Re: [Paraview] Q-criterion still wrong ?
Thanks to you :-) Aurélien 2012/8/14 Andy Bauer > FYI: The fix has made its way into ParaView. Thanks again for the bug > report. > > Andy > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Andy Bauer wrote: > >> Thanks for finding this. I have a fix in gerrit at >> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/t/957/. It should make it into VTK >> and ParaView shortly. >> >> Andy >> >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Aurélien Marsan wrote: >> >>> Good morning, >>> >>> I have just found the following bug report about a mistake in the >>> Q-criterion formula. >>> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12858 >>> that is now closed. >>> >>> However, the "1/2" factor may still be missing. >>> In vtkGradientFilter.cxx, in the VTK/Grahpics directory, on the line 65, >>> t1 should be divided by 2. (Paraview 3.14.1) >>> >>> Should I re-open the bug report ? >>> >>> With best regards, >>> >>> Aurélien >>> >>> ___ >>> Powered by www.kitware.com >>> >>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >>> >>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >>> >>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview >>> >>> >> > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Q-criterion still wrong ?
It's an option, along with vorticity, under the Gradient of Unstructured Dataset filter. The current behavior is a bit non-intuitive in that if you check Compute Vorticity the output will be the vorticity (assuming a vector field), otherwise the output will be the gradient. For the Compute QCriterion option though it outputs that in addition to the other outputs. This will get changed in 4.0 though to be a bit clearer. Andy On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Florian Lindner wrote: > Sorry for being ignorant.. I never found a Q criteria filter in > paraview? Where is it? > > 2012/8/14 Andy Bauer : > > FYI: The fix has made its way into ParaView. Thanks again for the bug > > report. > > > > Andy > > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Andy Bauer > wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for finding this. I have a fix in gerrit at > >> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/t/957/. It should make it into VTK > and > >> ParaView shortly. > >> > >> Andy > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Aurélien Marsan > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Good morning, > >>> > >>> I have just found the following bug report about a mistake in the > >>> Q-criterion formula. > >>> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12858 > >>> that is now closed. > >>> > >>> However, the "1/2" factor may still be missing. > >>> In vtkGradientFilter.cxx, in the VTK/Grahpics directory, on the line > 65, > >>> t1 should be divided by 2. (Paraview 3.14.1) > >>> > >>> Should I re-open the bug report ? > >>> > >>> With best regards, > >>> > >>> Aurélien > >>> > >>> ___ > >>> Powered by www.kitware.com > >>> > >>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > >>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > >>> > >>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > >>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > >>> > >>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > >>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > >>> > >> > > > > > > ___ > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > > ___ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Q-criterion still wrong ?
Sorry for being ignorant.. I never found a Q criteria filter in paraview? Where is it? 2012/8/14 Andy Bauer : > FYI: The fix has made its way into ParaView. Thanks again for the bug > report. > > Andy > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Andy Bauer wrote: >> >> Thanks for finding this. I have a fix in gerrit at >> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/t/957/. It should make it into VTK and >> ParaView shortly. >> >> Andy >> >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Aurélien Marsan >> wrote: >>> >>> Good morning, >>> >>> I have just found the following bug report about a mistake in the >>> Q-criterion formula. >>> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12858 >>> that is now closed. >>> >>> However, the "1/2" factor may still be missing. >>> In vtkGradientFilter.cxx, in the VTK/Grahpics directory, on the line 65, >>> t1 should be divided by 2. (Paraview 3.14.1) >>> >>> Should I re-open the bug report ? >>> >>> With best regards, >>> >>> Aurélien >>> >>> ___ >>> Powered by www.kitware.com >>> >>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >>> >>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >>> >>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview >>> >> > > > ___ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Q-criterion still wrong ?
FYI: The fix has made its way into ParaView. Thanks again for the bug report. Andy On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Andy Bauer wrote: > Thanks for finding this. I have a fix in gerrit at > http://review.source.kitware.com/#/t/957/. It should make it into VTK and > ParaView shortly. > > Andy > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Aurélien Marsan wrote: > >> Good morning, >> >> I have just found the following bug report about a mistake in the >> Q-criterion formula. >> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12858 >> that is now closed. >> >> However, the "1/2" factor may still be missing. >> In vtkGradientFilter.cxx, in the VTK/Grahpics directory, on the line 65, >> t1 should be divided by 2. (Paraview 3.14.1) >> >> Should I re-open the bug report ? >> >> With best regards, >> >> Aurélien >> >> ___ >> Powered by www.kitware.com >> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >> >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview >> >> > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Q-criterion still wrong ?
Thanks for finding this. I have a fix in gerrit at http://review.source.kitware.com/#/t/957/. It should make it into VTK and ParaView shortly. Andy On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Aurélien Marsan wrote: > Good morning, > > I have just found the following bug report about a mistake in the > Q-criterion formula. > http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12858 > that is now closed. > > However, the "1/2" factor may still be missing. > In vtkGradientFilter.cxx, in the VTK/Grahpics directory, on the line 65, > t1 should be divided by 2. (Paraview 3.14.1) > > Should I re-open the bug report ? > > With best regards, > > Aurélien > > ___ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
[Paraview] Q-criterion still wrong ?
Good morning, I have just found the following bug report about a mistake in the Q-criterion formula. http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12858 that is now closed. However, the "1/2" factor may still be missing. In vtkGradientFilter.cxx, in the VTK/Grahpics directory, on the line 65, t1 should be divided by 2. (Paraview 3.14.1) Should I re-open the bug report ? With best regards, Aurélien ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
