual.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Venke
>>
>>
>>
>> > Adam Dershowitz 
> hat am 25. Oktober 
2016 um 16:01
>> > geschrieben:
>> >
>> >
>> > Is 

Re: [Paraview] Project polygon onto surface

[Shawn Waldon]

Hi Adam,

The Slice Along PolyLine filter looks for a vtkPolyLine type cell.  But
there is no reason the algorithm itself can't work with a polygon (the
current implementation just doesn't look for one and may not handle it the
way you want if you pass a polyline that happens to have a first and last
point that are the same).  You would have to modify vtkPolyPlane to handle
a polygon input rather than assuming the first and last segments go off to
infinity (add an option for this).

If you want to color the inside, you have to get into how the algorithm
works a bit.  Internally I am using a vtkImplicitFunciton (vtkPolyPlane) to
compute the distance of each point in the dataset (or its projection into
the plane of the polyline) from the polyline.  Then I run a Contour filter
(vtkCutter), contouring where that filter's value is 0 and the output is
the slice along the polyline.  But if you directly applied the vtkPolyPlane
implicit function to your dataset and appended that as a data array rather
than contouring by it and throwing it away, you could get colors for
distance from the line.  You could then use the Calculator filter to scale
and color this however you wanted since the distance will be negative for
one side of the line.

HTH,
Shawn

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Adam Dershowitz 
wrote:

> The problem I was having is that I was planning and trying  to use a
> polygon.  It seems that if you try to use that Slice Along Polyline, but
> select a polygon for the input, it crashes paraview (it should probably
> bring up an error, or only allow a polyline!).  I realized that it actually
> wants a polyline, and once I created one for my region, the filter does
> what I had been looking for.
> But, that leads to another question…  If I want a whole region to be
> another color, is there a way to fill the output of SliceAlongPolyLine?
> So, instead of just an outline, I can get the inside to also be a certain
> color?
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 10/26/16, 10:10 AM, "Adam Dershowitz"  wrote:
>
> I tried it a few times, and it kept crashing Paraview.  So, then I
> read up on, it and seemed, from the description, that it was not what I
> wanted anyway.  But, if you think it is, I will see if I can get it to work.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/26/16, 1:01 AM, "postgu...@web.de"  wrote:
>
> >Adam,
> >
> >Have you actually tried the filter? Because I think the output is
> exactly what
> >you're asking for: the "section" of the surface is the part of the
> surface where
> >the polyline is proceted onto it, hence a polyline with the regarding
> topography
> >values for the respective z coordinates.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Venke
> >
> >
> >
> >> Adam Dershowitz  hat am 25. Oktober 2016
> um 17:29
> >> geschrieben:
> >>
> >>
> >> I don't think that will do it.  Because, I don't want to slice
> anything.
> >> I just want to show the boundaries on the 3D surface.  I want to
> project the
> >> polygon that marks the edges of a region, onto the 3D topography.
> >> It seems that Slice Along Polyline uses a laser to cut a section of
> the
> >> surface, according to the instructions.  Instead I want to see each
> spot where
> >> the laser hits on the surface.
> >>
> >> 
> >> From: postgu...@web.de [postgu...@web.de]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:13 AM
> >> To: Adam Dershowitz; paraview@paraview.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Project polygon onto surface
> >>
> >> Hi Adam
> >>
> >> I think the Slice Along Polyline Filter is what you need. Just
> select the data
> >> set and the poly line in the window popping up and then proceed in
> the
> >> properties section as usual.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Venke
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > Adam Dershowitz  hat am 25. Oktober
> 2016 um 16:01
> >> > geschrieben:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Is there a way to project a 2D, or 3D polygon onto a surface.
> >> > Specifically I have some elevation data, that is displaying
> fine.  But the
> >> > data has a lot of vertical variation.  I have a polygon that
> represents the
> >> > boundaries of different regions.  So, the polygon is effectively
> 2D.
> >> >  Although, I can give it a 3D values as well.
> >> > The difficulty is that I can know the elevation of the corners,
> but the
> >> > lines
> >> > between those corners often drop "underground".
> >> > So I would like to project the 2D (or 3D) polygon region onto the
> 3D ground
> >> > elevation.
> >> > You can think of this as having a topo map and I want to show the
> lines
> >> > around
> >> > an individual piece of property.
> >> > Is there a filter that can do this?
>   

Re: [Paraview] Paraview and Space Mouse Pro

[Dinu Patirniche]

Dear Cory,

You were of right. The option was there - I needed to set the correct
path for the QT directory for all modules to show up. I ignored at the
beginning the QT error, and tried to see whether this plugin is
available to start with.

Solved.

Thanks!

P.S. Looking fwd. for having this feature shipped with the binaries.

On 11/29/16, Cory Quammen  wrote:
> Dinu,
>
> I do my main development on a Mac and the option is indeed listed in
> the ccmake. The option variable is not defined in the top-level
> CMakeLists.txt file, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There is
> some CMake code that looks in the plugins directory and creates the
> option variable for each plugin during CMake configuration.
>
> Try this:
>
> In your ParaView build directory, run
>
> ccmake .
>
> Toggle the advanced options on by pressing the 't' key. Now type '/'
> and search for PARAVIEW_BUILD_PLUGIN_VRPlugin. It should be listed,
> with a default setting to off.
>
> Let us know how it goes,
> Cory
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Dinu Patirniche
>  wrote:
>> Hi Cory,
>>
>> Ah Yeah, I forgot to mention that I'm compiling on OSx. This option is
>> not available neither in Paraview 5.2.0 nor in 5.0.0 (both of which I
>> compiled from source). Have a look at the screenshot.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> D.
>>
>> On 11/29/16, Cory Quammen  wrote:
 Two questions:
 1. That page was last updated in 2014; did since then the plan succeed
 to include it in the binaries (I guess not, as I could not locate it)
>>>
>>> I believe this plugin is shipped with the Linux binaries only.
>>>
 2. If it is not included in the binaries, what should I add to the
 CMakeList to correctly install the plugin?
>>>
>>> You should just enable PARAVIEW_BUILD_PLUGIN_VRPlugin as the
>>> instructions say. It is an advanced CMakeLists.txt option, so make
>>> sure you have the advanced mode enabled in the CMake user interface.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Cory
>>>
 Thanks,
 D.
 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cory Quammen
>>> Staff R Engineer
>>> Kitware, Inc.
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cory Quammen
> Staff R Engineer
> Kitware, Inc.
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] Segfault reading polyhedral cells xdmf3 file

[Alessandro De Maio]

Dear All,
 I would like to use xdmf file format for exporting polyhedral mesh
results from a CFD code to be opened with Paraview. If I'm not wrong
Paraview 5.2.0 should be able to read/write such kind o files.

Just to understand the format of the xmf file, I've been trying to open a
very easy example taken from the post by Armin Wehrfritz (Tue Sep 27
09:03:00 EDT 2016) in this mailing list (the title of the post was
"Combination of polygonal-data and unstructured grid") named polyhedron.xmf
(that I put in attach to this post). But using Paraview 5.2.0 (Windows
64bit) binary, it gives segmentation fault immediately after the "Apply"
button click.

I've tried also to read the vtu version of the same geometry
(polyhedron.vtu taken from the same post of Armin and in attach) and to
save it from Paraview in xdmf3 file format. Once I try to re-read the xmf
generated file, the behaviour is the same and Paraview crashes.

Has anyone of you experience with xdmf polyhedral files in Paraview?

Thank you in advance for any suggestion

Alessandro De Maio


polyhedron.xmf
Description: Binary data


polyhedron.vtu
Description: Binary data
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Paraview and Space Mouse Pro

[Cory Quammen]

Dinu,

I do my main development on a Mac and the option is indeed listed in
the ccmake. The option variable is not defined in the top-level
CMakeLists.txt file, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There is
some CMake code that looks in the plugins directory and creates the
option variable for each plugin during CMake configuration.

Try this:

In your ParaView build directory, run

ccmake .

Toggle the advanced options on by pressing the 't' key. Now type '/'
and search for PARAVIEW_BUILD_PLUGIN_VRPlugin. It should be listed,
with a default setting to off.

Let us know how it goes,
Cory

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Dinu Patirniche
 wrote:
> Hi Cory,
>
> Ah Yeah, I forgot to mention that I'm compiling on OSx. This option is
> not available neither in Paraview 5.2.0 nor in 5.0.0 (both of which I
> compiled from source). Have a look at the screenshot.
>
> Thanks,
> D.
>
> On 11/29/16, Cory Quammen  wrote:
>>> Two questions:
>>> 1. That page was last updated in 2014; did since then the plan succeed
>>> to include it in the binaries (I guess not, as I could not locate it)
>>
>> I believe this plugin is shipped with the Linux binaries only.
>>
>>> 2. If it is not included in the binaries, what should I add to the
>>> CMakeList to correctly install the plugin?
>>
>> You should just enable PARAVIEW_BUILD_PLUGIN_VRPlugin as the
>> instructions say. It is an advanced CMakeLists.txt option, so make
>> sure you have the advanced mode enabled in the CMake user interface.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Cory
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> D.
>>> ___
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cory Quammen
>> Staff R Engineer
>> Kitware, Inc.
>>



-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview