Re: [PD] [Gridflow-dev] [gemdead]
Hey Jack cheers! that's what I needed :) Love the [#see] object, beyond it's practical use I just like having visual output on the same space as the patch Think I checked out pdvjtools before but could get it to compile-while try again On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Roberts anto...@hellocatfood.com wrote: I've just come across [pix-preview], which is part of the pdvjtools package http://hangar.org/wikis/lab/lib/exe/detail.php?id=start%3Apuredata_pdvjtoolsmedia=start:pix_preview_help_patch.png Looks like it does similar to [gem_see] object that was just created... On 30 April 2011 20:06, Antonio Roberts anto...@hellocatfood.com wrote: This is amazing, thanks to you both! Ant On 30 April 2011 18:05, Jack j...@rybn.org wrote: Something like this could help. ++ Jack Le samedi 30 avril 2011 à 12:06 +0100, ALAN BROOKER a écrit : Hey Ant, This can definitely be done- I was working on/off on a sort of ' #see for gem' but haven't perfected it yet. The method is to render 3d objects into a buffer to pix object then to #from_pix. Mathieu may know of a more efficient way of doing this tho The attached patch (if it doesn't work when first opened, close then re-open and should work) is what I was working on. As mentioned it's a work in progress and I could probably do with some efficiency tips here too! All the best Al On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Antonio Roberts anto...@hellocatfood.com wrote: Thanks and sorry that I didn't stick around to get the reply on IRC. Secondly, can the cube be rendered to an [#out window] object? I know [#from_pix] can handle [pix_] objects, and I've tried using a [cube] as a [pix_texture] that I can then send to [#from_pix] but no luck so far Ant On 30 April 2011 01:04, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: from irc #dataflow : hellocatfood Is it possible to use [gemdead] with objects such as [cube] and [sphere] in gridflow? In theory, I said no, but actually, [gemdead] doesn't prevent you from using OpenGL elements, and things like [cube] and [sphere] don't check at all whether they're given a real [gemhead] context, and don't seem to be doing much that is related to it, therefore : [gemhead] | [b] | [gemdead] | [cube] will really draw the cube as if you had done : [gemhead] | [cube] I suspect that very few Gem object classes really depend on an authentic GemState (one that was really created by [gemwin]). When you do find exceptions, please tell me. But you may have to use [gemhead] anyway (as in the above example) as long as [gemwin] decides when to clear the buffer and when to copy the buffer to the screen, just because [gemwin] uses [gemdead] to say when it's the time to draw. ___ | Mathieu Bouchard tél: +1.514.383.3801 Villeray, Montréal, QC ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Gridflow-dev mailing list gridflow-...@lists.artengine.ca http://lists.artengine.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gridflow-dev ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [Gridflow-dev] [gemdead]
I've just come across [pix-preview], which is part of the pdvjtools package http://hangar.org/wikis/lab/lib/exe/detail.php?id=start%3Apuredata_pdvjtoolsmedia=start:pix_preview_help_patch.png Looks like it does similar to [gem_see] object that was just created... On 30 April 2011 20:06, Antonio Roberts anto...@hellocatfood.com wrote: This is amazing, thanks to you both! Ant On 30 April 2011 18:05, Jack j...@rybn.org wrote: Something like this could help. ++ Jack Le samedi 30 avril 2011 à 12:06 +0100, ALAN BROOKER a écrit : Hey Ant, This can definitely be done- I was working on/off on a sort of ' #see for gem' but haven't perfected it yet. The method is to render 3d objects into a buffer to pix object then to #from_pix. Mathieu may know of a more efficient way of doing this tho The attached patch (if it doesn't work when first opened, close then re-open and should work) is what I was working on. As mentioned it's a work in progress and I could probably do with some efficiency tips here too! All the best Al On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Antonio Roberts anto...@hellocatfood.com wrote: Thanks and sorry that I didn't stick around to get the reply on IRC. Secondly, can the cube be rendered to an [#out window] object? I know [#from_pix] can handle [pix_] objects, and I've tried using a [cube] as a [pix_texture] that I can then send to [#from_pix] but no luck so far Ant On 30 April 2011 01:04, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: from irc #dataflow : hellocatfood Is it possible to use [gemdead] with objects such as [cube] and [sphere] in gridflow? In theory, I said no, but actually, [gemdead] doesn't prevent you from using OpenGL elements, and things like [cube] and [sphere] don't check at all whether they're given a real [gemhead] context, and don't seem to be doing much that is related to it, therefore : [gemhead] | [b] | [gemdead] | [cube] will really draw the cube as if you had done : [gemhead] | [cube] I suspect that very few Gem object classes really depend on an authentic GemState (one that was really created by [gemwin]). When you do find exceptions, please tell me. But you may have to use [gemhead] anyway (as in the above example) as long as [gemwin] decides when to clear the buffer and when to copy the buffer to the screen, just because [gemwin] uses [gemdead] to say when it's the time to draw. ___ | Mathieu Bouchard tél: +1.514.383.3801 Villeray, Montréal, QC ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Gridflow-dev mailing list gridflow-...@lists.artengine.ca http://lists.artengine.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gridflow-dev ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [Gridflow-dev] [gemdead]
Something like this could help. ++ Jack Le samedi 30 avril 2011 à 12:06 +0100, ALAN BROOKER a écrit : Hey Ant, This can definitely be done- I was working on/off on a sort of ' #see for gem' but haven't perfected it yet. The method is to render 3d objects into a buffer to pix object then to #from_pix. Mathieu may know of a more efficient way of doing this tho The attached patch (if it doesn't work when first opened, close then re-open and should work) is what I was working on. As mentioned it's a work in progress and I could probably do with some efficiency tips here too! All the best Al On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Antonio Roberts anto...@hellocatfood.com wrote: Thanks and sorry that I didn't stick around to get the reply on IRC. Secondly, can the cube be rendered to an [#out window] object? I know [#from_pix] can handle [pix_] objects, and I've tried using a [cube] as a [pix_texture] that I can then send to [#from_pix] but no luck so far Ant On 30 April 2011 01:04, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: from irc #dataflow : hellocatfood Is it possible to use [gemdead] with objects such as [cube] and [sphere] in gridflow? In theory, I said no, but actually, [gemdead] doesn't prevent you from using OpenGL elements, and things like [cube] and [sphere] don't check at all whether they're given a real [gemhead] context, and don't seem to be doing much that is related to it, therefore : [gemhead] | [b] | [gemdead] | [cube] will really draw the cube as if you had done : [gemhead] | [cube] I suspect that very few Gem object classes really depend on an authentic GemState (one that was really created by [gemwin]). When you do find exceptions, please tell me. But you may have to use [gemhead] anyway (as in the above example) as long as [gemwin] decides when to clear the buffer and when to copy the buffer to the screen, just because [gemwin] uses [gemdead] to say when it's the time to draw. ___ | Mathieu Bouchard tél: +1.514.383.3801 Villeray, Montréal, QC ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Gridflow-dev mailing list gridflow-...@lists.artengine.ca http://lists.artengine.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gridflow-dev gem_see.pd Description: application/extension-pd gem_see-help.pd Description: application/extension-pd signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [Gridflow-dev] [gemdead]
This is amazing, thanks to you both! Ant On 30 April 2011 18:05, Jack j...@rybn.org wrote: Something like this could help. ++ Jack Le samedi 30 avril 2011 à 12:06 +0100, ALAN BROOKER a écrit : Hey Ant, This can definitely be done- I was working on/off on a sort of ' #see for gem' but haven't perfected it yet. The method is to render 3d objects into a buffer to pix object then to #from_pix. Mathieu may know of a more efficient way of doing this tho The attached patch (if it doesn't work when first opened, close then re-open and should work) is what I was working on. As mentioned it's a work in progress and I could probably do with some efficiency tips here too! All the best Al On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Antonio Roberts anto...@hellocatfood.com wrote: Thanks and sorry that I didn't stick around to get the reply on IRC. Secondly, can the cube be rendered to an [#out window] object? I know [#from_pix] can handle [pix_] objects, and I've tried using a [cube] as a [pix_texture] that I can then send to [#from_pix] but no luck so far Ant On 30 April 2011 01:04, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: from irc #dataflow : hellocatfood Is it possible to use [gemdead] with objects such as [cube] and [sphere] in gridflow? In theory, I said no, but actually, [gemdead] doesn't prevent you from using OpenGL elements, and things like [cube] and [sphere] don't check at all whether they're given a real [gemhead] context, and don't seem to be doing much that is related to it, therefore : [gemhead] | [b] | [gemdead] | [cube] will really draw the cube as if you had done : [gemhead] | [cube] I suspect that very few Gem object classes really depend on an authentic GemState (one that was really created by [gemwin]). When you do find exceptions, please tell me. But you may have to use [gemhead] anyway (as in the above example) as long as [gemwin] decides when to clear the buffer and when to copy the buffer to the screen, just because [gemwin] uses [gemdead] to say when it's the time to draw. ___ | Mathieu Bouchard tél: +1.514.383.3801 Villeray, Montréal, QC ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Gridflow-dev mailing list gridflow-...@lists.artengine.ca http://lists.artengine.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gridflow-dev ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
