Re: computer speakers and suround sound

2011-11-13 Thread Gary Wood
Bryan!  I do a test tone on my surround speakers from time to time, to be 
sure they're set right.
- Original Message - 
From: brian briansackri...@att.net

To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:48 PM
Subject: computer speakers and suround sound


Hi this Brian Sackrider and I use bose computer speakers they cost about 
100 dollars and do not take very much room on my desk and they sound good. 
I use to have a pioneer surond sound system htp 55 that cost about 400 
dollars and I really did enjoy listening to music on it in my opinion this 
is the only way to listen to music.  It had great sounding base and II 
really liked the seperation and concert hall or club effect.  You just 
canâ?Tt get that kind of experence from a 2 speaker system.  To the person 
that did like suround systems for music maybe the speakers were not 
properly placed or the volume for the indivitual speakers was not properly 
addjusted.  On my system I could do a tone test to check the audio from 
all of the speakers.  Also this person may have a hearing problem and may 
not be able to detect the sutle differences in the music.  Also I have 
heard alltech lansing speakers and they do have better stereo seperation 
than anything that I have ever heard.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: computer speakers and suround sound

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
Good idea, it will be interesting to see how the latest Yamaha surround-sound 
receiver I plan to buy next year goes, it has manual setting as far as I'm 
aware but by default you use a microphone.

For example you sit in your favourite armchair once you've set the amp up and 
turn it on, the amp then plays tones through all the speakers and - by using 
feedback from the microphone you hold - it adjusts the volume for each channel 
in tern.

Well, that's one way of doing it I spose smile.


On 13/11/2011, at 7:21 PM, Gary Wood wrote:

 Bryan!  I do a test tone on my surround speakers from time to time, to be 
 sure they're set right.
 - Original Message - From: brian briansackri...@att.net
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:48 PM
 Subject: computer speakers and suround sound
 
 
 Hi this Brian Sackrider and I use bose computer speakers they cost about 100 
 dollars and do not take very much room on my desk and they sound good. I use 
 to have a pioneer surond sound system htp 55 that cost about 400 dollars and 
 I really did enjoy listening to music on it in my opinion this is the only 
 way to listen to music.  It had great sounding base and II really liked the 
 seperation and concert hall or club effect.  You just canâ?Tt get that kind 
 of experence from a 2 speaker system.  To the person that did like suround 
 systems for music maybe the speakers were not properly placed or the volume 
 for the indivitual speakers was not properly addjusted.  On my system I 
 could do a tone test to check the audio from all of the speakers.  Also this 
 person may have a hearing problem and may not be able to detect the sutle 
 differences in the music.  Also I have heard alltech lansing speakers and 
 they do have better stereo seperation than anything that I have ever heard.
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
Hi and thanks to those who provide me with valuable information on the Jawbone 
Jambox bluetooth speaker system http://www.jawbone.com

You've heard it said I'm sure that the Jambox is an amazing piece of 
technology, I echo that statement without hesitation so if you're looking for a 
portable bluetooth speaker solution say for a phone or a music player then the 
Jambox by Jawbone is certainly worth the consideration.

Jawbone say its the smallest speaker system on the planet? Well I don't know 
about that but there's no argument that Jambox is certainly small and yet 
sounds big!

There seems to be a misconception that the Jambox only gives out mono sound, 
not true when playing music but perfectly true when using the speakerphone 
function.

Pairing is easy, put the Jambox into Pairing mode by holding the power switch 
to the upmost position, Jambox confirms by saying Jambox Is In Pairing Mode 
let the switch go and connect your bluetooth device.

Jambox has a line in socket so no matter what your audio source - whether it be 
your bluetooth device or your Notebook - you can Blast Away All Day, well for 
at least ten hours according to the manual which rates the battery life at that 
after a full charge.



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Matthew Bullis
So how was it to navigate the web site to upgrade the firmware? Robert 
Carter mentioned that in his demonstration, and I'd like to know more about 
the web site challenges that you face when attempting to upgrade the 
machine.

Thanks a lot.
Matthew 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
I haven't played much with that aspect of it yet.

As I understand it there's no software upgrades available for it yet anyway so 
its not a terribly urgent issue for me, would be if something didn't work 
smile.


On 13/11/2011, at 8:05 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:

 So how was it to navigate the web site to upgrade the firmware? Robert Carter 
 mentioned that in his demonstration, and I'd like to know more about the web 
 site challenges that you face when attempting to upgrade the machine.
 Thanks a lot.
 Matthew 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Matthew Bullis
OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you do, as 
maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the world, might not 
be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. If I had the unit, I would 
go test this myself, but I need to wait until I get a bluetooth device yet, 
which is a bit down the road for me.

Thanks a lot.
Matthew 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
Okay well a couple of points I'd like to comment on.

I know various people around the world who have them and who have tested the 
update software.

Yep, it would appear to be a challenge for a blind person to use it would seem, 
the people I know have sight so they've used it and all report that no updates 
are available at this time.

I take your point about bluetooth devices but you certainly do not need a 
bluetooth device on hand to use one of these things, as I said they have a 
line-in socket thus make a truly marvelous portable speaker system, I plug a 
very nice Denon tuner into mine for example.


On 13/11/2011, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:

 OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you do, as 
 maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the world, might not 
 be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. If I had the unit, I would 
 go test this myself, but I need to wait until I get a bluetooth device yet, 
 which is a bit down the road for me.
 Thanks a lot.
 Matthew 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: audio quality

2011-11-13 Thread Richard Claypool

my bad, I thought flac was apple lossless.

-Original Message- 
From: Brent Harding

Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:26 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality

Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
don't know what would make it any better than flac, shn, or any of the
others except if you used an Ipod, now you can generate the files with other
tools.

- Original Message - 
From: Hamit Campos hamitcam...@gmail.com

To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 1:49 PM
Subject: RE: audio quality


Ah see that's the thing about Apple Losless, If you use it, you have to 
play

it either on your Ipod, or Itunes. So If you don't have them, or if you
don't care for them, then what's the point?

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:42 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality

I heard that Apple made their lossless format open source. I'm not sure 
why

they would do that or what makes it better or different than the rest
besides it locked you in when it wasn't open source. I'm not sure if 
anyone

made tools yet using it though if one doesn't use Itunes.

- Original Message - 
From: Richard Claypool bellevue@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: audio quality



I don't use wma lossless, the bootleggers I deal with use flac, and it's
not limited to windows.

-Original Message- 
From: Hamit Campos

Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:27 AM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: audio quality

Yep, PCM 44100 KHZ 16 bit is fine for music, that's what CDs are anyways.
Even wma lossless would be fine but only WMP can make it. That's why I
wish
Olympus would dump regular old WMA, and get WMA Losless on their
recorders.

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:24 AM
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: audio quality

in terms of audio quality for file types which is the best for archiving
music/ or spoken word?
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Logitech portable iPod docks

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
Hi!

Thinking of getting one of these things, anyone have one? Was talking to 
someone a couple of days ago who raves about his.

They're a portable speaker unit with an iPod dock on the top, they run on 
either Power or rechargeable battery for 8 hours.



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: audio quality

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
FLAC is a lossless format but nothing whatever to do with Apple, FLAC stands 
for Free Lossless Audio Coding, not exactly sure about the last word so I'm 
sure someone will correct me on that point.


On 13/11/2011, at 11:37 PM, Richard Claypool wrote:

 my bad, I thought flac was apple lossless.
 
 -Original Message- From: Brent Harding
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:26 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: audio quality
 
 Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
 don't know what would make it any better than flac, shn, or any of the
 others except if you used an Ipod, now you can generate the files with other
 tools.
 
 - Original Message - From: Hamit Campos hamitcam...@gmail.com
 To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 1:49 PM
 Subject: RE: audio quality
 
 
 Ah see that's the thing about Apple Losless, If you use it, you have to play
 it either on your Ipod, or Itunes. So If you don't have them, or if you
 don't care for them, then what's the point?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Brent Harding
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:42 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: audio quality
 
 I heard that Apple made their lossless format open source. I'm not sure why
 they would do that or what makes it better or different than the rest
 besides it locked you in when it wasn't open source. I'm not sure if anyone
 made tools yet using it though if one doesn't use Itunes.
 
 - Original Message - From: Richard Claypool 
 bellevue@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:14 AM
 Subject: Re: audio quality
 
 
 I don't use wma lossless, the bootleggers I deal with use flac, and it's
 not limited to windows.
 
 -Original Message- From: Hamit Campos
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:27 AM
 To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
 Subject: RE: audio quality
 
 Yep, PCM 44100 KHZ 16 bit is fine for music, that's what CDs are anyways.
 Even wma lossless would be fine but only WMP can make it. That's why I
 wish
 Olympus would dump regular old WMA, and get WMA Losless on their
 recorders.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Sunshine
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:24 AM
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Subject: audio quality
 
 in terms of audio quality for file types which is the best for archiving
 music/ or spoken word?
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: audio quality

2011-11-13 Thread David McLean
Apple lossless is ALAC.  I've never seen anything encoded with it however.
On Nov 13, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Richard Claypool wrote:

 my bad, I thought flac was apple lossless.
 
 -Original Message- From: Brent Harding
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:26 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: audio quality
 
 Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
 don't know what would make it any better than flac, shn, or any of the
 others except if you used an Ipod, now you can generate the files with other
 tools.
 
 - Original Message - From: Hamit Campos hamitcam...@gmail.com
 To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 1:49 PM
 Subject: RE: audio quality
 
 
 Ah see that's the thing about Apple Losless, If you use it, you have to play
 it either on your Ipod, or Itunes. So If you don't have them, or if you
 don't care for them, then what's the point?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Brent Harding
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:42 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: audio quality
 
 I heard that Apple made their lossless format open source. I'm not sure why
 they would do that or what makes it better or different than the rest
 besides it locked you in when it wasn't open source. I'm not sure if anyone
 made tools yet using it though if one doesn't use Itunes.
 
 - Original Message - From: Richard Claypool 
 bellevue@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:14 AM
 Subject: Re: audio quality
 
 
 I don't use wma lossless, the bootleggers I deal with use flac, and it's
 not limited to windows.
 
 -Original Message- From: Hamit Campos
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:27 AM
 To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
 Subject: RE: audio quality
 
 Yep, PCM 44100 KHZ 16 bit is fine for music, that's what CDs are anyways.
 Even wma lossless would be fine but only WMP can make it. That's why I
 wish
 Olympus would dump regular old WMA, and get WMA Losless on their
 recorders.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Sunshine
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:24 AM
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Subject: audio quality
 
 in terms of audio quality for file types which is the best for archiving
 music/ or spoken word?
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: computer speakers and suround sound

2011-11-13 Thread Hamit Campos
How good are these Yamaha systems anyways Dain? I don't know if you want to
call me on Skype to talk abiout them or E-mail me off list, but I've never
heard anything from these guys, so I want to know how good they are. How
theatrical they are. You see originally I wanted to use a Bose system, but
they don't make 7.1 systems and so many movies are now 7.1. Jurrasic park is
now 7.1 for instabnce. Starwars is now 6.1. So you see, what I mean, yeah, I
know I said I was using a Bose system before, but it's the Companion 5
system. Don't get me wrong, they are cool for what they are, but that's the
thing, they are a virtual surround sound system. It's only 2 speakers.
Nothing beats actually having 5 speakers or now with most movies being 6 or
7.1, having 7 speakers. So yeah, if you could fill me in and let me know
I'ed appreciate it.

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:25 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: computer speakers and suround sound

Good idea, it will be interesting to see how the latest Yamaha
surround-sound receiver I plan to buy next year goes, it has manual setting
as far as I'm aware but by default you use a microphone.

For example you sit in your favourite armchair once you've set the amp up
and turn it on, the amp then plays tones through all the speakers and - by
using feedback from the microphone you hold - it adjusts the volume for each
channel in tern.

Well, that's one way of doing it I spose smile.


On 13/11/2011, at 7:21 PM, Gary Wood wrote:

 Bryan!  I do a test tone on my surround speakers from time to time, to be
sure they're set right.
 - Original Message - From: brian briansackri...@att.net
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:48 PM
 Subject: computer speakers and suround sound
 
 
 Hi this Brian Sackrider and I use bose computer speakers they cost about
100 dollars and do not take very much room on my desk and they sound good. I
use to have a pioneer surond sound system htp 55 that cost about 400 dollars
and I really did enjoy listening to music on it in my opinion this is the
only way to listen to music.  It had great sounding base and II really liked
the seperation and concert hall or club effect.  You just canâ?Tt get that
kind of experence from a 2 speaker system.  To the person that did like
suround systems for music maybe the speakers were not properly placed or the
volume for the indivitual speakers was not properly addjusted.  On my system
I could do a tone test to check the audio from all of the speakers.  Also
this person may have a hearing problem and may not be able to detect the
sutle differences in the music.  Also I have heard alltech lansing speakers
and they do have better stereo seperation than anything that I have ever
heard.
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: audio quality

2011-11-13 Thread Richard Claypool
I never knew who made apple flac, so misunderstood the message, thanks for 
the knowledge.



-Original Message- 
From: David McLean

Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 9:04 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality

Apple lossless is ALAC.  I've never seen anything encoded with it however.
On Nov 13, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Richard Claypool wrote:


my bad, I thought flac was apple lossless.

-Original Message- From: Brent Harding
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:26 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality

Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
don't know what would make it any better than flac, shn, or any of the
others except if you used an Ipod, now you can generate the files with 
other

tools.

- Original Message - From: Hamit Campos hamitcam...@gmail.com
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 1:49 PM
Subject: RE: audio quality


Ah see that's the thing about Apple Losless, If you use it, you have to 
play

it either on your Ipod, or Itunes. So If you don't have them, or if you
don't care for them, then what's the point?

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:42 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality

I heard that Apple made their lossless format open source. I'm not sure 
why

they would do that or what makes it better or different than the rest
besides it locked you in when it wasn't open source. I'm not sure if 
anyone

made tools yet using it though if one doesn't use Itunes.

- Original Message - From: Richard Claypool 
bellevue@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: audio quality



I don't use wma lossless, the bootleggers I deal with use flac, and it's
not limited to windows.

-Original Message- From: Hamit Campos
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:27 AM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: audio quality

Yep, PCM 44100 KHZ 16 bit is fine for music, that's what CDs are 
anyways.

Even wma lossless would be fine but only WMP can make it. That's why I
wish
Olympus would dump regular old WMA, and get WMA Losless on their
recorders.

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:24 AM
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: audio quality

in terms of audio quality for file types which is the best for archiving
music/ or spoken word?
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Gary King

Dain,
Did your JamBox come with the Live Audio update installed?  The one I 
ordered from AMAZON.COM didn't.  The first thing I tried after starting 
music on my iPod Touch was to hold both volume buttons down to start Live 
Audio Mode, but nothing happened.


I then went to the web site and installed the JawBone Updater.  This program 
opens the update page, and I found that the free NVDA screen reader seemed 
to work a little better than either JFW or Window-Eyes on this page.  After 
updating, Live Audio was impressive for its ability to spread the stereo 
effect from such a small speaker.  Of course, for Live Audio to work 
properly, you must sit directly in front of the speaker at the optimum 
distance.


Gary King
w4...@bellsouth.net
- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker



Okay well a couple of points I'd like to comment on.

I know various people around the world who have them and who have tested 
the update software.


Yep, it would appear to be a challenge for a blind person to use it would 
seem, the people I know have sight so they've used it and all report that 
no updates are available at this time.


I take your point about bluetooth devices but you certainly do not need a 
bluetooth device on hand to use one of these things, as I said they have a 
line-in socket thus make a truly marvelous portable speaker system, I plug 
a very nice Denon tuner into mine for example.



On 13/11/2011, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:

OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you do, as 
maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the world, might 
not be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. If I had the unit, I 
would go test this myself, but I need to wait until I get a bluetooth 
device yet, which is a bit down the road for me.

Thanks a lot.
Matthew

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: computer speakers and suround sound

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
For what they are they're not too bad, the one I'm buying is one of the Pro 
series they make but be warned! you pay! and in this case you don't pay too 
much, you should be able to get the one I'm referring to for under $1,000.00 
and for a surround-sound receiver with its specs, works out quite cheap.

If I had the money I'd like to get one of the new Denon units, near to 
perfection they are but above what I can afford right now.


On 14/11/2011, at 3:31 AM, Hamit Campos wrote:

 How good are these Yamaha systems anyways Dain? I don't know if you want to
 call me on Skype to talk abiout them or E-mail me off list, but I've never
 heard anything from these guys, so I want to know how good they are. How
 theatrical they are. You see originally I wanted to use a Bose system, but
 they don't make 7.1 systems and so many movies are now 7.1. Jurrasic park is
 now 7.1 for instabnce. Starwars is now 6.1. So you see, what I mean, yeah, I
 know I said I was using a Bose system before, but it's the Companion 5
 system. Don't get me wrong, they are cool for what they are, but that's the
 thing, they are a virtual surround sound system. It's only 2 speakers.
 Nothing beats actually having 5 speakers or now with most movies being 6 or
 7.1, having 7 speakers. So yeah, if you could fill me in and let me know
 I'ed appreciate it.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:25 AM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: computer speakers and suround sound
 
 Good idea, it will be interesting to see how the latest Yamaha
 surround-sound receiver I plan to buy next year goes, it has manual setting
 as far as I'm aware but by default you use a microphone.
 
 For example you sit in your favourite armchair once you've set the amp up
 and turn it on, the amp then plays tones through all the speakers and - by
 using feedback from the microphone you hold - it adjusts the volume for each
 channel in tern.
 
 Well, that's one way of doing it I spose smile.
 
 
 On 13/11/2011, at 7:21 PM, Gary Wood wrote:
 
 Bryan!  I do a test tone on my surround speakers from time to time, to be
 sure they're set right.
 - Original Message - From: brian briansackri...@att.net
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:48 PM
 Subject: computer speakers and suround sound
 
 
 Hi this Brian Sackrider and I use bose computer speakers they cost about
 100 dollars and do not take very much room on my desk and they sound good. I
 use to have a pioneer surond sound system htp 55 that cost about 400 dollars
 and I really did enjoy listening to music on it in my opinion this is the
 only way to listen to music.  It had great sounding base and II really liked
 the seperation and concert hall or club effect.  You just canâ?Tt get that
 kind of experence from a 2 speaker system.  To the person that did like
 suround systems for music maybe the speakers were not properly placed or the
 volume for the indivitual speakers was not properly addjusted.  On my system
 I could do a tone test to check the audio from all of the speakers.  Also
 this person may have a hearing problem and may not be able to detect the
 sutle differences in the music.  Also I have heard alltech lansing speakers
 and they do have better stereo seperation than anything that I have ever
 heard.
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: audio quality

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
Whilst they're different compression methods FLAC and Apple Lossless pretty 
much amount to the same thing when used, that is to say that when music is 
compressed using either of these encoding methods, the end result is lossless.

AAC/AAC+ is not lossless compression nor is it Apple Lossless compression.


On 14/11/2011, at 5:36 AM, Richard Claypool wrote:

 I never knew who made apple flac, so misunderstood the message, thanks for 
 the knowledge.
 
 
 -Original Message- From: David McLean
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 9:04 AM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: audio quality
 
 Apple lossless is ALAC.  I've never seen anything encoded with it however.
 On Nov 13, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Richard Claypool wrote:
 
 my bad, I thought flac was apple lossless.
 
 -Original Message- From: Brent Harding
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:26 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: audio quality
 
 Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
 don't know what would make it any better than flac, shn, or any of the
 others except if you used an Ipod, now you can generate the files with other
 tools.
 
 - Original Message - From: Hamit Campos hamitcam...@gmail.com
 To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 1:49 PM
 Subject: RE: audio quality
 
 
 Ah see that's the thing about Apple Losless, If you use it, you have to play
 it either on your Ipod, or Itunes. So If you don't have them, or if you
 don't care for them, then what's the point?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Brent Harding
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:42 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: audio quality
 
 I heard that Apple made their lossless format open source. I'm not sure why
 they would do that or what makes it better or different than the rest
 besides it locked you in when it wasn't open source. I'm not sure if anyone
 made tools yet using it though if one doesn't use Itunes.
 
 - Original Message - From: Richard Claypool 
 bellevue@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:14 AM
 Subject: Re: audio quality
 
 
 I don't use wma lossless, the bootleggers I deal with use flac, and it's
 not limited to windows.
 
 -Original Message- From: Hamit Campos
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:27 AM
 To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
 Subject: RE: audio quality
 
 Yep, PCM 44100 KHZ 16 bit is fine for music, that's what CDs are anyways.
 Even wma lossless would be fine but only WMP can make it. That's why I
 wish
 Olympus would dump regular old WMA, and get WMA Losless on their
 recorders.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Sunshine
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:24 AM
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Subject: audio quality
 
 in terms of audio quality for file types which is the best for archiving
 music/ or spoken word?
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
Who told you to hold both volume controls down? I've never heard of this before.

I'm not saying your wrong.

Up till now I've controlled my iPod from the unit itself.


On 14/11/2011, at 5:43 AM, Gary King wrote:

 Dain,
 Did your JamBox come with the Live Audio update installed?  The one I ordered 
 from AMAZON.COM didn't.  The first thing I tried after starting music on my 
 iPod Touch was to hold both volume buttons down to start Live Audio Mode, but 
 nothing happened.
 
 I then went to the web site and installed the JawBone Updater.  This program 
 opens the update page, and I found that the free NVDA screen reader seemed to 
 work a little better than either JFW or Window-Eyes on this page.  After 
 updating, Live Audio was impressive for its ability to spread the stereo 
 effect from such a small speaker.  Of course, for Live Audio to work 
 properly, you must sit directly in front of the speaker at the optimum 
 distance.
 
 Gary King
 w4...@bellsouth.net
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:32 AM
 Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker
 
 
 Okay well a couple of points I'd like to comment on.
 
 I know various people around the world who have them and who have tested the 
 update software.
 
 Yep, it would appear to be a challenge for a blind person to use it would 
 seem, the people I know have sight so they've used it and all report that no 
 updates are available at this time.
 
 I take your point about bluetooth devices but you certainly do not need a 
 bluetooth device on hand to use one of these things, as I said they have a 
 line-in socket thus make a truly marvelous portable speaker system, I plug a 
 very nice Denon tuner into mine for example.
 
 
 On 13/11/2011, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:
 
 OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you do, as 
 maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the world, might 
 not be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. If I had the unit, I 
 would go test this myself, but I need to wait until I get a bluetooth 
 device yet, which is a bit down the road for me.
 Thanks a lot.
 Matthew
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: computer speakers and suround sound

2011-11-13 Thread Hamit Campos
What's the unit you would get if you could? What moddle are you getting so I
can look it up?

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:33 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: computer speakers and suround sound

For what they are they're not too bad, the one I'm buying is one of the
Pro series they make but be warned! you pay! and in this case you don't
pay too much, you should be able to get the one I'm referring to for under
$1,000.00 and for a surround-sound receiver with its specs, works out quite
cheap.

If I had the money I'd like to get one of the new Denon units, near to
perfection they are but above what I can afford right now.


On 14/11/2011, at 3:31 AM, Hamit Campos wrote:

 How good are these Yamaha systems anyways Dain? I don't know if you want
to
 call me on Skype to talk abiout them or E-mail me off list, but I've never
 heard anything from these guys, so I want to know how good they are. How
 theatrical they are. You see originally I wanted to use a Bose system, but
 they don't make 7.1 systems and so many movies are now 7.1. Jurrasic park
is
 now 7.1 for instabnce. Starwars is now 6.1. So you see, what I mean, yeah,
I
 know I said I was using a Bose system before, but it's the Companion 5
 system. Don't get me wrong, they are cool for what they are, but that's
the
 thing, they are a virtual surround sound system. It's only 2 speakers.
 Nothing beats actually having 5 speakers or now with most movies being 6
or
 7.1, having 7 speakers. So yeah, if you could fill me in and let me know
 I'ed appreciate it.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:25 AM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: computer speakers and suround sound
 
 Good idea, it will be interesting to see how the latest Yamaha
 surround-sound receiver I plan to buy next year goes, it has manual
setting
 as far as I'm aware but by default you use a microphone.
 
 For example you sit in your favourite armchair once you've set the amp up
 and turn it on, the amp then plays tones through all the speakers and - by
 using feedback from the microphone you hold - it adjusts the volume for
each
 channel in tern.
 
 Well, that's one way of doing it I spose smile.
 
 
 On 13/11/2011, at 7:21 PM, Gary Wood wrote:
 
 Bryan!  I do a test tone on my surround speakers from time to time, to be
 sure they're set right.
 - Original Message - From: brian briansackri...@att.net
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:48 PM
 Subject: computer speakers and suround sound
 
 
 Hi this Brian Sackrider and I use bose computer speakers they cost about
 100 dollars and do not take very much room on my desk and they sound good.
I
 use to have a pioneer surond sound system htp 55 that cost about 400
dollars
 and I really did enjoy listening to music on it in my opinion this is the
 only way to listen to music.  It had great sounding base and II really
liked
 the seperation and concert hall or club effect.  You just canâ?Tt get that
 kind of experence from a 2 speaker system.  To the person that did like
 suround systems for music maybe the speakers were not properly placed or
the
 volume for the indivitual speakers was not properly addjusted.  On my
system
 I could do a tone test to check the audio from all of the speakers.  Also
 this person may have a hearing problem and may not be able to detect the
 sutle differences in the music.  Also I have heard alltech lansing
speakers
 and they do have better stereo seperation than anything that I have ever
 heard.
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


computer speakers and surround sound

2011-11-13 Thread Rick Roderick
I am just correcgting the spelling of the subject line.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: computer speakers and suround sound

2011-11-13 Thread Dane trethowan
If I could I'd get the Denon unit featured at 
http://www.radioparts.com.au/ProdView.aspx?popup=1Category=SXAA3515Product=01611142ProdDesc=AVR4311BK+9.2CH+140W+AV+DENON+RECEIVER


Now I'd give you the model of the Yamaha unit i plan to get next year 
however the link to the model has changed so I'm going to have to look 
it up again.


I've had both Denon and Yahama amps and surround-sound receivers and I 
can say without hesitation that ifanyone bought anything from any of 
these names then they'd be most happy, another name that seems to 
impress these days is Onkyo.




On 14/11/2011 8:59 AM, Hamit Campos wrote:

What's the unit you would get if you could? What moddle are you getting so I
can look it up?

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:33 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: computer speakers and suround sound

For what they are they're not too bad, the one I'm buying is one of the
Pro series they make but be warned! you pay! and in this case you don't
pay too much, you should be able to get the one I'm referring to for under
$1,000.00 and for a surround-sound receiver with its specs, works out quite
cheap.

If I had the money I'd like to get one of the new Denon units, near to
perfection they are but above what I can afford right now.


On 14/11/2011, at 3:31 AM, Hamit Campos wrote:


How good are these Yamaha systems anyways Dain? I don't know if you want

to

call me on Skype to talk abiout them or E-mail me off list, but I've never
heard anything from these guys, so I want to know how good they are. How
theatrical they are. You see originally I wanted to use a Bose system, but
they don't make 7.1 systems and so many movies are now 7.1. Jurrasic park

is

now 7.1 for instabnce. Starwars is now 6.1. So you see, what I mean, yeah,

I

know I said I was using a Bose system before, but it's the Companion 5
system. Don't get me wrong, they are cool for what they are, but that's

the

thing, they are a virtual surround sound system. It's only 2 speakers.
Nothing beats actually having 5 speakers or now with most movies being 6

or

7.1, having 7 speakers. So yeah, if you could fill me in and let me know
I'ed appreciate it.

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:25 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: computer speakers and suround sound

Good idea, it will be interesting to see how the latest Yamaha
surround-sound receiver I plan to buy next year goes, it has manual

setting

as far as I'm aware but by default you use a microphone.

For example you sit in your favourite armchair once you've set the amp up
and turn it on, the amp then plays tones through all the speakers and - by
using feedback from the microphone you hold - it adjusts the volume for

each

channel in tern.

Well, that's one way of doing it I sposesmile.


On 13/11/2011, at 7:21 PM, Gary Wood wrote:


Bryan!  I do a test tone on my surround speakers from time to time, to be

sure they're set right.

- Original Message - From: brianbriansackri...@att.net
To:pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:48 PM
Subject: computer speakers and suround sound



Hi this Brian Sackrider and I use bose computer speakers they cost about

100 dollars and do not take very much room on my desk and they sound good.

I

use to have a pioneer surond sound system htp 55 that cost about 400

dollars

and I really did enjoy listening to music on it in my opinion this is the
only way to listen to music.  It had great sounding base and II really

liked

the seperation and concert hall or club effect.  You just canâ?Tt get that
kind of experence from a 2 speaker system.  To the person that did like
suround systems for music maybe the speakers were not properly placed or

the

volume for the indivitual speakers was not properly addjusted.  On my

system

I could do a tone test to check the audio from all of the speakers.  Also
this person may have a hearing problem and may not be able to detect the
sutle differences in the music.  Also I have heard alltech lansing

speakers

and they do have better stereo seperation than anything that I have ever
heard.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


--
sent from my HP Powerhouse Notebook.



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email 

Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Clifford Blackwell
In Robert Carter's review, he makes a point of demonstrating the difference 
between normal mode and live or stereo mode.
- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker


Who told you to hold both volume controls down? I've never heard of this 
before.


I'm not saying your wrong.

Up till now I've controlled my iPod from the unit itself.


On 14/11/2011, at 5:43 AM, Gary King wrote:


Dain,
Did your JamBox come with the Live Audio update installed?  The one I 
ordered from AMAZON.COM didn't.  The first thing I tried after starting 
music on my iPod Touch was to hold both volume buttons down to start Live 
Audio Mode, but nothing happened.


I then went to the web site and installed the JawBone Updater.  This 
program opens the update page, and I found that the free NVDA screen 
reader seemed to work a little better than either JFW or Window-Eyes on 
this page.  After updating, Live Audio was impressive for its ability to 
spread the stereo effect from such a small speaker.  Of course, for Live 
Audio to work properly, you must sit directly in front of the speaker at 
the optimum distance.


Gary King
w4...@bellsouth.net
- Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan 
grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker



Okay well a couple of points I'd like to comment on.

I know various people around the world who have them and who have tested 
the update software.


Yep, it would appear to be a challenge for a blind person to use it 
would seem, the people I know have sight so they've used it and all 
report that no updates are available at this time.


I take your point about bluetooth devices but you certainly do not need 
a bluetooth device on hand to use one of these things, as I said they 
have a line-in socket thus make a truly marvelous portable speaker 
system, I plug a very nice Denon tuner into mine for example.



On 13/11/2011, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:

OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you do, 
as maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the world, 
might not be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. If I had the 
unit, I would go test this myself, but I need to wait until I get a 
bluetooth device yet, which is a bit down the road for me.

Thanks a lot.
Matthew

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
Right, well I've not heard that review yet and yes! I've been meaning to listen 
to it.


On 14/11/2011, at 10:20 AM, Clifford Blackwell wrote:

 In Robert Carter's review, he makes a point of demonstrating the difference 
 between normal mode and live or stereo mode.
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:36 PM
 Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker
 
 
 Who told you to hold both volume controls down? I've never heard of this 
 before.
 
 I'm not saying your wrong.
 
 Up till now I've controlled my iPod from the unit itself.
 
 
 On 14/11/2011, at 5:43 AM, Gary King wrote:
 
 Dain,
 Did your JamBox come with the Live Audio update installed?  The one I 
 ordered from AMAZON.COM didn't.  The first thing I tried after starting 
 music on my iPod Touch was to hold both volume buttons down to start Live 
 Audio Mode, but nothing happened.
 
 I then went to the web site and installed the JawBone Updater.  This 
 program opens the update page, and I found that the free NVDA screen reader 
 seemed to work a little better than either JFW or Window-Eyes on this page. 
  After updating, Live Audio was impressive for its ability to spread the 
 stereo effect from such a small speaker.  Of course, for Live Audio to work 
 properly, you must sit directly in front of the speaker at the optimum 
 distance.
 
 Gary King
 w4...@bellsouth.net
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan 
 grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:32 AM
 Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker
 
 
 Okay well a couple of points I'd like to comment on.
 
 I know various people around the world who have them and who have tested 
 the update software.
 
 Yep, it would appear to be a challenge for a blind person to use it would 
 seem, the people I know have sight so they've used it and all report that 
 no updates are available at this time.
 
 I take your point about bluetooth devices but you certainly do not need a 
 bluetooth device on hand to use one of these things, as I said they have a 
 line-in socket thus make a truly marvelous portable speaker system, I plug 
 a very nice Denon tuner into mine for example.
 
 
 On 13/11/2011, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:
 
 OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you do, as 
 maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the world, might 
 not be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. If I had the unit, I 
 would go test this myself, but I need to wait until I get a bluetooth 
 device yet, which is a bit down the road for me.
 Thanks a lot.
 Matthew
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: computer speakers and suround sound

2011-11-13 Thread Hamit Campos
Ah okay then. I'l take a look at it in a bit. I've looked at some onkyo
recevers to when I realized 7.1 might just be the way to go and Bose doesn't
have any 7.1 systems
. Some people just hate this, I don't think it'll be too long until they do
it.
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Dane trethowan
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 5:57 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: computer speakers and suround sound

If I could I'd get the Denon unit featured at 
http://www.radioparts.com.au/ProdView.aspx?popup=1Category=SXAA3515Produc
t=01611142ProdDesc=AVR4311BK+9.2CH+140W+AV+DENON+RECEIVER

Now I'd give you the model of the Yamaha unit i plan to get next year 
however the link to the model has changed so I'm going to have to look 
it up again.

I've had both Denon and Yahama amps and surround-sound receivers and I 
can say without hesitation that ifanyone bought anything from any of 
these names then they'd be most happy, another name that seems to 
impress these days is Onkyo.



On 14/11/2011 8:59 AM, Hamit Campos wrote:
 What's the unit you would get if you could? What moddle are you getting so
I
 can look it up?

 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:33 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: computer speakers and suround sound

 For what they are they're not too bad, the one I'm buying is one of the
 Pro series they make but be warned! you pay! and in this case you don't
 pay too much, you should be able to get the one I'm referring to for under
 $1,000.00 and for a surround-sound receiver with its specs, works out
quite
 cheap.

 If I had the money I'd like to get one of the new Denon units, near to
 perfection they are but above what I can afford right now.


 On 14/11/2011, at 3:31 AM, Hamit Campos wrote:

 How good are these Yamaha systems anyways Dain? I don't know if you want
 to
 call me on Skype to talk abiout them or E-mail me off list, but I've
never
 heard anything from these guys, so I want to know how good they are. How
 theatrical they are. You see originally I wanted to use a Bose system,
but
 they don't make 7.1 systems and so many movies are now 7.1. Jurrasic park
 is
 now 7.1 for instabnce. Starwars is now 6.1. So you see, what I mean,
yeah,
 I
 know I said I was using a Bose system before, but it's the Companion 5
 system. Don't get me wrong, they are cool for what they are, but that's
 the
 thing, they are a virtual surround sound system. It's only 2 speakers.
 Nothing beats actually having 5 speakers or now with most movies being 6
 or
 7.1, having 7 speakers. So yeah, if you could fill me in and let me know
 I'ed appreciate it.

 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:25 AM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: computer speakers and suround sound

 Good idea, it will be interesting to see how the latest Yamaha
 surround-sound receiver I plan to buy next year goes, it has manual
 setting
 as far as I'm aware but by default you use a microphone.

 For example you sit in your favourite armchair once you've set the amp up
 and turn it on, the amp then plays tones through all the speakers and -
by
 using feedback from the microphone you hold - it adjusts the volume for
 each
 channel in tern.

 Well, that's one way of doing it I sposesmile.


 On 13/11/2011, at 7:21 PM, Gary Wood wrote:

 Bryan!  I do a test tone on my surround speakers from time to time, to
be
 sure they're set right.
 - Original Message - From: brianbriansackri...@att.net
 To:pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:48 PM
 Subject: computer speakers and suround sound


 Hi this Brian Sackrider and I use bose computer speakers they cost
about
 100 dollars and do not take very much room on my desk and they sound
good.
 I
 use to have a pioneer surond sound system htp 55 that cost about 400
 dollars
 and I really did enjoy listening to music on it in my opinion this is the
 only way to listen to music.  It had great sounding base and II really
 liked
 the seperation and concert hall or club effect.  You just canâ?Tt get
that
 kind of experence from a 2 speaker system.  To the person that did like
 suround systems for music maybe the speakers were not properly placed or
 the
 volume for the indivitual speakers was not properly addjusted.  On my
 system
 I could do a tone test to check the audio from all of the speakers.  Also
 this person may have a hearing problem and may not be able to detect the
 sutle differences in the music.  Also I have heard alltech lansing
 speakers
 and they do have better stereo seperation than anything that I have ever
 heard.
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

 To 

Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Gary King

Dain,
I'm sure there's information on the JamBox update page that tells how to 
invoke Live Audio Mode, but I first heard about it by listening to Robert 
Carter's review at


http://robertcarter.posterous.com/

Live Audio Mode only works when connected via Bluetooth.  If the update is 
installed, the speech in the JamBox announces Live Audio when you hold both 
volume controls down for a couple of seconds,, and you will hear the stereo 
effect expand.


Gary King
w4...@bellsouth.net
- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker


Who told you to hold both volume controls down? I've never heard of this 
before.


I'm not saying your wrong.

Up till now I've controlled my iPod from the unit itself.


On 14/11/2011, at 5:43 AM, Gary King wrote:


Dain,
Did your JamBox come with the Live Audio update installed?  The one I 
ordered from AMAZON.COM didn't.  The first thing I tried after starting 
music on my iPod Touch was to hold both volume buttons down to start Live 
Audio Mode, but nothing happened.


I then went to the web site and installed the JawBone Updater.  This 
program opens the update page, and I found that the free NVDA screen 
reader seemed to work a little better than either JFW or Window-Eyes on 
this page.  After updating, Live Audio was impressive for its ability to 
spread the stereo effect from such a small speaker.  Of course, for Live 
Audio to work properly, you must sit directly in front of the speaker at 
the optimum distance.


Gary King
w4...@bellsouth.net
- Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan 
grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker



Okay well a couple of points I'd like to comment on.

I know various people around the world who have them and who have tested 
the update software.


Yep, it would appear to be a challenge for a blind person to use it 
would seem, the people I know have sight so they've used it and all 
report that no updates are available at this time.


I take your point about bluetooth devices but you certainly do not need 
a bluetooth device on hand to use one of these things, as I said they 
have a line-in socket thus make a truly marvelous portable speaker 
system, I plug a very nice Denon tuner into mine for example.



On 13/11/2011, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:

OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you do, 
as maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the world, 
might not be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. If I had the 
unit, I would go test this myself, but I need to wait until I get a 
bluetooth device yet, which is a bit down the road for me.

Thanks a lot.
Matthew

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
Thanks for that, I had the link but couldn't get it to work at the time, this 
was 3 weeks ago and it may have been you who sent it to me.

In the meantime? I can only speak from my experience so it will be most 
interesting to hear how another has got on with this.

With my iPhone, the Jambox switches modes depending on what you're doing, when 
playing music it switches to stereo mode, when using the speakerphone it 
switches to voice mode, you can hear the difference quite certainly.


On 14/11/2011, at 11:26 AM, Gary King wrote:

 Dain,
 I'm sure there's information on the JamBox update page that tells how to 
 invoke Live Audio Mode, but I first heard about it by listening to Robert 
 Carter's review at
 
 http://robertcarter.posterous.com/
 
 Live Audio Mode only works when connected via Bluetooth.  If the update is 
 installed, the speech in the JamBox announces Live Audio when you hold both 
 volume controls down for a couple of seconds,, and you will hear the stereo 
 effect expand.
 
 Gary King
 w4...@bellsouth.net
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:36 PM
 Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker
 
 
 Who told you to hold both volume controls down? I've never heard of this 
 before.
 
 I'm not saying your wrong.
 
 Up till now I've controlled my iPod from the unit itself.
 
 
 On 14/11/2011, at 5:43 AM, Gary King wrote:
 
 Dain,
 Did your JamBox come with the Live Audio update installed?  The one I 
 ordered from AMAZON.COM didn't.  The first thing I tried after starting 
 music on my iPod Touch was to hold both volume buttons down to start Live 
 Audio Mode, but nothing happened.
 
 I then went to the web site and installed the JawBone Updater.  This 
 program opens the update page, and I found that the free NVDA screen reader 
 seemed to work a little better than either JFW or Window-Eyes on this page. 
  After updating, Live Audio was impressive for its ability to spread the 
 stereo effect from such a small speaker.  Of course, for Live Audio to work 
 properly, you must sit directly in front of the speaker at the optimum 
 distance.
 
 Gary King
 w4...@bellsouth.net
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan 
 grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:32 AM
 Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker
 
 
 Okay well a couple of points I'd like to comment on.
 
 I know various people around the world who have them and who have tested 
 the update software.
 
 Yep, it would appear to be a challenge for a blind person to use it would 
 seem, the people I know have sight so they've used it and all report that 
 no updates are available at this time.
 
 I take your point about bluetooth devices but you certainly do not need a 
 bluetooth device on hand to use one of these things, as I said they have a 
 line-in socket thus make a truly marvelous portable speaker system, I plug 
 a very nice Denon tuner into mine for example.
 
 
 On 13/11/2011, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:
 
 OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you do, as 
 maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the world, might 
 not be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. If I had the unit, I 
 would go test this myself, but I need to wait until I get a bluetooth 
 device yet, which is a bit down the road for me.
 Thanks a lot.
 Matthew
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
Okay thanks, I now have the review, had trouble reading the page on the 
other computer system I have here for some reason smile.


Thanks again




On 14/11/2011 11:26 AM, Gary King wrote:

Dain,
I'm sure there's information on the JamBox update page that tells how 
to invoke Live Audio Mode, but I first heard about it by listening to 
Robert Carter's review at


http://robertcarter.posterous.com/

Live Audio Mode only works when connected via Bluetooth.  If the 
update is installed, the speech in the JamBox announces Live Audio 
when you hold both volume controls down for a couple of seconds,, and 
you will hear the stereo effect expand.


Gary King
w4...@bellsouth.net
- Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan 
grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker


Who told you to hold both volume controls down? I've never heard of 
this before.


I'm not saying your wrong.

Up till now I've controlled my iPod from the unit itself.


On 14/11/2011, at 5:43 AM, Gary King wrote:


Dain,
Did your JamBox come with the Live Audio update installed?  The one 
I ordered from AMAZON.COM didn't.  The first thing I tried after 
starting music on my iPod Touch was to hold both volume buttons down 
to start Live Audio Mode, but nothing happened.


I then went to the web site and installed the JawBone Updater.  This 
program opens the update page, and I found that the free NVDA screen 
reader seemed to work a little better than either JFW or Window-Eyes 
on this page.  After updating, Live Audio was impressive for its 
ability to spread the stereo effect from such a small speaker.  Of 
course, for Live Audio to work properly, you must sit directly in 
front of the speaker at the optimum distance.


Gary King
w4...@bellsouth.net
- Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan 
grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker



Okay well a couple of points I'd like to comment on.

I know various people around the world who have them and who have 
tested the update software.


Yep, it would appear to be a challenge for a blind person to use it 
would seem, the people I know have sight so they've used it and all 
report that no updates are available at this time.


I take your point about bluetooth devices but you certainly do not 
need a bluetooth device on hand to use one of these things, as I 
said they have a line-in socket thus make a truly marvelous 
portable speaker system, I plug a very nice Denon tuner into mine 
for example.



On 13/11/2011, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:

OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you 
do, as maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the 
world, might not be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. 
If I had the unit, I would go test this myself, but I need to wait 
until I get a bluetooth device yet, which is a bit down the road 
for me.

Thanks a lot.
Matthew

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


--
Dane Trethowan
From Melton Victoria Australia
skype callto:grtdane12
MSN: grtd...@dane-trethowan.net


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
Okay, here's the situation.

The Live audio update Robert discusses in his podcast is not a critical 
firmware update, that is to say Jambox will function quite nicely with or 
without it.

I was aware of the Live Audio add-on and I will download it perhaps as soon 
as I get my head around the Updater utility, as Robert says its not the easiest 
thing to use when using a Screen Reader smile.

The procedure Robert goes through doesn't switch between stereo and normal 
mode, rather it switches the Live Audio component on or off.

Live Audio is similar to say a 3D Affect on a hi-fi system, on Squeezebox 
Boom etc so its nice and handy sometimes.


On 14/11/2011, at 11:26 AM, Gary King wrote:

 Dain,
 I'm sure there's information on the JamBox update page that tells how to 
 invoke Live Audio Mode, but I first heard about it by listening to Robert 
 Carter's review at
 
 http://robertcarter.posterous.com/
 
 Live Audio Mode only works when connected via Bluetooth.  If the update is 
 installed, the speech in the JamBox announces Live Audio when you hold both 
 volume controls down for a couple of seconds,, and you will hear the stereo 
 effect expand.
 
 Gary King
 w4...@bellsouth.net
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:36 PM
 Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker
 
 
 Who told you to hold both volume controls down? I've never heard of this 
 before.
 
 I'm not saying your wrong.
 
 Up till now I've controlled my iPod from the unit itself.
 
 
 On 14/11/2011, at 5:43 AM, Gary King wrote:
 
 Dain,
 Did your JamBox come with the Live Audio update installed?  The one I 
 ordered from AMAZON.COM didn't.  The first thing I tried after starting 
 music on my iPod Touch was to hold both volume buttons down to start Live 
 Audio Mode, but nothing happened.
 
 I then went to the web site and installed the JawBone Updater.  This 
 program opens the update page, and I found that the free NVDA screen reader 
 seemed to work a little better than either JFW or Window-Eyes on this page. 
  After updating, Live Audio was impressive for its ability to spread the 
 stereo effect from such a small speaker.  Of course, for Live Audio to work 
 properly, you must sit directly in front of the speaker at the optimum 
 distance.
 
 Gary King
 w4...@bellsouth.net
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan 
 grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:32 AM
 Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker
 
 
 Okay well a couple of points I'd like to comment on.
 
 I know various people around the world who have them and who have tested 
 the update software.
 
 Yep, it would appear to be a challenge for a blind person to use it would 
 seem, the people I know have sight so they've used it and all report that 
 no updates are available at this time.
 
 I take your point about bluetooth devices but you certainly do not need a 
 bluetooth device on hand to use one of these things, as I said they have a 
 line-in socket thus make a truly marvelous portable speaker system, I plug 
 a very nice Denon tuner into mine for example.
 
 
 On 13/11/2011, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:
 
 OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you do, as 
 maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the world, might 
 not be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. If I had the unit, I 
 would go test this myself, but I need to wait until I get a bluetooth 
 device yet, which is a bit down the road for me.
 Thanks a lot.
 Matthew
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread André van Deventer
Where can I see this review by Robert carter?



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Clifford Blackwell
Sent: 14 November 2011 01:21 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

In Robert Carter's review, he makes a point of demonstrating the difference
between normal mode and live or stereo mode.
- Original Message -
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker


 Who told you to hold both volume controls down? I've never heard of 
 this before.

 I'm not saying your wrong.

 Up till now I've controlled my iPod from the unit itself.


 On 14/11/2011, at 5:43 AM, Gary King wrote:

 Dain,
 Did your JamBox come with the Live Audio update installed?  The one I 
 ordered from AMAZON.COM didn't.  The first thing I tried after 
 starting music on my iPod Touch was to hold both volume buttons down 
 to start Live Audio Mode, but nothing happened.

 I then went to the web site and installed the JawBone Updater.  This 
 program opens the update page, and I found that the free NVDA screen 
 reader seemed to work a little better than either JFW or Window-Eyes 
 on this page.  After updating, Live Audio was impressive for its 
 ability to spread the stereo effect from such a small speaker.  Of 
 course, for Live Audio to work properly, you must sit directly in 
 front of the speaker at the optimum distance.

 Gary King
 w4...@bellsouth.net
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan 
 grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:32 AM
 Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker


 Okay well a couple of points I'd like to comment on.

 I know various people around the world who have them and who have 
 tested the update software.

 Yep, it would appear to be a challenge for a blind person to use it 
 would seem, the people I know have sight so they've used it and all 
 report that no updates are available at this time.

 I take your point about bluetooth devices but you certainly do not 
 need a bluetooth device on hand to use one of these things, as I 
 said they have a line-in socket thus make a truly marvelous portable 
 speaker system, I plug a very nice Denon tuner into mine for example.


 On 13/11/2011, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Bullis wrote:

 OK, well if you could let us know when you do get to that, if you 
 do, as maybe some units, purchased from various sellers around the 
 world, might not be selling the unit with the latest upgrades in. 
 If I had the unit, I would go test this myself, but I need to wait 
 until I get a bluetooth device yet, which is a bit down the road for
me.
 Thanks a lot.
 Matthew

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread Matthew Bullis

If you'll go to:
http://robertcarter.posterous.com/
you'll find the demo for download. Just so you know, this page takes about a 
minute to load up, for some reason. The audio demo is about ten minutes 
long, and as we've been discussing on this subject, he doesn't go through 
the updating process on the web site, thus our recent discussion of that 
aspect of owning this unit.
Matthew 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread André van Deventer


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Matthew Bullis
Sent: 14 November 2011 08:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

If you'll go to:
http://robertcarter.posterous.com/
you'll find the demo for download. Just so you know, this page takes about a
minute to load up, for some reason. The audio demo is about ten minutes
long, and as we've been discussing on this subject, he doesn't go through
the updating process on the web site, thus our recent discussion of that
aspect of owning this unit.
Matthew 


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
Thanx!pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

2011-11-13 Thread André van Deventer
Sounds interesting.

I'm trying to get an idea of size for myself.  Would this be something you
could actually carry along with you or not?  Say for example with a netbook?

I wouldn't listen to music on this but for the size for something like
speech reproduction the sound is very good indeed.



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Matthew Bullis
Sent: 14 November 2011 08:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Jawbone Jambox portable bluetooth speaker

If you'll go to:
http://robertcarter.posterous.com/
you'll find the demo for download. Just so you know, this page takes about a
minute to load up, for some reason. The audio demo is about ten minutes
long, and as we've been discussing on this subject, he doesn't go through
the updating process on the web site, thus our recent discussion of that
aspect of owning this unit.
Matthew 


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org