Re: [PD] [pyext] sending a bang to an object
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Thomas Grill wrote: > self._send(rcvname) > currently sends an empty list message to the rcvname receiver which is often > interpreted but need not always be > > the correct way would be > self._send(rcvname,"bang",()) > which is equivalent to a message with selector bang and no further arguments > (empty tuple) > > since the former notation > self._send(rcvname) > is also used with pyext outlets as > self._outlet(outletnum) > to send a bang, i corrected the behavior in the py/pyext SVN to indeed send a > bang. > However, this is not yet reflected in the binaries in circulation hi Thomas, latest svn and self._send(rcvname) does not work with [nbx] but self._send(rcvname, "bang", ()) does the trick and solves the [nbx] issue at the same time =) thanks ! _y ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pyext] sending a bang to an object
Am 12.03.2011 um 21:11 schrieb Thomas Grill: > Hi all, > >> Thomas kindly stated that the trick is to call the method without >> further arguments: >> self._send(rcvname) >> > > actually my statement is only half true: > > self._send(rcvname) > currently sends an empty list message to the rcvname receiver which is often > interpreted but need not always be sorry, there's something missing: ... which is often interpreted as a bang message, that is. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pyext] sending a bang to an object
Hi all, > Thomas kindly stated that the trick is to call the method without > further arguments: > self._send(rcvname) > actually my statement is only half true: self._send(rcvname) currently sends an empty list message to the rcvname receiver which is often interpreted but need not always be the correct way would be self._send(rcvname,"bang",()) which is equivalent to a message with selector bang and no further arguments (empty tuple) since the former notation self._send(rcvname) is also used with pyext outlets as self._outlet(outletnum) to send a bang, i corrected the behavior in the py/pyext SVN to indeed send a bang. However, this is not yet reflected in the binaries in circulation gr~~~ ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pyext] sending a bang to an object
On 3/11/11, Yvan Volochine wrote: > hi > just wondering how I could send a bang to an object with [pyext] ? > I tryed: > self._send(rcvname, "bang") > but of course I get the error 'No method for symbol' because my object > receives the *string* "bang" > is there any workaround for this ? Thomas kindly stated that the trick is to call the method without further arguments: self._send(rcvname) detailed story: http://g.org/pipermail/ext/2011-March/37.html cheers, _y ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] [pyext] sending a bang to an object
hi just wondering how I could send a bang to an object with [pyext] ? I tryed: self._send(rcvname, "bang") but of course I get the error 'No method for symbol' because my object receives the *string* "bang" is there any workaround for this ? what I try to achieve is get the current value of this object, so I thought about binding it and sending it a bang. maybe there is a way to retrieve the current value of this object directly with some method I overlooked ? like: self._receive(sndname) that would be nice =) cheers, _y ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
