Re: [PD] HD 1920 X 1080

2014-03-14 Thread Max
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 2014? 03? 14? 17:06, pured...@11h11.com wrote:
 What codec, it does a big difference on CPU usage. I use mjpeg with
 good result.

Also, the choice of codec would be a different one depending on what
you are going to do. If you are aiming to JUMP to specific frames in
the video or play it backwards you would choose a different codec than
if you just want to play it from the beginning to the end linearly.

m.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlMiyCAACgkQ3EB7kzgMM6KPUACfUZ0W7FF8E5aS564Rfxd8m+T9
FP4An1dobNo91sN1+eJx2jmQX7shZBNa
=vrQr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] HD 1920 X 1080

2014-03-14 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Max abonneme...@revolwear.com wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Also, the choice of codec would be a different one depending on what
 you are going to do. If you are aiming to JUMP to specific frames in
 the video or play it backwards you would choose a different codec than
 if you just want to play it from the beginning to the end linearly.


Could you give some examples? I don't know anything about this but would
really like to. Could you explain why is it like this?


 m.

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] HD 1920 X 1080

2014-03-14 Thread Charles Goyard
Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
 If you are aiming to JUMP to specific frames in
  the video or play it backwards you would choose a different codec
  than if you just want to play it from the beginning to the end
  linearly.
 
 Could you give some examples? I don't know anything about this but would
 really like to. Could you explain why is it like this?

This is because with some codecs, to save storage space/bandwidth,
movies are made of a few full images (key frames), and partial images
that hold only the difference with respect to the previous keyframe. Say
there is 1 full frame for 24 partial frame.

So if you jump to a partial frame, the computer has to seek to a
keyframe and then to the diff frame, and rebuild the complete image from
that.

mjpeg is just more or less a series of JPEG images in a queue. So when
you seek to frame x, there is less work to do. The downside is that
files are very large.

If you just read a movie linearly, you're good with keyframes and so.
If you want to jump all over the file like crazy, it could be more
efficient with mjpeg.



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] HD 1920 X 1080 (Mateo De Los R?os)

2014-03-14 Thread olm-e
 Message: 4
 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:12:44 -0500
 From: Mateo De Los R?os mdlrmailingli...@gmail.com
 Subject: [PD] HD 1920 X 1080
 To: pd-list@iem.at
 Message-ID:
   CAL=gbt4p6wfo8esg35svbwa-ucamuczt_sbakjz_vupsfuv...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Hi,



 I'm trying to load a video in full HD 1920 X 1080 with [pix_film] to
 texture a rectangle.



 Quicktime movie .mov

 Size 1920 X 1080


 I reduced its format size to HD 1280 X 720 and now [pix_film] is able to
 open it but reproduction is slow and choppy.



 I use [pix_film] to load Quicktime (.mov) DV 780 X 420 videos and they run
 perfectly.The same setup won't work with 1920 X 1080.



 I work on OS X 10.9.1 and Pd-Ext 0.43.4 extended.



 How can I load videos in full HD 1920 x 1080 in order to texture
 effectively?


 M

Hello,

to my experience, at least on linux, it is hard to keep good framerate
with the current implementation of pix_film and HD files, regardless of
the format, and it plays far better using pdgst library.
https://github.com/umlaeute/pdgst
although it still need some polishing (for controlling the playback of a
file f.ex. ) the displaying of even multiple movies in full HD mpg4 or
mjpg is fluid with it ...

(I did a small fork of it on github - https://github.com/Olm-e/pdgst - 
to play with the code and added the seek parameter so you can control
the playhead and speed ... but it still needs some stuff like being able
to get the length of a movie to know when to stop, loop, etc ...
Iohannes, maybe you can look at this a bit ?)

hope it helps,

Ol.

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] HD 1920 X 1080

2014-03-14 Thread Mateo De Los Ríos
I want to play from start to finish.

I have in my Final Cut Pro the choice of producing a file with the
following codecs

Quicktime movie Format Size 1980 X 1080
MPEG4 Format Size 1980 X 1080
H.264 for apple devices Format size 1280 X 720 (.m4v)

What codec works best with format size 1920 X1080? One of these or is there
another one more suitable.

 [pix_film] was able to open the .m4v (H.264 for apple devices Format size
1280 X 720) but when the video plays it stutters.

What causes this? The codec or [pix_film] or my cpu's capacity?

I'm running a mac pro with 2 x 2,8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon and 6GB of RAM.

M




On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Charles Goyard c...@fsck.fr wrote:

 Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
  If you are aiming to JUMP to specific frames in
   the video or play it backwards you would choose a different codec
   than if you just want to play it from the beginning to the end
   linearly.
 
  Could you give some examples? I don't know anything about this but would
  really like to. Could you explain why is it like this?

 This is because with some codecs, to save storage space/bandwidth,
 movies are made of a few full images (key frames), and partial images
 that hold only the difference with respect to the previous keyframe. Say
 there is 1 full frame for 24 partial frame.

 So if you jump to a partial frame, the computer has to seek to a
 keyframe and then to the diff frame, and rebuild the complete image from
 that.

 mjpeg is just more or less a series of JPEG images in a queue. So when
 you seek to frame x, there is less work to do. The downside is that
 files are very large.

 If you just read a movie linearly, you're good with keyframes and so.
 If you want to jump all over the file like crazy, it could be more
 efficient with mjpeg.



 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] Arp emulation?

2014-03-14 Thread Dan Wilcox
You have an Arp emulation patch? Can I get a copy?

I have a MiniMoog emulation in pd, but I've been sitting on it for years
... just haven't been abel to add the finishing touches. I recently brought
in the bandlimited oscillators in rjlib and it sounds really good now. It's
not a perfect emualtion, but more in the same spirit with the same controls.

I have the code for an ARP Odyssey that still works and it even has midi
 working. So it might be a nice starter project, especially if i can export
 it to a ipad/iphone.

 I guess i am just looking for some more in-depth examples to digest before
 i get cracking

 thanks!

 pp



-- 
Dan Wilcox
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Arp emulation?

2014-03-14 Thread Cyrille Henry



Le 14/03/2014 16:07, Dan Wilcox a écrit :

You have an Arp emulation patch? Can I get a copy?

if you like analog synth emulation, you can have a look at mine:
it's an example of the nusmuk_audio lib, in pd svn.

cheers
c



I have a MiniMoog emulation in pd, but I've been sitting on it for years ... 
just haven't been abel to add the finishing touches. I recently brought in the 
bandlimited oscillators in rjlib and it sounds really good now. It's not a 
perfect emualtion, but more in the same spirit with the same controls.

I have the code for an ARP Odyssey that still works and it even has midi 
working. So it might be a nice starter project, especially if i can export it 
to a ipad/iphone.

I guess i am just looking for some more in-depth examples to digest before 
i get cracking

thanks!

pp



--
Dan Wilcox
danomatika.com http://danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread Aaron L.
I'll take this a bit further into newb-question territory.

Are there any soundcards that output instrument level signals?

This would allow one to use PD into a computer and then out of a computer
similar to how one uses an effects pedal, no?


On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Aaron L. elmaster...@gmail.com wrote:

 List.

 Total newb question

 Is there any way to encapsulate(?) a pd patch into some sort of hardware
 (pedal?  something else?) allowing for no computers (e.g. no bootup, no
 load times, etc.) on stage?

 I can't imagine that there is but, hey, I have no shame.

 Thanks.

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread Dan Wilcox
Without a computer, no. Without a desktop or laptop computer, yes.

An embedded computer (rpi or UDOO, for instance) can totally do this and
that's what some of us have used them for. Simplest case is to setup the
system, install pd with your patch, and write a script that is launched
when the machine boots that connects to the sound card and starts pd. This
way it starts immediately when you turn on the power, no interaction
required. All of this can be built into a box of some sort, giving you an
in/out effects setup. It's what I've done with several systems, although
they are not as small as a real pedal.

Any regular USB sound card will work. I recommend the Roland Edirol UA-25
 o/ UA-25EX as it's a simple USB 1 sound device that will work with
anything that speaks USB audio without a driver. You get instrument
jack/XLR preamps in and stereo out.

You could also get this setup with my Pd iOs app
PdPartyhttps://github.com/danomatika/PdParty/blob/master/doc/PdParty_User_Guide.mdof
Chris McCormick's
PdDroidParty http://droidparty.net/ and a sound interface to your mobile
device. For instance, I have an Alesis iODock for my iPad which gives me
the equivalent of a UA-25. I've also had success using a UA-25 with a
powered USB hub connected to the iPad via the camera connection kit usb
adapter. Let me know if you want to beta test PdParty as it's currently not
released on the App Store.

Subject: Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)
 I'll take this a bit further into newb-question territory.

 Are there any soundcards that output instrument level signals?

 This would allow one to use PD into a computer and then out of a
 computer similar to how one uses an effects pedal, no?


 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Aaron L. elmaster...@gmail.com wrote:

 List.

 Total newb question

 Is there any way to encapsulate(?) a pd patch into some sort of
 hardware (pedal?  something else?) allowing for no computers (e.g. no
 bootup, no load times, etc.) on stage?

 I can't imagine that there is but, hey, I have no shame.

 Thanks.



-- 
Dan Wilcox
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread Aaron L.
Wow.  Many thanks, Dan.

I'll look into these options and get back to you then.



On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:

 Without a computer, no. Without a desktop or laptop computer, yes.

 An embedded computer (rpi or UDOO, for instance) can totally do this and
 that's what some of us have used them for. Simplest case is to setup the
 system, install pd with your patch, and write a script that is launched
 when the machine boots that connects to the sound card and starts pd. This
 way it starts immediately when you turn on the power, no interaction
 required. All of this can be built into a box of some sort, giving you an
 in/out effects setup. It's what I've done with several systems, although
 they are not as small as a real pedal.

 Any regular USB sound card will work. I recommend the Roland Edirol UA-25
  o/ UA-25EX as it's a simple USB 1 sound device that will work with
 anything that speaks USB audio without a driver. You get instrument
 jack/XLR preamps in and stereo out.

 You could also get this setup with my Pd iOs app 
 PdPartyhttps://github.com/danomatika/PdParty/blob/master/doc/PdParty_User_Guide.mdof
  Chris McCormick's
 PdDroidParty http://droidparty.net/ and a sound interface to your
 mobile device. For instance, I have an Alesis iODock for my iPad which
 gives me the equivalent of a UA-25. I've also had success using a UA-25
 with a powered USB hub connected to the iPad via the camera connection kit
 usb adapter. Let me know if you want to beta test PdParty as it's currently
 not released on the App Store.

 Subject: Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

 I'll take this a bit further into newb-question territory.

 Are there any soundcards that output instrument level signals?

 This would allow one to use PD into a computer and then out of a
 computer similar to how one uses an effects pedal, no?


 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Aaron L. elmaster...@gmail.com wrote:

 List.

 Total newb question

 Is there any way to encapsulate(?) a pd patch into some sort of
 hardware (pedal?  something else?) allowing for no computers (e.g. no
 bootup, no load times, etc.) on stage?

 I can't imagine that there is but, hey, I have no shame.

 Thanks.



 --
 Dan Wilcox
 danomatika.com
 robotcowboy.com

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread patrick
Another excellent example is:
http://guitarextended.wordpress.com/

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread Jonathan Wilkes

On 03/14/2014 03:44 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:

Without a computer, no. Without a desktop or laptop computer, yes.


Well, maybe we could design and manufacture an enormous ASIC that runs 
libpd.


-Jonathan

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread Aaron L.
You get instrument jack/XLR preamps in and stereo out.

Hey Dan (or anyone who feels compelled to answer),

How does one use, say, the UDOO board similar to a pedal then?

Doesn't a standard guitar effects pedal's input-jack accept
instrument-level as well as output instrument-level at its output jack?

I suppose you could reverse a DI on the output of the UDOO?  (As well as a
1/8 to 1/4 adaptor out of that stereo jack.ugh.)

Is that what one would do to have the PD-effected audio to go back into
one's guitar amp?

Thanks.

This is gettin deep!




On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:

 On 03/14/2014 03:44 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:

 Without a computer, no. Without a desktop or laptop computer, yes.


 Well, maybe we could design and manufacture an enormous ASIC that runs
 libpd.

 -Jonathan


 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/
 listinfo/pd-list

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread Dan Wilcox
See this also :D
http://danomatika.com/media/projects/s2007/thesis/dwilcox_thesis_arttech_07.pdf


On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Aaron L. elmaster...@gmail.com wrote:

 Wow.  Many thanks, Dan.

 I'll look into these options and get back to you then.



 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:

 Without a computer, no. Without a desktop or laptop computer, yes.

 An embedded computer (rpi or UDOO, for instance) can totally do this and
 that's what some of us have used them for. Simplest case is to setup the
 system, install pd with your patch, and write a script that is launched
 when the machine boots that connects to the sound card and starts pd. This
 way it starts immediately when you turn on the power, no interaction
 required. All of this can be built into a box of some sort, giving you an
 in/out effects setup. It's what I've done with several systems, although
 they are not as small as a real pedal.

 Any regular USB sound card will work. I recommend the Roland Edirol UA-25
  o/ UA-25EX as it's a simple USB 1 sound device that will work with
 anything that speaks USB audio without a driver. You get instrument
 jack/XLR preamps in and stereo out.

 You could also get this setup with my Pd iOs app 
 PdPartyhttps://github.com/danomatika/PdParty/blob/master/doc/PdParty_User_Guide.mdof
  Chris McCormick's
 PdDroidParty http://droidparty.net/ and a sound interface to your
 mobile device. For instance, I have an Alesis iODock for my iPad which
 gives me the equivalent of a UA-25. I've also had success using a UA-25
 with a powered USB hub connected to the iPad via the camera connection kit
 usb adapter. Let me know if you want to beta test PdParty as it's currently
 not released on the App Store.

 Subject: Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

 I'll take this a bit further into newb-question territory.

 Are there any soundcards that output instrument level signals?

 This would allow one to use PD into a computer and then out of a
 computer similar to how one uses an effects pedal, no?


 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Aaron L. elmaster...@gmail.comwrote:

 List.

 Total newb question

 Is there any way to encapsulate(?) a pd patch into some sort of
 hardware (pedal?  something else?) allowing for no computers (e.g. no
 bootup, no load times, etc.) on stage?

 I can't imagine that there is but, hey, I have no shame.

 Thanks.



 --
 Dan Wilcox
 danomatika.com
 robotcowboy.com





-- 
Dan Wilcox
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread Aaron L.
Wow.

That pdf is beyond awesome, Dan.  On many different levels.

Question about this part though:

An attached direct box
 converts high-impedance signals to microphone level for connection to a
 stage
 mixing and amplification systems


(and I guess my previous question still remains unanswered)

I want to take line-level (which is low-level impedance, correct?) back to
instrument-level so as to use the guitar amp.

So how does one get one's guitar out of the UDOO and back into the guitar
amp?

I'm assuming the only way would be to take the stereo out from the UDOO and
plug it into a DI running in reverse and, finally, back into the guitar amp.

But it doesn't sound like that's what you're doing specifically.  It almost
sounds to me like you go into the 'house mains' sans amps on stage.  Or am
I missing something (wouldn't be the first time).






On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:

 See this also :D
 http://danomatika.com/media/projects/s2007/thesis/dwilcox_thesis_arttech_07.pdf


 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Aaron L. elmaster...@gmail.com wrote:

 Wow.  Many thanks, Dan.

 I'll look into these options and get back to you then.



 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.comwrote:

 Without a computer, no. Without a desktop or laptop computer, yes.

 An embedded computer (rpi or UDOO, for instance) can totally do this and
 that's what some of us have used them for. Simplest case is to setup the
 system, install pd with your patch, and write a script that is launched
 when the machine boots that connects to the sound card and starts pd. This
 way it starts immediately when you turn on the power, no interaction
 required. All of this can be built into a box of some sort, giving you an
 in/out effects setup. It's what I've done with several systems, although
 they are not as small as a real pedal.

 Any regular USB sound card will work. I recommend the Roland Edirol
 UA-25  o/ UA-25EX as it's a simple USB 1 sound device that will work with
 anything that speaks USB audio without a driver. You get instrument
 jack/XLR preamps in and stereo out.

 You could also get this setup with my Pd iOs app 
 PdPartyhttps://github.com/danomatika/PdParty/blob/master/doc/PdParty_User_Guide.mdof
  Chris McCormick's
 PdDroidParty http://droidparty.net/ and a sound interface to your
 mobile device. For instance, I have an Alesis iODock for my iPad which
 gives me the equivalent of a UA-25. I've also had success using a UA-25
 with a powered USB hub connected to the iPad via the camera connection kit
 usb adapter. Let me know if you want to beta test PdParty as it's currently
 not released on the App Store.

 Subject: Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

 I'll take this a bit further into newb-question territory.

 Are there any soundcards that output instrument level signals?

 This would allow one to use PD into a computer and then out of a
 computer similar to how one uses an effects pedal, no?


 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Aaron L. elmaster...@gmail.comwrote:

 List.

 Total newb question

 Is there any way to encapsulate(?) a pd patch into some sort of
 hardware (pedal?  something else?) allowing for no computers (e.g. no
 bootup, no load times, etc.) on stage?

 I can't imagine that there is but, hey, I have no shame.

 Thanks.



 --
 Dan Wilcox
 danomatika.com
 robotcowboy.com





 --
 Dan Wilcox
 danomatika.com
 robotcowboy.com

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread Charles Z Henry
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
 On 03/14/2014 03:44 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:

 Without a computer, no. Without a desktop or laptop computer, yes.


 Well, maybe we could design and manufacture an enormous ASIC that runs
 libpd.

 -Jonathan

I appreciate the spirit of that... but man, that would be one
intimidating project.

oh to have an infinite number of monkeys programming FPGAs

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] udoo board sound issues

2014-03-14 Thread Simon Iten
hi dan,

tried your setup/instructions. thanks, it now works down to 15ms. at 12ms i 
start to get clicks here and there…

your script has some “errors” (missing instructions a novice would not 
understand how to deal with). do you want me to post them, or do you overdo it 
anyway?

thanks again

simon

On 13 Mar 2014, at 05:21, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks. I was just waiting to redo my website, edit the video, put the pics 
 together, etc etc but life and freelance work get in the way. Man, I could 
 use a clone right about now :P
  
 On Mar 13, 2014, at 12:19 AM, Richie Cyngler glitch...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Also interested in the UDOO setup instructions so thank you. A bit OT but, 
 Dan, love your work (that onward to mars patch is awesome) thanks for the 
 links. I think people should post more of this sort of thing to the list, 
 celebrate what we make. =)
 
 
 On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 FWIW: here's a picture of my UDOO setup inside my Mars space suit backpack: 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/danomatika/13115604285/
 
 Media of the backpack in use 
 https://twitter.com/danomatika/status/433273394122207232/photo/1  
 https://vimeo.com/86670103 (not my video, I'll put out a different edit soon)
 
 On Mar 12, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I will do that later tonight when I boot the udoo and pull my run scripts 
 off of it. I'll post everything to GitHub so we can share resources.
 
 On Mar 12, 2014, at 5:44 AM, Jamie Bullock ja...@jamiebullock.com wrote:
 
 
 Hi Dan,
 
 Thanks for sharing these notes. They arrived in my inbox to coincide 
 nicely with the delivery of my quad Udoo this morning! It would be great 
 to see a full writeup of your Udoo setup at some point as I think many 
 people will want to be doing a similar thing.
 
 All best,
 
 Jamie
 
 
 On 11 Mar 2014, at 14:14, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Heres a trim of my notes:
 
 Enable realtime audio priority (if you haven't done it already):
 
   sudo su -c 'echo @audio - rtprio 99  /etc/security/limits.conf'
   sudo su -c 'echo @audio - memlock 25  /etc/security/limits.conf'
   sudo su -c 'echo @audio - nice -10  /etc/security/limits.conf'
 
 I disable pulseaudio. Make sure pulseaudio does not respawn itself (from 
 http://voices.canonical.com/david.henningsson/2012/07/13/top-five-wrong-ways-to-fix-your-audio):
 
 echo autospawn=no  ~/.pulse/client.conf
 
 Also add the following to ~/.bash_login to kill pulse audio if it's 
 running on login:
 
 # kill pulse audio if it was spawned
 pulseaudio -k
 
 I'm not looking at the udoo run script, but I'm pretty sure I'm using the 
 following with the US-25EX USB soudcard:
 
 pd -rt -nogui -alsa -audiodev 5
 
 Use pd -listdev to get the device list from alsa. I chose 5 as the first 
 4 (from memory) are 1-2 (built in hardware  plugin)  2-3 (HDMI audio 
 hardware  plugin). 5 is the USB hardware alsa dev.
 
 On Mar 11, 2014, at 4:05 AM, Simon Iten itensi...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 without jack i should add...
 On 11 Mar 2014, at 08:55, Simon Iten itensi...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 hey dan,
 
 unfortunately i’m in switzerland :-)
 
 would be great if you could post your setup somewhere or send the 
 infos! i compiled pd from source as well. i start it from console (with 
 -rt) and it works without problems with the builtin sound card. maybe 
 the cheap card from dx.com just does not work properly with udoo.
 but please post your setup.
 
 thanks
 
 On 09 Mar 2014, at 22:26, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I've tried my both Roland Edirol UA-25  UA-25EX and both work great. 
 The dedicated USB controller makes these guys work as compared to an 
 RPI where I can't get full duplex without tons of dropouts. I'm using 
 a Linaro install which boots to the console and runs the PD through 
 scripting. The speed is great as compared to my old wearable computer. 
 4 cores makes a difference.
 
 I had to recompile my kernel to add midi support, but that's working 
 great. It's not too bad, actually. I also built Pd-vanilal from source 
 which was pretty easy using ./configure + make. I also have a script 
 which fetches externals and builds/installs the agains vanilla so I 
 have the few externals I need.
 
 As with my previous experience running Pd + embedded Ubuntu, I get 
 great performance with RT permissions, the -rt startup flag, and ALSA. 
 Jack is needless overheard unless you want to work with other 
 Jack-enabeld apps. Same with X windows, although my setup was running 
 great in X with pd + ALSA in testing.
 
 From your description, it sounds like your main issue is jack  pd are 
 probably not running in realtime.
 
 I can sent you my install notes if you want (or put them online, as 
 I've been meaning to). Also, are based in the NE within driving 
 distance to Pittsburgh? We could do a patching circle/UDOO setup 
 afternoon :D
 
 On Mar 9, 2014, at 5:14 PM, 

Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread Dan Wilcox
On Mar 14, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Aaron L. elmaster...@gmail.com wrote:

 Wow.
 
 That pdf is beyond awesome, Dan.  On many different levels.  

Thanks :D

 Question about this part though:
 
 An attached direct box
 converts high-impedance signals to microphone level for connection to a stage
 mixing and amplification systems 

The DI box is for being able to plug into the house mains via XLR which, as you 
probably know, is balanced so you can send it alot further. This is especially 
useful when I generally ask for 2 50 foot XLRs so I can roam around the crowd.

 I want to take line-level (which is low-level impedance, correct?) back to 
 instrument-level so as to use the guitar amp.

Well, this is why don't want to use the dinky 1/8 inch audio jacks on an 
onboard sound card and use a USB sound card with built in preamps which handle 
the impedance issues. Any better sound card will have balanced 1/4 inch jacks 
out, which is what my UA-25 has (or at least is what the block diagram on the 
top says). I've run these into regular guitar amps many times. 

 So how does one get one's guitar out of the UDOO and back into the guitar 
 amp?

guitar -- soundcard neutrik 1/4+XLR combo jack -- stereo 1/4 balanced jacks 
out -- 1 channel into guitar amp

Obviously you'll want to adjust the levels accordingly. I'd suggest getting a 
USB soundcard with hardware incoming preamp and outgoing volume controls. This 
is another reason why I've been using UA-25s.

 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 See this also :D 
 http://danomatika.com/media/projects/s2007/thesis/dwilcox_thesis_arttech_07.pdf
 
 
 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Aaron L. elmaster...@gmail.com wrote:
 Wow.  Many thanks, Dan.
 
 I'll look into these options and get back to you then.
 
 
 
 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 Without a computer, no. Without a desktop or laptop computer, yes.
 
 An embedded computer (rpi or UDOO, for instance) can totally do this and 
 that's what some of us have used them for. Simplest case is to setup the 
 system, install pd with your patch, and write a script that is launched when 
 the machine boots that connects to the sound card and starts pd. This way it 
 starts immediately when you turn on the power, no interaction required. All 
 of this can be built into a box of some sort, giving you an in/out effects 
 setup. It's what I've done with several systems, although they are not as 
 small as a real pedal.
 
 Any regular USB sound card will work. I recommend the Roland Edirol UA-25  o/ 
 UA-25EX as it's a simple USB 1 sound device that will work with anything that 
 speaks USB audio without a driver. You get instrument jack/XLR preamps in and 
 stereo out.
 
 You could also get this setup with my Pd iOs app PdParty of Chris McCormick's 
 PdDroidParty and a sound interface to your mobile device. For instance, I 
 have an Alesis iODock for my iPad which gives me the equivalent of a UA-25. 
 I've also had success using a UA-25 with a powered USB hub connected to the 
 iPad via the camera connection kit usb adapter. Let me know if you want to 
 beta test PdParty as it's currently not released on the App Store.
 
 Subject: Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)
 
 I'll take this a bit further into newb-question territory.
 
 Are there any soundcards that output instrument level signals?
 
 This would allow one to use PD into a computer and then out of a computer 
 similar to how one uses an effects pedal, no?
 
 
 On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Aaron L. elmaster...@gmail.com wrote:
 List.
 
 Total newb question
 
 Is there any way to encapsulate(?) a pd patch into some sort of hardware 
 (pedal?  something else?) allowing for no computers (e.g. no bootup, no load 
 times, etc.) on stage?
 
 I can't imagine that there is but, hey, I have no shame.
 
 Thanks.
 
 
 -- 
 Dan Wilcox
 danomatika.com
 robotcowboy.com
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Dan Wilcox
 danomatika.com
 robotcowboy.com
 


Dan Wilcox
@danomatika
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com





___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] udoo board sound issues

2014-03-14 Thread Dan Wilcox
I haven't run any latency tests, so that might be what I'm getting. If so, it's 
acceptable for what I do. From what I've read, guitar - effects - amp 
latencies are already closer to 20ms.

Sorry I haven't gotten back to the UDOO and pulled the relevant scripts etc off 
of it yet. I'm trying to get a few things done before I head out of town for 
work the next 2 weeks. I might be abel to get to it Sunday, but no promises.

On Mar 14, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Simon Iten itensi...@gmail.com wrote:

 hi dan,
 
 tried your setup/instructions. thanks, it now works down to 15ms. at 12ms i 
 start to get clicks here and there…
 
 your script has some “errors” (missing instructions a novice would not 
 understand how to deal with). do you want me to post them, or do you overdo 
 it anyway?
 
 thanks again
 
 simon
 
 On 13 Mar 2014, at 05:21, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Thanks. I was just waiting to redo my website, edit the video, put the pics 
 together, etc etc but life and freelance work get in the way. Man, I could 
 use a clone right about now :P
  
 On Mar 13, 2014, at 12:19 AM, Richie Cyngler glitch...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Also interested in the UDOO setup instructions so thank you. A bit OT but, 
 Dan, love your work (that onward to mars patch is awesome) thanks for the 
 links. I think people should post more of this sort of thing to the list, 
 celebrate what we make. =)
 
 
 On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 FWIW: here's a picture of my UDOO setup inside my Mars space suit backpack: 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/danomatika/13115604285/
 
 Media of the backpack in use 
 https://twitter.com/danomatika/status/433273394122207232/photo/1  
 https://vimeo.com/86670103 (not my video, I'll put out a different edit 
 soon)
 
 On Mar 12, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I will do that later tonight when I boot the udoo and pull my run scripts 
 off of it. I'll post everything to GitHub so we can share resources.
 
 On Mar 12, 2014, at 5:44 AM, Jamie Bullock ja...@jamiebullock.com wrote:
 
 
 Hi Dan,
 
 Thanks for sharing these notes. They arrived in my inbox to coincide 
 nicely with the delivery of my quad Udoo this morning! It would be great 
 to see a full writeup of your Udoo setup at some point as I think many 
 people will want to be doing a similar thing.
 
 All best,
 
 Jamie
 
 
 On 11 Mar 2014, at 14:14, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Heres a trim of my notes:
 
 Enable realtime audio priority (if you haven't done it already):
 
  sudo su -c 'echo @audio - rtprio 99  /etc/security/limits.conf'
  sudo su -c 'echo @audio - memlock 25  
 /etc/security/limits.conf'
  sudo su -c 'echo @audio - nice -10  /etc/security/limits.conf'
 
 I disable pulseaudio. Make sure pulseaudio does not respawn itself (from 
 http://voices.canonical.com/david.henningsson/2012/07/13/top-five-wrong-ways-to-fix-your-audio):
 
 echo autospawn=no  ~/.pulse/client.conf
 
 Also add the following to ~/.bash_login to kill pulse audio if it's 
 running on login:
 
 # kill pulse audio if it was spawned
 pulseaudio -k
 
 I'm not looking at the udoo run script, but I'm pretty sure I'm using 
 the following with the US-25EX USB soudcard:
 
 pd -rt -nogui -alsa -audiodev 5
 
 Use pd -listdev to get the device list from alsa. I chose 5 as the first 
 4 (from memory) are 1-2 (built in hardware  plugin)  2-3 (HDMI audio 
 hardware  plugin). 5 is the USB hardware alsa dev.
 
 On Mar 11, 2014, at 4:05 AM, Simon Iten itensi...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 without jack i should add...
 On 11 Mar 2014, at 08:55, Simon Iten itensi...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 hey dan,
 
 unfortunately i’m in switzerland :-)
 
 would be great if you could post your setup somewhere or send the 
 infos! i compiled pd from source as well. i start it from console 
 (with -rt) and it works without problems with the builtin sound card. 
 maybe the cheap card from dx.com just does not work properly with udoo.
 but please post your setup.
 
 thanks
 
 On 09 Mar 2014, at 22:26, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I've tried my both Roland Edirol UA-25  UA-25EX and both work great. 
 The dedicated USB controller makes these guys work as compared to an 
 RPI where I can't get full duplex without tons of dropouts. I'm using 
 a Linaro install which boots to the console and runs the PD through 
 scripting. The speed is great as compared to my old wearable 
 computer. 4 cores makes a difference.
 
 I had to recompile my kernel to add midi support, but that's working 
 great. It's not too bad, actually. I also built Pd-vanilal from 
 source which was pretty easy using ./configure + make. I also have a 
 script which fetches externals and builds/installs the agains vanilla 
 so I have the few externals I need.
 
 As with my previous experience running Pd + embedded Ubuntu, I get 
 great performance with RT permissions, the -rt startup flag, and 
 ALSA. Jack is needless 

Re: [PD] using pd live (sans computer/laptop/raspberry pi)

2014-03-14 Thread Simon Wise

On 15/03/14 09:56, Charles Z Henry wrote:

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Wilkesjancs...@yahoo.com  wrote:

On 03/14/2014 03:44 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:


Without a computer, no. Without a desktop or laptop computer, yes.



Well, maybe we could design and manufacture an enormous ASIC that runs
libpd.

-Jonathan


I appreciate the spirit of that... but man, that would be one
intimidating project.

oh to have an infinite number of monkeys programming FPGAs


... hence the attraction of building on and adding to open source projects, or 
falling back on hardware that is at least open, programmable and accessible down 
to some level. These things are to big to do alone on most scales.



Simon

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list