Re: [PD] [helmholtz~]

2013-02-14 Thread Simon Iten
hi phil,

what are you trying to do? do you need midi from your electric bass? or just a 
way to make a synth in pd? 
i ask because i built a gr-300 emulation for bass that works very well and with 
almost no latency. you can drive any oscillator within pd from that. it's all 
signalpath though.
ideally you would use such a thing with a hexaphonic (or quadraphonic) pickup, 
because it's monophonic. but the same is true for helmholtz i guess.

cheers,

simon

On Feb 14, 2013, at 1:24 AM, Phil Stone pkst...@ucdavis.edu wrote:

 Hi Katja,
 
 I'm looking with great interest at your [helmholtz~] pitch tracking object. 
 I'm not asking to be lazy (I'm going to try it out for myself!), but I'm 
 wondering if you have any general impressions of its performance as to how it 
 compares with [sigmund~]. I'm particularly interested as to how it will do 
 for tracking a fretless electric bass.
 
 It looks like an excellent piece of work, and I've enjoyed reading your 
 detailed page about it.
 
 
 Phil Stone
 
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] [helmholtz~]

2013-02-14 Thread Phil Stone

Hi Simon,

I've been using [sigmund~] with pretty good results, tracking the bass 
and using it to drive various things in a complex Pd setup. I'm always 
interested in alternative pitch trackers, though. I play a Steinberger 
XL, so I won't likely be carving it up to put in a hex pickup; that's 
kept me a way from Roland's approach (that plus the cost!).


I'm still quite intrigued by what you've done; do you have any 
documentation about it?


Thanks for writing,

Phil


On 2/14/13 12:48 AM, Simon Iten wrote:

hi phil,

what are you trying to do? do you need midi from your electric bass? or just a 
way to make a synth in pd?
i ask because i built a gr-300 emulation for bass that works very well and with 
almost no latency. you can drive any oscillator within pd from that. it's all 
signalpath though.
ideally you would use such a thing with a hexaphonic (or quadraphonic) pickup, 
because it's monophonic. but the same is true for helmholtz i guess.

cheers,

simon

On Feb 14, 2013, at 1:24 AM, Phil Stone pkst...@ucdavis.edu wrote:


Hi Katja,

I'm looking with great interest at your [helmholtz~] pitch tracking object. I'm 
not asking to be lazy (I'm going to try it out for myself!), but I'm wondering 
if you have any general impressions of its performance as to how it compares 
with [sigmund~]. I'm particularly interested as to how it will do for tracking 
a fretless electric bass.

It looks like an excellent piece of work, and I've enjoyed reading your 
detailed page about it.


Phil Stone

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list





___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] [helmholtz~]

2013-02-14 Thread Stephan Elliot Perez
[helmholtz~] is probably more accurate and will show you all of the pitch
fluctuations live. [sigmund~] with the argument notes is probably
preferable, if you only want one simple value per note.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Phil Stone pkst...@ucdavis.edu wrote:

 Hi Katja,

 I'm looking with great interest at your [helmholtz~] pitch tracking
 object. I'm not asking to be lazy (I'm going to try it out for myself!),
 but I'm wondering if you have any general impressions of its performance as
 to how it compares with [sigmund~]. I'm particularly interested as to how
 it will do for tracking a fretless electric bass.

 It looks like an excellent piece of work, and I've enjoyed reading your
 detailed page about it.


 Phil Stone

 __**_
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/**
 listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] [helmholtz~]

2013-02-14 Thread Simon Iten
I'm not home at the moment but I will send you the snippet I used for pitch
tracking when I get home.

Have a nice day
On Feb 14, 2013 5:13 PM, Phil Stone pkst...@ucdavis.edu wrote:

 Hi Simon,

 I've been using [sigmund~] with pretty good results, tracking the bass and
 using it to drive various things in a complex Pd setup. I'm always
 interested in alternative pitch trackers, though. I play a Steinberger XL,
 so I won't likely be carving it up to put in a hex pickup; that's kept me a
 way from Roland's approach (that plus the cost!).

 I'm still quite intrigued by what you've done; do you have any
 documentation about it?

 Thanks for writing,

 Phil


 On 2/14/13 12:48 AM, Simon Iten wrote:

 hi phil,

 what are you trying to do? do you need midi from your electric bass? or
 just a way to make a synth in pd?
 i ask because i built a gr-300 emulation for bass that works very well
 and with almost no latency. you can drive any oscillator within pd from
 that. it's all signalpath though.
 ideally you would use such a thing with a hexaphonic (or quadraphonic)
 pickup, because it's monophonic. but the same is true for helmholtz i guess.

 cheers,

 simon

 On Feb 14, 2013, at 1:24 AM, Phil Stone pkst...@ucdavis.edu wrote:

  Hi Katja,

 I'm looking with great interest at your [helmholtz~] pitch tracking
 object. I'm not asking to be lazy (I'm going to try it out for myself!),
 but I'm wondering if you have any general impressions of its performance as
 to how it compares with [sigmund~]. I'm particularly interested as to how
 it will do for tracking a fretless electric bass.

 It looks like an excellent piece of work, and I've enjoyed reading your
 detailed page about it.


 Phil Stone

 __**_
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/**
 listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] [helmholtz~]

2013-02-13 Thread Phil Stone

Hi Katja,

I'm looking with great interest at your [helmholtz~] pitch tracking 
object. I'm not asking to be lazy (I'm going to try it out for myself!), 
but I'm wondering if you have any general impressions of its performance 
as to how it compares with [sigmund~]. I'm particularly interested as to 
how it will do for tracking a fretless electric bass.


It looks like an excellent piece of work, and I've enjoyed reading your 
detailed page about it.



Phil Stone

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Helmholtz Motion Verifier

2010-12-12 Thread Andy Farnell


A job for spectral tools I would guess. At the point
spectral flux hits a first minimum and autocorrelation
hits a first maximum, the string will be in stable
resonance. You could use something fast like
bonk or a schmitt trigger to time those from
the onset and get a measure of how well the note
was bowed.

Actually verifying that the thing is in stick-slip
Helmholtz motion is a different thing than looking
at the waveform, you need a stroboscope or very
high speed camera for that.

BTW if you have never seen the images of Prof Andrew 
Davidhazy there's plenty of string sequences there. He
kindly gave me some for my book cover.

ajf


On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:29:11 +0100
Ludwig Maes ludwig.m...@gmail.com wrote:

 How would one (and how hard or easy would it be) write a patch which
 does the following:
 Instruct the user to play a sustained note on the violin; then give
 feedback about how accurate Helmholtz motion is achieved; Could we
 measure how short the transient takes from nonHelmholtz motion to
 helmholtz motion? How about changing from a note on one string to one
 on another, ...
 Could we write a patch that trains the user to minimize install and
 end times for helmholtz motion and to somehow show a level of
 periodicity during the systaining period?
 
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


-- 
Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] Helmholtz Motion Verifier

2010-12-11 Thread Ludwig Maes
How would one (and how hard or easy would it be) write a patch which
does the following:
Instruct the user to play a sustained note on the violin; then give
feedback about how accurate Helmholtz motion is achieved; Could we
measure how short the transient takes from nonHelmholtz motion to
helmholtz motion? How about changing from a note on one string to one
on another, ...
Could we write a patch that trains the user to minimize install and
end times for helmholtz motion and to somehow show a level of
periodicity during the systaining period?

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Helmholtz Motion Verifier

2010-12-11 Thread Ludwig Maes
And a different question:
Just like how the different non harmonic partials are shifted and
forced into a harmonic compromise in a bowed string, does something
similar happen when playing simultaneous harmony?
I.e. would partials on 2 strings sharing bow and bridge, say fingered
at a frequency ratio of close to 2:3 but not exactly 2:3 (i.e. equal
temperament), also modelock to the just(=pythagorean/integer ratio)
interval 2:3? would the one out of 2 slips on one string be
simultaneous with one out of 3 slips on the other?

On 11 December 2010 20:29, Ludwig Maes ludwig.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 How would one (and how hard or easy would it be) write a patch which
 does the following:
 Instruct the user to play a sustained note on the violin; then give
 feedback about how accurate Helmholtz motion is achieved; Could we
 measure how short the transient takes from nonHelmholtz motion to
 helmholtz motion? How about changing from a note on one string to one
 on another, ...
 Could we write a patch that trains the user to minimize install and
 end times for helmholtz motion and to somehow show a level of
 periodicity during the systaining period?


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Helmholtz Motion Verifier

2010-12-11 Thread Collin Oldham
Interesting idea! Might be a good idea to use a pickup, since the body 
resonances of the instrument will smear the helmholtz motion from the 
signal a bit if you use mic. Regarding your second question: There will 
be no phase lock across 2 strings, which is why it is possible, and even 
likely, that double stops can be played out of tune! Can such a patch be 
written in Pd? Certainly!


Collin


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list