[PD] Gem compile error: filmAVIPLAY.cpp
Dear List, getting this trying to compile gem-0.92-1: g++ -c-g -O2 -fPIC -freg-struct-return -O3 -falign-loops=32 -falign-functions=32 -falign-jumps=32 -funroll-loops -ffast-math -mmmx -msse2 -I/usr/include/lqt -I/usr/include/lqt -I/usr/include/avifile-0.7 -I/usr/include/FTGL -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I.. -I/usr/include/FTGL -I/usr/include/freetype2 filmAVIPLAY.cpp -o ../Objects/filmAVIPLAY.o filmAVIPLAY.cpp: In member function ‘virtual bool filmAVIPLAY::open(char*, int)’: filmAVIPLAY.cpp:96: error: ‘StreamInfo’ was not declared in this scope filmAVIPLAY.cpp:96: error: ‘m_info’ was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [filmAVIPLAY.o] Error 1 any help greatly appreciated PP ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Finding $0 and dealing with it in messages
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 29, 2009, at 3:26 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote: I have written a bit about Pd's messages on puredata.info, feel free to quote as much as you like. I'm not the right person to fix pd-extended docs. I can't even create all objects in that patch and bug 2026128 is still open, which indicates, that we believe different things about data types and messages. I don't want to get into that discussion again. :) The PDDP docs predate pd-extended. The PDDP could easily be distributed or used by anyone. That patch is related to PDDP. But yes, Pd-extended does include the PDDP docs. What's the point of writing all this email about the topic if it doesn't actually end up in something useful? Few people read the archives... I don't understand this anti-Pd-extended puritanism. Does distributing docs or code in Pd-extended somehow taint it with evil? I think the PDDP docs are mostly really good. Most of that work was done by Dave Sabine. Why wouldn't we use it and keep it up to date? Hey, all I said is that *I* am not the right person to do that. Ciao -- Frank ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] ANN: Purity 0.2.4 debian package // was Re: ANN: Purity dynamic patching for Python release 0.1.1
Hello, Can anyone try the latest Purity Debian package I have done ? It works on Ubuntu 8.04 (LTS) and up and should work on Debian. http://bitbucket.org/aalex/purity/downloads/python-purity_0.2.4_all.deb Thomas : Yes, I guess I should check out py/pyext to make this syntax similar to the one in pyext. Note that Purity wraps PD, as opposed to being an external within PD. Cheers ! a 2009/10/21 Thomas Grill g...@g.org: I guess I am looking for something like: for i in range(2): obj1 = pdobj.osc~(i) obj2 = pdobj.throw~(bus-1) pdconnect(obj1 0, obj2 0) obj1 = pdobj.receive~(bus-1) obj2 = pdobj.dac~ pdconnect(obj1 0, obj2 0 1) and then call this script from within pd itself, hehe... If you remember the pd convention in Graz, that was exactly what my talk was about - the dyn api that i introduced - also available as a module for py/pyext. It's still there, in the svn - as soon as my server is back up again. gr~~~ -- Alexandre Quessy http://alexandre.quessy.net ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] ANN: Purity 0.2.4 debian package // was Re: ANN: Purity dynamic patching for Python release 0.1.1
Hello again everyone, I thought it would be nice if I would provide a way to actually try purity once the Debian package is installed. 1) Start jackd. (using qjackctl, for example) 2) Open a terminal 3) Type one of these two commands : python /usr/share/pyshared/purity/examples/random_notes.py python /usr/share/pyshared/purity/examples/hello_metro.py Cheers ! alex 2009/12/5 Alexandre Quessy lis...@sourcelibre.com: Hello, Can anyone try the latest Purity Debian package I have done ? It works on Ubuntu 8.04 (LTS) and up and should work on Debian. http://bitbucket.org/aalex/purity/downloads/python-purity_0.2.4_all.deb Thomas : Yes, I guess I should check out py/pyext to make this syntax similar to the one in pyext. Note that Purity wraps PD, as opposed to being an external within PD. Cheers ! a 2009/10/21 Thomas Grill g...@g.org: I guess I am looking for something like: for i in range(2): obj1 = pdobj.osc~(i) obj2 = pdobj.throw~(bus-1) pdconnect(obj1 0, obj2 0) obj1 = pdobj.receive~(bus-1) obj2 = pdobj.dac~ pdconnect(obj1 0, obj2 0 1) and then call this script from within pd itself, hehe... If you remember the pd convention in Graz, that was exactly what my talk was about - the dyn api that i introduced - also available as a module for py/pyext. It's still there, in the svn - as soon as my server is back up again. gr~~~ -- Alexandre Quessy http://alexandre.quessy.net ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Alexandre Quessy http://alexandre.quessy.net ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] ANN: Purity 0.2.4 debian package // was Re: ANN: Purity dynamic patching for Python release 0.1.1
hi alexandre, installing fine on ubuntu 9.10, but: p...@mbp:~$ python /usr/share/pyshared/purity/examples/random_notes.py Running command /usr/bin/pd -alsa -verbose -r 48000 -inchannels 2 -outchannels 2 /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/purity/data/dynamic_patch.pd /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/purity/process.py:390: PotentialZombieWarning: spawnProcess called, but the SIGCHLD handler is not installed. This probably means you have not yet called reactor.run, or called reactor.run(installSignalHandler=0). You will probably never see this process finish, and it may become a zombie process. self._process_transport = reactor.spawnProcess(self._process_protocol, proc_path, args, environ, usePTY=True) 1) Start jackd. (using qjackctl, for example) doesn't make sense if the running command is /usr/bin/pd -alsa pat ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Finding $0 and dealing with it in messages
--- On Sat, 12/5/09, Frank Barknecht f...@footils.org wrote: From: Frank Barknecht f...@footils.org Subject: Re: [PD] Finding $0 and dealing with it in messages To: pd-list@iem.at Date: Saturday, December 5, 2009, 1:09 PM Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 29, 2009, at 3:26 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote: I have written a bit about Pd's messages on puredata.info, feel free to quote as much as you like. I'm not the right person to fix pd-extended docs. I can't even create all objects in that patch and bug 2026128 is still open, which indicates, that we believe different things about data types and messages. I don't want to get into that discussion again. :) The PDDP docs predate pd-extended. The PDDP could easily be distributed or used by anyone. That patch is related to PDDP. But yes, Pd-extended does include the PDDP docs. What's the point of writing all this email about the topic if it doesn't actually end up in something useful? Few people read the archives... I don't understand this anti-Pd-extended puritanism. Does distributing docs or code in Pd-extended somehow taint it with evil? I think the PDDP docs are mostly really good. Most of that work was done by Dave Sabine. Why wouldn't we use it and keep it up to date? Hey, all I said is that *I* am not the right person to do that. If that's all you had said, I doubt anyone would have replied with anything other than ok. And now I'm curious: why can't you create all the objects in that patch? If some of those objects don't create in pd-ext on win/macos/ linux, at the very least the patch should be changed so that they are removed (or replaced with ascii art). But if it's that you just prefer using pd-vanilla and don't want to download/install pd-ext, why not just say that? -Jonathan ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
