Hi Julien
Read the draft and support adaption of the draft.
The fact that the draft leaves the TLS 1.3 negotiation in line with RFC 8446
and it is a "SHOULD" makes sense.
Thanks
Hooman
-Original Message-
From: Pce On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 5:49 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-pceps-tls13-02
CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links
or opening attachments. See http://nok.it/ext for additional information.
Dear WG,
During the PCE session today, there was clear support behind the PCEPS updates
I-D. Let's take it to the next level: do you consider that
draft-dhody-pce-pceps-tls13-02 should be adopted as a PCE WG item?
Please, share your answer and any detailed feedback using the PCE mailing list.
Thanks,
Julien
_
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites
ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez
le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les
messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute
responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used
or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
