Re: [PD-dev] Signing deken packages
Am 30. November 2022 00:35:47 MEZ schrieb Thomas Mayer : >Hello, > >I have uploaded packages to deken, but have just found out, that these >packages were not signed correctly with my gpg key for reasons totally >unrelated to deken. > >Should I reupload the packages or should I sign these packages with gpg, get >the signature extension .gpg (or .asc or .sig), and should I upload those >signatures via the webinterface to >https://puredata.info/Members/residuum/software/purest_json/2.0.0/ deken uses detached signatures (.asc files), so you only need to (re)upload the signatures themselves (eg using the webinterface). mfg.sfg.jfd IOhannes ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
[PD-dev] Signing deken packages
Hello, I have uploaded packages to deken, but have just found out, that these packages were not signed correctly with my gpg key for reasons totally unrelated to deken. Should I reupload the packages or should I sign these packages with gpg, get the signature extension .gpg (or .asc or .sig), and should I upload those signatures via the webinterface to https://puredata.info/Members/residuum/software/purest_json/2.0.0/ Thanks, Thomas -- "It seems to me, Golan, that the advance of civilization is nothing but an exercise in the limiting of privacy." (Janov Pelorat in: Isaac Asimov - Foundation's Edge) http://www.residuum.org/ ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Re: [PD-dev] release time?
Em ter., 29 de nov. de 2022 às 13:32, Antoine Rousseau escreveu: > we should retire the public iemgui API >> > > does this mean that mknob (or iemgui library) would have to be entirely > rewritten, by copying/adapting the entire iemgui API to mkob source tree? > I think that adapting is really simple, just copy and use the old public iemgui API, no need to entirely rewrite, right? ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Re: [PD-dev] release time?
> > we should retire the public iemgui API > does this mean that mknob (or iemgui library) would have to be entirely rewritten, by copying/adapting the entire iemgui API to mkob source tree? not caring about ABI breakage > the ABI compatibility is already broken IIUC ;-) GUI objects aren't that common for Pd, unfortunately > obviously... there would be many more with a better (and more stable...) GUI system. We all feel that we need to move forward. @IOhannes is it for this reason that you want to retract the iemgui API? To have freer hands when modifying the GUI code? I totally understand this reason; however, maybe we can wait here, since it's unlikely that someone starts a new GUI project on the current codebase, before we switch to a better system... I wouldn't want to have to rewrite the mknob, which would be needed by someone (not me actually...) who would need Pd 0.54 at the same time We could simply discourage new developers from using the API, maybe signaling it's about to be deprecated. Antoine Le lun. 28 nov. 2022 à 03:48, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit : > > > Em dom., 27 de nov. de 2022 às 23:33, Alexandre Torres Porres < > por...@gmail.com> escreveu: > >> We can investigate. >> > > besides moonlib's knob, the knob from 'flatgui' also uses it. > > I also found objects in "iemgui" that uses it, like [cube_sphere] (I guess > "IEM" can easily take care of this one hehe). > > These are all the ones found in Pd Extended. I don't remember or know of > any new compiled GUIs popping up since its demise that would use this. The > ones from ELSE don't use it, the ones from CEAMMC don't either. > > Again, GUI objects aren't that common for Pd, unfortunately. > > cheers > > ___ > Pd-dev mailing list > Pd-dev@lists.iem.at > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
