Re: [PD-dev] Refactoring Pure Data (2 of 2)
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 03:26:41AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: As a human being, Miller has the right to reject patches. That doesn't mean that as a human being I have the duty to enjoy it. I genuinely believe that PureData is a fantastic piece of software in many ways (else I surely wouldn't have posted a thousand mails about PureData). I don't think that I would be complaining so much if there wasn't people insisting that I ought to submit my diffs to someone who doesn't want them. Hopefully I'll stop getting caught into that trap every damn time: it just makes me want to restate disagreements that I've already stated enough times and in a less angry way. I still have to learn about this. It's good to hear this viewpoint. I think in your situation where what you want Pd to be seems to be quite different from what Miller wants Pd to be, forking was and is the correct course of action. Software evolution in the 'marketplace' will define which version is more successful for which types of things. Best, Chris. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mccormick.cx ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1473873 ] osx now big or little endian
Patches item #1473873, was opened at 2006-04-21 00:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1473873group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: bugfix Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Submitted By: Jamie Tittle (tigital) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: osx now big or little endian Initial Comment: the attached patches update code which previously assumed osx == big endian... -- Comment By: IOhannes m zm�lnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2006-09-18 13:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564396 at least in 0.40 this seems to be fixed -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1473873group_id=55736 ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1473684 ] fix for array overflow
Patches item #1473684, was opened at 2006-04-20 18:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1473684group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: bugfix Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 8 Submitted By: Thomas Grill (xovo) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: fix for array overflow Initial Comment: in s_inter.c, function sys_startgui the zz array is too small to hold all members of the defaultfontshit array, leading to overflow and uneasyness. Attached is a patch (relative to devel) providing a fix for the problem. greetings, Thomas -- Comment By: IOhannes m zm�lnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2006-09-18 13:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564396 seems to be fixed in 0.40 -- Comment By: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Date: 2006-08-14 07:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=313747 Applied by hand, hope this fixes it. (0.40) -- Comment By: Thomas Grill (xovo) Date: 2006-04-20 18:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=350252 increased priority since the bug implies memory corruption or crashes. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1473684group_id=55736 ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1368488 ] qlist unused vars, etc
Patches item #1368488, was opened at 2005-11-28 19:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1368488group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: bugfix Status: Pending Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mathieu Bouchard (matju) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: qlist unused vars, etc Initial Comment: removed unused vars in x_net x_interface x_qlist fixed c++ error in x_qlist -- Comment By: IOhannes m zm�lnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2006-09-18 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564396 please either attach the fix, or we ought to close this -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1368488group_id=55736 ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1057320 ] mlock fix
Patches item #1057320, was opened at 2004-10-30 16:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1057320group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: bugfix Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tim Blechmann (timblech) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: mlock fix Initial Comment: this patch will cause the os not to overcommit memory when memory locking is enabled. this will reduce the probability of a segfault after memory allocation -- Comment By: IOhannes m zm�lnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2006-09-18 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564396 this has been fixed some time ago (at least it is in 0.40) -- Comment By: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Date: 2005-05-18 06:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=313747 I'm not sure this works on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels... I've had trouble compiling something like this before. I'd have to test it carefully on several generations of linux to be sure. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1057320group_id=55736 ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1551825 ] autoscrollbars
Patches item #1551825, was opened at 2006-09-04 04:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eighthave You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1551825group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: bugfix Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 7 Submitted By: oskude (oskude) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: autoscrollbars Initial Comment: autoscrollbars patch for pd cvs. dunno how good the code is, but it works :) -- Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2006-09-18 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27104 One other thing that would be fixed ideally. This problem existed before this patch, but its related. If a patch is bigger than the window, the scrollbars are not displayed when that patch is opened. You have to resize the window, then the scrollbars will display. -- Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2006-09-16 13:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27104 Very nice! My only comment is that it is a couple pixels off on Mac OS X 10.4/Pd-extended 0.39.2-test5. I can cover about 3 pixels before the scrollbars kick in. I added to the Pd-extended build system as pure-data/packages/patches/pd_autoscrollbars-0.40-pre.patch It will be in the nightly builds starting tomorrow. -- Comment By: oskude (oskude) Date: 2006-09-15 04:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1383707 this patch removes scrollbars in a pd-patch canvas window when the content is smaller than the window size. and add scrollbars to pd-patch window if content bigger than window size. works individually for height(bottom scrollbar) and width(right scrollbar) -- Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2006-09-13 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27104 can you elaborate on what this patch does? -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1551825group_id=55736 ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Bugs-1560895 ] [value] and [s]/[r] share the same name
Bugs item #1560895, was opened at 2006-09-18 19:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1560895group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: IOhannes m zm�lnig (zmoelnig) Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: [value] and [s]/[r] share the same name Initial Comment: [value] and [s] don't like if they are used with the same name. e.g. the following will output [value]: no method for bang [bang( | [s bla] [value bla] -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1560895group_id=55736 ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Bugs-1540259 ] bug in shuffle makes the cpu go into 100%
Bugs item #1540259, was opened at 2006-08-15 00:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1540259group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: externals Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: João Miguel Pais (jmmmp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: bug in shuffle makes the cpu go into 100% Initial Comment: due to a bug on [shuffle], after a value is sent to the 2nd inlet, at the end of each cycle the cpu will go into 100%. I don't know exactly what's the relation between the parameter values to bring the bug (if there's any), but the bug seems to be consistent. no special patch is necessary, it happens also on the help patch. XP, Pd-Ext 0.39-2-t3. Joao -- Comment By: IOhannes m zm�lnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2006-09-18 19:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564396 even though no special patch is necessary, could you give an example patch that reliably triggers the bug. (i never used [shuffle] before and i don't know what to do to make it behave as you describe) -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1540259group_id=55736 ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1561099 ] Unused vars
Patches item #1561099, was opened at 2006-09-18 16:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1561099group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unused vars Initial Comment: Here is a patch with unused variables throughout PD. It'll help readability. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1561099group_id=55736 ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
