Re: [PD] Migrate away from Sourceforge?

2013-08-31 Thread Dan Wilcox
True but I imagine alot of the older open issues could be closed so I doubt all 
of them need to be migrated, unless you wanted to keep a full history. But 
that's what the changelog is for anyway right?

On Aug 30, 2013, at 8:31 PM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote:

 Do you think that bitbucket or github are any better ? Who is to say
 that some minutes down the road they will not do the same.
 I cannot vouch, that any commercial service will not do the same of
 course. Github e.g. stopped supporting downloads of binaries a few
 months ago.
 
 It would not be much work to setup mirrors for hosting the code, and in
 any event migrate to yet another service, but there are other things to
 consider: There is the bug tracker that is hosted by Sourceforge, then
 binaries, people and their accounts and access rights, etc.
 
 bug tracker is certainly an issue and will just take work to migrate it
 somewhere.


Dan Wilcox
@danomatika
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com





___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Migrate away from Sourceforge?

2013-08-31 Thread Simon Wise

On 31/08/13 06:46, Thomas Mayer wrote:


I cannot vouch, that any commercial service will not do the same of
course. Github e.g. stopped supporting downloads of binaries a few
months ago.


ISPs charge for bandwidth, in some places much more heavily than others, so for 
hosting lots of binaries without this kind of revenue raising you need to go 
through some big institution with serious bandwidth ... say a university, or the 
mirrors provided within various ISPs or academic networks, and accept their 
conditions to do so.


Otherwise you can choose to only supply binaries to those people willing (and 
able) to join peer to peer file sharing networks, or willing and able to get 
their binaries through the big mirror system organised by Debian or similar.


Essentially either abandon potential or existing users who only use commercial 
channels (maybe a few will actually learn, expand their horizons, and follow the 
move) or join their club, make use of their channels, and live with their 
techniques. It's a difficult choice, it depends on your goals.


Github is offering binary downloads again, but I'd guess that can only continue 
if the volume stays reasonably small (i.e. if most users are there for the code, 
as developers ... and they distribute their binaries using other channels) or 
the revenue they can extract from the user in the process gets higher, or they 
can pass the bandwidth cost on to the projects as a paid service.



Simon

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] getting data from gem chain

2013-08-31 Thread Ronni Montoya
Hi , i was wondering how can i get data from a gem chain.

I ve made a patch that generate nested iterated structures and i would
like to sonify the gem chain.

Which should be the best approach for this?
Do anybody have tried something similar?


cheers


R.

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list