[PD] pd geek shirts
Hi all, I'm designing a couple of Pd geek shirts, pretty much just to merge my love of Pd and shirts. I've attached a .pd version of both designs. Since I'm not a screen printer I'm considering uploading the designs to redbubble.com and listing them at cost. That way anyone who wants to order them can, and only redbubble makes money out of it. I chose redbubble because they have good postage rates for me and the quality of the final product is good. If anyone is not cool with this please say so. I'm very happy to send out the high rez files to anyone who wants to print them themselves too, just let me know. -cheers Richard pd_shirts.pd Description: Binary data ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] pd geek shirts
My experience with both screen and polymer processes is you need to avoid too many thin lines So the single object, printed large, would make a better design for technical reasons IMHO. On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:59:50 +1100 Richie Cyngler glitch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm designing a couple of Pd geek shirts, pretty much just to merge my love of Pd and shirts. I've attached a .pd version of both designs. Since I'm not a screen printer I'm considering uploading the designs to redbubble.com and listing them at cost. That way anyone who wants to order them can, and only redbubble makes money out of it. I chose redbubble because they have good postage rates for me and the quality of the final product is good. If anyone is not cool with this please say so. I'm very happy to send out the high rez files to anyone who wants to print them themselves too, just let me know. -cheers Richard -- Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] pd geek shirts
Agree with Andy, I'd like just the human~ printed really big. :) On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.ukwrote: My experience with both screen and polymer processes is you need to avoid too many thin lines So the single object, printed large, would make a better design for technical reasons IMHO. On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:59:50 +1100 Richie Cyngler glitch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm designing a couple of Pd geek shirts, pretty much just to merge my love of Pd and shirts. I've attached a .pd version of both designs. Since I'm not a screen printer I'm considering uploading the designs to redbubble.com and listing them at cost. That way anyone who wants to order them can, and only redbubble makes money out of it. I chose redbubble because they have good postage rates for me and the quality of the final product is good. If anyone is not cool with this please say so. I'm very happy to send out the high rez files to anyone who wants to print them themselves too, just let me know. -cheers Richard -- Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Pedro Lopes (MSc) contact: pedro.lo...@ist.utl.pt website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes / http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | http://twitter.com/plopesresearch ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] pd geek shirts
my 2 cents is to use direct color instead of a raster on a white backprint i'd love [metro] | [sexual~] but i've checked the infamous thread and i know it's not very likely :o) Andras On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Pedro Lopes pedro.lo...@ist.utl.ptwrote: Agree with Andy, I'd like just the human~ printed really big. :) On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk wrote: My experience with both screen and polymer processes is you need to avoid too many thin lines So the single object, printed large, would make a better design for technical reasons IMHO. On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:59:50 +1100 Richie Cyngler glitch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm designing a couple of Pd geek shirts, pretty much just to merge my love of Pd and shirts. I've attached a .pd version of both designs. Since I'm not a screen printer I'm considering uploading the designs to redbubble.com and listing them at cost. That way anyone who wants to order them can, and only redbubble makes money out of it. I chose redbubble because they have good postage rates for me and the quality of the final product is good. If anyone is not cool with this please say so. I'm very happy to send out the high rez files to anyone who wants to print them themselves too, just let me know. -cheers Richard -- Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Pedro Lopes (MSc) contact: pedro.lo...@ist.utl.pt website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes / http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | http://twitter.com/plopesresearch ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Muranyi Andras ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] pd geek shirts
GENIUS. 2011/2/23 András Murányi muran...@gmail.com my 2 cents is to use direct color instead of a raster on a white backprint i'd love [metro] | [sexual~] but i've checked the infamous thread and i know it's not very likely :o) Andras On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Pedro Lopes pedro.lo...@ist.utl.ptwrote: Agree with Andy, I'd like just the human~ printed really big. :) On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk wrote: My experience with both screen and polymer processes is you need to avoid too many thin lines So the single object, printed large, would make a better design for technical reasons IMHO. On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:59:50 +1100 Richie Cyngler glitch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm designing a couple of Pd geek shirts, pretty much just to merge my love of Pd and shirts. I've attached a .pd version of both designs. Since I'm not a screen printer I'm considering uploading the designs to redbubble.com and listing them at cost. That way anyone who wants to order them can, and only redbubble makes money out of it. I chose redbubble because they have good postage rates for me and the quality of the final product is good. If anyone is not cool with this please say so. I'm very happy to send out the high rez files to anyone who wants to print them themselves too, just let me know. -cheers Richard -- Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Pedro Lopes (MSc) contact: pedro.lo...@ist.utl.pt website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes / http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | http://twitter.com/plopesresearch ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Muranyi Andras ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Pedro Lopes (MSc) contact: pedro.lo...@ist.utl.pt website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes / http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | http://twitter.com/plopesresearch ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Pitch envelope
As Matt points out, it's not trivial. Your initial instinct was best IMHO, to use the integral (running accumulation) of normalised pitch. If you have a samplewise integrator then a small increment value 1/samplerate , lets call it I, will cause the output, let's call that O, to reach a value of 1 in 1 second of time. If your sample is S samples long (look at the output of [soundfiler] object) then divide by samplerate to get the time T You want to reach a value of 1 in T seconds so divide to get your new increment I. The envelope can be made by subtracting O from 1, so that the output fades away. It's a good idea to add a [max 0] or [clip 0 1] to the envelope output because it will continue to get smaller and go negative otherwise. If pitch varies up or down during playback then 1 - O should still hit zero at the end of the playback. On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:49:45 -0500 Matt Barber brbrof...@gmail.com wrote: I think it would help me to think of the problem if you could say what you wanted the envelope itself to look/sound like. Is this a continuous glissando (in frequency? pitch?) from low to high? Does it go up then down then up again? Or any of these possibilities? Does it matter more what transpositions are involved or what the timing of the contour is? All of this matters. For instance let's say you had a 1000ms sample, and you want the result of this process to start out an octave lower than the original for a period of time, and then you want it to jump suddenly to an octave higher than the original at some point, such that the total time of this event is 1000ms. Then your timing is determined for you -- you spend 666.667 ms for the octave lower (chewing up 1/3 of the original), and then 333.333 ms for the octave higher (chewing up the remaining 2/3 of the original). But let's say you just want the sound to start some unspecified interval lower than original and then exactly halfway through the 1000ms you leap up to some interval higher than written -- this is a very different problem and it has multiple solutions (that is, it depends on the value of at least one of the intervals). You can start with an octave lower (0.5 playback speed) and then jump at 500ms to a perfect fifth higher (1.5 playback speed). Or you could start a just major third lower (0.8 playback speed) and then jump at 500ms to a just minor third higher (1.2 playback speed). This is true but a little more complicated with glissandi -- it matters a lot whether you care more about the timing or more about the intervals of transposition, and if you care about the intervals it's important whether you're thinking of interval in terms of frequency difference or in terms of pitch (the base-2 log of frequency ratios, i.e. fractions of an octave or semitones or what have you). The linearity of the continuous change will have everything to do with whether you're thinking of frequency or the pitch measurement. I haven't thought this through but I'm pretty sure that a linear envelope on frequency will have the same timing as the average of the endpoint playback speeds -- in the above example, going from 0.5x to 1.5x at 500ms would be the same as linearly changing from 0.5x to 1.5x over the whole 1000ms -- so long as the mean is 1. Matt Herm.. not sure, What I mean is this. If I have a sample of 1000ms, and a breakpoint envelope of 1000ms duration, the two will stay the same length as long as I don't make any points on the graph (i.e. the transpose envelope stays at 0 all the way through). With a transposing sampler, as soon as the transposition is increased the time of the sample playback is decreased, so the transposition envelope will not finish before the sample is played out. Similarly, if the transposition envelope is goes down, the transposition envelope will finish before the sample does. What I am looking for is a mathematical way to calculate the length of a transposition envelope relative to its effect on a finite-length sample, and so to derive a length for the envelope that will allow the envelope and the sample to play out over the same duration. The transposition will continuously change the length of the sample, and so from my limited knowledge of mathematics I reckon it will take some integration of the breakpoint envelope to calculate this number. I'm just not sure how to do this. Best, Ed Metastudio 4 for Pure Data - coming soon! Metastudio 3 still available at http://sharktracks.co.uk/puredata ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] pd-kinect-skeleton
hi pat... thanks by the tryplex links. yesterday i'd test some processing and animata examples also. in mac osx i had lots of crashes. in linux, everything runs well. now, i will start to try something more usefull. i hope still today, to post some video with all these experiences. if somebody need some help, just ask. sharing is the key! thx for all again. cheers palm 2011/2/23 philippe boisnard philem...@mac.com Hi yeah, incredible PSI POse hihihihi, but when I work with dancer or actually in theater, comedian or dancer have more flexible posture, for example it captures the back and not just face, and if you are at the good distance, it captures really in a dynamic movement. And I think, that the most interresting work, is not only figurative (3D modelisation for example), but to invente some virtual interactive space. For example : create a virtual and invisible wall, each brick is a sample. The right hand chooses the specific sample, and the other hand and other interactive dot of body manipulate effects. This way is interresting because, with the xyz axes we work in a complet space. The only difficulty actually, it's for me the speed of captation by kinect. It's slow, and for the creation where I work actually, the comedian is speeder than uptake by kinect. hope to see you soon guys. Hope tooo ! p cheers palm -- twitt-me: @ricardopalmieri mobile# +551185833173 [memelab.com.br] [palm.estudiolivre.org] [myspace.com/livenoisetupi] [skype:palmieriricardo] [msn: ricardopalmi...@bol.com.br] [linux user # 392484] ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Gridflow+ L2Ork pd-extended (was: L2Ork pd-extended release candidate 1 now available)
Yeah all seems to work( so far) like #out and #see which were not working before, I am using pd-l2ork 18/02 build so maybe something was fixed there not too sure. Going to join on the pd-l2ork-dev mailing list to catch future announcements---pd-l2ork is great stuff! On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu wrote: Great! Thanks for the report. This was definitely on my todo list. BTW There have been a lot of unannounced releases of pd-l2ork lately so you may want to check it out. Latest release alone includes universal copy and paste and many other usability improvements. Cheers! ALAN BROOKER alan.brooker2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All tried quickly L2Ork with Gridflow 9.14 and both are working great-big thanks :) Off topic Mathieu but has Gridflow 9.14 been tested with the vanilla Pd 0.43-0 test versions? Thanks again On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:15 PM, ALAN BROOKER alan.brooker2...@gmail.com wrote: oops!Apologies Mathieu, it was meant for list, rather just an email to you directly I have all of those libraries installed, so I will download Gridflow again shortly for those additions- the object [#to_pdp] is working and and can display output, so I am using that for meantime Thanks to all for looking into this, it's great to have gridflow going on L2Ork pd-extended for a good set up ! On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, ALAN BROOKER wrote: I have replaced the g_canvas.h with the version from L2Ork pd-extended and recomplided gridflow- yes it is stable now. However some objects are not loading/working specifically [#see] and [#out window]. I am replying back to the list because it looks like your email doesn't have private content, even though you wrote it to just me. The problem with [#see] must have to do with changes specific to L2Ork. Do you get a crash ? It has to do with the NEWWB macro in src/classes_gui.cxx, which allocates a t_widgetbehavior, but does not set the 8th field. To do this in a way that is also compatible with pd-extended's g_canvas.h, we have to add a CLEAR(wb) right there (it's just a memset shortcut). I'm adding it now. [#out window] is an alias for any of the 3 main image display handlers : [#out x11], [#out sdl], [#out quartz]. (there are two more, [#out aalib] and [#see], that aren't accessible by [#out window]). To get [#out x11] working, you need to have enough .h files installed. Perhaps you need libx11-dev, libxext-dev, and/or libxt-dev. They're not listed in README. I'm adding them now. ___ | Mathieu Bouchard tél: +1.514.383.3801 Villeray, Montréal, QC ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] Pd 0.43-0 test +Gridflow (was Gridflow+ L2Ork pd-extended)
Hi Thanks, yes wanted to see if it was compatible at your end- just to give some brief feedback,-I have actually been using Gridflow + vanilla Pd 0.43-0 (test 3) on Ubuntu and it works mostly. The big issue for me was the help index, which would completely crash PD when selected, but PD 0.43 is a test release I suppose. So for me, other than the help index (and perhaps some examples which crashed PD) it is usable On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, ALAN BROOKER wrote: tried quickly L2Ork with Gridflow 9.14 and both are working great-big thanks :) I haven't done any testing nor debugging with L20rk, and AFAIK, I haven't fixed anything that caused a problem with L20rk. This means that the bug is probably still there, and might pop in your face, probably only in a future release. This is unless I fixed it by accident. Off topic Mathieu but has Gridflow 9.14 been tested with the vanilla Pd 0.43-0 test versions? It's been tried and it doesn't work. It's currently hard to debug, so, I want to make some big changes to the [doc_...] abstractions to make it easier to put my finger on the bug. Either that or hack pd again so that it tells me real error messages in those circumstances. ___ | Mathieu Bouchard tél: +1.514.383.3801 Villeray, Montréal, QC ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Pitch envelope
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Andy Farnell wrote: If you have a samplewise integrator That's called [rpole~] in pd. then a small increment value 1/samplerate , lets call it I, will cause the output, let's call that O, to reach a value of 1 in 1 second of time. Try this attachment. Press the bang many times and look at what happens. ___ | Mathieu Bouchard tél: +1.514.383.3801 Villeray, Montréal, QC#N canvas 0 0 450 300 10; #X obj 147 163 / 44100; #X msg 147 143 1; #X obj 122 163 f; #X obj 122 103 until; #X msg 122 83 44100; #X obj 147 183 t a; #X obj 147 123 loadbang; #X obj 42 213 spigot; #X obj 42 233 print; #X obj 58 35 bng 15 250 50 0 empty empty empty 17 7 0 10 -262144 -1 -1; #X obj 58 53 t b b b b; #X msg 75 73 1; #X msg 119 53 0; #X msg 58 139 0; #X obj 122 183 +; #X connect 0 0 2 1; #X connect 1 0 0 0; #X connect 2 0 14 0; #X connect 3 0 2 0; #X connect 4 0 3 0; #X connect 5 0 14 1; #X connect 6 0 1 0; #X connect 7 0 8 0; #X connect 9 0 10 0; #X connect 10 0 13 0; #X connect 10 1 11 0; #X connect 10 2 4 0; #X connect 10 3 12 0; #X connect 11 0 7 1; #X connect 12 0 7 1; #X connect 13 0 14 0; #X connect 14 0 5 0; #X connect 14 0 7 0; ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
