Re: [PD] pduino
sorry for the noise. i did not realize Standard Firmata is a specific 'sketch' which is in the examples. thx, rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] pduino
i'm trying to use Pduino-0.5 and/or pduino-master (from reduzent) with Windows 7 and Arduino Uno. i don't get anything with [info( or [firmware( or [version(. it's possible to pulse all outputs, i.e. it's visible on Led13. toggling Led13 in Pduino only gives a short flash on the Led. the GUI in pduino-master seems to do nothing, except connecting through [comport] what am i missing? rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] declare and abstraction (cont.)
hi miller, thanks for investigating this 'problem'. my patch is randomly reading wav's from a library(=folder). for that it needs first to find out what's in the folder. which is done with [moocow/readdir]. (i don't know another way) to give [readdir] the right directory i was using ../sounds. this doesn't work when Pd is started first. with [getdir] i hoped to have a workaround. however [getdir], following Pd, gives different answers, depending whether a [declare -path .] is used or not. strange enough (?) using ./sounds seems to work ok. it would mean to put the folder with wav's inside the patch folder. which of course isn't a very elegant solution. ciao, rolf Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu schreef: OK... but I don't see any problem there - 'empty' gets saved to the correct place, just with a different spaling of the file path, correct? I thought the original problem was in not being able to load a soundfile from a 'declared' folder somehow. cheers Miller On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 12:11:09PM +0100, ro...@dds.nl wrote: hi miller here's the zip i'm on Windows 7 ciao,rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] declare and abstraction (cont.)
- i'm not using readsf~ but soundfiler - all my abstractions are in the same folder as the main patch - i now noticed that it does not depend on [declare ] - [declare -path .] introduces however another complication: Pd gives in the header of a patch-window: name.pd - /path/of/this/patch the same for any used abstraction WITH the declare the path for an abstraction in the header is extended with /. [getdir] (in Pdext) follows this change. (all this is in Windows 7 and XP) rolf Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu schreef: Are you using readsf~ to read th soundfile? Unfortunately, readsf~ doesn't search along the canvas's path (for complicated reasons) and so needs to be sent an explicit path, like ../folder/a.wav, to find files outside the patch's directory. Alternatively you can set Pd's global path in preferences -- readsf~ knows how to use those even though it doesn't know about the patch's own declarations. cheers Miller On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:05:39PM +0100, ro...@dds.nl wrote: sorry, i should be more precise about what i experience. i'm using ../folder to load soundfiles in my patch. while having a [declare -path .] in the main patch. like i said in the first mail: this works when the patch is started up 'directly'. when i first start Pd and then open the patch with the menu-open Pd cannot find the directory. rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] declare and abstraction (cont.)
using [declare -path .] works when the main patch is started up through the .pd extension; NOT when the patch is opened through the Pd menu. at least that's what i experience in Windows rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] declare and abstraction (cont.)
sorry, i should be more precise about what i experience. i'm using ../folder to load soundfiles in my patch. while having a [declare -path .] in the main patch. like i said in the first mail: this works when the patch is started up 'directly'. when i first start Pd and then open the patch with the menu-open Pd cannot find the directory. rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] was confused about $1 in messages; finding last error
thanks everyone for answering, and for explaining my persistent blind spot. i stumbled over it, because of a patch which gave continuously an error message no method for 'abc'. but 'finding last error' always said 'sorry...'. my question: is there any useful (hidden) info in this message/fact, that Pd sees the error but can't tell where it happened? rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] confused about $1 in messages
dear list, i'm confused about the $1 replacement in messages. [one two three( |\ | \ | [list split 1] | / | / |/ | / | [; [this $1 $2( [r this] | [print this] output: this: two three this: two three why? rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Reverse Kickstarter Update
hi jonathan, on my windows 7 the sound works both with standard and ASIO; tested with the Pd audio test. rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] ANN: New Pd-L2Ork x86_64 and Raspberry Pi release now available together with comprehensive how-to
Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu schreef: no, it didn't (yet?) first there was the message that some dpkg data was locked. trying to resolve that, there was found a strange new update file, filled with #padding lines. up until now i did not succeed to 'repair' the dpkg process i'll inform you lateron rolf That looks like something on your dpkg setup is messed up. You may want to google for a resolution. Best wishes, Ico hi ico, i made a fresh install of Ubuntu 12.04 repeated all the steps described by you / at the l2ork site. i used this command to save the output: ./tar_em_up.sh -B | tee l2ork-out.txt according to this file (attached) there should be a deb. in the terminal window however the text at the end is: [...] fakeroot dpkg-deb --build /home/rolf/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build/ /home/rolf/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/pd-l2ork-`arch`-20130610.deb getopt: onbekende optie '--build' fakeroot, create a fake root environment. usage: fakeroot [-l|--lib fakerootlib] [-f|--faked fakedbin] [-i file] [-s file] [-u|--unknown-is-real] [-b|--fd-base fd] [-h|--help] [-v|--version] [--] [command] make: *** [deb] Fout 1 move full installer... mv: kan status van ‘*.deb’ niet opvragen: Bestand of map bestaat niet done. [...] apparently the error messages are not included in the file. there is no deb. rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] ANN: New Pd-L2Ork x86_64 and Raspberry Pi release now available together with comprehensive how-to
Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu schreef: Looks like you don't have git installed which is unusual, as that is what you need to get the source from git in the first place. Do: sudo apt-get install git Then use git to retrieve latest source (as per pd-l2ork documentation found at http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56#install-dev): git clone git://github.com/pd-l2ork/pd.git pd-l2ork Then inside the newly created pd-l2ork/ folder go to l2ork_addons folder and follow instructions below. HTH i have no experience with git, i downloaded the zip. now, following the instructions above i get these errors: [..] rm: kan ‘/home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build//usr/lib/pd-l2ork/doc/manuals/Pd/ReadMe.html’ niet verwijderen: Bestand of map bestaat niet make[1]: [readme_install] Fout 1 (genegeerd)ignored rm: kan ‘/home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build//usr/lib/pd-l2ork/doc/manuals/Pd/Welcome.html’ niet verwijderen: Bestand of map bestaat niet make[1]: [welcome_install] Fout 1 (genegeerd) ignored install -p /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/noncvs/linux/bin/*.* /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build//usr/bin install: kan status van ‘/home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/noncvs/linux/bin/*.*’ niet opvragen: Bestand of map bestaat niet make[1]: [noncvs_install] Fout 1 (genegeerd)ignored install -p /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/noncvs/linux/doc/5.reference/*.* /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build//usr/lib/pd-l2ork/doc/5.reference install: kan status van ‘/home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/noncvs/linux/doc/5.reference/*.*’ niet opvragen: Bestand of map bestaat niet make[1]: [noncvs_install] Fout 1 (genegeerd)ignored install -p /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/noncvs/linux/extra/*.* /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build//usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra install: kan status van ‘/home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/noncvs/linux/extra/*.*’ niet opvragen: Bestand of map bestaat niet make[1]: [noncvs_install] Fout 1 (genegeerd)ignored test -d /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/noncvs/linux/gripd \ install -d /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build//usr/gripd make[1]: [noncvs_install] Fout 1 (genegeerd)ignored install -p /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/noncvs/linux/gripd/*.* \ /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build//usr/gripd install: kan status van ‘/home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/noncvs/linux/gripd/*.*’ niet opvragen: Bestand of map bestaat niet make[1]: [noncvs_install] Fout 1 (genegeerd)ignored Complete install succeeded! fakeroot dpkg-deb --build /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/build/ /home/rolfm/pd-l2ork/packages/linux_make/pd-l2ork-`arch`-20130606.deb getopt: onbekende optie '--build' fakeroot, create a fake root environment. usage: fakeroot [-l|--lib fakerootlib] [-f|--faked fakedbin] [-i file] [-s file] [-u|--unknown-is-real] [-b|--fd-base fd] [-h|--help] [-v|--version] [--] [command] make: *** [deb] Fout 1 move full installer... mv: kan status van ‘*.deb’ niet opvragen: Bestand of map bestaat niet [..] ?? rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] ANN: New Pd-L2Ork x86_64 and Raspberry Pi release now available together with comprehensive how-to
Ivica Bukvic i...@vt.edu schreef: Forgot to mention, building your own is a simple three-step process: 1) get the source from git 2) run the apt-get command found on L2Ork's software page to install Dev libraries (simply copy and paste it into terminal) 3) in the source tree cd into l2ork_addons/ folder and run: ./tar_em_up.sh -B Go get a lunch/coffee, come back in an hour and install your own brand new pd-l2ork (it will be located two folders up so you will have to type cd ../../ to get there) HTH hi ivica, following your guidelines i get some errors and no result. my system is in dutch, but i think the errors are clear. in the beginning there is this: [..] ./tar_em_up.sh: regel 125: git: opdracht niet gevonden ./tar_em_up.sh: regel 126: git: opdracht niet gevonden [..] the lines in question are: git submodule init git submodule update lateron the proces ends with these lines: [...] make[1]: *** Er is geen regel om doel '/home/rolfm/Downloads/pd-master/Gem/configure' te maken, nodig voor '/home/rolfm/Downloads/pd-master/Gem/src/.libs/Gem.pd_linux'. Gestopt. make[1]: Map '/home/rolfm/Downloads/pd-master/packages' wordt verlaten make: *** [install] Fout 2 fakeroot dpkg-deb --build /home/rolfm/Downloads/pd-master/packages/linux_make/build/ /home/rolfm/Downloads/pd-master/packages/linux_make/pd-l2ork-`arch`-20130605.deb getopt: onbekende optie '--build' unknown option fakeroot, create a fake root environment. usage: fakeroot [-l|--lib fakerootlib] [-f|--faked fakedbin] [-i file] [-s file] [-u|--unknown-is-real] [-b|--fd-base fd] [-h|--help] [-v|--version] [--] [command] make: *** [deb] Fout 1 move full installer... mv: kan status van ?*.deb? niet opvragen: Bestand of map bestaat niet [...] any suggestions? i am on Ubuntu 12.04 rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] ANN: New Pd-L2Ork x86_64 and Raspberry Pi release now available together with comprehensive how-to
(hello ivica) i tried to install the new version with the burrito installer in Ubuntu 12.04 and got : wrong architecture: amd64. does it mean i have to compile from source? best, rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] Pd-ext 43.4 [msgfile] crashes Pd
cont. also on Vista sending a read to [msgfile] for an existing file crashes Pd-ext [read file.txt( | [msgfile] rolf meesters earlier post: hello 'list', (Windows 7, VAIO 4Gb AMD 1.65 Ghz 64-bits). Pdext from download page. it took quit some time to find out why my patch, working in 42.5 didn't in 43.4: [read file.txt( | [msgfile] crashes Pd without any message. even using the commandline with -stderr doesn't give anything. something missing or a bug? rolf meesters ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] Pd-ext 43.4 [msgfile] crashes Pd
hello 'list', (Windows 7, VAIO 4Gb AMD 1.65 Ghz 64-bits). Pdext from download page. it took quit some time to find out why my patch, working in 42.5 didn't in 43.4: [read file.txt( | [msgfile] crashes Pd without any message. even using the commandline with -stderr doesn't give anything. something missing or a bug? rolf meesters ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] how to debug tcpsocketserver?
1. closing this somewhat unnecessary thread: tcp(socket)server seemingly ignoring some tcpclient appears to be a tcpclient_send_byte: could not send data tcpclient gives this console message only once, in my case it got drowned in all the prints i did (for debugging (sic)). due to in-experience with the net objects the patch did not pay attention to a possible 'blocked' message of tcpclient. 2. tcpserver establishes 2 connections/sockets for the same tcpclient when the tcpserver starts after the tcpclient is already in the air. Pd-console of server: tcpserver listening on port 3000 tcpserver: accepted connection from 192.168.3.105 on socket 1188 tcpserver: accepted connection from 192.168.3.105 on socket 1156 Pd-console of client: :: disconnect 52 16 tcpclient: not connected tcpclient: connecting socket 988 to port 3000 :: up 52 19 :: up 52 20 the :: lines are [print]s i make with time in min secs; the ::up lines are triggered by the 3rd outlet of the tcpclient which signals about connected or not. in my case it's not causing problems, but it's confusing and also a bit strange because tcpserver is supposed to check whether a connection is already in play, like it does when given a second [connect ..( message. 3. with pd.com chasing ghosts? also because the client patch sometimes crashes for unclear reasons, i started using the command line pd.com -stderr -open tcpclient-patch. it caused me quite some headaches. first it gave an disturbing error message: tcpclient: not connected tcpclient: connecting socket 600 to port 3000 tcpclient: connecting stream socket: Unknown error (10060) secondly ALL the clients got blocked very quickly: tcpclient: send: No error (0) tcpclient_send_byte: could not send data it led me to an unproductive query for information about these appearances, until the lucky idea to use pd.exe instead. then i was back at the situation with only once in a while a send blocked. is this to be expected using pd.com? or is it specific for tcpclient? rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
