[PD] Building PD-extended

2009-07-27 Thread danomatika
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 04:18 +0200, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote:

 hello pd'people!
 
 
   i am trying to install Pd.extened-41.4 on a debian64 sid (unstable)
 kernel 2.6.30-
  i have been looking around and the option of installing 32bit with
 ia32lbs an ---force-architecture
  gave me libsasound2 problems..
 so i found a tutorial that explain how two build from source for
 64bits..   i have managed to compile the extended libraries.. and run
 make install  make packages... here everything gives the ok..  and
 then after compiling for a while  it gives me an error saying that i
 have a problem with DEBIAN/control file on line 9.. in depends
 field,
 that i its missing a packages name or that garbage has been found.. 
   when checking this file.. in the place of dependes it says: xterm,
 ttf-bitsream-vera
 
 i dont really understand what the problem is.. can somebody helpme


It's probably missing a comma: xterm, ttf-bitsream-vera--- add
',' here.

I had the same problem
(http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid):


If, like me, you get an error similar to this:

dpkg-deb: parse error, in
file 
/home/dano/Desktop/pd-build/Pd-0.40.3-extended/packages/linux_make/build//DEBIAN/control
 near line 8 \package pd-extended: Depends field, syntax error after reference 
to package zlib1g make: *** deb Error 2

then there is a comma missing after a dependency. Open the
Debian control file, look through the dependency list on line 8,
and add the missing comma(s) after the referenced package in the
error, in this case zlib1g:


---
Dan Wilcox
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] pd video promo

2009-07-27 Thread CICCOLIX

Hi,
I like to show this video made with recordmydesktop where I show a fanny 
pd interface (suitable for children) with some basic noise processing 
stuff.


The title is Dal Rumore al Suono (From noise to sound)

http://www.vimeo.com/4313993
bye
--
Lazzaro

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] gem pix shear

2009-07-27 Thread Py Fave
Thanks for your help.

i would like to output a pix with this transformation,with image wrapping
around ,
so shearXY is not very practical in my situation.

i would prefer to avoid using pix_snap too.

i need it to be quite fast, working on a live 25 fps 720*576(cropped to
square) video feed.

any other otions?

would a GLSL shader do it ?

or this?

[pix dump]
|
|
something shifting a list
|
|
(pix set]


on my video card pix_coordinates works only on right angles .

any advice welcome!

Thanks

Py




2009/7/27 marius schebella marius.schebe...@gmail.com

 hi py,
 have you tried shearXY? it's part of gem.
 marius.

 Py Fave wrote:


 hello  list

 i'm trying to  slant (kind of shear xy) a pix

 any advice on how to do this ?

 i tried to use pix_coordinates , freeframe plugins, pdmtl (without luck .

 Please check the image i joined.

 it shows the kind of transformations i need.

 then it should be recursive, but i keep it for later...
 i hope the images makes sense.

 it's missing the first state wich is 4 squares side by side

 Thanks and have a nice end of we

 Pierre-Yves
 Paris France




 


 

 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] gem pix shear

2009-07-27 Thread Py Fave
today's attempts produced this :


test07.pd

it needs optimisation but it works

i used part of patches i found on the web ,

http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg25216.html

thanks Marius

any comments welcome

questions:

the rendering depends on the window size.

how can i make it take all screen ?


test07.pd
Description: Binary data
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] float counting reset not working

2009-07-27 Thread Gabriel Vinazza
i use [moses] instead of route and it works perfectly to me



On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Frank Barknechtf...@footils.org wrote:
 Hallo,
 Vitor Calejuri hat gesagt: // Vitor Calejuri wrote:

 I've attached a more general and standart approach using object [counter]

 The problem is: The object [counter] is not standardized - there are many
 different versions of it in various external collections. So better use the
 real standard: [f ]x[+ 1]

 Ciao
 --
 Frank

 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Building PD-extended

2009-07-27 Thread el jay
yes i have tried this..  buit then when i try to build  with

fakeroot dpkg-deb --build build/ Pd-0.40.3-extended.deb


i get given the same error.. and if i touch around some more then i am
told that package name was expected but is missing or garabe found



2009/7/27 danomatika danomat...@gmail.com

  On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 04:18 +0200, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote:

 hello pd'people!


   i am trying to install Pd.extened-41.4 on a debian64 sid (unstable)
 kernel 2.6.30-
  i have been looking around and the option of installing 32bit with
 ia32lbs an ---force-architecture
  gave me libsasound2 problems..
 so i found a tutorial that explain how two build from source for
 64bits..   i have managed to compile the extended libraries.. and run
 make install  make packages... here everything gives the ok..  and
 then after compiling for a while  it gives me an error saying that i
 have a problem with DEBIAN/control file on line 9.. in depends field,
 that i its missing a packages name or that garbage has been found..
   when checking this file.. in the place of dependes it says: xterm,
 ttf-bitsream-vera

 i dont really understand what the problem is.. can somebody helpme


 It's probably missing a comma: xterm, ttf-bitsream-vera--- add
 ',' here.

 I had the same problem (
 http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid
 ):

  If, like me, you get an error similar to this:

 dpkg-deb: parse error, in file
 /home/dano/Desktop/pd-build/Pd-0.40.3-extended/packages/linux_make/build//DEBIAN/control
 near line 8 \package pd-extended: Depends field, syntax error after
 reference to package zlib1g make: *** deb Error 2

 then there is a comma missing after a dependency. Open the Debian control
 file, look through the dependency list on line 8, and add the missing
 comma(s) after the referenced package in the error, in this case zlib1g:


   ---
 Dan Wilcox
 danomatika.com
 robotcowboy.com http://www.robotcowboy.com

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] HID problem in Xubuntu.

2009-07-27 Thread Diego Azar
Hans, Daniel, 

Hi again,

I made a 90-puredata.rules  file in /lib/udev/rules.d/ containing the following 
line:

KERNEL==event[0-9]*, MODE=0660, GROUP=plugdev

The evdev EVIOCGABS ioctl: Invalid argument doesn't appear anymore but [hid] 
still can't recieve data from de /dev/input/event8 that is where my touchpad is 
located.

I tried copying the 90.puredata.rules file to the old ubuntu udev rules 
directory  (/etc/udev/rules.d/) but it didn't work either. I also tried both 
modes (0660 and 0666). 

Am I doing something wrong?

thanks again, 

Diego.


--- On Sat, 7/18/09, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:

From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
Subject: Re: [PD] HID problem in Xubuntu.
To: Daniel Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com
Cc: Diego Azar dazar...@yahoo.com, pd-list@iem.at
Date: Saturday, July 18, 2009, 10:31 PM


Hey Dan,

Making a 90-puredata.rules file and including it in the package sounds
like a good idea.  We will need to be careful with the permissions
stuff, I don't want to be responsible for lots of people getting their
machines pwned via pd ;)  I imagine MODE=0666 is not necessary, for
example, MODE=0660 with the plugdev group should work and be more
secure.

If you have something sketched out, how about committing it to the SVN,
or posting it to the patch tracker.  Or really whatever it takes to get
people to contribute work on this stuff.  I don't know the udev stuff
really, so I don't have much to contribute there.

I see no reason not to include the .rules file in the Pd-extended
package, we'll just have to work out the security details if its going
to be loaded by default.

.hc

On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 12:53 +0200, Daniel Wilcox wrote:
 
         Hi? Hans,
         
         I've been checking the archives and found only one issue that
         has to do with the ubuntu problem and sais to put this line:
         KERNEL==event[0-9]*,                  MODE=0666
         
         in /etc/udev/rules.d/40-
         permissions.rules file.
         
         The problem is that xubuntu 9.04 (jaunty) doesn't have this
         file
         any more and permissions.rules, i think, are given in other
         archives...
         i'm looking in ubuntu forums to see what can i do... If
         someone
         knows something about...
         
 
 If you are using  Ubuntu/Xubuntu Jaunty, the udev permissions files
 have been moved to /lib/udev/rules.d:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/jaunty-changes/2009-January/002619.html
 
 As for the above, you can try adding the group to plugdev, something
 like
 
 KERNEL==event[0-9]*,                   MODE=0666, GROUP=plugdev
 
 since all users should be in the plugdev group.
 
 I use this technique to open the mouse on my visual application which
 uses sdl and runs from a basic terminal without X:
 
 KERNEL==mouse*                      GROUP=plugdev
 
 There is also no need to modify the existing udev rule files since
 they are read sequentially and can overwrite each other.
 So, following the debian udev rule naming convention, if you make a
 file called 90-puredata.rules and put the event rule
 in there, it should override or modify the existing default rule.
 
 Hans, it should be totally possible to ship a pd Ubuntu .deb that can
 install this automatically as I've done this with my own
 tools.  I can help with this if needed, I just havent used [hid] much.
 
 Also, udev is really picky ... make sure each rule is on one line or
 it will fail.  You can also use the udev tools to test each script
 for parse errors, but I'm at work on a Hardy machine so I can't give
 you the command right now.  The udev admin script changed names
 between versions.
 
 
 -- 
 Dan Wilcox
 danomatika
 www.robotcowboy.com
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




  ___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] maximum number of outlets, pd file format

2009-07-27 Thread Peter Plessas

Dear list,

i want to create a [readsf~] with 120 audio outlets, and connect them to 
somewhere. I create that very patch in a text editor, since i don't want 
to pull that many patchcords. If i open that patch with pd, it seems to 
load it fine, but if i save the same patch from within pd, the maximum 
number of outlets gets truncated at 64.
While i perfectly understand that no one ever thought about someone 
needing 120 outlets (and yes, there is a reason why i attempt this :-)), 
it seems 2^6 is a limit for pd's patchfile format.


didn't find something in the archives, anyone already had this? Could 
there be a simple change to pd's sources to increase that limit?


thanks!
Peter

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] maximum number of outlets, pd file format

2009-07-27 Thread Peter Plessas

(replying to myself)

this is only an issue with readsf~.
An [unpack] with 120 arguments and outlets works and saves fine.

PP

Peter Plessas wrote:

Dear list,

i want to create a [readsf~] with 120 audio outlets, and connect them to 
somewhere. I create that very patch in a text editor, since i don't want 
to pull that many patchcords. If i open that patch with pd, it seems to 
load it fine, but if i save the same patch from within pd, the maximum 
number of outlets gets truncated at 64.
While i perfectly understand that no one ever thought about someone 
needing 120 outlets (and yes, there is a reason why i attempt this :-)), 
it seems 2^6 is a limit for pd's patchfile format.


didn't find something in the archives, anyone already had this? Could 
there be a simple change to pd's sources to increase that limit?


thanks!
Peter

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] maximum number of outlets, pd file format

2009-07-27 Thread Peter Plessas

(replying to myself)

this is only an issue with readsf~.
An [unpack] with 120 arguments and outlets works and saves fine.
Seems to be sth. within readsf~.
Initiating that object as [readsf~ 120] does not give an error msg. But 
is seems it is only created with 64 outlets. The multichannel-wav format 
seems to allow for more channels than that, i was able to create a file 
without errors, with its channels getting displayed in audacity (before 
that software gracefully crashes)


PP

Peter Plessas wrote:

Dear list,

i want to create a [readsf~] with 120 audio outlets, and connect them to 
somewhere. I create that very patch in a text editor, since i don't want 
to pull that many patchcords. If i open that patch with pd, it seems to 
load it fine, but if i save the same patch from within pd, the maximum 
number of outlets gets truncated at 64.
While i perfectly understand that no one ever thought about someone 
needing 120 outlets (and yes, there is a reason why i attempt this :-)), 
it seems 2^6 is a limit for pd's patchfile format.


didn't find something in the archives, anyone already had this? Could 
there be a simple change to pd's sources to increase that limit?


thanks!
Peter

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] maximum number of outlets, pd file format

2009-07-27 Thread Peter Plessas

Once more:

problem solved: Accessible via
#define MAXSFCHANS 64
in d_soundfile.c

oh, great Pd!

Peter

Peter Plessas wrote:

Dear list,

i want to create a [readsf~] with 120 audio outlets, and connect them to 
somewhere. I create that very patch in a text editor, since i don't want 
to pull that many patchcords. If i open that patch with pd, it seems to 
load it fine, but if i save the same patch from within pd, the maximum 
number of outlets gets truncated at 64.
While i perfectly understand that no one ever thought about someone 
needing 120 outlets (and yes, there is a reason why i attempt this :-)), 
it seems 2^6 is a limit for pd's patchfile format.


didn't find something in the archives, anyone already had this? Could 
there be a simple change to pd's sources to increase that limit?


thanks!
Peter

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] maximum number of outlets, pd file format

2009-07-27 Thread Miller Puckette
Hi Peter,

try changing this line in d_soundfile.c:

#define MAXSFCHANS 64

I never thought anyone would want more than 64 :)

Miller

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 05:54:10PM -0700, Peter Plessas wrote:
 (replying to myself)
 
 this is only an issue with readsf~.
 An [unpack] with 120 arguments and outlets works and saves fine.
 Seems to be sth. within readsf~.
 Initiating that object as [readsf~ 120] does not give an error msg. But 
 is seems it is only created with 64 outlets. The multichannel-wav format 
 seems to allow for more channels than that, i was able to create a file 
 without errors, with its channels getting displayed in audacity (before 
 that software gracefully crashes)
 
 PP
 
 Peter Plessas wrote:
 Dear list,
 
 i want to create a [readsf~] with 120 audio outlets, and connect them to 
 somewhere. I create that very patch in a text editor, since i don't want 
 to pull that many patchcords. If i open that patch with pd, it seems to 
 load it fine, but if i save the same patch from within pd, the maximum 
 number of outlets gets truncated at 64.
 While i perfectly understand that no one ever thought about someone 
 needing 120 outlets (and yes, there is a reason why i attempt this :-)), 
 it seems 2^6 is a limit for pd's patchfile format.
 
 didn't find something in the archives, anyone already had this? Could 
 there be a simple change to pd's sources to increase that limit?
 
 thanks!
 Peter
 
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
 
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list