Re: [PD-dev] grumpy: pure-data.sf.net redirected??!?!?

2006-10-12 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:

 I mean, like in attached new SF website...

Damnit, who besides me can find the bug? ;)

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht _ __footils.org_ __goto10.org__

___
PD-dev mailing list
PD-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Bugs-1563095 ] bug in iemlib's for++

2006-10-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1563095, was opened at 2006-09-21 15:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1563095group_id=55736

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: pd-extended
Group: v0.39.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: bug in iemlib's for++ 

Initial Comment:
There is a bug with the iemlib for++ object in PD-
extended:

I discovered a workaround to load for++ for now:



1. try to make an object [for++] - PD will say that 
there is no object like for++
2. try to make an object [forpp] - PD will say that 
there is no object like forpp
3. try again to make an object [for++] - et viola , 
there is thefor++ I was looking for

cheers,

Nils 


--

Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
Date: 2006-10-12 18:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=27104


I never use this object, and its not my lib, so please stop
assigning this bug to me.  Its not something I am going to fix.

The problem is that the source file name doesn't match the
class name, therefore the resulting binary doesn't load the
right class.

--

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2006-09-26 02:40

Message:
Logged In: NO 

Not a fix, but another workaround: I've checked in a
for++.pd abstraction, which is compatible with the
IEMLIB-external. It's in the CVS at
http://pure-data.cvs.sourceforge.net/pure-data/abstractions/purepd/

ciao
-- fbar

--

Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
Date: 2006-09-22 10:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=27104


This is most likely because the class name is for++, but
the source filename is forpp.c.  I think + is a valid
character for the filesystem, otherwise it could be renamed
using the hex loader.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1563095group_id=55736

___
PD-dev mailing list
PD-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev