Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Sunshine
like a kernal driver if that would works to get bit perfect play back.

- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:32 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


I'm just curious, why would you want to use VAC within Winamp?

David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 1:02 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

how can i use this  lets say with winamp?
i would like to use it like a virtual sound card for the audio.

- Original Message - 
From: "Brent Harding" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


I think when you download it. You will eventually get the word trial
injected into your audio.

- Original Message - 
From: "Sunshine" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Ok, how do you know if it is a trial version or not? since from what i can
tell there is no place that says trial. in any dialogs.
- Original Message - 
From: "Brent Harding" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


I don't know legally that there is any without that word trial in it's
audio. I could've been wrong and they could've made a stripped down free one
that is fully functional, but I think to get rid of the trial noise involves
paying for a license of it.

- Original Message - 
From: "Sunshine" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Ok on the site itlooks like it is 50 dollars? where would i find the free
version?
- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


http://www.ntonyx.com/vac.htm



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 8:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Ok, is the version4.10 a free version or do you have to pay for it? and if
it is free where can i find it?
- Original Message -
From: "Jörgen Hansson" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this 

RE: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread David Truong
I'm just curious, why would you want to use VAC within Winamp?

David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 1:02 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

how can i use this  lets say with winamp?
i would like to use it like a virtual sound card for the audio.

- Original Message - 
From: "Brent Harding" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


I think when you download it. You will eventually get the word trial
injected into your audio.

- Original Message - 
From: "Sunshine" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Ok, how do you know if it is a trial version or not? since from what i can
tell there is no place that says trial. in any dialogs.
- Original Message - 
From: "Brent Harding" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


I don't know legally that there is any without that word trial in it's
audio. I could've been wrong and they could've made a stripped down free one
that is fully functional, but I think to get rid of the trial noise involves
paying for a license of it.

- Original Message - 
From: "Sunshine" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Ok on the site itlooks like it is 50 dollars? where would i find the free
version?
- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


http://www.ntonyx.com/vac.htm



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 8:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Ok, is the version4.10 a free version or do you have to pay for it? and if
it is free where can i find it?
- Original Message -
From: "Jörgen Hansson" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question a

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Sunshine
how can i use this  lets say with winamp?
i would like to use it like a virtual sound card for the audio.

- Original Message - 
From: "Brent Harding" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


I think when you download it. You will eventually get the word trial
injected into your audio.

- Original Message - 
From: "Sunshine" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Ok, how do you know if it is a trial version or not? since from what i can
tell there is no place that says trial. in any dialogs.
- Original Message - 
From: "Brent Harding" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


I don't know legally that there is any without that word trial in it's
audio. I could've been wrong and they could've made a stripped down free one
that is fully functional, but I think to get rid of the trial noise involves
paying for a license of it.

- Original Message - 
From: "Sunshine" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Ok on the site itlooks like it is 50 dollars? where would i find the free
version?
- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


http://www.ntonyx.com/vac.htm



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 8:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Ok, is the version4.10 a free version or do you have to pay for it? and if
it is free where can i find it?
- Original Message -
From: "Jörgen Hansson" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


> Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in
> their skype calls and they claim it works well.
>
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Bre

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Brent Harding
I think when you download it. You will eventually get the word trial 
injected into your audio.


- Original Message - 
From: "Sunshine" 

To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Ok, how do you know if it is a trial version or not? since from what i can
tell there is no place that says trial. in any dialogs.
- Original Message - 
From: "Brent Harding" 

To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


I don't know legally that there is any without that word trial in it's
audio. I could've been wrong and they could've made a stripped down free one
that is fully functional, but I think to get rid of the trial noise involves
paying for a license of it.

- Original Message - 
From: "Sunshine" 

To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Ok on the site itlooks like it is 50 dollars? where would i find the free
version?
- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 

To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


http://www.ntonyx.com/vac.htm



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 8:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Ok, is the version4.10 a free version or do you have to pay for it? and if
it is free where can i find it?
- Original Message -
From: "Jörgen Hansson" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in
their skype calls and they claim it works well.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot
of people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from
the phone. In a setup like that, you really 

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Sunshine
Ok, how do you know if it is a trial version or not? since from what i can 
tell there is no place that says trial. in any dialogs.
- Original Message - 
From: "Brent Harding" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


I don't know legally that there is any without that word trial in it's
audio. I could've been wrong and they could've made a stripped down free one
that is fully functional, but I think to get rid of the trial noise involves
paying for a license of it.

- Original Message - 
From: "Sunshine" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Ok on the site itlooks like it is 50 dollars? where would i find the free
version?
- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


http://www.ntonyx.com/vac.htm



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 8:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Ok, is the version4.10 a free version or do you have to pay for it? and if
it is free where can i find it?
- Original Message -
From: "Jörgen Hansson" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


> Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in
> their skype calls and they claim it works well.
>
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
> I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot
> of people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from
> the phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels
> and a virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not
> sending the caller his own audio.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Truong" 
> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Brent Harding
I don't know legally that there is any without that word trial in it's 
audio. I could've been wrong and they could've made a stripped down free one 
that is fully functional, but I think to get rid of the trial noise involves 
paying for a license of it.


- Original Message - 
From: "Sunshine" 

To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Ok on the site itlooks like it is 50 dollars? where would i find the free
version?
- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 

To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


http://www.ntonyx.com/vac.htm



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 8:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Ok, is the version4.10 a free version or do you have to pay for it? and if
it is free where can i find it?
- Original Message -
From: "Jörgen Hansson" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in
their skype calls and they claim it works well.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot
of people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from
the phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels
and a virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not
sending the caller his own audio.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of
instances of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5
or 6 instances of the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a
machine running Win7 64 bit with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen rea

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Sunshine
Ok on the site itlooks like it is 50 dollars? where would i find the free 
version?
- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


http://www.ntonyx.com/vac.htm



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 8:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Ok, is the version4.10 a free version or do you have to pay for it? and if
it is free where can i find it?
- Original Message -
From: "Jörgen Hansson" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


> Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in
> their skype calls and they claim it works well.
>
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
> I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot
> of people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from
> the phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels
> and a virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not
> sending the caller his own audio.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Truong" 
> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
> Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable
>
>
>> Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of
>> instances of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5
>> or 6 instances of the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a
>> machine running Win7 64 bit with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader
>> is none other than JFW 13. Having said all that, I rarely use the
>> Audio repeater though. If I do I only use
>> 1
>> or two instances.
>>
>>
>> David Truong
>>
>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>
>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>
>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>
>> Facebook: http://facebo

RE: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread David Truong
http://www.ntonyx.com/vac.htm



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967


-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 8:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Ok, is the version4.10 a free version or do you have to pay for it? and if
it is free where can i find it?
- Original Message -
From: "Jörgen Hansson" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


> Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in 
> their skype calls and they claim it works well.
>
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
> I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot 
> of people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from 
> the phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels 
> and a virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not 
> sending the caller his own audio.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Truong" 
> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
> Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable
>
>
>> Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of 
>> instances of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 
>> or 6 instances of the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a 
>> machine running Win7 64 bit with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader 
>> is none other than JFW 13. Having said all that, I rarely use the 
>> Audio repeater though. If I do I only use
>> 1
>> or two instances.
>>
>>
>> David Truong
>>
>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>
>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>
>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>
>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
>> Skype: blindboxer1967
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
>> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
>> Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
>> To: PC Audi

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Jörgen Hansson

Het david!
yes, it must be something wrong, there.
I may search for a better 4.1 version.
Regards
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande- 
From: David Truong

Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:04 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

Yes, I meant 4.1 But you said in your message you were going to search for
version 2. Anyway, I have win7 64 bit running jaws 13 and VAC installs and
works well here. I use version 4.1. So it definitely works with win7. Must
be something wrong with your win7 somewhere.

In fact you said:
"I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but
I can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2."


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 5:34 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in
their skype calls and they claim it works well.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot
of people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from
the phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels
and a virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not
sending the caller his own audio.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of
instances of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5
or 6 instances of the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a
machine running Win7 64 bit with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader
is none other than JFW 13. Having said all that, I rarely use the
Audio repeater though. If I do I only use
1
or two instances.


David Truong

Email: b

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Sunshine
Ok, is the version4.10 a free version or do you have to pay for it? and if 
it is free where can i find it?
- Original Message - 
From: "Jörgen Hansson" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande- 
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


> Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in their
> skype calls and they claim it works well.
>
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
> I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot of
> people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from the
> phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels and a
> virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not sending the
> caller
> his own audio.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Truong" 
> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
> Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable
>
>
>> Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of
>> instances
>> of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 or 6 instances
>> of
>> the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a machine running Win7 64
>> bit
>> with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is none other than JFW 13. Having
>> said all that, I rarely use the Audio repeater though. If I do I only use
>> 1
>> or two instances.
>>
>>
>> David Truong
>>
>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>
>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>
>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>
>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
>> Skype: blindboxer1967
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
>> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
>> Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>>
>> The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the
>> added
>> delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a
>> second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down
>> one
>> can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that
>> could've
>> caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said
>> that
>> by

RE: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread David Truong
Yes, I meant 4.1 But you said in your message you were going to search for
version 2. Anyway, I have win7 64 bit running jaws 13 and VAC installs and
works well here. I use version 4.1. So it definitely works with win7. Must
be something wrong with your win7 somewhere.

In fact you said:
"I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but
I can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2."


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 5:34 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well,
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: David Truong
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


> Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in 
> their skype calls and they claim it works well.
>
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
> I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot 
> of people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from 
> the phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels 
> and a virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not 
> sending the caller his own audio.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Truong" 
> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
> Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable
>
>
>> Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of 
>> instances of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 
>> or 6 instances of the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a 
>> machine running Win7 64 bit with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader 
>> is none other than JFW 13. Having said all that, I rarely use the 
>> Audio repeater though. If I do I only use
>> 1
>> or two instances.
>>
>>
>> David Truong
>>
>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>
>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>
>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>
>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
>> Skype: blindboxer1967
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Jörgen Hansson

Hello david!
well it's up to version 4.12 now, but well, I use to have the free version 
which was 4.1 full, but now when I tried out the new version some minutes 
ago, I hear a female voice saying trial, that's understandable, but well, 
the 4.1 should be working good with win7, smile.

Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande- 
From: David Truong

Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:26 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable

I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in their
skype calls and they claim it works well.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot of
people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from the
phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels and a
virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not sending the
caller
his own audio.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of
instances
of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 or 6 instances
of
the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a machine running Win7 64
bit
with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is none other than JFW 13. Having
said all that, I rarely use the Audio repeater though. If I do I only use
1
or two instances.


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the
added
delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a
second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down
one
can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that
could've
caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said
that
by being a software emulated device, it tries its best, but cannot quite
keep in sync to the sample rate of the hardware, which could be something
that drifts over time and needs a tear-down and reset.
- Original Message -
From: "chris hallsworth" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable



Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some
time ago, I ended up wi

RE: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread David Truong
I think you will find it is up to version 4 now. That might be why you
aren't able to install in Win7. If you are using a version lower than 2
well


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 4:19 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.
I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


> Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in their
> skype calls and they claim it works well.
>
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
> I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot of
> people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from the
> phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels and a
> virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not sending the 
> caller
> his own audio.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Truong" 
> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
> Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable
>
>
>> Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of
>> instances
>> of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 or 6 instances
>> of
>> the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a machine running Win7 64
>> bit
>> with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is none other than JFW 13. Having
>> said all that, I rarely use the Audio repeater though. If I do I only use
>> 1
>> or two instances.
>>
>>
>> David Truong
>>
>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>
>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>
>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>
>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
>> Skype: blindboxer1967
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
>> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
>> Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>>
>> The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the
>> added
>> delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a
>> second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down
>> one
>> can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that
>> could've
>> caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said
>> that
>> by being a software emulated device, it tries its best, but cannot quite
>> keep in sync to the sample rate of the hardware, which could be something
>> that drifts over time and needs a tear-down and reset.
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "chris hallsworth" 
>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
>> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>>
>>
>>> Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some
>>> time ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is
>>> constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!
>>>
>>>
>>> Christopher Hallsworth
>>>
>>> On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:
 Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you.
 Set streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where
 NV

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Jörgen Hansson

Hello there!
I often used VAC when taking skypr calls, and that worked pretty good, but I 
can't install VAC on this win7 computer for some reason.

I may see if I can get a hold of version 2.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +46 70-3601296
Website: www.jorgenhansson.com
Skype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande- 
From: Brent Harding

Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:12 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get.
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.

- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 

To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in their
skype calls and they claim it works well.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot of
people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from the
phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels and a
virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not sending the 
caller

his own audio.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of
instances
of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 or 6 instances
of
the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a machine running Win7 64
bit
with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is none other than JFW 13. Having
said all that, I rarely use the Audio repeater though. If I do I only use
1
or two instances.


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the
added
delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a
second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down
one
can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that
could've
caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said
that
by being a software emulated device, it tries its best, but cannot quite
keep in sync to the sample rate of the hardware, which could be something
that drifts over time and needs a tear-down and reset.
- Original Message -
From: "chris hallsworth" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable



Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some
time ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is
constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:

Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you.
Set streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where
NVDA and where your other music etc should be coming through if you
have told said programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual
cable
1
as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification
because I understand the concept but so far when I t

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Brent Harding
With Station Playlist Studio, at least the pro one, it can be brought in 
using the line in control, as Skype can talk to and from VAC and the L will 
put it into the air path and out at will. The difficulty would be listening 
after the audio processing, as that's the audio the speakers normally get. 
There's now a facility around this for the mic control to hear it straight 
through, but don't know if it's available for the line one.


- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 

To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in their
skype calls and they claim it works well.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot of
people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from the
phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels and a
virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not sending the 
caller

his own audio.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable



Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of
instances
of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 or 6 instances
of
the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a machine running Win7 64
bit
with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is none other than JFW 13. Having
said all that, I rarely use the Audio repeater though. If I do I only use
1
or two instances.


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the
added
delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a
second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down
one
can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that
could've
caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said
that
by being a software emulated device, it tries its best, but cannot quite
keep in sync to the sample rate of the hardware, which could be something
that drifts over time and needs a tear-down and reset.
- Original Message -
From: "chris hallsworth" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable



Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some
time ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is
constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:

Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you.
Set streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where
NVDA and where your other music etc should be coming through if you
have told said programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual
cable
1
as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification
because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with
NVDA using cable
1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't
get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer196

RE: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread David Truong
Agreed! Although I have heard of broadcasters  using BAC to patch in their
skype calls and they claim it works well.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:58 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot of
people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from the
phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels and a
virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not sending the caller
his own audio.

- Original Message -
From: "David Truong" 
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


> Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of 
> instances
> of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 or 6 instances 
> of
> the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a machine running Win7 64 
> bit
> with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is none other than JFW 13. Having
> said all that, I rarely use the Audio repeater though. If I do I only use 
> 1
> or two instances.
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
> Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
> The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the 
> added
> delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a
> second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down 
> one
> can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that 
> could've
> caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said 
> that
> by being a software emulated device, it tries its best, but cannot quite
> keep in sync to the sample rate of the hardware, which could be something
> that drifts over time and needs a tear-down and reset.
> - Original Message -
> From: "chris hallsworth" 
> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
>
>> Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some
>> time ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is
>> constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!
>>
>>
>> Christopher Hallsworth
>>
>> On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:
>>> Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you.
>>> Set streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where
>>> NVDA and where your other music etc should be coming through if you
>>> have told said programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Truong
>>>
>>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>>
>>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>>
>>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
>>> Skype: blindboxer1967
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
>>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
>>> On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
>>> Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>>>
>>> Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual
>>> cable
>>> 1
>>> as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
>>> application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification
>>> because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with
>>> NVDA using cable
>>> 1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't
>>> get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.
>>>
>>>
>>> Christopher Hallsworth
>>>
>>> On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:
 Short answer is yes.



 David Truong

 Email: blindbo...@me.com
 blindbo...@gmail.com

 MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

 Phone: 07 3844 1678
 Mobile: 0400 557 511

 Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
 Skype: blindboxer1967



 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
 [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
 Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Question 

RE: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread David Truong
No it doesn't. Well at least it doesn't for me.


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 2:05 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Does Virtual Audio Cable affect JAWS' ILM scheme in any way? Asking as some
of these virtual drivers fool JAWS into thinking a hardware change has been
made and thus asks for reactivation. This is one beauty of using a screen
reader other than JAWS, unless you have dongle authorization of course.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 16:07, David Truong wrote:
> Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of 
> instances of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 
> or 6 instances of the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a 
> machine running Win7 64 bit with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is 
> none other than JFW 13. Having said all that, I rarely use the Audio 
> repeater though. If I do I only use 1 or two instances.
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Brent Harding
> Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
> The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the 
> added delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter 
> to half a second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure 
> how far down one can get away with before you do get skipping. The 
> other thing that could've caused your feedback sound over time is that 
> I thought the manual said that by being a software emulated device, it 
> tries its best, but cannot quite keep in sync to the sample rate of 
> the hardware, which could be something that drifts over time and needs a
tear-down and reset.
> - Original Message -
> From: "chris hallsworth"
> To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
>
>> Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some 
>> time ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is 
>> constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!
>>
>>
>> Christopher Hallsworth
>>
>> On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:
>>> Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you.
>>> Set streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where 
>>> NVDA and where your other music etc should be coming through if you 
>>> have told said programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Truong
>>>
>>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>>
>>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>>
>>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
>>> Skype: blindboxer1967
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
>>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
>>> On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
>>> Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>>>
>>> Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual 
>>> cable
>>> 1
>>> as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming 
>>> application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification 
>>> because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with 
>>> NVDA using cable
>>> 1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't 
>>> get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.
>>>
>>>
>>> Christopher Hallsworth
>>>
>>> On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:
 Short answer is yes.



 David Truong

 Email: blindbo...@me.com
 blindbo...@gmail.com

 MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

 Phone: 07 3844 1678
 Mobile: 0400 557 511

 Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
 Skype: blindboxer1967



 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
 [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
 Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

 If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record 
 internet streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is 
 an issue

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Brent Harding
I think I had Jaws deactivate over a USB device once, but it was temporary 
in that a reboot made it active again. I never knew until the demo was 
timing out.


- Original Message - 
From: "chris hallsworth" 

To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Does Virtual Audio Cable affect JAWS' ILM scheme in any way? Asking as 
some of these virtual drivers fool JAWS into thinking a hardware change 
has been made and thus asks for reactivation. This is one beauty of using 
a screen reader other than JAWS, unless you have dongle authorization of 
course.



Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 16:07, David Truong wrote:
Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of 
instances
of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 or 6 instances 
of
the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a machine running Win7 64 
bit

with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is none other than JFW 13. Having
said all that, I rarely use the Audio repeater though. If I do I only use 
1

or two instances.


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the 
added

delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a
second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down 
one
can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that 
could've
caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said 
that

by being a software emulated device, it tries its best, but cannot quite
keep in sync to the sample rate of the hardware, which could be something
that drifts over time and needs a tear-down and reset.
- Original Message -
From: "chris hallsworth"
To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable



Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some
time ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is
constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:

Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you.
Set streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where
NVDA and where your other music etc should be coming through if you
have told said programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual
cable
1
as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification
because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with
NVDA using cable
1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't
get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record
internet streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is
an issue for some particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not
wish to use an external sound card. As far as I can see I know this
can be done with Virtual Audio Streaming simply by setting the
playback device to the virtual card in the application where the
stream is to be

played.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe fro

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Brent Harding
I'm not sure if Vac would be a good way to broadcast Skype with a lot of 
people, as in, use Skype in to patch calls through, some even from the 
phone. In a setup like that, you really need the separate channels and a 
virtual splitter on your mic, or an equivalent way of not sending the caller 
his own audio.


- Original Message - 
From: "David Truong" 

To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: Question about virtual audio cable


Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of 
instances
of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 or 6 instances 
of
the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a machine running Win7 64 
bit

with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is none other than JFW 13. Having
said all that, I rarely use the Audio repeater though. If I do I only use 
1

or two instances.


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the 
added

delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a
second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down 
one
can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that 
could've
caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said 
that

by being a software emulated device, it tries its best, but cannot quite
keep in sync to the sample rate of the hardware, which could be something
that drifts over time and needs a tear-down and reset.
- Original Message -
From: "chris hallsworth" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable



Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some
time ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is
constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:

Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you.
Set streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where
NVDA and where your other music etc should be coming through if you
have told said programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual
cable
1
as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification
because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with
NVDA using cable
1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't
get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record
internet streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is
an issue for some particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not
wish to use an external sound card. As far as I can see I know this
can be done with Virtual Audio Streaming simply by setting the
playback device to the virtual card in the application where the
stream is to be

played.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
p

RE: multi track recording

2012-04-16 Thread Rishi D Mack
The good news with ct is that it's verry accessabel with jaws. The cake talking 
scripts  makes it fully functional with jaws and it's really good. There're 
also sounds to indicate sertain things. Like arming tracks, soloing tracks, 
muting/unmuting and such like that. Even moving of tracks and switching views 
like the bus view, track pain view, mix/custom/caketalking tab. It's really 
blind friendly. How ever, there're new vst being developped every day. For 
instance, I never seen cake talking work well with autotune. Cuz there wasn't 
bscripts built in ct for that. Or edaral vsts. Ither. They're really kind hard 
to use unless you can navigate well with your jaws curser. Addictive drums are 
the same. I've known blind producers using that vst as well. And they couldn't 
get all the kits. How ever, I had a little site. So I had to click to get my 
kits then save them as a normal preset. So now when I have to go to them I can 
access them easyer.
With JSonar, scripts, they constantly update scripts for it. Like autotune, 
edaral, addictive, ny, kvr, and stuff like those vst plugins. I like JSonar. 
But for me, I use CT. because I like how the sounds alerts us of different 
things. And it let me aware what is going on. Sometimes jaws moves and the 
curser doesn't if that make sence. But I think the two of them are grate. But 
everyone has different tast. I'd like to get one computer with j sonar and one 
with CT. simply because some has things that the other doesn't have. And that 
is what makes them unique. Cake talking creates a surface over sonar which some 
people says that it's hard for sited to navigate if working on a project with a 
blind person. But with JScripts it doesn't. it use the scripting methard and 
the sonar basic layout. But if a sited person know what to look for it's not 
hard. It surely looks a bit different. But it can be used by sited people.I'm 
sited parcially. But I use a screanreader to not strane my eyes too much.. I 
hope that maby bill mccan can explain how the sonar works. To you? And if he 
could correct me where I'm rong. I mean after all, he'd know about it better 
than I do.
And maby those who uses JScripts can help him out too? And explain how that 
works too. But like I said, the both of them are good. And it depends on what 
your like and what you want and need. I'm gana get the two since I do from 
music, to audio production to sound designing. And If anyone knows a good 
sampler out there that is accessabel to the blind? Can you please tell me? 
Thanks a lot. Hae bill, I have a question for you if you don't mind.but I'd 
have to get a private email where I can go with you one on one. Thanks. I hope 
this is not against AUDIO-PC mailing list rules. ☺


-Original Message-
From: Mike Edwards [mailto:m...@ultraemail.us] 
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 6:27 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: multi track recording

I'd like to hear both good and bad experiences with cake talk.
- Original Message - 
From: "Dane Trethowan" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: multi track recording


> Try Reaper and see how you go, available for both Windows and Mac.
>
>
> On 14/04/2012, at 2:52 AM, Matt Diemert wrote:
>
>> Good afternoon all,
>> I'm really struggling with finding a  successful method for multi track 
>> recording. I own both a mac, and PC, and am a fairly advanced jaws and 
>> VoiceOver user, but to date, I've not found a great solution for tracking 
>> multiple instruments and vocals. I've used audacity with some success, 
>> but I never quite feel like I'm able to attain the sound I'm looking for.
>> does anyone have any suggestions, either MAc, or PC or even hardware that 
>> would allow me to do some basic multi track recording with relative ease 
>> of use.
>> I realize that's a subjective term but I guess i'm looking for something 
>> that if I do have to invest considerable time in using, i'll get a more 
>> professional sound.
>> THanks for any guidance.
>>
>> Warm Regards:
>> Matt Diemert
>> 330-980-0046
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.929 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4934 - Release Date: 04/12/12 
23:34:00


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread chris hallsworth
Does Virtual Audio Cable affect JAWS' ILM scheme in any way? Asking as 
some of these virtual drivers fool JAWS into thinking a hardware change 
has been made and thus asks for reactivation. This is one beauty of 
using a screen reader other than JAWS, unless you have dongle 
authorization of course.



Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 16:07, David Truong wrote:

Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of instances
of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 or 6 instances of
the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a machine running Win7 64 bit
with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is none other than JFW 13. Having
said all that, I rarely use the Audio repeater though. If I do I only use 1
or two instances.


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the added
delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a
second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down one
can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that could've
caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said that
by being a software emulated device, it tries its best, but cannot quite
keep in sync to the sample rate of the hardware, which could be something
that drifts over time and needs a tear-down and reset.
- Original Message -
From: "chris hallsworth"
To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable



Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some
time ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is
constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:

Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you.
Set streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where
NVDA and where your other music etc should be coming through if you
have told said programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual
cable
1
as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification
because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with
NVDA using cable
1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't
get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record
internet streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is
an issue for some particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not
wish to use an external sound card. As far as I can see I know this
can be done with Virtual Audio Streaming simply by setting the
playback device to the virtual card in the application where the
stream is to be

played.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread chris hallsworth

Ar I see. Thanks for the clarification.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 12:10, David Truong wrote:

What do you mean? I don't really understand how you come to that conclusion.
Still, it's your setup and perhaps I'm missing something. But I usually
launch audio repeater first smile.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 8:43 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

I can't see that working as I am going to lose all sounds in the first place
and that's before I launch Audio Repeater.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:29, David Truong wrote:

Did this work for you?


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Doc wright
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 7:14 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

try this
go to control pannal/sound and make v1 the default for playback and record

then in the audio retrieval point  your mike to input and the output to v1

- Original Message -
From: "chris hallsworth"
To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable



Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual cable
1 as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification
because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with NVDA
using cable 1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I
didn't get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record internet
streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is an issue for
some
particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not wish to use an
external
sound card. As far as I can see I know this can be done with Virtual
Audio
Streaming simply by setting the playback device to the virtual card in
the
application where the stream is to be played.


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread chris hallsworth
At the time I think I set two rea sound cards as both input and output 
hence the feedback.



Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 13:46, Brent Harding wrote:

The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the
added delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to
half a second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how
far down one can get away with before you do get skipping. The other
thing that could've caused your feedback sound over time is that I
thought the manual said that by being a software emulated device, it
tries its best, but cannot quite keep in sync to the sample rate of the
hardware, which could be something that drifts over time and needs a
tear-down and reset.
- Original Message - From: "chris hallsworth"

To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable



Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some
time ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is
constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:

Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you. Set
streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where NVDA and
where your other music etc should be coming through if you have told
said
programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual
cable 1
as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification
because
I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with NVDA using
cable
1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't
get any
sound even though the audio repeater was running.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record
internet streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is an
issue for some particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not wish
to use an external sound card. As far as I can see I know this can be
done with Virtual Audio Streaming simply by setting the playback
device to the virtual card in the application where the stream is to be

played.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread David Truong
Yes that is all true and that's why I try and avoid using a lot of instances
of Audio repeater. I started having problems after about 5 or 6 instances of
the Audio repeater being open at once. I have a machine running Win7 64 bit
with 16GB ram and 3.2MHZ. Screen reader is none other than JFW 13. Having
said all that, I rarely use the Audio repeater though. If I do I only use 1
or two instances.


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 10:46 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the added
delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a
second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down one
can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that could've
caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said that
by being a software emulated device, it tries its best, but cannot quite
keep in sync to the sample rate of the hardware, which could be something
that drifts over time and needs a tear-down and reset.
- Original Message -
From: "chris hallsworth" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


> Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some 
> time ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is 
> constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!
>
>
> Christopher Hallsworth
>
> On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:
>> Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you. 
>> Set streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where 
>> NVDA and where your other music etc should be coming through if you 
>> have told said programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Truong
>>
>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>
>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>
>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>
>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
>> Skype: blindboxer1967
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
>> On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
>> Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>>
>> Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual 
>> cable
>> 1
>> as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming 
>> application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification 
>> because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with 
>> NVDA using cable
>> 1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't 
>> get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.
>>
>>
>> Christopher Hallsworth
>>
>> On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:
>>> Short answer is yes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Truong
>>>
>>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>>
>>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>>
>>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
>>> Skype: blindboxer1967
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
>>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
>>> On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
>>> Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>> Subject: Question about virtual audio cable
>>>
>>> If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record 
>>> internet streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is 
>>> an issue for some particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not 
>>> wish to use an external sound card. As far as I can see I know this 
>>> can be done with Virtual Audio Streaming simply by setting the 
>>> playback device to the virtual card in the application where the 
>>> stream is to be
>> played.
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
> 


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Brent Harding
The one bad thing I heard of about VAC being a possible problem is the added 
delay. I think each repeater instance by default adds a quarter to half a 
second of buffer to keep the audio smooth, but I'm not sure how far down one 
can get away with before you do get skipping. The other thing that could've 
caused your feedback sound over time is that I thought the manual said that 
by being a software emulated device, it tries its best, but cannot quite 
keep in sync to the sample rate of the hardware, which could be something 
that drifts over time and needs a tear-down and reset.
- Original Message - 
From: "chris hallsworth" 

To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some time 
ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is constantly 
looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!



Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:

Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you. Set
streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where NVDA and
where your other music etc should be coming through if you have told said
programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual cable 
1

as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification 
because
I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with NVDA using 
cable
1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't get 
any

sound even though the audio repeater was running.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record
internet streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is an
issue for some particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not wish
to use an external sound card. As far as I can see I know this can be
done with Virtual Audio Streaming simply by setting the playback
device to the virtual card in the application where the stream is to be

played.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread David Truong
What do you mean? I don't really understand how you come to that conclusion.
Still, it's your setup and perhaps I'm missing something. But I usually
launch audio repeater first smile.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 8:43 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

I can't see that working as I am going to lose all sounds in the first place
and that's before I launch Audio Repeater.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:29, David Truong wrote:
> Did this work for you?
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Doc wright
> Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 7:14 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
> try this
> go to control pannal/sound and make v1 the default for playback and record
>
> then in the audio retrieval point  your mike to input and the output to v1
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "chris hallsworth"
> To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:24 AM
> Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable
>
>
>> Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual cable
>> 1 as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
>> application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification
>> because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with NVDA
>> using cable 1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I
>> didn't get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.
>>
>>
>> Christopher Hallsworth
>>
>> On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:
>>> Short answer is yes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Truong
>>>
>>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>>
>>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>>
>>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
>>> Skype: blindboxer1967
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
>>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
>>> On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
>>> Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>> Subject: Question about virtual audio cable
>>>
>>> If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record internet
>>> streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is an issue for
>>> some
>>> particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not wish to use an
>>> external
>>> sound card. As far as I can see I know this can be done with Virtual
>>> Audio
>>> Streaming simply by setting the playback device to the virtual card in
>>> the
>>> application where the stream is to be played.
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread chris hallsworth
Thanks! Sorry for all this, asking as when I tried this before some time 
ago, I ended up with terrible feedback! You know like audio is 
constantly looping mixed with feedback noise? Ugh!



Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:28, David Truong wrote:

Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you. Set
streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where NVDA and
where your other music etc should be coming through if you have told said
programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual cable 1
as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification because
I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with NVDA using cable
1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't get any
sound even though the audio repeater was running.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record
internet streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is an
issue for some particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not wish
to use an external sound card. As far as I can see I know this can be
done with Virtual Audio Streaming simply by setting the playback
device to the virtual card in the application where the stream is to be

played.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread chris hallsworth
I can't see that working as I am going to lose all sounds in the first 
place and that's before I launch Audio Repeater.



Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 11:29, David Truong wrote:

Did this work for you?


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Doc wright
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 7:14 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

try this
go to control pannal/sound and make v1 the default for playback and record

then in the audio retrieval point  your mike to input and the output to v1

- Original Message -
From: "chris hallsworth"
To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable



Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual cable
1 as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification
because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with NVDA
using cable 1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I
didn't get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record internet
streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is an issue for
some
particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not wish to use an
external
sound card. As far as I can see I know this can be done with Virtual
Audio
Streaming simply by setting the playback device to the virtual card in
the
application where the stream is to be played.


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread David Truong
Did this work for you?


David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Doc wright
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 7:14 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

try this
go to control pannal/sound and make v1 the default for playback and record

then in the audio retrieval point  your mike to input and the output to v1

- Original Message - 
From: "chris hallsworth" 
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


> Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual cable 
> 1 as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming 
> application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification 
> because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with NVDA 
> using cable 1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I 
> didn't get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.
>
>
> Christopher Hallsworth
>
> On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:
>> Short answer is yes.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Truong
>>
>> Email: blindbo...@me.com
>> blindbo...@gmail.com
>>
>> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>>
>> Phone: 07 3844 1678
>> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>>
>> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
>> Skype: blindboxer1967
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
>> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
>> On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
>> Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>> Subject: Question about virtual audio cable
>>
>> If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record internet
>> streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is an issue for 
>> some
>> particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not wish to use an 
>> external
>> sound card. As far as I can see I know this can be done with Virtual 
>> Audio
>> Streaming simply by setting the playback device to the virtual card in 
>> the
>> application where the stream is to be played.
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
> 


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread David Truong
Yes, correct. Audio repeater will be doing the monitoring for you. Set
streaming program to use virtual audio cable1 as this is where NVDA and
where your other music etc should be coming through if you have told said
programs to use VAC1 as the sound device to output to.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2012 5:25 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable

Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual cable 1
as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification because
I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with NVDA using cable
1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I didn't get any
sound even though the audio repeater was running.


Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:
> Short answer is yes.
>
>
>
> David Truong
>
> Email: blindbo...@me.com
> blindbo...@gmail.com
>
> MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au
>
> Phone: 07 3844 1678
> Mobile: 0400 557 511
>
> Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
> Skype: blindboxer1967
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
> [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
> Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Question about virtual audio cable
>
> If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record 
> internet streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is an 
> issue for some particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not wish 
> to use an external sound card. As far as I can see I know this can be 
> done with Virtual Audio Streaming simply by setting the playback 
> device to the virtual card in the application where the stream is to be
played.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread Doc wright

try this
go to control pannal/sound and make v1 the default for playback and record

then in the audio retrieval point  your mike to input and the output to v1

- Original Message - 
From: "chris hallsworth" 

To: "PC Audio Discussion List" 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: Question about virtual audio cable


Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual cable 
1 as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the streaming 
application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want clarification 
because I understand the concept but so far when I tried this with NVDA 
using cable 1 as both input and output then getting NVDA to use cable 1 I 
didn't get any sound even though the audio repeater was running.



Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
[mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record internet
streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is an issue for 
some
particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not wish to use an 
external
sound card. As far as I can see I know this can be done with Virtual 
Audio
Streaming simply by setting the playback device to the virtual card in 
the

application where the stream is to be played.


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Question about virtual audio cable

2012-04-16 Thread chris hallsworth
Thanks, so I take it using audio repeater for example I set virtual 
cable 1 as input and the real sound card as output? Then in the 
streaming application set it to use cable 1 as output? Just want 
clarification because I understand the concept but so far when I tried 
this with NVDA using cable 1 as both input and output then getting NVDA 
to use cable 1 I didn't get any sound even though the audio repeater was 
running.



Christopher Hallsworth

On 16/04/2012 04:30, David Truong wrote:

Short answer is yes.



David Truong

Email: blindbo...@me.com
blindbo...@gmail.com

MS Messenger: davidtru...@optusnet.com.au

Phone: 07 3844 1678
Mobile: 0400 557 511

Facebook: http://facebook.com/Changa181
Skype: blindboxer1967



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of chris hallsworth
Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2012 7:36 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Question about virtual audio cable

If one uses the driver as a recording source, could one record internet
streams without the speech mixing into it? I know this is an issue for some
particularly on Windows Vista and later and do not wish to use an external
sound card. As far as I can see I know this can be done with Virtual Audio
Streaming simply by setting the playback device to the virtual card in the
application where the stream is to be played.


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org